Of common use in labs where any kind of relativists work. And it doesn't matter
if relativity is involved or not.

Common practice of the heirs of the biggest fraudster on science since ......

On Saturday, December 18, 2021 at 9:48:20 PM UTC-3, Richard Hertz wrote:
> Of common use in labs where any kind of relativists work. And it doesn't matter
> if relativity is involved or not.
>
> Common practice of the heirs of the biggest fraudster on science since ......

Weber? Who, in 1969, claimed to have detected the first gravitational waves with some
metallic drums and wires. Sort of.

On Saturday, December 18, 2021 at 4:48:20 PM UTC-8, Richard Hertz wrote:

> Of common use in labs where any kind of relativists work.

That word does not mean what you think it means...

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/relativist

relativist
noun [ C ]
US /ˈrel.ə.tɪ.vɪst/ UK /ˈrel.ə.tɪ.vɪst/
SOCIAL SCIENCE specialized
someone who believes that truth and right and wrong can only be judged in relation to other things and that nothing can be true or right in all situations:

He confesses to being a moral relativist.
I do not think one can be a complete relativist in art.

On Saturday, December 18, 2021 at 10:25:20 PM UTC-3, Paul Alsing wrote:
> On Saturday, December 18, 2021 at 4:48:20 PM UTC-8, Richard Hertz wrote:
>
> > Of common use in labs where any kind of relativists work.
> That word does not mean what you think it means...
>
> https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/relativist
>
> relativist
> noun [ C ]
> US /ˈrel.ə.tɪ.vɪst/ UK /ˈrel.ə.tɪ.vɪst/
>
> SOCIAL SCIENCE specialized
> someone who believes that truth and right and wrong can only be judged in relation to other things and that nothing can be true or right in all situations:
>
> He confesses to being a moral relativist.
> I do not think one can be a complete relativist in art.

I invented the term "relativist" to be applied to any fanatic imbecile that worship relativity, so I give it the proper meaning
in the proper context: physics, chemistry, mathematics.

But an extension to social sciences, regarding morality, decency, fits perfectly to relativistic physicists.

Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Saturday, December 18, 2021 at 10:25:20 PM UTC-3, Paul Alsing wrote:
>> On Saturday, December 18, 2021 at 4:48:20 PM UTC-8, Richard Hertz wrote:
>>
>>> Of common use in labs where any kind of relativists work.
>> That word does not mean what you think it means...
>>
>> https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/relativist
>>
>> relativist
>> noun [ C ]
>> US /ˈrel.ə.tɪ.vɪst/ UK /ˈrel.ə.tɪ.vɪst/
>>
>> SOCIAL SCIENCE specialized
>> someone who believes that truth and right and wrong can only be judged
>> in relation to other things and that nothing can be true or right in all situations:
>>
>> He confesses to being a moral relativist.
>> I do not think one can be a complete relativist in art.
>
> I invented the term "relativist" to be applied to any fanatic imbecile
> that worship relativity,

Ah, so a name for a fictional creature.

> so I give it the proper meaning
> in the proper context: physics, chemistry, mathematics.
>
> But an extension to social sciences, regarding morality, decency, fits
> perfectly to relativistic physicists.
>
>

--
Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables

On 12/18/2021 8:34 PM, Richard Hertz wrote:
> On Saturday, December 18, 2021 at 10:25:20 PM UTC-3, Paul Alsing wrote:
>> On Saturday, December 18, 2021 at 4:48:20 PM UTC-8, Richard Hertz wrote:
>>
>>> Of common use in labs where any kind of relativists work.
>> That word does not mean what you think it means...
>>
>> https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/relativist
>>
>> relativist
>> noun [ C ]
>> US /ˈrel.ə.tɪ.vɪst/ UK /ˈrel.ə.tɪ.vɪst/
>>
>> SOCIAL SCIENCE specialized
>> someone who believes that truth and right and wrong can only be judged in relation to other things and that nothing can be true or right in all situations:
>>
>> He confesses to being a moral relativist.
>> I do not think one can be a complete relativist in art.
>
> I invented the term "relativist"

No, you didn't invent the crackpot definition of "relativist" either.
Many cranks have come and gone over the years using that word that way,
displaying for the world to see that they are crackpots.

> to be applied to any fanatic imbecile that worship relativity,

There is nobody who "worships" relativity, fanatic or otherwise. Only
crackpots think that ever happens.

> so I give it the proper meaning
> in the proper context: physics, chemistry, mathematics.

The proper words to describe a person who uses relativity in physics,
chemistry, and mathematics are "physicist", "chemist" and
"mathematician" respectively.

On Saturday, December 18, 2021 at 5:34:51 PM UTC-8, Richard Hertz wrote:
> On Saturday, December 18, 2021 at 10:25:20 PM UTC-3, Paul Alsing wrote:
> > On Saturday, December 18, 2021 at 4:48:20 PM UTC-8, Richard Hertz wrote:
> >
> > > Of common use in labs where any kind of relativists work.
> > That word does not mean what you think it means...
> >
> > https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/relativist
> >
> > relativist
> > noun [ C ]
> > US /ˈrel.ə.tɪ.vɪst/ UK /ˈrel.ə.tɪ.vɪst/
> >
> > SOCIAL SCIENCE specialized
> > someone who believes that truth and right and wrong can only be judged in relation to other things and that nothing can be true or right in all situations:
> >
> > He confesses to being a moral relativist.
> > I do not think one can be a complete relativist in art.

> I invented the term "relativist" to be applied to any fanatic imbecile that worship relativity, so I give it the proper meaning in the proper context: physics, chemistry, mathematics.

Well, if *your* word is already in the dictionary and means something else, it seems to me that YOU need to come up with another word that is NOT in the dictionary... otherwise folks will assume you to be just another troll here... OOPS, too late...

On Sunday, December 19, 2021 at 12:23:24 AM UTC-3, Paul Alsing wrote:
> On Saturday, December 18, 2021 at 5:34:51 PM UTC-8, Richard Hertz wrote:

<snip>

> > I invented the term "relativist" to be applied to any fanatic imbecile that worship relativity, so I give it the proper meaning in the proper context: physics, chemistry, mathematics.

> Well, if *your* word is already in the dictionary and means something else, it seems to me that YOU need to come up with another word that is NOT in the dictionary... otherwise folks will assume you to be just another troll here... OOPS, too late...

TERM!, not WORD! A TERM is context sensitive, and I use as a DEROGATORY TERM! Got it?

TERM: a word or phrase used to describe a thing or to express a concept, especially in a particular kind of language or branch of study.

And the CONCEPT that relativist describe, in MY conception of hard sciences, is a FUCKING RETARDED, like you!

Check your dosage of anti-psychotic pills, and try doubling it. Also, clean your chin, as you're drooling. Age takes its toll, and it's a bitch.

Also, there are degrees of relativism, like with burns.

There are three degrees of burns:

* First-degree relativism (superficial relativism): mild, just used to socialize with other retarded people. Mostly used to belong: YOU
and several other pretenders here. Don't fool anyone, but they choose what they think is the winning side. Poor convictions and values.

* Second-degree relativism (partial brain fossilization): even when it allow a person to function, most actions require supervision by MD.
Bodkin, Sylvia, Moroney, etc.

* Third-degree relativism (full brain fossilization): the brain is a fucking rock (granite). No known cure for this terminal disease. It's
recommended for others to run like hell in the case of a casual and unfortunate presence with this kind of relativist. RUN!
Dono, Dork vin de Muurtel, JanPB, Roberts, prokaryotic, PointedEars , Andersen, Mitch Raemsch, etc.

On Saturday, December 18, 2021 at 8:43:52 PM UTC-8, Richard Hertz wrote:
> On Sunday, December 19, 2021 at 12:23:24 AM UTC-3, Paul Alsing wrote:
> > On Saturday, December 18, 2021 at 5:34:51 PM UTC-8, Richard Hertz wrote:
> <snip>
> > > I invented the term "relativist" to be applied to any fanatic imbecile that worship relativity, so I give it the proper meaning in the proper context: physics, chemistry, mathematics.
>
> > Well, if *your* word is already in the dictionary and means something else, it seems to me that YOU need to come up with another word that is NOT in the dictionary... otherwise folks will assume you to be just another troll here... OOPS, too late...

> TERM!, not WORD! A TERM is context sensitive, and I use as a DEROGATORY TERM! Got it?

https://www.differencebetween.com/difference-between-term-and-vs-word/

" All terms are words, but not all words are terms." Got it? ALL TERMS ARE WORDS!

You have no chance here attempting to tell native English speakers what they are saying is wrong. No chance at all.

On Sunday, December 19, 2021 at 2:21:18 AM UTC-3, Paul Alsing wrote:
> On Saturday, December 18, 2021 at 8:43:52 PM UTC-8, Richard Hertz wrote:

<snip>

> > TERM!, not WORD! A TERM is context sensitive, and I use as a DEROGATORY TERM! Got it?
> https://www.differencebetween.com/difference-between-term-and-vs-word/
>
> " All terms are words, but not all words are terms." Got it? ALL TERMS ARE WORDS!
>
> You have no chance here attempting to tell native English speakers what they are saying is wrong. No chance at all.

TERM: a word or phrase used to describe a thing or to express a concept, especially in a particular kind of language or branch of study.

Paul got mad! Don't be mad, Paul. I'm not pretending to be a master in the command of English. I'm 6/10 at my best, and only here,
dealing with technical posts.

But there is something that supersedes the ability to manage native language. It's called FUCKING LOGIC, which is INDEPENDENT of
the native language. Also, it comes together with analytical power.

Using these two tools of thought, I can make eat the dust to you, to a German, a French, a Chinese, etc. IF WE ARE TALKING ABOUT
COMMON WESTERN CONCEPTS on Politics, Religion, Society, Science, etc.

I'm not going to argue with any national about their SLANG (more than 10,000 dialects in the world), nor about EASTERN and MIDDLE
EAST concepts of life and death, religion, politics or social issues.

But when we are placed on a COMMON GROUND, with western concepts that every educated people is familiar with, THERE IS NO
ADVANTAGE using your NATIVE TONGUE. Call it GLOBALIZATION, but such common ground is vital for business, law affairs, science
and even several social issues.

So, don't troll me with the "native tongue" argument. I don't discuss your natural dominance of it for EVERYTHING in your life.

I discuss things that can be brought to an INTERNATIONAL Committee to be questioned. Are you AWARE that this kind of issues
happens every day worldwide, and by the millions?

If you had some common sense, you'll concede that I'm perfectly entitled to take a LEGAL DEFINITION and analyze it with all the
power of my abilities.

I'm sorry if I hurt your sensibilities, but we are not discussing about how to order dinner at a restaurant here. We are talking about
the LAW.

And I didn't stretch the definitions to fit my objective: to mock physicists. What I wrote is PERFECT, in the logical and the analytical sense.

Deal with it and slow down with me. You're are going to uncharted grounds arguing in this way. What come next? Xenophobia?

Watch what you write, dear imbecile.

Den 19.12.2021 01:48, skrev Richard Hertz:
> Of common use in labs where any kind of relativists work. And it doesn't matter
> if relativity is involved or not.
>
> Common practice of the heirs of the biggest fraudster on science since ......

Are you claiming that all these experiments are frauds?

https://paulba.no/paper/index.html

Physics isn't a matter of belief.
It is a matter of experimental evidence.

Can you name one experiment that falsifies GR?

You will have to ignore this, won't you? :-D

--
Paul

https://paulba.no/

On Sunday, 19 December 2021 at 11:31:18 UTC+1, Paul B. Andersen wrote:

> Physics isn't a matter of belief.
> It is a matter of experimental evidence.

In the meantime in the real world, however, forbidden by
your moronic religion TAI keep measuring t'=t, just like
all serious clocks always did.

Paul B. Andersen wrote:

> Den 19.12.2021 01:48, skrev Richard Hertz:
>> Of common use in labs where any kind of relativists work. And it
>> doesn't matter if relativity is involved or not.
>> Common practice of the heirs of the biggest fraudster on science since
>
> Are you claiming that all these experiments are frauds?
> https://paulba.no/paper/index.html
> Physics isn't a matter of belief. It is a matter of experimental
> evidence. Can you name one experiment that falsifies GR?

absolutely, I can do it for you right now. The star systems "orbiting"
inside galaxies. Try again.

Ricardo Pons wrote:

> But when we are placed on a COMMON GROUND, with western concepts that
> every educated people is familiar with, THERE IS NO ADVANTAGE using your
> NATIVE TONGUE. Call it GLOBALIZATION, but such common ground is vital
> for business, law affairs, science and even several social issues.

western are gays. Feminized to a large degree. That's why they push the
war, as people from large distance coming defeminize them. Actually so
simple. If not mistaken also written in The Bible.

Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sunday, December 19, 2021 at 12:23:24 AM UTC-3, Paul Alsing wrote:
>> On Saturday, December 18, 2021 at 5:34:51 PM UTC-8, Richard Hertz wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
>>> I invented the term "relativist" to be applied to any fanatic imbecile
>>> that worship relativity, so I give it the proper meaning in the proper
>>> context: physics, chemistry, mathematics.
>
>> Well, if *your* word is already in the dictionary and means something
>> else, it seems to me that YOU need to come up with another word that is
>> NOT in the dictionary... otherwise folks will assume you to be just
>> another troll here... OOPS, too late...
>
> TERM!, not WORD! A TERM is context sensitive, and I use as a DEROGATORY TERM! Got it?
>
> TERM: a word or phrase used to describe a thing or to express a concept,
> especially in a particular kind of language or branch of study.
>
> And the CONCEPT that relativist describe, in MY conception of hard
> sciences, is a FUCKING RETARDED, like you!
>
> Check your dosage of anti-psychotic pills, and try doubling it. Also,
> clean your chin, as you're drooling. Age takes its toll, and it's a bitch.
>
> Also, there are degrees of relativism, like with burns.
>
> There are three degrees of burns:
>
> * First-degree relativism (superficial relativism): mild, just used to
> socialize with other retarded people. Mostly used to belong: YOU
> and several other pretenders here. Don't fool anyone, but they choose
> what they think is the winning side. Poor convictions and values.
>
> * Second-degree relativism (partial brain fossilization): even when it
> allow a person to function, most actions require supervision by MD.
> Bodkin, Sylvia, Moroney, etc.
>
> * Third-degree relativism (full brain fossilization): the brain is a
> fucking rock (granite). No known cure for this terminal disease. It's
> recommended for others to run like hell in the case of a casual and
> unfortunate presence with this kind of relativist. RUN!
> Dono, Dork vin de Muurtel, JanPB, Roberts, prokaryotic, PointedEars ,
> Andersen, Mitch Raemsch, etc.
>

There is a little dog who lives behind a fence down the road from my place.
His favorite pastime is to snarl at people walking down the road, baring
his teeth, growling and barking, inventing all sorts of derogatory terms.
And when they go on by walking, the dog says to himself, “I won, didn’t I?
I barked and growled names at them and scared them away.” Of course, it’s
an amusement to me to walk by, and when he bares his teeth at me, I stop
walking and look at him. This throws him into an all-caps frenzy, his paws
tearing at the dirt and foam appearing on his lips. Sometimes, when that
happens, I’ll go over to the unlocked gate and open it a little, to let him
know I intend to come in. That turns the tables for this little mutt, and
he yelps and heads for the porch at full run, still barking but from a
safer distance.

--
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Ricardo Pons <ponsric@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sunday, December 19, 2021 at 2:21:18 AM UTC-3, Paul Alsing wrote:
>> On Saturday, December 18, 2021 at 8:43:52 PM UTC-8, Richard Hertz wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
>>> TERM!, not WORD! A TERM is context sensitive, and I use as a DEROGATORY TERM! Got it?
>> https://www.differencebetween.com/difference-between-term-and-vs-word/
>>
>> " All terms are words, but not all words are terms." Got it? ALL TERMS ARE WORDS!
>>
>> You have no chance here attempting to tell native English speakers what
>> they are saying is wrong. No chance at all.
>
> TERM: a word or phrase used to describe a thing or to express a concept,
> especially in a particular kind of language or branch of study.
>
> Paul got mad! Don't be mad, Paul. I'm not pretending to be a master in
> the command of English. I'm 6/10 at my best, and only here,
> dealing with technical posts.
>
> But there is something that supersedes the ability to manage native
> language. It's called FUCKING LOGIC, which is INDEPENDENT of
> the native language. Also, it comes together with analytical power.

Because as long as he has his fearsome analytical power and whatever skills
remain from his training, a retired engineer can outdo, outthink, outtalk
anyone on any subject. It seems to be part of the secret handshake, a code
of conduct and attitude appropriate for technical royalty.

“Bow DOWN,” bellows the retired engineer. “I MADE things! I suffered under
impossible specs and schedules for an entire career, while consumers
thanklessly consumed the fruits of my toils. But now that I’m done with
that, I demand RESPECT!”

>
> Using these two tools of thought, I can make eat the dust to you, to a
> German, a French, a Chinese, etc. IF WE ARE TALKING ABOUT
> COMMON WESTERN CONCEPTS on Politics, Religion, Society, Science, etc.
>
> I'm not going to argue with any national about their SLANG (more than
> 10,000 dialects in the world), nor about EASTERN and MIDDLE
> EAST concepts of life and death, religion, politics or social issues.
>
> But when we are placed on a COMMON GROUND, with western concepts that
> every educated people is familiar with, THERE IS NO
> ADVANTAGE using your NATIVE TONGUE. Call it GLOBALIZATION, but such
> common ground is vital for business, law affairs, science
> and even several social issues.
>
> So, don't troll me with the "native tongue" argument. I don't discuss
> your natural dominance of it for EVERYTHING in your life.
>
> I discuss things that can be brought to an INTERNATIONAL Committee to be
> questioned. Are you AWARE that this kind of issues
> happens every day worldwide, and by the millions?
>
> If you had some common sense, you'll concede that I'm perfectly entitled
> to take a LEGAL DEFINITION and analyze it with all the
> power of my abilities.
>
> I'm sorry if I hurt your sensibilities, but we are not discussing about
> how to order dinner at a restaurant here. We are talking about
> the LAW.
>
> And I didn't stretch the definitions to fit my objective: to mock
> physicists. What I wrote is PERFECT, in the logical and the analytical sense.
>
> Deal with it and slow down with me. You're are going to uncharted grounds
> arguing in this way. What come next? Xenophobia?
>
> Watch what you write, dear imbecile.
>
>
>
>

--
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

On Sunday, 19 December 2021 at 15:22:17 UTC+1, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
> Ricardo Pons <pon...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Sunday, December 19, 2021 at 2:21:18 AM UTC-3, Paul Alsing wrote:
> >> On Saturday, December 18, 2021 at 8:43:52 PM UTC-8, Richard Hertz wrote:
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> >>> TERM!, not WORD! A TERM is context sensitive, and I use as a DEROGATORY TERM! Got it?
> >> https://www.differencebetween.com/difference-between-term-and-vs-word/
> >>
> >> " All terms are words, but not all words are terms." Got it? ALL TERMS ARE WORDS!
> >>
> >> You have no chance here attempting to tell native English speakers what
> >> they are saying is wrong. No chance at all.
> >
> > TERM: a word or phrase used to describe a thing or to express a concept,
> > especially in a particular kind of language or branch of study.
> >
> > Paul got mad! Don't be mad, Paul. I'm not pretending to be a master in
> > the command of English. I'm 6/10 at my best, and only here,
> > dealing with technical posts.
> >
> > But there is something that supersedes the ability to manage native
> > language. It's called FUCKING LOGIC, which is INDEPENDENT of
> > the native language. Also, it comes together with analytical power.
>
> Because as long as he has his fearsome analytical power and whatever skills
> remain from his training, a retired engineer can outdo, outthink, outtalk
> anyone on any subject. It seems to be part of the secret handshake, a code
> of conduct and attitude appropriate for technical royalty.
>
> “Bow DOWN,” bellows the retired engineer. “I MADE things! I suffered under
> impossible specs and schedules for an entire career, while consumers
> thanklessly consumed the fruits of my toils. But now that I’m done with
> that, I demand RESPECT!”

“Bow DOWN,” bellows an idiot woodworkerer. “I'VE STUDIED!!! IVE STUDIED
my idiot guru!!! I suffered under his incredible idiocies for many years!!!
But now that I’m done with that, I demand RESPECT!”