novaBBS - sci.math - Re: There is no such thing as an "irrational number"

Re: There is no such thing as an "irrational number" - it's a myth.

<1245a360-7d2f-4c62-a021-9f3d99a3c647n@googlegroups.com>

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=73975&group=sci.math#73975

X-Received: by 2002:a37:9e11:: with SMTP id h17mr7941031qke.370.1630495875489;
Wed, 01 Sep 2021 04:31:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:4587:: with SMTP id s129mr37567318yba.257.1630495875395;
Wed, 01 Sep 2021 04:31:15 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.math
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2021 04:31:15 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <81af1cf2-a800-4631-82d0-c1741fc04383@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=65.246.123.18; posting-account=SFjzlQoAAAButaEM_s2P3WQCG06CwoKJ
NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.246.123.18
References: <81af1cf2-a800-4631-82d0-c1741fc04383@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <1245a360-7d2f-4c62-a021-9f3d99a3c647n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: There is no such thing as an "irrational number" - it's a myth.
From: gabrielj...@gmail.com (New Age Prophet)
Injection-Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2021 11:31:15 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lines: 32

by: New Age Prophet - Wed, 1 Sep 2021 11:31 UTC

On Saturday, May 2, 2020 at 9:19:46 AM UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
> There is no such thing as an "irrational number" - it's a myth.
>
> A *NUMBER* is the *NAME* given to a *MEASURE* that describes a commensurable *MAGNITUDE* (length, area, mass, etc).
>
> https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/how-we-got-numbers-john-gabriel-1

Essentially what the Baboons of mainstream academia will have you believe is that:

t(c+h)-t(c)]/h = Lim (h->0)[f(c+h)-f(c)]/h = f'(c) + Q(c,h) and is possible ONLY if Q(c,h)=0, but this happens only in the case of the straight line t(x). It NEVER happens with the finite difference quotients. The mainstream want you to believe that there is some finite difference ratio hovering at infinity which produces f'(c):

t(c+h)-t(c)]/h = [f(c+h_1)-f(c)]/h_1 ; [f(c+h_2)-f(c)]/h_2 ; [f(c+h_3)-f(c)]/h_3 ; ... ; [f(c+h_3n-f(c)]/h_n ...; [f(c+h_oo)-f(c)]/h_oo

t(c+h)-t(c)]/h = [f(c+h_oo)-f(c)]/h_oo ?! What?!!! There is no such finite difference. It does not exist! But Baboon mathematics of the mainstream insists there is a limit!

Can you imagine how embarrassed Newton and Leibniz would be at these idiots today?! They knew that they could not solve the tangent line problem - this had to wait for the great John Gabriel. It is I who revealed to the entire world that:

[f(x+h)-f(x)]/h = f'(x) + Q(x,h)

It usually takes a genius to realise the most simple concepts that escape the syphilitic brains of highly educated idiots in the mainstream.

Know Thy User.

tech / sci.math / Re: There is no such thing as an "irrational number" - it's a myth.

Subject	Author
Re: There is no such thing as an "irrational number" - it's a myth.	New Age Prophet