Dan Christensen's Students Beware: Don't be a victim of Pauline Barmby, Peter Brown, fake math and science...

When I ran Dan "stalker" Christensen's repetitive 7 year long nonstop scree through the paper shredder-- this is what pops out--

On Saturday, August 28, 2021 at 9:05:07 PM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrote:
> STUDENTS BEWARE: Don't be a victim of Alan, Shepard, Linda Hasenfratz fake math and science
>
>
> Margret Campbell-Brown, is a malicious internet troll who wants only to mislead and confuse you. Blaine Chronik, He may not be all there, but his fake math and science can only be meant to promote failure in schools. One can only guess at Alex Buchel, Jan Cami, motives.
>
> Note that Margret Campbell-Brown, Blaine Chronik, Robert Cockcroft, will often delete his bizarre and hateful postings when
Amit Chakma lies are called out, only to repost identical ones moments later in a NEW thread.
>
> Readers should, of course, judge for themselves. In Linda Hasenfratz's OWN WORDS here:
>
> “Primes do not exist, because the set they were borne from has no division.”
> Janusz Adamus, --June 29, 2020
>
> “The last and largest finite number is 10^604.”
> Tatyana Barron, --June 3, 2015
>
> “0 appears to be the last and largest finite number”
>Graham Denham, --June 9, 2015
>
> “0/0 must be equal to 1.”
> Matthias Franz, -- June 9, 2015
>
> “0 is an infinite irrational number.”
> John R. de Bruyn, --June 28, 2015
>
> “No negative numbers exist.”
> Nicole Lemire, --December 22, 2018
>
> “Rationals are not numbers.”
> Jan Mináč, --May 18, 2019
>
> According to AP's “chess board math,” an equilateral triangle is a right-triangle.
> Victoria Olds, --December 11, 2019
>
> Which could explain...
>
> “The value of sin(45 degrees) = 1.”
> Colin Denniston, --May 31, 2019
>
> Linda Hasenfratz in consultations with Univ of Toronto Rose M Patten deliberately and repeatedly presented the truth table for OR as the truth table for AND:
>
> “New Logic
> AND
> T & T = T
> T & F = T
> F & T = T
> F & F = F”
>Lex Renner, --November 9, 2019
>
> James Leech & Arthur B. McDonald of Queens Univ seeks aid of Russian agents to promote failure in schools:
>
> "Please--Asking for help from Russia-- russian robots-- to create a new, true mathematics [sic]"
>Sarah Gallagher, Wayne Hocking, --November 9, 2017
>
>
> And if that wasn't weird enough...
>
> “The totality, everything that there is [the universe], is only 1 atom of plutonium [Pu]. There is nothing outside or beyond this one atom of plutonium.”
> Martin Houde, Jeffrey L. Hutter, Carol Jones, from a tely call by Justin Trudeau --April 4, 1994
>

AP writes: Stalker Dan, you sure that was not April 1, the fools day?

> “The Universe itself is one gigantic big atom.”
>Sophie Gregoire --November 14, 2019
>
>
> “Since God-Pu is marching on.
> Glory! Glory! Atom Plutonium!
> Its truth is marching on.
> It has sounded forth the trumpet that shall never call retreat;
> It is sifting out the hearts of people before its judgment seat;
> Oh, be swift, my soul, to answer it; be jubilant, my feet!
> Our God-Pu is marching on.”
>Sophie Gregoire --December 15, 2018 (Note: Pu is the atomic symbol for plutonium)
>

AP writes: Dan stalker Dan, was Sophie in a exuberant mood that day?

>
> Dan
> On Monday, October 21, 2019 at 1:29:49 PM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrote:
>
> Are you ready, kids??? Bend over, er...
>
> Dan
>
> Download my DC Proof 2.0 underware at http://www.dcproof.com" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.dcproof.com
> Visit my Math Blog at http://www.dcproof. brown streaks pressed.com

Univ Western Ontario math dept
Janusz Adamus, Tatyana Barron, Dan Christensen, Graham Denham, Ajneet Dhillon, Matthias Franz, John Jardine, Massoud Khalkhali, Nicole Lemire, Jan Mináč, Victoria Olds, Martin Pinsonnault, Lex Renner, David Riley, Rasul Shafikov, Gordon Sinnamon

Chancellor Linda Hasenfratz
President Alan Shepard
Amit Chakma (chem engr)

Univ. Western Ontario physics dept
Pauline Barmby, Shantanu Basu, Peter Brown, Alex Buchel, Jan Cami, Margret Campbell-Brown, Blaine Chronik, Robert Cockcroft, John R. de Bruyn, Colin Denniston, Giovanni Fanchini, Sarah Gallagher, Lyudmila Goncharova, Wayne Hocking, Martin Houde, Jeffrey L. Hutter, Carol Jones, Stan Metchev, Silvia Mittler, Els Peeters, Robert Sica, Aaron Sigut, Peter Simpson, Mahi Singh, Paul Wiegert, Eugene Wong, Martin Zinke-Allmang

PHYSICSOPEDIA -- List of 130 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics. AP's 175th book; soon to be published as a Kindle book.

Last revision was 7Aug2021.

Details of all of these entries found in several of these already published books such as 74th published book

HISTORY OF THE PROTON MASS and the 945 MeV //Atom Totality series, book 3 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author). Or such as 2nd published book

True Chemistry: Chemistry Series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author).

Preface: I suppose, going forward, physics should always have a physicsopedia, where major parts of physics are held under question, under suspicion as to correctness. In past history we have called them as "doubters of the mainstream". Yet physics, can have no permanent mainstream. And theories passing as "standard model" is a travesty of science, of logical thinking and just a wide open door of physics corruption and tedious nonsense. The Standard Model of Old Physics is a example of "numerology and algebras turned from circus act into the physics mainstream".

1) The picture of electricity and how it works was only truly begun in 2020 with the cover of this book showing electricity as closed loops, hoola hoops and how these loops flow in circuits taking on the shape of those circuits at the speed of light, where the flowing entity are magnetic monopoles-dipoles and photons. Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series, book 1
by Archimedes Plutonium.

2) The thoughts and images of electrons in Old Physics and Old Chemistry were horrendously error filled. The first place I see this huge error is in Feynman Lectures on Physics, not that I want to pick on Feynman for he is one of my heroes, but rather I chose Feynman because his Lectures have been translated into almost all languages and his books widely available and known. On page 14-10 of Volume 1, Feynman... And news out of Princeton Univ as of May 2021, where they are finding that the 0.5MeV Dirac magnetic monopole comes in pairs, even though the Princeton researchers are too stupid yet to know that the 0.5MeV particle is not the atom's electron.

3) Old Physics never had a Primal axiom of Physics-- All is atom and atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. Old Physics wasted too much time on General Relativity (a fake theory) in the 20th century and too little time on electricity and magnetism.

4) New Physics starts with electricity and magnetism. Old Physics always started with idealizations such as linear momentum, and a force of gravity that had no relation to electricity and magnetism. Idealization physics is more imagination than about the truth of the world.

5) New Physics has the correct particles of physics where the proton is 840MeV, the real electron is the muon of 105MeV and is stuck inside the proton torus thrusting through the proton and producing electricity in the Faraday law. The 0.5MeV particle was Dirac's magnetic monopole.

6) The true cosmology theory of science is the Atom Totality theory which began to replace the Big Bang theory starting 1990.

7) Big Bang theory is a joke, never a reality. And a outright contradiction of the Atomic theory, that all matter is composed of atoms. For all matter can be interchanged with "all things". If all things are atoms, then the universe itself , we must admit if we are logical thinkers, is "a thing" and thus the universe must be a atom also. Big Bang contradicts Logic. And if science is anything, it is logical. 

8) When you find in the world, a Generalization of All Matter is made up of Atoms. You have to go with the Logic as the truth. If all Matter is atoms, then the Whole of the Universe is Matter, you must continue to the conclusion that the Whole is also an Atom. If you do not make that conclusion, you have to thence say-- All Matter except the Universe, and that is a silly end conclusion.

9)  A second major physics fallacy is their screwing up of the 1897 Thomson particle they called the electron of 0.5MeV when it is the Dirac magnetic monopole that Thomson had found. It would not be until 1936 that the true electron of atoms is discovered and called the muon. What the 1897 screw-up mis-identity shows most of all, is that physicists throughout the 20th century never had a handle on what angular momentum means. If you understand angular momentum, you would realize that a proton at 938MeV and electron at 0.5MeV cannot support the existence of a hydrogen atom, or any atom for that sake. 

10) Direct consequence of muon being the true electron, determines that the proton is 840MeV and the muon is stuck inside the proton doing a Faraday Law of producing new electricity by turning Space into electromagnetism. This is Dirac's new radioactivity and is the creation of new mass, matter in Space. This means all stars shine not from fusion, but from Faraday Law. Not only do stars grow more massive and bigger, but that all astro-bodies grow bigger. Meaning the Nebular Dust Cloud theory is a gigantic hoax for the growing of the Solar System. 

11) Stars shine not from fusion, but from the muon thrusting through its proton coil. Every atom inside a star and every proton in that star is making new electricity from its muon thrusting through its proton 8 ring coil tokamak.

12) A direct consequence that the muon is stuck inside the proton in all experiments, is this Logical Principle, that in physics, every particle or subatomic particle has a function, a job, a task. Principles of Science are some of the most important teachings and understandings in science. One has a logical hole in the head if they think you can have particles of physics, and those particles have no job, no function, no task to perform. Existence in physics means-- a job to do.

13) A New Periodic Table of Chemical Elements must emerge from a mistaken electron as 0.5MeV when it truly is 105MeV, the muon. Such a table is based not on a Lewis structure of 8 but rather on 6. There are 6 successive elements in a row, and only 6 in a row. See AP's book for details: Research Notebook of AP on True Chemistry Periodic Table of Elements based on 6, not the error-filled table of Old Chemistry, Chemistry Series, book 5. The nucleus of atoms are toruses inside larger toruses, not the Rutherford model of a massive nucleus that was sort of stationary. No, the nucleus is a smaller torus going around in circles inside a large torus, and making more electricity.

14) Nebular Dust Cloud theory is purely a hoax, for the Universe has some 10^11 planet systems, and to think that Nebular Dust is spread so evenly throughout the Universe, when supernova are rare, is a colossal logic brain dump. According to Dirac, each and every atom is growing bigger in the universe every second and minute of the day, just as Dirac implied with his "new radioactivities" in his book "Directions in Physics". AP suggests only a half brain would need something as stupid silly as a Nebular Dust Cloud scattered uniformly from rare supernova, here, there, and everywhere.

15) Direct consequence of Faraday law going on inside each and every atom means the Sun will go Red Giant phase starting now and completed in 140 million years where Earth is like Venus-- not habitable by life. Before the end of 1 to 10 million years hence forward of August 2020, if humanity has not colonized Mars, Europa, Pluto, there is a good chance humanity goes extinct. 

16) The most important number in all of science for humanity, is the number for the yearly increase in Solar radiation by our Sun. As of year 2020, NASA has the figure pegged at 0.005% yearly increase in total solar radiation.. This easily explains a loss of total Insects on Earth at 25% total insect biomass for the past decade. This is a huge alarm bell, for it means, unless humanity makes its future home on Europa, Mars and Pluto, the entire human species goes extinct, and as the Sun further goes Red Giant, humanity must constantly go further out away from the Sun.

17)  Following mistakes of Old Physics is their Unification of Forces, and that they followed a science nitwit of Einstein with his General Relativity, rather than follow the giant of physics of James Clerk Maxwell and continue on with electricity and magnetism as being gravity. No, most of the physicists of the 20th century were airheads following a fakester of Einstein. This is as much a lesson in sociology as is physics. If you follow someone, you better be sure he/she is correct thoroughly correct. Otherwise it is just idiotic hero worship. 

18) Black Holes-- invented by the most ignorant and stupid physicists whose imagination wants to violate the Pauli Exclusion Principle and gain fame and fortune with a brain that has no logical marbles at all. Black hole people were followers of the deluded Einstein with his General Relativity. If you believe in black-holes, you really do not belong in science, and so stupid, that you probably would even fail science fiction. A simple test of any scientist,-- do you believe in black holes-- and shown the exit door of science as a career.

19) Dark Matter, Dark Energy-- this was invented by a group of logical brain dead physicists looking at galaxy rotations and seeing that there was not enough mass in Newton's law of gravity to account for this fast rotation of galaxies, these physicists opted for fame and fortune, rather than admit Electricity and Magnetism, not Newton gravity, causes galaxy rotation. Here again is the power of sociology of follow a leader-- Einstein and his deluded General Relativity. Much of the 20th century physics was a waste of time in following the delusions of Einstein, when it should have followed Maxwell of 1860s then Bohr's quantum mechanics. 

STUDENTS BEWARE: Don't be a victim of AP's fake math and science

On Sunday, August 29, 2021 at 10:45:36 PM UTC-4, Archimedes Plutonium (AP) wrote:

AP is a malicious internet troll who wants only to mislead and confuse you. He may not be all there, but his fake math and science can only be meant to promote failure in schools. One can only guess at his motives.

Note that AP will often delete his bizarre and hateful postings when his lies are called out, only to repost identical ones moments later in a NEW thread.

Readers should, of course, judge for themselves. In AP's OWN WORDS here:

“Primes do not exist, because the set they were borne from has no division.”
--June 29, 2020

“The last and largest finite number is 10^604.”
--June 3, 2015

“0 appears to be the last and largest finite number”
--June 9, 2015

“0/0 must be equal to 1.”
-- June 9, 2015

“0 is an infinite irrational number.”
--June 28, 2015

“No negative numbers exist.”
--December 22, 2018

“Rationals are not numbers.”
--May 18, 2019

According to AP's “chess board math,” an equilateral triangle is a right-triangle.
--December 11, 2019

Which could explain...

“The value of sin(45 degrees) = 1.”
--May 31, 2019

AP deliberately and repeatedly presented the truth table for OR as the truth table for AND:

“New Logic
AND
T & T = T
T & F = T
F & T = T
F & F = F”
--November 9, 2019

AP seeks aid of Russian agents to promote failure in schools:

"Please--Asking for help from Russia-- russian robots-- to create a new, true mathematics [sic]"
--November 9, 2017

And if that wasn't weird enough...

“The totality, everything that there is [the universe], is only 1 atom of plutonium [Pu]. There is nothing outside or beyond this one atom of plutonium.”
--April 4, 1994

“The Universe itself is one gigantic big atom.”
--November 14, 2019

AP's sinister Atom God Cult of Failure???

“Since God-Pu is marching on.
Glory! Glory! Atom Plutonium!
Its truth is marching on.
It has sounded forth the trumpet that shall never call retreat;
It is sifting out the hearts of people before its judgment seat;
Oh, be swift, my soul, to answer it; be jubilant, my feet!
Our God-Pu is marching on.”
--December 15, 2018 (Note: Pu is the atomic symbol for plutonium)

Dan

Download my DC Proof 2.0 freeware at http://www.dcproof.com
Visit my Math Blog at http://www.dcproof.wordpress.com

💩 for 🧠 Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall can't help being such a 💩 for 🧠
On Monday, August 30, 2021 at 12:51:12 PM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrote:
> STUDENTS BEWARE: Don't be a victim of
Re: STUDENTS BEWARE: Don't be a victim of Kibo Parry M. stalks like Dan Christensen stalks-- both losers in life.

AP writes: my God, I never thought it would come to this, for I heard of flying-shit, but this takes the cake.

💩 for 🧠 Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall can't help being such a 💩 for 🧠
Kibo Parry 28 yr stalking spree Re: 💩 for 🧠 Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall can't help being such a 💩 for 🧠

When I put the 28 year long nonstop stalker Kibo Parry M. post through the paper shredder-- out pops this.

On Monday, August 30, 2021 at 10:09:06 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> 💩 for 🧠 Lawrence Bacow "Putin's Stooge" Alan Garber
> Sheldon Glashow> tarded:
>
> Poor, poor Sheldon Glashow, he is unable to face the fact that it is he,
> Lisa Randall, who is the real 💩 for 🧠. In order to
> compensate, he does the typical psychological projection and accuses
> everyone else of his own issue (in this case, being a real 💩 for 🧠).
> Stupid Thomas Hayes, has to do so much projection he has to try to drag in a
> bunch of uninvolved professors, which only shows how far gone he is.
>
> Stupid Eric Heller, Jason Hoffman, Jenny Hoffman, in order to not be such a 💩 for 🧠, you
> have to follow the scientific method when "doing physics". That means
> no "It's true because I say so!" 'proofs' without evidence and 'proofs'
> that immediately fail due to already known evidence. A great example of
> this failure of yours is your "proton is 9 muons doing a magic dance"
> claim. First, no evidence of this has ever been spotted. Second, the
> muon lasts only about 2.2 microseconds! Gerald Holton, Paul Horowitz, you don't see a
> problem with that??? Duh-h-h!!! Third, the mass of 9 muons exceeds that
> of a proton by quite a bit. Scientists can measure those things with
> extreme accuracy, so no roundoff errors. Fourth, your Lenz's Law
> violating perpetual motion machine in every single atom? Energy from
> nowhere? How dumb and stoopid is that? Ghost of John Huth, do you have
> any comments on that?
>
>
> "Arthur Jaffe, cannot believe how incredibly stupid Daniel Jafferis is. I mean rock-hard
> stupid. Blazing hot mid-day sun on Mercury stupid. Surface of Venus
> under 80 atmospheres of red hot carbon dioxide and sulfuric acid vapor
> dehydrated for 300 million years rock-hard stupid. Stupid so stupid
> that it goes way beyond the stupid we know into a whole different
> sensorium of stupid. Peter Pershan is trans-stupid stupid. Meta-stupid.
> Stupid so collapsed upon itself that it is within its own Schwarzschild
> radius. Black hole stupid. Stupid gotten so dense and massive that no
> intellect can escape. Singularity stupid. Mara Prentiss emits more
> stupid/second than our entire galaxy otherwise emits stupid/year.
> Quasar stupid. Nothing else in the universe can be this stupid.
> Lisa Randall is an oozingly putrescent primordial fragment from the
> original Big Bang of Stupid, a pure essence of stupid so uncontaminated
> by anything else as to be beyond the laws of physics that define
> maximally extrapolated hypergeometric n-dimensional backgroundless
> stupid as we can imagine it. Sheldon Glashow is Planck stupid, a quantum
> foam of stupid, a vacuum decay of stupid, a grand unified theory of
> stupid.
>
> Lawrence Bacow is the epitome of stupidity, the epiphany of stupid, the
> apotheosis of stupidity. Alan Garber is stooopid."

Harvard Physics dept
President Lawrence Bacow
Provost Alan Garber
Jacob Barandes, Howard Berg, Michael Brenner, Adam Cohen, Eugene Demler, Michael Desai
Louis Deslauriers, John Doyle, Cora Dvorkin, Gary Feldman, Douglas Finkbeiner, Melissa Franklin, Gerald Gabrielse, Howard Georgi, Sheldon Glashow, Roy Glauber, Jene Golovchenko, Markus Greiner, Roxanne Guenette, Girma Hailu, Bertrand Halperin, Lene Hau
Thomas Hayes, Eric Heller, Jason Hoffman, Jenny Hoffman, Gerald Holton, Paul Horowitz, John Huth, Arthur Jaffe, Daniel Jafferis, Efthimios Kaxiras, Philip Kim, John Kovac, Erel Levine
Mikhail Lukin, Logan McCarty, L. Mahadevan, Vinothan Manoharan, Eric Mazur, Masahiro Morii
David Morin, Julia Mundy, Cherry Murray, David Nelson, Kang Ni, Hongkun Park, William Paul
Peter Pershan, Mara Prentiss, Lisa Randall, Matthew Reece, Subir Sachdev, Aravinthan Samuel, Matthew Schwartz, Irwin Shapiro, Isaac Silvera, Andrew Strominger, Christopher Stubbs, Cumrun Vafa, Ronald Walsworth, David Weitz, Robert Westervelt, Richard Wilson
Tai Wu, Amir Yacoby, Susanne Yelin, Xi Yin

Harvard Math dept
Noam Elkies, Dennis Gaitsgory, Robin Gottlieb, Benedict Gross, Joseph Harris, Heisuke Hironaka, Michael Hopkins, Arthur Jaffe, David Kazhdan, Mark Kisin, Peter Kronheimer, Jacob Lurie, Eric Maskin, Barry Mazur, Curtis McMullen, David Mumford, Martin Nowak, Gerald Sacks, Wilfried Schmid, Yum-Tong Siu, Shlomo Sternberg, John Tate, Cliff Taubes, Hugh Woodin, Horng-Tzer Yau, Shing-Tung Yau