That the speed of light is not constant is just as obvious as "two and two is not five". For instance, in Doppler https://youtube.com/watch?v=bg7O4rtlwEE, frequency and speed of light pulses vary proportionally for the observer, as per the formula

(frequency) = (speed of light pulses)/(distance between pulses)

Theoretical physicists do see that frequency and speed of light pulses vary proportionally for the moving observer, but believe that only the frequency varies - the speed of the pulses gloriously remains constant. Ignatius of Loyola explains:

"We should always be prepared so as never to err to believe that what we see as white is black, if the hierarchy of the Church defines it thus" https://i.pinimg.com/736x/c9/bb/5e/c9bb5eb049bc1d58834129afcea7d63b.jpg

Why is it so important for theoretical physicists to believe that white is black? Because otherwise they would have to live with an unbearable feeling of guilt:

"He opened by explaining how Einstein's theory of relativity is the foundation of every other theory in modern physics and that the assumption that the speed of light is constant is the foundation of that theory. Thus a constant speed of light is embedded in all of modern physics and to propose a varying speed of light (VSL) is worse than swearing! It is like proposing a language without vowels." http://www.thegreatdebate.org.uk/VSLRevPrnt.html

See more here: https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

Pentcho Valev

Pentcho Valev wrote:

> pulses vary proportionally for the observer, as per the formula
>
> (frequency) = (speed of light pulses)/(distance between pulses)

crests / wave_numbers, not pulses.

Albert Einstein Institute: "In the above paragraphs, we have only considered moving sources. In fact, a closer look at cases where it is the receiver that is in motion will show that this kind of motion leads to a very similar kind of Doppler effect. Here is an animation of the receiver moving towards the source:

https://www.einstein-online.info/wp-content/uploads/SRT_Dopplereffekt_Pulse_4_%C2%A9_Daniela_Leitner_Markus_Poessel_Einstein-Online.gif

By observing the two indicator lights, you can see for yourself that, once more, there is a blue-shift - the pulse frequency measured at the receiver is somewhat higher than the frequency with which the pulses are sent out. This time, THE DISTANCES BETWEEN SUBSEQUENT PULSES ARE NOT AFFECTED, BUT STILL THERE IS A FREQUENCY SHIFT: As the receiver moves towards each pulse, the time until pulse and receiver meet up is shortened. In this particular animation, which has the receiver moving towards the source at one third the speed of the pulses themselves, four pulses are received in the time it takes the source to emit three pulses." http://www.einstein-online.info/spotlights/doppler.html

The text in CAPITALS, combined with the formula

(frequency at receiver) = (speed of light relative to receiver)/(distance between subsequent pulses)

proves variable speed of light and disproves Einstein's relativity.

More here: https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

Pentcho Valev

Le 12/12/2021 à 21:37, Pentcho Valev a écrit :
> Albert Einstein Institute: "In the above paragraphs, we have only considered
> moving sources. In fact, a closer look at cases where it is the receiver that is
> in motion will show that this kind of motion leads to a very similar kind of
> Doppler effect. Here is an animation of the receiver moving towards the source:
>
>
> https://www.einstein-online.info/wp-content/uploads/SRT_Dopplereffekt_Pulse_4_%C2%A9_Daniela_Leitner_Markus_Poessel_Einstein-Online.gif
>
> By observing the two indicator lights, you can see for yourself that, once more,
> there is a blue-shift - the pulse frequency measured at the receiver is somewhat
> higher than the frequency with which the pulses are sent out. This time, THE
> DISTANCES BETWEEN SUBSEQUENT PULSES ARE NOT AFFECTED, BUT STILL THERE IS A
> FREQUENCY SHIFT: As the receiver moves towards each pulse, the time until pulse
> and receiver meet up is shortened. In this particular animation, which has the
> receiver moving towards the source at one third the speed of the pulses
> themselves, four pulses are received in the time it takes the source to emit three
> pulses." http://www.einstein-online.info/spotlights/doppler.html
>
> The text in CAPITALS, combined with the formula
>
> (frequency at receiver) = (speed of light relative to receiver)/(distance
> between subsequent pulses)
>
> proves variable speed of light and disproves Einstein's relativity.
>
> More here: https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev
>
> Pentcho Valev

Thank you Pentcho Valev.

In terms of relativity theory, this effect also exists, it is called the
longitudinal Doppler effect.
Thus, this effect will produce an observation of one more or less length
depending on the speed and direction of the source relative to the
observer.
I found in two different ways the logical equation of wavelength
relativity. Either by taking the ballistic theory of light, or by taking
its wave theory. We obviously fall back on the same equation.
Physicists have the same as me. In this, I do not bother them. Finally,
one day we will understand that I am nice.
The equation of the relativity of wavelengths is given here, with that of
the relativity of lengths (and distances, it is the same), and that of the
relativity of durations.

<http://news2.nemoweb.net/jntp?M5O8p1XRz8Ht3JAqnRq5vMmt9cI@jntp/Data.Media:1>

<http://news2.nemoweb.net/jntp?M5O8p1XRz8Ht3JAqnRq5vMmt9cI@jntp/Data.Media:2>

These three fundamental equations should be learned by heart and asked
systematically to any student who wants to take a degree in relalivist
science.

R.H.
Clic here to read this post in html <http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=M5O8p1XRz8Ht3JAqnRq5vMmt9cI@jntp>