One thing this going back does for me is checks up on my mind, see how well my memory is still in tact. Much like most people who go through their old collected letters of the skirmish back to the past and the images it conjures up.

Actually my mind can remember those days in 1993 very well, so well, that I even remember that my first posts were all in sci.math, and that I had not sprung my great theory out into the open, and only some days later, after I had posted about my proof of Fermat's Last Theorem. So I found how to get on Usenet, sci.math and sci.physics and was outraged of a Fermat's Last Theorem proof by Andrew Wiles.

--- quoting my first post to Usenet ---
Newsgroups: sci.math
From: Ludwig.Plutonium@dartmouth.edu (Ludwig Plutonium)
Subject: Wiles blunders
Message-ID: (CBo3EG.3vu@dartvax.dartmouth.edu>
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1993 22:20:39 GMT
Lines: 51

Tabloid presses press for stories like that of apprentice A. Wiles--
" Wiles Masters The Cold Fusion Reporting Technique". Wiles has 1000
pages which 5 other math majors S. Kochen, K. Ribet, H.M. Edwards, B.
Mazur, and J. McKay can read. What has the world come to, when an
alleged proof is reported as a forgone conclusion because 6 persons
jump-up-and-down? Can not the NYT staff recognize self-deluded
publicity seekers? What is the limit for math tolerance? When one
person from Princeton reports a 10000 page proof and the method of
proof is-- readers fatigue. The most important aspect of a math proof
is to convince. If Wiles really does have a valid 1000 page proof,
then it can be boiled-down to 1 or 2 pages. Wiles can not do that,
indicating his proof is another fake. Here are the logical flaws in
Wiles's alleged proof. 1) Elliptic curves can not uniquely represent
the positive integers 2) Wiles can not even produce Pythagorean
triples when the exponent is 2. 3) Fourier Analysis proves that all
generalized functions are uniquely representable by sine-cosine. But
after transforming Wiles's elliptic curves into the more general
mathematics of Fourier Analysis, the net result is that when Wiles
wants to show the nonexistence of peculiar elliptic curves, his
method implies that the sine-cosine function of Fourier Analysis
does not exist. 4) Wiles's method contradicts Fourier Analysis.
5) Wiles's method is indirect nonexistence. Mathematically there
are only three viable existence proof methods i) direct existence
ii) direct nonexistence iii) and indirect existence. A proof
method of indirect nonexistence is impossible. The supercomputer
4-color mapping problem proof is another fake proof because it
uses the method of indirect nonexistence. See The Dartmouth
19MAY1992 for my two proofs of the 4-color mapping problem.
Forgive these 6 math majors for they are weak in mathematical
logic and know not what they do. And be not surprised that some
in the math community will eject overboard sine-cosine just to
embrace wiles curves. Wiles is wily about publicity, but will
he be a test-tube-cry-baby once he realizes that his FLouT sunk?
Not all is lost though, because Wiles's blunders creates a very
important mathematical conjecture. Call my conjecture
Complementary Mathematics (CM) since it originates from the
complementary principle of quantum physics. CM states: Math
theorems have a duality of proof method, either geometrical or
arithmetical, where one excludes 100% of the other
(particle-wave duality of quantum mechanics). Hence, the
correct geometrical proof of FLT will come only after someone
gives the proven equivalent geometrical statement to the
arithmetical FLT. The Moebius function proved to be the
geometrical equivalent to the Riemann Hypothesis. See my two
proofs of the Riemann Hypothesis The Dartmouth 9AUG1991, and
my proof of FLT The Dartmouth 16APR1991. The arithmetic
proofs of both the Riemann Hypothesis and FLT were achieved
through the uniqueness of the number 2. But the geometrical
proof of FLT will come only after the equivalent geometrical
statement is obtained, and it will be much longer than my 1
page proof of FLT, or my 1 paragraph proof of the World's
most outstanding math problem-- the Riemann Hypothesis. This
newsgram was published in The Dartmouth under Notices 9JUL1993.
Sincerely, LP

--- end quote ---

Maybe that was a good first post, because I needed to learn this Usenet, to post my single greatest of all posts. And I would not want to botch that post. Was what I was thinking at the time in 1993. So my first posts were about Fermat's Last Theorem. And a few days later, here comes what I think will be my alltime greatest single post ever. The Plutonium Atom Totality theory.

I want to touch base with several of my old starting posts to Usenet, especially these on Atom Totality. That was almost 30 years ago, and I am due for a reflection back in time. See how much I have grown and to comment on then, versus now. Quite a lot has changed for me with science. Of course my greatest discovery ever and forever more is the Plutonium Atom Totality. And quite honestly I never thought I would have any more spectacular great discoveries. Just the one, but then even another surprise came to me, that the misidentification of the real electron of atoms because the muon is 9 times the mass of a proton or neutron in sigma-error, that unfolded a second massive great discoveries, even the idea that the Sun shines from Faraday law not from fusion and that the Earth inhabitants have a limited time to make Europa and Ganymede their new home because the Sun has started its Red Giant Initiation phase. I thought I was just a one time big science achiever, but then as the 30 years unfolded, it was plain to see, I had become the King of Science. And my old posts are worth a review and comment.

Newsgroups: sci.math
From: Ludwig.Plutonium@dartmouth.edu (Ludwig Plutonium)
Subject: Pi 22/7 & e 19/7 because our Maker is an atom of plutonium
Message-ID: (CBoD58.B74@dartvax.dartmouth.edu>
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 1993 01:51:07 GMT
Lines: 19

Ludwig.Plutonium@dartmouth.edu (Ludwig Plutonium) writes:
The most often used numbers throughout math and physics are
pi and e. Pi is approx 22/7 and e is approx 19/7. An atom
of plutonium has approx 22 subshells in approx 7 shells and
approx 19 of those subshells are occupied by electrons at
any one instant of time. The observable universe is just
the last electron, the 94th electron of 231Pu. The dots of
the electron cloud-- one of those dots is the planet Earth,
a larger dot is the Sun. An atom totality explains
everything-- why quantum physics is bizarre because the
totality itself is an atom. Why the night sky Olbers
paradox, because the night sky is a blackbody cavity of
the 94th electron. Why the microwave background radiation
is relentlessly uniform because the 94th electron is a
perfect quantum blackbody cavity. Finally Dirac's answer
to the inverse fine-structure constant because the 94th
electron is a perfect quantum blackbody cavity. Finally
Dirac's answer to the inverse fine-structure constant
because 231Pu has 137 neutrons. Readers Meet your Maker
an Atom of Plutonium.

All of the above copyrighted 1990 in my book PLUTONIUM
ATOM TOTALITY: THE UNIFICATION OF PHYSICS, CHEMISTRY,
BIOLOGY AND MATHEMATICS.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Fri, 13AUG1993,17:15:48 GMT sci.bio(CBpJyC.F57@dartvax.dartmouth.edu>
Fri, 13AUG1993, 17:18:45 GMT sci.chem(CBpK3A.FAs@dartvax.dartmouth.edu>
Fri, 13AUG1993, 17:24:30 GMT sci.math (CBpKCv.Fq2@dartvax.dartmouth.edu>
Fri, 13AUG1993, 17:32:06 GMT sci.physics (CBpKpL.G7n@dartvax.dartmouth.edu>
Lines: 121
Subject: The Unification of Physics, Chemistry, Biology, and Mathematics
Ludwig.Plutonium@dartmouth.edu (Ludwig Plutonium) writes:
This entire newsgram was published in The Dartmouth 22Feb93.
The Plutonium Atom Totality is easy to explain. An electron is
not a ball, but instead, an infinite number of dots. Those dots are
commonly called the "electron cloud". One of those tiny dots of the
94th electron of plutonium is the Sun, another tinier dot the planet
Earth. Stars are just bits and pieces of the last electron, the dots
of the 94th electron of plutonium. You and me are very tiny dots of
the 94th electron of one atom of 231Pu.
An electron is a perfect quantum blackbody cavity.
Blackbody--that is why the night sky is dark explaining Olbers
paradox. Perfect cavity-- that is why the microwave background
radiation is quantized and relentlessly uniform, and in addition
that is why the cosmic gamma ray bursts are relentlessly uniform.
The observable universe is the 94th electron-- that is why Tifft
found galaxy speeds quantized.
We are living inside one atom of plutonium and will never
directly see the nucleus because it is in planar nodes of the 5f6--
that is why over 99% of the mass of the universe is missing.
One atom which is everything and superdeterministic--
that explains Bell's Inequality with the Aspect experimental results.
One atom which is the totality explains why quantum physics before
7Nov90 was mathematically correct yet simultaneously counterintuitive.
Once you see that the whole is an atom itself, then the
counterintuitiveness evaporates. None of quantum physics or any
physics for that matter is counterintuitive once you realize that
the totality itself is an atom. The uncertainty principle restated
is simply that-- atom parts (we) cannot know an atom whole. The 4
principles of quantum mechanics are easy to explain once a person
sees the whole as an atom itself.
Truth, when it comes to science has a natural flowing
continuity. Never awkward, or goofy, or in violation of physical
law. Violation like the big bang model, or awkward like the steady
state model, or goofy like superstring theory, or in violation of
physical law like religion or myth--all of which violate the laws
of physics and science.

Archimedes Plutonium wrote:

> Actually my mind can remember those days in 1993 very well, so well,
> that I even remember that my first posts were all in sci.math, and that
> I had not sprung my great theory out into the open, and only some days
> later, after I had posted about my proof of Fermat's Last Theorem. So I
> found how to get on Usenet, sci.math and sci.physics and was outraged of
> a Fermat's Last Theorem proof by Andrew Wiles.

why don't you write more books then?

Hasidic Jewish Doctor: COVID Medical Tyranny is Genocide Against the
Innocent https://www.brighteon.com/4998c3e3-65bc-42bf-90ce-cdc34a845d81