Ken Seto, long-time poster to sci.physics.relativity (since 1996?) is
famous.

1. He is famous for writing what he calls a Theory of Everything, though he
does not know what those words mean or entail.

2. He is famous for not being able to do third grade arithmetic, yet saying
he is decades ahead of the best physicists in the world.

3. He is famous for believing that any physics theory that involves an
explanation using math is not a physical theory but a mathematical one, and
thus is abstract and overly complicated. In his mind, a good theory should
not need math at all, though a couple of equations sprinkled in is good for
credibility.

4. He is famous for believing that anything real should be common and
visible to the naked idea, and that anything that requires expensive
equipment to detect is therefore not real.

5. He is famous for throwing his life savings into self-publishing a book
which got no sales, and then into fees to have it put in the Library of
Congress, believing that this will ensure his undying legacy.

6. He is famous for having ideas about relativity, though he cannot follow
even the first few chapters of an introductory book in physics.

7. He is especially famous for steadfastly believing that people will not
notice any of the above.

--
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Odd Bodkin wrote:

> Ken Seto, long-time poster to sci.physics.relativity (since 1996?) is
> famous.
>
> 1. He is famous for writing what he calls a Theory of Everything, though
> he does not know what those words mean or entail.
>
> 2. He is famous for not being able to do third grade arithmetic, yet
> saying he is decades ahead of the best physicists in the world.

you forgot number 0. , that he is a disgusting pig stealing theories he
doesn't even understand.

On Tuesday, December 14, 2021 at 3:00:18 PM UTC-3, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
> Ken Seto, long-time poster to sci.physics.relativity (since 1996?) is
> famous.
>
> 1. He is famous for writing what he calls a Theory of Everything, though he
> does not know what those words mean or entail.
>
> 2. He is famous for not being able to do third grade arithmetic, yet saying
> he is decades ahead of the best physicists in the world.
>
> 3. He is famous for believing that any physics theory that involves an
> explanation using math is not a physical theory but a mathematical one, and
> thus is abstract and overly complicated. In his mind, a good theory should
> not need math at all, though a couple of equations sprinkled in is good for
> credibility.
>
> 4. He is famous for believing that anything real should be common and
> visible to the naked idea, and that anything that requires expensive
> equipment to detect is therefore not real.
>
> 5. He is famous for throwing his life savings into self-publishing a book
> which got no sales, and then into fees to have it put in the Library of
> Congress, believing that this will ensure his undying legacy.
>
> 6. He is famous for having ideas about relativity, though he cannot follow
> even the first few chapters of an introductory book in physics.
>
> 7. He is especially famous for steadfastly believing that people will not
> notice any of the above.
>
> --
> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

You should admire Ken. He's a survivalist full of resilience, while almost everyone quit or bit the dust in the last decades.

He has to be on something that you don't perceive, and thinks it's crazy just because don't conform your conceptions.

Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tuesday, December 14, 2021 at 3:00:18 PM UTC-3, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Ken Seto, long-time poster to sci.physics.relativity (since 1996?) is
>> famous.
>>
>> 1. He is famous for writing what he calls a Theory of Everything, though he
>> does not know what those words mean or entail.
>>
>> 2. He is famous for not being able to do third grade arithmetic, yet saying
>> he is decades ahead of the best physicists in the world.
>>
>> 3. He is famous for believing that any physics theory that involves an
>> explanation using math is not a physical theory but a mathematical one, and
>> thus is abstract and overly complicated. In his mind, a good theory should
>> not need math at all, though a couple of equations sprinkled in is good for
>> credibility.
>>
>> 4. He is famous for believing that anything real should be common and
>> visible to the naked idea, and that anything that requires expensive
>> equipment to detect is therefore not real.
>>
>> 5. He is famous for throwing his life savings into self-publishing a book
>> which got no sales, and then into fees to have it put in the Library of
>> Congress, believing that this will ensure his undying legacy.
>>
>> 6. He is famous for having ideas about relativity, though he cannot follow
>> even the first few chapters of an introductory book in physics.
>>
>> 7. He is especially famous for steadfastly believing that people will not
>> notice any of the above.
>>
>> --
>> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
>
> You should admire Ken. He's a survivalist full of resilience, while
> almost everyone quit or bit the dust in the last decades.
>
> He has to be on something that you don't perceive, and thinks it's crazy
> just because don't conform your conceptions.
>
>
>
>

Or he’s just crazy.

--
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tuesday, December 14, 2021 at 3:00:18 PM UTC-3, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Ken Seto, long-time poster to sci.physics.relativity (since 1996?) is
> > famous.
> >
> > 1. He is famous for writing what he calls a Theory of Everything, though he
> > does not know what those words mean or entail.
> >
> > 2. He is famous for not being able to do third grade arithmetic, yet saying
> > he is decades ahead of the best physicists in the world.
> >
> > 3. He is famous for believing that any physics theory that involves an
> > explanation using math is not a physical theory but a mathematical one, and
> > thus is abstract and overly complicated. In his mind, a good theory should
> > not need math at all, though a couple of equations sprinkled in is good for
> > credibility.
> >
> > 4. He is famous for believing that anything real should be common and
> > visible to the naked idea, and that anything that requires expensive
> > equipment to detect is therefore not real.
> >
> > 5. He is famous for throwing his life savings into self-publishing a book
> > which got no sales, and then into fees to have it put in the Library of
> > Congress, believing that this will ensure his undying legacy.
> >
> > 6. He is famous for having ideas about relativity, though he cannot follow
> > even the first few chapters of an introductory book in physics.
> >
> > 7. He is especially famous for steadfastly believing that people will not
> > notice any of the above.
> >
> > --
> > Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
>
> You should admire Ken. He's a survivalist full of resilience, while almost
> everyone quit or bit the dust in the last decades.

Certainly. Unfortunately the results are not proportional
to the effort put into it.

> He has to be on something that you don't perceive, and thinks it's crazy
> just because don't conform your conceptions.

Quite possible.
Let him produce a prediction that goes beyond the standard model
and the world will be convinced.

Any prediction will do, but none seen so far,

Jan