Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

"World domination. Fast" (By Linus Torvalds)

tech / rec.bicycles.tech / Re: Carbon Wheel design lawsuit

SubjectAuthor
* Carbon Wheel design lawsuitAMuzi
`* Re: Carbon Wheel design lawsuitTom Kunich
 `- Re: Carbon Wheel design lawsuitAMuzi

1
Carbon Wheel design lawsuit

<tqmadu$3m69f$1@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=73531&group=rec.bicycles.tech#73531

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: am...@yellowjersey.org (AMuzi)
Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech
Subject: Carbon Wheel design lawsuit
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2023 09:51:25 -0600
Organization: Yellow Jersey, Ltd.
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <tqmadu$3m69f$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2023 15:51:26 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="ff4115a122599cd94a52ca83d44ebb8d";
logging-data="3873071"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19pz3vim53NP8nQnpWagQRn"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120604 Thunderbird/13.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:VlOhjqYxHixj36FRtQE1KfyVu6s=
 by: AMuzi - Mon, 23 Jan 2023 15:51 UTC

SRAM v Princeton Carbon

https://casetext.com/case/sram-llc-v-princeton-carbon-works-inc

Beyond the design patent dispute itself, judge Roy K Altman
can think clearly and write persuasively (with some cute
turns of phrase here ad there).

He also shows some humility and subsidiarity ("We won't
weigh in on which of these two experts is right -or on which
is telling the truth- because that's what juries are for. ")

To certain RBT contributors, please note that the judge
reviews several arguments within the statutes and prior case
law and writes his decision without once descending to
invective or ad hominem snark.

--
Andrew Muzi
<www.yellowjersey.org/>
Open every day since 1 April, 1971

Re: Carbon Wheel design lawsuit

<07488cc3-ef14-45b2-9f1c-06c8009e9b7dn@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=73595&group=rec.bicycles.tech#73595

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:2b8d:b0:534:d44e:69ea with SMTP id kr13-20020a0562142b8d00b00534d44e69eamr1348212qvb.42.1674523245469;
Mon, 23 Jan 2023 17:20:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a0c:e64d:0:b0:534:7a81:c396 with SMTP id
c13-20020a0ce64d000000b005347a81c396mr1096662qvn.126.1674523245232; Mon, 23
Jan 2023 17:20:45 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2023 17:20:44 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <tqmadu$3m69f$1@dont-email.me>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=162.251.5.50; posting-account=ai195goAAAAWOHLnJWPRm0qjf_39qMws
NNTP-Posting-Host: 162.251.5.50
References: <tqmadu$3m69f$1@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <07488cc3-ef14-45b2-9f1c-06c8009e9b7dn@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Carbon Wheel design lawsuit
From: cyclin...@gmail.com (Tom Kunich)
Injection-Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2023 01:20:45 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Received-Bytes: 1950
 by: Tom Kunich - Tue, 24 Jan 2023 01:20 UTC

On Monday, January 23, 2023 at 7:51:29 AM UTC-8, AMuzi wrote:
> SRAM v Princeton Carbon
>
> https://casetext.com/case/sram-llc-v-princeton-carbon-works-inc
>
> Beyond the design patent dispute itself, judge Roy K Altman
> can think clearly and write persuasively (with some cute
> turns of phrase here ad there).
>
> He also shows some humility and subsidiarity ("We won't
> weigh in on which of these two experts is right -or on which
> is telling the truth- because that's what juries are for. ")
>
> To certain RBT contributors, please note that the judge
> reviews several arguments within the statutes and prior case
> law and writes his decision without once descending to
> invective or ad hominem snark.
>
> --
> Andrew Muzi
> <www.yellowjersey.org/>
> Open every day since 1 April, 1971
Effectively the court denied SRAM's case

Re: Carbon Wheel design lawsuit

<tqncs9$3rspd$1@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=73596&group=rec.bicycles.tech#73596

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: am...@yellowjersey.org (AMuzi)
Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech
Subject: Re: Carbon Wheel design lawsuit
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2023 19:39:21 -0600
Organization: Yellow Jersey, Ltd.
Lines: 34
Message-ID: <tqncs9$3rspd$1@dont-email.me>
References: <tqmadu$3m69f$1@dont-email.me> <07488cc3-ef14-45b2-9f1c-06c8009e9b7dn@googlegroups.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2023 01:39:21 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="d1d112de85d7b7d3d00282404a6825cf";
logging-data="4059949"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18gl9TWib2T6ho5aG2SJieB"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120604 Thunderbird/13.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Iq+2lo+L/hClHaPYejv2j9OlPso=
In-Reply-To: <07488cc3-ef14-45b2-9f1c-06c8009e9b7dn@googlegroups.com>
 by: AMuzi - Tue, 24 Jan 2023 01:39 UTC

On 1/23/2023 7:20 PM, Tom Kunich wrote:
> On Monday, January 23, 2023 at 7:51:29 AM UTC-8, AMuzi wrote:
>> SRAM v Princeton Carbon
>>
>> https://casetext.com/case/sram-llc-v-princeton-carbon-works-inc
>>
>> Beyond the design patent dispute itself, judge Roy K Altman
>> can think clearly and write persuasively (with some cute
>> turns of phrase here ad there).
>>
>> He also shows some humility and subsidiarity ("We won't
>> weigh in on which of these two experts is right -or on which
>> is telling the truth- because that's what juries are for. ")
>>
>> To certain RBT contributors, please note that the judge
>> reviews several arguments within the statutes and prior case
>> law and writes his decision without once descending to
>> invective or ad hominem snark.
>>

> Effectively the court denied SRAM's case
>

If you read his decision (a pleasant discourse with very
good composition)you'll note he denied some petitions for
summary dismissal and granted others. It will proceed to trial.

--
Andrew Muzi
<www.yellowjersey.org/>
Open every day since 1 April, 1971

1
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.81
clearnet tor