On Monday, September 6, 2021 at 7:13:58 PM UTC-7, Serg io wrote:
> On 9/6/2021 8:55 PM, bwr fml wrote:
> > On Monday, September 6, 2021 at 4:46:56 PM UTC-7, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> >> On 9/6/2021 4:35 PM, Serg io wrote:
> >>> 61 + 62 = 42
> >>
> >> This is perplexing to me. ;^)
> >
> > -1/8*6+1+-1/8*6+2==4*-1/8+2
> >
> > so maybe it is somehow in base negative-one-eighth ;^}
> >
> quite true! how did you do that ?
>
> I find it very hard to do fractional or decimal Bases, not many calculators on line that do that

I just plodded along with the simplest algebra by hand
and solve to see if there is are one or more bases that makes that true.

base*6+1 + base*6+2 = base*4+2
so
12*base - 4*base = -1
so
8*base = -1

Now what the "digits" are in base -1/8, that is another question.

On Monday, 6 September 2021 at 23:36:14 UTC+3, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
> måndag 6 september 2021 kl. 22:24:43 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > On Monday, 6 September 2021 at 18:25:30 UTC+3, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > måndag 6 september 2021 kl. 16:42:00 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > > I promise that every dumb bastard on this newsgroup (including my filthy vile fellow Jew cunts!) are going to some day pay very dearly for the disrespect I experienced.
> > > >
> > > > It puzzles your peanut brains that I can be so intelligent and yet so discourteous to ALL you swine, does it not? Yes, I am more than just an enigma. I am a fucking genius like you couldn't even imagine because like that vile homosexual cunt Prof. Gilbert Strang of MIT, you are ALL just retarded. :)
> > > >
> > > > The New Calculus is just gaining popularity day after day. I am on the right of history. Everyone that has opposed me on this shit pile called sci.math will be assigned to the dustbin of history. I never forget and NEVER forgive. I change not.
> > > >
> > > > https://drive.google.com/file/d/1CIul68phzuOe6JZwsCuBuXUR8X-AkgEO/
> > > "vile Jew counts"
> > >
> > > "retards"
> > >
> > > Really, John?
> > Ask questions about math, not about the vile Jew cunt on this newsgroup.. I have nothing but the utmost contempt for them. As for you, stop being a stupid lackey and try to think for yourself.
> >
> > "42 <=> 42 is not logical" ??
> >
> > Are you insane? Really?
> >
> > If 42 <=> 42, then what the hell does 42 imply, you silly boy? LMAO.
> >
> > a <=> a is logical.
> >
> > Just as logical as [f(x+h)-f(x)]/h <=> f'(x) + Q(x,h).
> >
> > Do you want to be like that dumb Greek bastard from Crete university (Prof. Michalis Lambros)?
> >
> > He thinks the same way as you do. He looks like Hitler in his faculty photo. He acted like Hitler too when he banned me from the Greek forum:
> >
> > https://www.mathematica.gr/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=65422
> >
> > See, this is what happens when mainstream mathematics becomes a cult. No different from the Nazis.

> "42 <=> 42" is not a logical statement no? What truth value does "42" have?

42 = 4x10 + 2

It is TRUE.

42 cannot imply 32:

42 = 4x10 + 2 =/= 32 = 3x10 + 2

Sheesh. You're a prize idiot.

On Tuesday, 7 September 2021 at 02:03:19 UTC+3, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 9/6/2021 7:41 AM, Eram semper recta wrote:
> > I promise that every dumb bastard on this newsgroup (including my filthy vile fellow Jew cunts!) are going to some day pay very dearly for the disrespect I experienced.
> >
> > It puzzles your peanut brains that I can be so intelligent and yet so discourteous to ALL you swine, does it not? Yes, I am more than just an enigma. I am a fucking genius like you couldn't even imagine because like that vile homosexual cunt Prof. Gilbert Strang of MIT, you are ALL just retarded.. :)
> >
> > The New Calculus is just gaining popularity day after day. I am on the right of history. Everyone that has opposed me on this shit pile called sci..math will be assigned to the dustbin of history. I never forget and NEVER forgive. I change not.
> >
> > https://drive.google.com/file/d/1CIul68phzuOe6JZwsCuBuXUR8X-AkgEO/
> >
> Wow, what did the Jews ever do to you? Jesus!

I do not believe in Jesus. :)

I am a Jew and when I refer to vile Jews, the comment is mostly directed at the scum Jews that frequent this newsgroup.

tisdag 7 september 2021 kl. 08:50:17 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> On Tuesday, 7 September 2021 at 02:03:19 UTC+3, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> > On 9/6/2021 7:41 AM, Eram semper recta wrote:
> > > I promise that every dumb bastard on this newsgroup (including my filthy vile fellow Jew cunts!) are going to some day pay very dearly for the disrespect I experienced.
> > >
> > > It puzzles your peanut brains that I can be so intelligent and yet so discourteous to ALL you swine, does it not? Yes, I am more than just an enigma. I am a fucking genius like you couldn't even imagine because like that vile homosexual cunt Prof. Gilbert Strang of MIT, you are ALL just retarded. :)
> > >
> > > The New Calculus is just gaining popularity day after day. I am on the right of history. Everyone that has opposed me on this shit pile called sci.math will be assigned to the dustbin of history. I never forget and NEVER forgive. I change not.
> > >
> > > https://drive.google.com/file/d/1CIul68phzuOe6JZwsCuBuXUR8X-AkgEO/
> > >
> > Wow, what did the Jews ever do to you? Jesus!
> I do not believe in Jesus. :)
>
> I am a Jew and when I refer to vile Jews, the comment is mostly directed at the scum Jews that frequent this newsgroup.

You are still antisemitic and a bigot.

On Tuesday, 7 September 2021 at 11:17:40 UTC+3, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> tisdag 7 september 2021 kl. 08:50:17 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > On Tuesday, 7 September 2021 at 02:03:19 UTC+3, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> > > On 9/6/2021 7:41 AM, Eram semper recta wrote:
> > > > I promise that every dumb bastard on this newsgroup (including my filthy vile fellow Jew cunts!) are going to some day pay very dearly for the disrespect I experienced.
> > > >
> > > > It puzzles your peanut brains that I can be so intelligent and yet so discourteous to ALL you swine, does it not? Yes, I am more than just an enigma. I am a fucking genius like you couldn't even imagine because like that vile homosexual cunt Prof. Gilbert Strang of MIT, you are ALL just retarded. :)
> > > >
> > > > The New Calculus is just gaining popularity day after day. I am on the right of history. Everyone that has opposed me on this shit pile called sci.math will be assigned to the dustbin of history. I never forget and NEVER forgive. I change not.
> > > >
> > > > https://drive.google.com/file/d/1CIul68phzuOe6JZwsCuBuXUR8X-AkgEO/
> > > >
> > > Wow, what did the Jews ever do to you? Jesus!
> > I do not believe in Jesus. :)
> >
> > I am a Jew and when I refer to vile Jews, the comment is mostly directed at the scum Jews that frequent this newsgroup.
> You are still antisemitic and a bigot.

Not at all. To be antisemitic means to hate the Jewish race. I don't hate Jews. It would be illogical to hate an entire race just because a segment of them (arrogant, stupid American Jews) are scumbags. Chuckle.

Now I hated my father who was a Jew, but not because he was a Jew, but because he was a prize scumbag. LMAO.

Wanna try your libeling again, you dumb bastard?

On Tuesday, 7 September 2021 at 13:56:34 UTC+3, Eram semper recta wrote:
> On Tuesday, 7 September 2021 at 11:17:40 UTC+3, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > tisdag 7 september 2021 kl. 08:50:17 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > On Tuesday, 7 September 2021 at 02:03:19 UTC+3, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> > > > On 9/6/2021 7:41 AM, Eram semper recta wrote:
> > > > > I promise that every dumb bastard on this newsgroup (including my filthy vile fellow Jew cunts!) are going to some day pay very dearly for the disrespect I experienced.
> > > > >
> > > > > It puzzles your peanut brains that I can be so intelligent and yet so discourteous to ALL you swine, does it not? Yes, I am more than just an enigma. I am a fucking genius like you couldn't even imagine because like that vile homosexual cunt Prof. Gilbert Strang of MIT, you are ALL just retarded. :)
> > > > >
> > > > > The New Calculus is just gaining popularity day after day. I am on the right of history. Everyone that has opposed me on this shit pile called sci.math will be assigned to the dustbin of history. I never forget and NEVER forgive. I change not.
> > > > >
> > > > > https://drive.google.com/file/d/1CIul68phzuOe6JZwsCuBuXUR8X-AkgEO/
> > > > >
> > > > Wow, what did the Jews ever do to you? Jesus!
> > > I do not believe in Jesus. :)
> > >
> > > I am a Jew and when I refer to vile Jews, the comment is mostly directed at the scum Jews that frequent this newsgroup.
> > You are still antisemitic and a bigot.
> Not at all. To be antisemitic means to hate the Jewish race. I don't hate Jews. It would be illogical to hate an entire race just because a segment of them (arrogant, stupid American Jews) are scumbags. Chuckle.

I can give you several examples of shitty Jews of the diaspora:

Most CEOs who are Jews are scum
Bernie Madoff (deceased)
Stephen Miller (Trump's ex-advisor)
--> Here you can include all the Jew scum that voted for Trump
Owners of Basis Independent Schools in the USA
Vile shit the likes you find on this newsgroup

Need more examples? Chuckle.

>
> Now I hated my father who was a Jew, but not because he was a Jew, but because he was a prize scumbag. LMAO.
>
> Wanna try your libeling again, you dumb bastard?

tisdag 7 september 2021 kl. 12:56:34 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> On Tuesday, 7 September 2021 at 11:17:40 UTC+3, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > tisdag 7 september 2021 kl. 08:50:17 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > On Tuesday, 7 September 2021 at 02:03:19 UTC+3, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> > > > On 9/6/2021 7:41 AM, Eram semper recta wrote:
> > > > > I promise that every dumb bastard on this newsgroup (including my filthy vile fellow Jew cunts!) are going to some day pay very dearly for the disrespect I experienced.
> > > > >
> > > > > It puzzles your peanut brains that I can be so intelligent and yet so discourteous to ALL you swine, does it not? Yes, I am more than just an enigma. I am a fucking genius like you couldn't even imagine because like that vile homosexual cunt Prof. Gilbert Strang of MIT, you are ALL just retarded. :)
> > > > >
> > > > > The New Calculus is just gaining popularity day after day. I am on the right of history. Everyone that has opposed me on this shit pile called sci.math will be assigned to the dustbin of history. I never forget and NEVER forgive. I change not.
> > > > >
> > > > > https://drive.google.com/file/d/1CIul68phzuOe6JZwsCuBuXUR8X-AkgEO/
> > > > >
> > > > Wow, what did the Jews ever do to you? Jesus!
> > > I do not believe in Jesus. :)
> > >
> > > I am a Jew and when I refer to vile Jews, the comment is mostly directed at the scum Jews that frequent this newsgroup.
> > You are still antisemitic and a bigot.
> Not at all. To be antisemitic means to hate the Jewish race. I don't hate Jews. It would be illogical to hate an entire race just because a segment of them (arrogant, stupid American Jews) are scumbags. Chuckle.
>
> Now I hated my father who was a Jew, but not because he was a Jew, but because he was a prize scumbag. LMAO.
>
> Wanna try your libeling again, you dumb bastard?

When you call someone vile jew you clearly consider the adjective jew negative so you are anti-semitic.

tisdag 7 september 2021 kl. 08:48:51 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> On Monday, 6 September 2021 at 23:36:14 UTC+3, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
> > måndag 6 september 2021 kl. 22:24:43 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > On Monday, 6 September 2021 at 18:25:30 UTC+3, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > måndag 6 september 2021 kl. 16:42:00 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > > > I promise that every dumb bastard on this newsgroup (including my filthy vile fellow Jew cunts!) are going to some day pay very dearly for the disrespect I experienced.
> > > > >
> > > > > It puzzles your peanut brains that I can be so intelligent and yet so discourteous to ALL you swine, does it not? Yes, I am more than just an enigma. I am a fucking genius like you couldn't even imagine because like that vile homosexual cunt Prof. Gilbert Strang of MIT, you are ALL just retarded. :)
> > > > >
> > > > > The New Calculus is just gaining popularity day after day. I am on the right of history. Everyone that has opposed me on this shit pile called sci.math will be assigned to the dustbin of history. I never forget and NEVER forgive. I change not.
> > > > >
> > > > > https://drive.google.com/file/d/1CIul68phzuOe6JZwsCuBuXUR8X-AkgEO/
> > > > "vile Jew counts"
> > > >
> > > > "retards"
> > > >
> > > > Really, John?
> > > Ask questions about math, not about the vile Jew cunt on this newsgroup. I have nothing but the utmost contempt for them. As for you, stop being a stupid lackey and try to think for yourself.
> > >
> > > "42 <=> 42 is not logical" ??
> > >
> > > Are you insane? Really?
> > >
> > > If 42 <=> 42, then what the hell does 42 imply, you silly boy? LMAO..
> > >
> > > a <=> a is logical.
> > >
> > > Just as logical as [f(x+h)-f(x)]/h <=> f'(x) + Q(x,h).
> > >
> > > Do you want to be like that dumb Greek bastard from Crete university (Prof. Michalis Lambros)?
> > >
> > > He thinks the same way as you do. He looks like Hitler in his faculty photo. He acted like Hitler too when he banned me from the Greek forum:
> > >
> > > https://www.mathematica.gr/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=65422
> > >
> > > See, this is what happens when mainstream mathematics becomes a cult. No different from the Nazis.
>
> > "42 <=> 42" is not a logical statement no? What truth value does "42" have?
> 42 = 4x10 + 2
>
> It is TRUE.
>
> 42 cannot imply 32:
>
> 42 = 4x10 + 2 =/= 32 = 3x10 + 2
>
> Sheesh. You're a prize idiot.

"42 = 4x10 + 2" is a logical statement, "42" is not.

On Tuesday, 7 September 2021 at 17:50:41 UTC+3, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
> tisdag 7 september 2021 kl. 08:48:51 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > On Monday, 6 September 2021 at 23:36:14 UTC+3, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > måndag 6 september 2021 kl. 22:24:43 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > > On Monday, 6 September 2021 at 18:25:30 UTC+3, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > måndag 6 september 2021 kl. 16:42:00 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > > > > I promise that every dumb bastard on this newsgroup (including my filthy vile fellow Jew cunts!) are going to some day pay very dearly for the disrespect I experienced.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It puzzles your peanut brains that I can be so intelligent and yet so discourteous to ALL you swine, does it not? Yes, I am more than just an enigma. I am a fucking genius like you couldn't even imagine because like that vile homosexual cunt Prof. Gilbert Strang of MIT, you are ALL just retarded. :)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The New Calculus is just gaining popularity day after day. I am on the right of history. Everyone that has opposed me on this shit pile called sci.math will be assigned to the dustbin of history. I never forget and NEVER forgive. I change not.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://drive.google.com/file/d/1CIul68phzuOe6JZwsCuBuXUR8X-AkgEO/
> > > > > "vile Jew counts"
> > > > >
> > > > > "retards"
> > > > >
> > > > > Really, John?
> > > > Ask questions about math, not about the vile Jew cunt on this newsgroup. I have nothing but the utmost contempt for them. As for you, stop being a stupid lackey and try to think for yourself.
> > > >
> > > > "42 <=> 42 is not logical" ??
> > > >
> > > > Are you insane? Really?
> > > >
> > > > If 42 <=> 42, then what the hell does 42 imply, you silly boy? LMAO.
> > > >
> > > > a <=> a is logical.
> > > >
> > > > Just as logical as [f(x+h)-f(x)]/h <=> f'(x) + Q(x,h).
> > > >
> > > > Do you want to be like that dumb Greek bastard from Crete university (Prof. Michalis Lambros)?
> > > >
> > > > He thinks the same way as you do. He looks like Hitler in his faculty photo. He acted like Hitler too when he banned me from the Greek forum:
> > > >
> > > > https://www.mathematica.gr/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=65422
> > > >
> > > > See, this is what happens when mainstream mathematics becomes a cult. No different from the Nazis.
> >
> > > "42 <=> 42" is not a logical statement no? What truth value does "42" have?
> > 42 = 4x10 + 2
> >
> > It is TRUE.
> >
> > 42 cannot imply 32:
> >
> > 42 = 4x10 + 2 =/= 32 = 3x10 + 2
> >
> > Sheesh. You're a prize idiot.

> "42 = 4x10 + 2" is a logical statement, "42" is not.

Ooh! You just hammered a nail into your foot!

I can't believe you are this stupid! Tsk, tsk.

IF as you say "42 = 4x10 + 2" is a logical statement" THEN "42" is definitely a logical statement because it means "4x10 + 2".

x = x means x must be logical since it has a value. Tsk, tsk.

ROFLMAO.

On Tuesday, September 7, 2021 at 1:44:04 PM UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:

>
> IF as you say "42 = 4x10 + 2" is a logical statement" THEN "42" is definitely a logical statement

Jeez, yer dumb, Troll Boy!

42 is neither true nor false. It is NOT a logical statement. It is NUMBER! Get it? Didn't think so.

There is no way you ever started, never mind finished high school.

Dan

tisdag 7 september 2021 kl. 19:44:04 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> On Tuesday, 7 September 2021 at 17:50:41 UTC+3, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
> > tisdag 7 september 2021 kl. 08:48:51 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > On Monday, 6 September 2021 at 23:36:14 UTC+3, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > måndag 6 september 2021 kl. 22:24:43 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > > > On Monday, 6 September 2021 at 18:25:30 UTC+3, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > > måndag 6 september 2021 kl. 16:42:00 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > > > > > I promise that every dumb bastard on this newsgroup (including my filthy vile fellow Jew cunts!) are going to some day pay very dearly for the disrespect I experienced.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > It puzzles your peanut brains that I can be so intelligent and yet so discourteous to ALL you swine, does it not? Yes, I am more than just an enigma. I am a fucking genius like you couldn't even imagine because like that vile homosexual cunt Prof. Gilbert Strang of MIT, you are ALL just retarded. :)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The New Calculus is just gaining popularity day after day. I am on the right of history. Everyone that has opposed me on this shit pile called sci.math will be assigned to the dustbin of history. I never forget and NEVER forgive. I change not.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > https://drive.google.com/file/d/1CIul68phzuOe6JZwsCuBuXUR8X-AkgEO/
> > > > > > "vile Jew counts"
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "retards"
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Really, John?
> > > > > Ask questions about math, not about the vile Jew cunt on this newsgroup. I have nothing but the utmost contempt for them. As for you, stop being a stupid lackey and try to think for yourself.
> > > > >
> > > > > "42 <=> 42 is not logical" ??
> > > > >
> > > > > Are you insane? Really?
> > > > >
> > > > > If 42 <=> 42, then what the hell does 42 imply, you silly boy? LMAO.
> > > > >
> > > > > a <=> a is logical.
> > > > >
> > > > > Just as logical as [f(x+h)-f(x)]/h <=> f'(x) + Q(x,h).
> > > > >
> > > > > Do you want to be like that dumb Greek bastard from Crete university (Prof. Michalis Lambros)?
> > > > >
> > > > > He thinks the same way as you do. He looks like Hitler in his faculty photo. He acted like Hitler too when he banned me from the Greek forum:
> > > > >
> > > > > https://www.mathematica.gr/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=65422
> > > > >
> > > > > See, this is what happens when mainstream mathematics becomes a cult. No different from the Nazis.
> > >
> > > > "42 <=> 42" is not a logical statement no? What truth value does "42" have?
> > > 42 = 4x10 + 2
> > >
> > > It is TRUE.
> > >
> > > 42 cannot imply 32:
> > >
> > > 42 = 4x10 + 2 =/= 32 = 3x10 + 2
> > >
> > > Sheesh. You're a prize idiot.
>
> > "42 = 4x10 + 2" is a logical statement, "42" is not.
> Ooh! You just hammered a nail into your foot!
>
> I can't believe you are this stupid! Tsk, tsk.
>
> IF as you say "42 = 4x10 + 2" is a logical statement" THEN "42" is definitely a logical statement because it means "4x10 + 2".
>
> x = x means x must be logical since it has a value. Tsk, tsk.
>
> ROFLMAO.
42 is a number. It has no truth value. An equality has a truth value.

On Tuesday, September 7, 2021 at 10:26:53 PM UTC+3, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
> tisdag 7 september 2021 kl. 19:44:04 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > On Tuesday, 7 September 2021 at 17:50:41 UTC+3, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > tisdag 7 september 2021 kl. 08:48:51 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > > On Monday, 6 September 2021 at 23:36:14 UTC+3, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > måndag 6 september 2021 kl. 22:24:43 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > > > > On Monday, 6 September 2021 at 18:25:30 UTC+3, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > > > måndag 6 september 2021 kl. 16:42:00 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > > > > > > I promise that every dumb bastard on this newsgroup (including my filthy vile fellow Jew cunts!) are going to some day pay very dearly for the disrespect I experienced.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > It puzzles your peanut brains that I can be so intelligent and yet so discourteous to ALL you swine, does it not? Yes, I am more than just an enigma. I am a fucking genius like you couldn't even imagine because like that vile homosexual cunt Prof. Gilbert Strang of MIT, you are ALL just retarded. :)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The New Calculus is just gaining popularity day after day. I am on the right of history. Everyone that has opposed me on this shit pile called sci.math will be assigned to the dustbin of history. I never forget and NEVER forgive. I change not.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > https://drive.google.com/file/d/1CIul68phzuOe6JZwsCuBuXUR8X-AkgEO/
> > > > > > > "vile Jew counts"
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > "retards"
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Really, John?
> > > > > > Ask questions about math, not about the vile Jew cunt on this newsgroup. I have nothing but the utmost contempt for them. As for you, stop being a stupid lackey and try to think for yourself.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "42 <=> 42 is not logical" ??
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Are you insane? Really?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If 42 <=> 42, then what the hell does 42 imply, you silly boy? LMAO.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > a <=> a is logical.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Just as logical as [f(x+h)-f(x)]/h <=> f'(x) + Q(x,h).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Do you want to be like that dumb Greek bastard from Crete university (Prof. Michalis Lambros)?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > He thinks the same way as you do. He looks like Hitler in his faculty photo. He acted like Hitler too when he banned me from the Greek forum:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://www.mathematica.gr/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=65422
> > > > > >
> > > > > > See, this is what happens when mainstream mathematics becomes a cult. No different from the Nazis.
> > > >
> > > > > "42 <=> 42" is not a logical statement no? What truth value does "42" have?
> > > > 42 = 4x10 + 2
> > > >
> > > > It is TRUE.
> > > >
> > > > 42 cannot imply 32:
> > > >
> > > > 42 = 4x10 + 2 =/= 32 = 3x10 + 2
> > > >
> > > > Sheesh. You're a prize idiot.
> >
> > > "42 = 4x10 + 2" is a logical statement, "42" is not.
> > Ooh! You just hammered a nail into your foot!
> >
> > I can't believe you are this stupid! Tsk, tsk.
> >
> > IF as you say "42 = 4x10 + 2" is a logical statement" THEN "42" is definitely a logical statement because it means "4x10 + 2".
> >
> > x = x means x must be logical since it has a value. Tsk, tsk.
> >
> > ROFLMAO.
> 42 is a number. It has no truth value. An equality has a truth value.

It does not need to have a "truth value", you idiot. It is a logical statement.

What's obviously hilarious is that you claim "42 = 4x10 + 2" is a logical statement" and deny that "[f(x+h)-f(x)]/h=f'(x) + Q(x,h)" is a logical statement.

You can't get more cranky than this! LMAO.

On 9/6/2021 6:55 PM, bwr fml wrote:
> On Monday, September 6, 2021 at 4:46:56 PM UTC-7, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>> On 9/6/2021 4:35 PM, Serg io wrote:
>>> 61 + 62 = 42
>>
>> This is perplexing to me. ;^)
>
> -1/8*6+1+-1/8*6+2==4*-1/8+2
>
> so maybe it is somehow in base negative-one-eighth ;^}
>

Indeed! :^D

1.5 = 1.5

On 9/6/2021 7:09 PM, Serg io wrote:
> On 9/6/2021 6:46 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>> On 9/6/2021 4:35 PM, Serg io wrote:
>>> 61 + 62 = 42
>>
>> This is perplexing to me. ;^)
>
>
> ha, lost 2 carrots ^^ => 6^1 + 6^2 = 4^2
>

Shit happens. :^)

tisdag 7 september 2021 kl. 22:12:39 UTC+2 skrev New Age Prophet:
> On Tuesday, September 7, 2021 at 10:26:53 PM UTC+3, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
> > tisdag 7 september 2021 kl. 19:44:04 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > On Tuesday, 7 September 2021 at 17:50:41 UTC+3, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > tisdag 7 september 2021 kl. 08:48:51 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > > > On Monday, 6 September 2021 at 23:36:14 UTC+3, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > > måndag 6 september 2021 kl. 22:24:43 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > > > > > On Monday, 6 September 2021 at 18:25:30 UTC+3, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > > > > måndag 6 september 2021 kl. 16:42:00 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > > > > > > > I promise that every dumb bastard on this newsgroup (including my filthy vile fellow Jew cunts!) are going to some day pay very dearly for the disrespect I experienced.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > It puzzles your peanut brains that I can be so intelligent and yet so discourteous to ALL you swine, does it not? Yes, I am more than just an enigma. I am a fucking genius like you couldn't even imagine because like that vile homosexual cunt Prof. Gilbert Strang of MIT, you are ALL just retarded. :)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The New Calculus is just gaining popularity day after day.. I am on the right of history. Everyone that has opposed me on this shit pile called sci.math will be assigned to the dustbin of history. I never forget and NEVER forgive. I change not.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > https://drive.google.com/file/d/1CIul68phzuOe6JZwsCuBuXUR8X-AkgEO/
> > > > > > > > "vile Jew counts"
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > "retards"
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Really, John?
> > > > > > > Ask questions about math, not about the vile Jew cunt on this newsgroup. I have nothing but the utmost contempt for them. As for you, stop being a stupid lackey and try to think for yourself.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > "42 <=> 42 is not logical" ??
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Are you insane? Really?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > If 42 <=> 42, then what the hell does 42 imply, you silly boy? LMAO.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > a <=> a is logical.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Just as logical as [f(x+h)-f(x)]/h <=> f'(x) + Q(x,h).
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Do you want to be like that dumb Greek bastard from Crete university (Prof. Michalis Lambros)?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > He thinks the same way as you do. He looks like Hitler in his faculty photo. He acted like Hitler too when he banned me from the Greek forum:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > https://www.mathematica.gr/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=65422
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > See, this is what happens when mainstream mathematics becomes a cult. No different from the Nazis.
> > > > >
> > > > > > "42 <=> 42" is not a logical statement no? What truth value does "42" have?
> > > > > 42 = 4x10 + 2
> > > > >
> > > > > It is TRUE.
> > > > >
> > > > > 42 cannot imply 32:
> > > > >
> > > > > 42 = 4x10 + 2 =/= 32 = 3x10 + 2
> > > > >
> > > > > Sheesh. You're a prize idiot.
> > >
> > > > "42 = 4x10 + 2" is a logical statement, "42" is not.
> > > Ooh! You just hammered a nail into your foot!
> > >
> > > I can't believe you are this stupid! Tsk, tsk.
> > >
> > > IF as you say "42 = 4x10 + 2" is a logical statement" THEN "42" is definitely a logical statement because it means "4x10 + 2".
> > >
> > > x = x means x must be logical since it has a value. Tsk, tsk.
> > >
> > > ROFLMAO.
> > 42 is a number. It has no truth value. An equality has a truth value.
> It does not need to have a "truth value", you idiot. It is a logical statement.
>
> What's obviously hilarious is that you claim "42 = 4x10 + 2" is a logical statement" and deny that "[f(x+h)-f(x)]/h=f'(x) + Q(x,h)" is a logical statement.
>
> You can't get more cranky than this! LMAO.

"[f(x+h)-f(x)]/h=f'(x) + Q(x,h)" is a logical statement.

On Tuesday, 7 September 2021 at 23:56:44 UTC+3, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
> tisdag 7 september 2021 kl. 22:12:39 UTC+2 skrev New Age Prophet:
> > On Tuesday, September 7, 2021 at 10:26:53 PM UTC+3, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > tisdag 7 september 2021 kl. 19:44:04 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > > On Tuesday, 7 September 2021 at 17:50:41 UTC+3, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > tisdag 7 september 2021 kl. 08:48:51 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > > > > On Monday, 6 September 2021 at 23:36:14 UTC+3, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > > > måndag 6 september 2021 kl. 22:24:43 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > > > > > > On Monday, 6 September 2021 at 18:25:30 UTC+3, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > > > > > måndag 6 september 2021 kl. 16:42:00 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > > > > > > > > I promise that every dumb bastard on this newsgroup (including my filthy vile fellow Jew cunts!) are going to some day pay very dearly for the disrespect I experienced.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > It puzzles your peanut brains that I can be so intelligent and yet so discourteous to ALL you swine, does it not? Yes, I am more than just an enigma. I am a fucking genius like you couldn't even imagine because like that vile homosexual cunt Prof. Gilbert Strang of MIT, you are ALL just retarded. :)
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > The New Calculus is just gaining popularity day after day. I am on the right of history. Everyone that has opposed me on this shit pile called sci.math will be assigned to the dustbin of history. I never forget and NEVER forgive. I change not.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > https://drive.google.com/file/d/1CIul68phzuOe6JZwsCuBuXUR8X-AkgEO/
> > > > > > > > > "vile Jew counts"
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > "retards"
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Really, John?
> > > > > > > > Ask questions about math, not about the vile Jew cunt on this newsgroup. I have nothing but the utmost contempt for them. As for you, stop being a stupid lackey and try to think for yourself.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > "42 <=> 42 is not logical" ??
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Are you insane? Really?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > If 42 <=> 42, then what the hell does 42 imply, you silly boy? LMAO.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > a <=> a is logical.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Just as logical as [f(x+h)-f(x)]/h <=> f'(x) + Q(x,h).
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Do you want to be like that dumb Greek bastard from Crete university (Prof. Michalis Lambros)?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > He thinks the same way as you do. He looks like Hitler in his faculty photo. He acted like Hitler too when he banned me from the Greek forum:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > https://www.mathematica.gr/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=65422
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > See, this is what happens when mainstream mathematics becomes a cult. No different from the Nazis.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > "42 <=> 42" is not a logical statement no? What truth value does "42" have?
> > > > > > 42 = 4x10 + 2
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It is TRUE.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 42 cannot imply 32:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 42 = 4x10 + 2 =/= 32 = 3x10 + 2
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Sheesh. You're a prize idiot.
> > > >
> > > > > "42 = 4x10 + 2" is a logical statement, "42" is not.
> > > > Ooh! You just hammered a nail into your foot!
> > > >
> > > > I can't believe you are this stupid! Tsk, tsk.
> > > >
> > > > IF as you say "42 = 4x10 + 2" is a logical statement" THEN "42" is definitely a logical statement because it means "4x10 + 2".
> > > >
> > > > x = x means x must be logical since it has a value. Tsk, tsk.
> > > >
> > > > ROFLMAO.
> > > 42 is a number. It has no truth value. An equality has a truth value.
> > It does not need to have a "truth value", you idiot. It is a logical statement.
> >
> > What's obviously hilarious is that you claim "42 = 4x10 + 2" is a logical statement" and deny that "[f(x+h)-f(x)]/h=f'(x) + Q(x,h)" is a logical statement.
> >
> > You can't get more cranky than this! LMAO.
>
"[f(x+h)-f(x)]/h=f'(x) + Q(x,h)" is NOT a logical statement.

onsdag 8 september 2021 kl. 14:27:08 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> On Tuesday, 7 September 2021 at 23:56:44 UTC+3, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
> > tisdag 7 september 2021 kl. 22:12:39 UTC+2 skrev New Age Prophet:
> > > On Tuesday, September 7, 2021 at 10:26:53 PM UTC+3, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > tisdag 7 september 2021 kl. 19:44:04 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > > > On Tuesday, 7 September 2021 at 17:50:41 UTC+3, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > > tisdag 7 september 2021 kl. 08:48:51 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > > > > > On Monday, 6 September 2021 at 23:36:14 UTC+3, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > > > > måndag 6 september 2021 kl. 22:24:43 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > > > > > > > On Monday, 6 September 2021 at 18:25:30 UTC+3, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > måndag 6 september 2021 kl. 16:42:00 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > > > > > > > > > I promise that every dumb bastard on this newsgroup (including my filthy vile fellow Jew cunts!) are going to some day pay very dearly for the disrespect I experienced.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > It puzzles your peanut brains that I can be so intelligent and yet so discourteous to ALL you swine, does it not? Yes, I am more than just an enigma. I am a fucking genius like you couldn't even imagine because like that vile homosexual cunt Prof. Gilbert Strang of MIT, you are ALL just retarded. :)
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > The New Calculus is just gaining popularity day after day. I am on the right of history. Everyone that has opposed me on this shit pile called sci.math will be assigned to the dustbin of history. I never forget and NEVER forgive. I change not.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > https://drive.google.com/file/d/1CIul68phzuOe6JZwsCuBuXUR8X-AkgEO/
> > > > > > > > > > "vile Jew counts"
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > "retards"
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Really, John?
> > > > > > > > > Ask questions about math, not about the vile Jew cunt on this newsgroup. I have nothing but the utmost contempt for them. As for you, stop being a stupid lackey and try to think for yourself.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > "42 <=> 42 is not logical" ??
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Are you insane? Really?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > If 42 <=> 42, then what the hell does 42 imply, you silly boy? LMAO.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > a <=> a is logical.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Just as logical as [f(x+h)-f(x)]/h <=> f'(x) + Q(x,h).
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Do you want to be like that dumb Greek bastard from Crete university (Prof. Michalis Lambros)?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > He thinks the same way as you do. He looks like Hitler in his faculty photo. He acted like Hitler too when he banned me from the Greek forum:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > https://www.mathematica.gr/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=65422
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > See, this is what happens when mainstream mathematics becomes a cult. No different from the Nazis.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > "42 <=> 42" is not a logical statement no? What truth value does "42" have?
> > > > > > > 42 = 4x10 + 2
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > It is TRUE.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 42 cannot imply 32:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 42 = 4x10 + 2 =/= 32 = 3x10 + 2
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Sheesh. You're a prize idiot.
> > > > >
> > > > > > "42 = 4x10 + 2" is a logical statement, "42" is not.
> > > > > Ooh! You just hammered a nail into your foot!
> > > > >
> > > > > I can't believe you are this stupid! Tsk, tsk.
> > > > >
> > > > > IF as you say "42 = 4x10 + 2" is a logical statement" THEN "42" is definitely a logical statement because it means "4x10 + 2".
> > > > >
> > > > > x = x means x must be logical since it has a value. Tsk, tsk.
> > > > >
> > > > > ROFLMAO.
> > > > 42 is a number. It has no truth value. An equality has a truth value.
> > > It does not need to have a "truth value", you idiot. It is a logical statement.
> > >
> > > What's obviously hilarious is that you claim "42 = 4x10 + 2" is a logical statement" and deny that "[f(x+h)-f(x)]/h=f'(x) + Q(x,h)" is a logical statement.
> > >
> > > You can't get more cranky than this! LMAO.
> >
> "[f(x+h)-f(x)]/h=f'(x) + Q(x,h)" is NOT a logical statement.
Well, it is. It's just that "[f(x+h)-f(x)]/h <--> f'(x) + Q(x,h)" isn't. Come on, you're just strawmanning now. I didn't say that.

On Wednesday, September 8, 2021 at 4:08:57 PM UTC+3, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
> onsdag 8 september 2021 kl. 14:27:08 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > On Tuesday, 7 September 2021 at 23:56:44 UTC+3, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > tisdag 7 september 2021 kl. 22:12:39 UTC+2 skrev New Age Prophet:
> > > > On Tuesday, September 7, 2021 at 10:26:53 PM UTC+3, markus...@gmail..com wrote:
> > > > > tisdag 7 september 2021 kl. 19:44:04 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > > > > On Tuesday, 7 September 2021 at 17:50:41 UTC+3, markus...@gmail..com wrote:
> > > > > > > tisdag 7 september 2021 kl. 08:48:51 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > > > > > > On Monday, 6 September 2021 at 23:36:14 UTC+3, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > > > > > måndag 6 september 2021 kl. 22:24:43 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > > > > > > > > On Monday, 6 September 2021 at 18:25:30 UTC+3, markus....@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > måndag 6 september 2021 kl. 16:42:00 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > > > > > > > > > > I promise that every dumb bastard on this newsgroup (including my filthy vile fellow Jew cunts!) are going to some day pay very dearly for the disrespect I experienced.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > It puzzles your peanut brains that I can be so intelligent and yet so discourteous to ALL you swine, does it not? Yes, I am more than just an enigma. I am a fucking genius like you couldn't even imagine because like that vile homosexual cunt Prof. Gilbert Strang of MIT, you are ALL just retarded. :)
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > The New Calculus is just gaining popularity day after day. I am on the right of history. Everyone that has opposed me on this shit pile called sci.math will be assigned to the dustbin of history. I never forget and NEVER forgive. I change not.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > https://drive.google.com/file/d/1CIul68phzuOe6JZwsCuBuXUR8X-AkgEO/
> > > > > > > > > > > "vile Jew counts"
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > "retards"
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Really, John?
> > > > > > > > > > Ask questions about math, not about the vile Jew cunt on this newsgroup. I have nothing but the utmost contempt for them. As for you, stop being a stupid lackey and try to think for yourself.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > "42 <=> 42 is not logical" ??
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Are you insane? Really?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > If 42 <=> 42, then what the hell does 42 imply, you silly boy? LMAO.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > a <=> a is logical.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Just as logical as [f(x+h)-f(x)]/h <=> f'(x) + Q(x,h)..
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Do you want to be like that dumb Greek bastard from Crete university (Prof. Michalis Lambros)?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > He thinks the same way as you do. He looks like Hitler in his faculty photo. He acted like Hitler too when he banned me from the Greek forum:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > https://www.mathematica.gr/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=65422
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > See, this is what happens when mainstream mathematics becomes a cult. No different from the Nazis.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > "42 <=> 42" is not a logical statement no? What truth value does "42" have?
> > > > > > > > 42 = 4x10 + 2
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > It is TRUE.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 42 cannot imply 32:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 42 = 4x10 + 2 =/= 32 = 3x10 + 2
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Sheesh. You're a prize idiot.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > "42 = 4x10 + 2" is a logical statement, "42" is not.
> > > > > > Ooh! You just hammered a nail into your foot!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I can't believe you are this stupid! Tsk, tsk.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > IF as you say "42 = 4x10 + 2" is a logical statement" THEN "42" is definitely a logical statement because it means "4x10 + 2".
> > > > > >
> > > > > > x = x means x must be logical since it has a value. Tsk, tsk.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ROFLMAO.
> > > > > 42 is a number. It has no truth value. An equality has a truth value.
> > > > It does not need to have a "truth value", you idiot. It is a logical statement.
> > > >
> > > > What's obviously hilarious is that you claim "42 = 4x10 + 2" is a logical statement" and deny that "[f(x+h)-f(x)]/h=f'(x) + Q(x,h)" is a logical statement.
> > > >
> > > > You can't get more cranky than this! LMAO.
> > >
> > "[f(x+h)-f(x)]/h=f'(x) + Q(x,h)" is NOT a logical statement.
> Well, it is. It's just that "[f(x+h)-f(x)]/h <--> f'(x) + Q(x,h)" isn't.

"[f(x+h)-f(x)]/h=f'(x) + Q(x,h)" is most definitely the same as "[f(x+h)-f(x)]/h <=> f'(x) + Q(x,h)".

Kindergarten example:

4+3 => 2 + 5 AND 2+5 => 4+3

4+3 <=> 2+5

You keep making a fool of yourself, but that's what cranks and trolls do. It's their modus operandi.

Grow a brain, idiot!!!

On 9/7/2021 3:12 PM, New Age Prophet wrote:
> On Tuesday, September 7, 2021 at 10:26:53 PM UTC+3, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
>> tisdag 7 september 2021 kl. 19:44:04 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
>>> On Tuesday, 7 September 2021 at 17:50:41 UTC+3, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>> tisdag 7 september 2021 kl. 08:48:51 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
>>>>> On Monday, 6 September 2021 at 23:36:14 UTC+3, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>> måndag 6 september 2021 kl. 22:24:43 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
>>>>>>> On Monday, 6 September 2021 at 18:25:30 UTC+3, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>> måndag 6 september 2021 kl. 16:42:00 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
>>>>>>>>> I promise that every dumb bastard on this newsgroup (including my filthy vile fellow Jew cunts!) are going to some day pay very dearly for the disrespect I experienced.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It puzzles your peanut brains that I can be so intelligent and yet so discourteous to ALL you swine, does it not? Yes, I am more than just an enigma. I am a fucking genius like you couldn't even imagine because like that vile homosexual cunt Prof. Gilbert Strang of MIT, you are ALL just retarded. :)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The New Calculus is just gaining popularity day after day. I am on the right of history. Everyone that has opposed me on this shit pile called sci.math will be assigned to the dustbin of history. I never forget and NEVER forgive. I change not.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1CIul68phzuOe6JZwsCuBuXUR8X-AkgEO/
>>>>>>>> "vile Jew counts"
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "retards"
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Really, John?
>>>>>>> Ask questions about math, not about the vile Jew cunt on this newsgroup. I have nothing but the utmost contempt for them. As for you, stop being a stupid lackey and try to think for yourself.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "42 <=> 42 is not logical" ??
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Are you insane? Really?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If 42 <=> 42, then what the hell does 42 imply, you silly boy? LMAO.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> a <=> a is logical.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Just as logical as [f(x+h)-f(x)]/h <=> f'(x) + Q(x,h).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Do you want to be like that dumb Greek bastard from Crete university (Prof. Michalis Lambros)?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> He thinks the same way as you do. He looks like Hitler in his faculty photo. He acted like Hitler too when he banned me from the Greek forum:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://www.mathematica.gr/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=65422
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> See, this is what happens when mainstream mathematics becomes a cult. No different from the Nazis.
>>>>>
>>>>>> "42 <=> 42" is not a logical statement no? What truth value does "42" have?
>>>>> 42 = 4x10 + 2
>>>>>
>>>>> It is TRUE.
>>>>>
>>>>> 42 cannot imply 32:
>>>>>
>>>>> 42 = 4x10 + 2 =/= 32 = 3x10 + 2
>>>>>
>>>>> Sheesh. You're a prize idiot.
>>>
>>>> "42 = 4x10 + 2" is a logical statement, "42" is not.
>>> Ooh! You just hammered a nail into your foot!
>>>
>>> I can't believe you are this stupid! Tsk, tsk.
>>>
>>> IF as you say "42 = 4x10 + 2" is a logical statement" THEN "42" is definitely a logical statement because it means "4x10 + 2".
>>>
>>> x = x means x must be logical since it has a value. Tsk, tsk.
>>>
>>> ROFLMAO.
>> 42 is a number. It has no truth value. An equality has a truth value.
>
> It does not need to have a "truth value", you idiot. It is a logical statement.
>
> What's obviously hilarious is that you claim "42 = 4x10 + 2" is a logical statement" and deny that "[f(x+h)-f(x)]/h=f'(x) +

QUACK FUNCTION = > Q(x,h)"

is a logical statement.
>
> You can't get more cranky than this! LMAO.
>

onsdag 8 september 2021 kl. 18:00:52 UTC+2 skrev New Age Prophet:
> On Wednesday, September 8, 2021 at 4:08:57 PM UTC+3, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
> > onsdag 8 september 2021 kl. 14:27:08 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > On Tuesday, 7 September 2021 at 23:56:44 UTC+3, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > tisdag 7 september 2021 kl. 22:12:39 UTC+2 skrev New Age Prophet:
> > > > > On Tuesday, September 7, 2021 at 10:26:53 PM UTC+3, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > > tisdag 7 september 2021 kl. 19:44:04 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > > > > > On Tuesday, 7 September 2021 at 17:50:41 UTC+3, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > > > > tisdag 7 september 2021 kl. 08:48:51 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > > > > > > > On Monday, 6 September 2021 at 23:36:14 UTC+3, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > måndag 6 september 2021 kl. 22:24:43 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > > > > > > > > > On Monday, 6 September 2021 at 18:25:30 UTC+3, markus....@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > måndag 6 september 2021 kl. 16:42:00 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > I promise that every dumb bastard on this newsgroup (including my filthy vile fellow Jew cunts!) are going to some day pay very dearly for the disrespect I experienced.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > It puzzles your peanut brains that I can be so intelligent and yet so discourteous to ALL you swine, does it not? Yes, I am more than just an enigma. I am a fucking genius like you couldn't even imagine because like that vile homosexual cunt Prof. Gilbert Strang of MIT, you are ALL just retarded. :)
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > The New Calculus is just gaining popularity day after day. I am on the right of history. Everyone that has opposed me on this shit pile called sci.math will be assigned to the dustbin of history. I never forget and NEVER forgive. I change not.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > https://drive.google.com/file/d/1CIul68phzuOe6JZwsCuBuXUR8X-AkgEO/
> > > > > > > > > > > > "vile Jew counts"
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > "retards"
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Really, John?
> > > > > > > > > > > Ask questions about math, not about the vile Jew cunt on this newsgroup. I have nothing but the utmost contempt for them. As for you, stop being a stupid lackey and try to think for yourself.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > "42 <=> 42 is not logical" ??
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Are you insane? Really?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > If 42 <=> 42, then what the hell does 42 imply, you silly boy? LMAO.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > a <=> a is logical.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Just as logical as [f(x+h)-f(x)]/h <=> f'(x) + Q(x,h).
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Do you want to be like that dumb Greek bastard from Crete university (Prof. Michalis Lambros)?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > He thinks the same way as you do. He looks like Hitler in his faculty photo. He acted like Hitler too when he banned me from the Greek forum:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > https://www.mathematica.gr/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=65422
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > See, this is what happens when mainstream mathematics becomes a cult. No different from the Nazis.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > "42 <=> 42" is not a logical statement no? What truth value does "42" have?
> > > > > > > > > 42 = 4x10 + 2
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > It is TRUE.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 42 cannot imply 32:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 42 = 4x10 + 2 =/= 32 = 3x10 + 2
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Sheesh. You're a prize idiot.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > "42 = 4x10 + 2" is a logical statement, "42" is not.
> > > > > > > Ooh! You just hammered a nail into your foot!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I can't believe you are this stupid! Tsk, tsk.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > IF as you say "42 = 4x10 + 2" is a logical statement" THEN "42" is definitely a logical statement because it means "4x10 + 2".
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > x = x means x must be logical since it has a value. Tsk, tsk.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ROFLMAO.
> > > > > > 42 is a number. It has no truth value. An equality has a truth value.
> > > > > It does not need to have a "truth value", you idiot. It is a logical statement.
> > > > >
> > > > > What's obviously hilarious is that you claim "42 = 4x10 + 2" is a logical statement" and deny that "[f(x+h)-f(x)]/h=f'(x) + Q(x,h)" is a logical statement.
> > > > >
> > > > > You can't get more cranky than this! LMAO.
> > > >
> > > "[f(x+h)-f(x)]/h=f'(x) + Q(x,h)" is NOT a logical statement.
> > Well, it is. It's just that "[f(x+h)-f(x)]/h <--> f'(x) + Q(x,h)" isn't..
> "[f(x+h)-f(x)]/h=f'(x) + Q(x,h)" is most definitely the same as "[f(x+h)-f(x)]/h <=> f'(x) + Q(x,h)".
>
> Kindergarten example:
>
> 4+3 => 2 + 5 AND 2+5 => 4+3
>
> 4+3 <=> 2+5
>
> You keep making a fool of yourself, but that's what cranks and trolls do. It's their modus operandi.
>
> Grow a brain, idiot!!!

"4+3 <=> 2+5" is a nonsensical statement. "4+3=2+5" is a logical statement.

markus...@gmail.com wrote:
> onsdag 8 september 2021 kl. 18:00:52 UTC+2 skrev New Age Prophet:
>> On Wednesday, September 8, 2021 at 4:08:57 PM UTC+3, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> onsdag 8 september 2021 kl. 14:27:08 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
>>>> On Tuesday, 7 September 2021 at 23:56:44 UTC+3, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>> tisdag 7 september 2021 kl. 22:12:39 UTC+2 skrev New Age Prophet:
>>>>>> On Tuesday, September 7, 2021 at 10:26:53 PM UTC+3, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>> tisdag 7 september 2021 kl. 19:44:04 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, 7 September 2021 at 17:50:41 UTC+3, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>> tisdag 7 september 2021 kl. 08:48:51 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, 6 September 2021 at 23:36:14 UTC+3, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> måndag 6 september 2021 kl. 22:24:43 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, 6 September 2021 at 18:25:30 UTC+3, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> måndag 6 september 2021 kl. 16:42:00 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I promise that every dumb bastard on this newsgroup (including my filthy vile fellow Jew cunts!) are going to some day pay very dearly for the disrespect I experienced.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It puzzles your peanut brains that I can be so intelligent and yet so discourteous to ALL you swine, does it not? Yes, I am more than just an enigma. I am a fucking genius like you couldn't even imagine because like that vile homosexual cunt Prof. Gilbert Strang of MIT, you are ALL just retarded. :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The New Calculus is just gaining popularity day after day. I am on the right of history. Everyone that has opposed me on this shit pile called sci.math will be assigned to the dustbin of history. I never forget and NEVER forgive. I change not.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1CIul68phzuOe6JZwsCuBuXUR8X-AkgEO/
>>>>>>>>>>>>> "vile Jew counts"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> "retards"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Really, John?
>>>>>>>>>>>> Ask questions about math, not about the vile Jew cunt on this newsgroup. I have nothing but the utmost contempt for them. As for you, stop being a stupid lackey and try to think for yourself.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> "42 <=> 42 is not logical" ??
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you insane? Really?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> If 42 <=> 42, then what the hell does 42 imply, you silly boy? LMAO.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> a <=> a is logical.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Just as logical as [f(x+h)-f(x)]/h <=> f'(x) + Q(x,h).
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you want to be like that dumb Greek bastard from Crete university (Prof. Michalis Lambros)?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> He thinks the same way as you do. He looks like Hitler in his faculty photo. He acted like Hitler too when he banned me from the Greek forum:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.mathematica.gr/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=65422
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> See, this is what happens when mainstream mathematics becomes a cult. No different from the Nazis.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> "42 <=> 42" is not a logical statement no? What truth value does "42" have?
>>>>>>>>>> 42 = 4x10 + 2
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It is TRUE.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 42 cannot imply 32:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 42 = 4x10 + 2 =/= 32 = 3x10 + 2
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Sheesh. You're a prize idiot.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "42 = 4x10 + 2" is a logical statement, "42" is not.
>>>>>>>> Ooh! You just hammered a nail into your foot!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I can't believe you are this stupid! Tsk, tsk.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> IF as you say "42 = 4x10 + 2" is a logical statement" THEN "42" is definitely a logical statement because it means "4x10 + 2".
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> x = x means x must be logical since it has a value. Tsk, tsk.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ROFLMAO.
>>>>>>> 42 is a number. It has no truth value. An equality has a truth value.
>>>>>> It does not need to have a "truth value", you idiot. It is a logical statement.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What's obviously hilarious is that you claim "42 = 4x10 + 2" is a logical statement" and deny that "[f(x+h)-f(x)]/h=f'(x) + Q(x,h)" is a logical statement.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You can't get more cranky than this! LMAO.
>>>>>
>>>> "[f(x+h)-f(x)]/h=f'(x) + Q(x,h)" is NOT a logical statement.
>>> Well, it is. It's just that "[f(x+h)-f(x)]/h <--> f'(x) + Q(x,h)" isn't.
>> "[f(x+h)-f(x)]/h=f'(x) + Q(x,h)" is most definitely the same as "[f(x+h)-f(x)]/h <=> f'(x) + Q(x,h)".
>>
>> Kindergarten example:
>>
>> 4+3 => 2 + 5 AND 2+5 => 4+3
>>
>> 4+3 <=> 2+5
>>
>> You keep making a fool of yourself, but that's what cranks and trolls do. It's their modus operandi.
>>
>> Grow a brain, idiot!!!
>
> "4+3 <=> 2+5" is a nonsensical statement. "4+3=2+5" is a logical statement.

Did you notice too that John is more mentally insane than usual
(suprisingly enough it is possible!)? Not a good sign. He won't
last long.

On Wednesday, 8 September 2021 at 21:33:08 UTC+3, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
> onsdag 8 september 2021 kl. 18:00:52 UTC+2 skrev New Age Prophet:
> > On Wednesday, September 8, 2021 at 4:08:57 PM UTC+3, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > onsdag 8 september 2021 kl. 14:27:08 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > > On Tuesday, 7 September 2021 at 23:56:44 UTC+3, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > tisdag 7 september 2021 kl. 22:12:39 UTC+2 skrev New Age Prophet:
> > > > > > On Tuesday, September 7, 2021 at 10:26:53 PM UTC+3, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > > > tisdag 7 september 2021 kl. 19:44:04 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > > > > > > On Tuesday, 7 September 2021 at 17:50:41 UTC+3, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > > > > > tisdag 7 september 2021 kl. 08:48:51 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > > > > > > > > On Monday, 6 September 2021 at 23:36:14 UTC+3, markus....@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > måndag 6 september 2021 kl. 22:24:43 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Monday, 6 September 2021 at 18:25:30 UTC+3, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > måndag 6 september 2021 kl. 16:42:00 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > I promise that every dumb bastard on this newsgroup (including my filthy vile fellow Jew cunts!) are going to some day pay very dearly for the disrespect I experienced.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > It puzzles your peanut brains that I can be so intelligent and yet so discourteous to ALL you swine, does it not? Yes, I am more than just an enigma. I am a fucking genius like you couldn't even imagine because like that vile homosexual cunt Prof. Gilbert Strang of MIT, you are ALL just retarded. :)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > The New Calculus is just gaining popularity day after day. I am on the right of history. Everyone that has opposed me on this shit pile called sci.math will be assigned to the dustbin of history. I never forget and NEVER forgive. I change not.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://drive.google.com/file/d/1CIul68phzuOe6JZwsCuBuXUR8X-AkgEO/
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "vile Jew counts"
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "retards"
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Really, John?
> > > > > > > > > > > > Ask questions about math, not about the vile Jew cunt on this newsgroup. I have nothing but the utmost contempt for them. As for you, stop being a stupid lackey and try to think for yourself.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > "42 <=> 42 is not logical" ??
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Are you insane? Really?
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > If 42 <=> 42, then what the hell does 42 imply, you silly boy? LMAO.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > a <=> a is logical.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Just as logical as [f(x+h)-f(x)]/h <=> f'(x) + Q(x,h).
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Do you want to be like that dumb Greek bastard from Crete university (Prof. Michalis Lambros)?
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > He thinks the same way as you do. He looks like Hitler in his faculty photo. He acted like Hitler too when he banned me from the Greek forum:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > https://www.mathematica.gr/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=65422
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > See, this is what happens when mainstream mathematics becomes a cult. No different from the Nazis.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > "42 <=> 42" is not a logical statement no? What truth value does "42" have?
> > > > > > > > > > 42 = 4x10 + 2
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > It is TRUE.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > 42 cannot imply 32:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > 42 = 4x10 + 2 =/= 32 = 3x10 + 2
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Sheesh. You're a prize idiot.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > "42 = 4x10 + 2" is a logical statement, "42" is not.
> > > > > > > > Ooh! You just hammered a nail into your foot!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I can't believe you are this stupid! Tsk, tsk.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > IF as you say "42 = 4x10 + 2" is a logical statement" THEN "42" is definitely a logical statement because it means "4x10 + 2".
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > x = x means x must be logical since it has a value. Tsk, tsk.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > ROFLMAO.
> > > > > > > 42 is a number. It has no truth value. An equality has a truth value.
> > > > > > It does not need to have a "truth value", you idiot. It is a logical statement.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > What's obviously hilarious is that you claim "42 = 4x10 + 2" is a logical statement" and deny that "[f(x+h)-f(x)]/h=f'(x) + Q(x,h)" is a logical statement.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You can't get more cranky than this! LMAO.
> > > > >
> > > > "[f(x+h)-f(x)]/h=f'(x) + Q(x,h)" is NOT a logical statement.
> > > Well, it is. It's just that "[f(x+h)-f(x)]/h <--> f'(x) + Q(x,h)" isn't.
> > "[f(x+h)-f(x)]/h=f'(x) + Q(x,h)" is most definitely the same as "[f(x+h)-f(x)]/h <=> f'(x) + Q(x,h)".
> >
> > Kindergarten example:
> >
> > 4+3 => 2 + 5 AND 2+5 => 4+3
> >
> > 4+3 <=> 2+5
> >
> > You keep making a fool of yourself, but that's what cranks and trolls do. It's their modus operandi.
> >
> > Grow a brain, idiot!!!
> "4+3 <=> 2+5" is a nonsensical statement.

Huh??!!! You mean to tell me that 4+3 DOES NOT imply 7 and that 2+5 DOES NOT imply 7?

Seriously?? You're a clown, boy!

> "4+3=2+5" is a logical statement.

Of course, because 4+3 => 7 AND 2+5 => 7

torsdag 9 september 2021 kl. 08:48:10 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> On Wednesday, 8 September 2021 at 21:33:08 UTC+3, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
> > onsdag 8 september 2021 kl. 18:00:52 UTC+2 skrev New Age Prophet:
> > > On Wednesday, September 8, 2021 at 4:08:57 PM UTC+3, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > onsdag 8 september 2021 kl. 14:27:08 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > > > On Tuesday, 7 September 2021 at 23:56:44 UTC+3, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > > tisdag 7 september 2021 kl. 22:12:39 UTC+2 skrev New Age Prophet:
> > > > > > > On Tuesday, September 7, 2021 at 10:26:53 PM UTC+3, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > > > > tisdag 7 september 2021 kl. 19:44:04 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > > > > > > > On Tuesday, 7 September 2021 at 17:50:41 UTC+3, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > tisdag 7 september 2021 kl. 08:48:51 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > > > > > > > > > On Monday, 6 September 2021 at 23:36:14 UTC+3, markus....@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > måndag 6 september 2021 kl. 22:24:43 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Monday, 6 September 2021 at 18:25:30 UTC+3, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > måndag 6 september 2021 kl. 16:42:00 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I promise that every dumb bastard on this newsgroup (including my filthy vile fellow Jew cunts!) are going to some day pay very dearly for the disrespect I experienced.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It puzzles your peanut brains that I can be so intelligent and yet so discourteous to ALL you swine, does it not? Yes, I am more than just an enigma. I am a fucking genius like you couldn't even imagine because like that vile homosexual cunt Prof. Gilbert Strang of MIT, you are ALL just retarded. :)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The New Calculus is just gaining popularity day after day. I am on the right of history. Everyone that has opposed me on this shit pile called sci.math will be assigned to the dustbin of history. I never forget and NEVER forgive. I change not.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://drive.google.com/file/d/1CIul68phzuOe6JZwsCuBuXUR8X-AkgEO/
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "vile Jew counts"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "retards"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Really, John?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Ask questions about math, not about the vile Jew cunt on this newsgroup. I have nothing but the utmost contempt for them. As for you, stop being a stupid lackey and try to think for yourself.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "42 <=> 42 is not logical" ??
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Are you insane? Really?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > If 42 <=> 42, then what the hell does 42 imply, you silly boy? LMAO.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > a <=> a is logical.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Just as logical as [f(x+h)-f(x)]/h <=> f'(x) + Q(x,h).
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you want to be like that dumb Greek bastard from Crete university (Prof. Michalis Lambros)?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > He thinks the same way as you do. He looks like Hitler in his faculty photo. He acted like Hitler too when he banned me from the Greek forum:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > https://www.mathematica.gr/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=65422
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > See, this is what happens when mainstream mathematics becomes a cult. No different from the Nazis.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > "42 <=> 42" is not a logical statement no? What truth value does "42" have?
> > > > > > > > > > > 42 = 4x10 + 2
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > It is TRUE.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > 42 cannot imply 32:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > 42 = 4x10 + 2 =/= 32 = 3x10 + 2
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Sheesh. You're a prize idiot.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > "42 = 4x10 + 2" is a logical statement, "42" is not.
> > > > > > > > > Ooh! You just hammered a nail into your foot!
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I can't believe you are this stupid! Tsk, tsk.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > IF as you say "42 = 4x10 + 2" is a logical statement" THEN "42" is definitely a logical statement because it means "4x10 + 2".
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > x = x means x must be logical since it has a value. Tsk, tsk.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > ROFLMAO.
> > > > > > > > 42 is a number. It has no truth value. An equality has a truth value.
> > > > > > > It does not need to have a "truth value", you idiot. It is a logical statement.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > What's obviously hilarious is that you claim "42 = 4x10 + 2" is a logical statement" and deny that "[f(x+h)-f(x)]/h=f'(x) + Q(x,h)" is a logical statement.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > You can't get more cranky than this! LMAO.
> > > > > >
> > > > > "[f(x+h)-f(x)]/h=f'(x) + Q(x,h)" is NOT a logical statement.
> > > > Well, it is. It's just that "[f(x+h)-f(x)]/h <--> f'(x) + Q(x,h)" isn't.
> > > "[f(x+h)-f(x)]/h=f'(x) + Q(x,h)" is most definitely the same as "[f(x+h)-f(x)]/h <=> f'(x) + Q(x,h)".
> > >
> > > Kindergarten example:
> > >
> > > 4+3 => 2 + 5 AND 2+5 => 4+3
> > >
> > > 4+3 <=> 2+5
> > >
> > > You keep making a fool of yourself, but that's what cranks and trolls do. It's their modus operandi.
> > >
> > > Grow a brain, idiot!!!
> > "4+3 <=> 2+5" is a nonsensical statement.
> Huh??!!! You mean to tell me that 4+3 DOES NOT imply 7 and that 2+5 DOES NOT imply 7?
>
> Seriously?? You're a clown, boy!
> > "4+3=2+5" is a logical statement.
> Of course, because 4+3 => 7 AND 2+5 => 7
"4+3" doesn't imply anything, because it can't imply anything. 4+3 is a number, not a logical statement. 4+3=7 is a logical statement, as well as 4+3=9. The former is true, and the latter is false. "4+3" has no truth value on its own.

On Thursday, 9 September 2021 at 17:32:13 UTC+3, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
> torsdag 9 september 2021 kl. 08:48:10 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > On Wednesday, 8 September 2021 at 21:33:08 UTC+3, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > onsdag 8 september 2021 kl. 18:00:52 UTC+2 skrev New Age Prophet:
> > > > On Wednesday, September 8, 2021 at 4:08:57 PM UTC+3, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > onsdag 8 september 2021 kl. 14:27:08 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > > > > On Tuesday, 7 September 2021 at 23:56:44 UTC+3, markus...@gmail..com wrote:
> > > > > > > tisdag 7 september 2021 kl. 22:12:39 UTC+2 skrev New Age Prophet:
> > > > > > > > On Tuesday, September 7, 2021 at 10:26:53 PM UTC+3, markus....@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > > > > > tisdag 7 september 2021 kl. 19:44:04 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > > > > > > > > On Tuesday, 7 September 2021 at 17:50:41 UTC+3, markus....@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > tisdag 7 september 2021 kl. 08:48:51 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Monday, 6 September 2021 at 23:36:14 UTC+3, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > måndag 6 september 2021 kl. 22:24:43 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Monday, 6 September 2021 at 18:25:30 UTC+3, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > måndag 6 september 2021 kl. 16:42:00 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I promise that every dumb bastard on this newsgroup (including my filthy vile fellow Jew cunts!) are going to some day pay very dearly for the disrespect I experienced.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It puzzles your peanut brains that I can be so intelligent and yet so discourteous to ALL you swine, does it not? Yes, I am more than just an enigma. I am a fucking genius like you couldn't even imagine because like that vile homosexual cunt Prof. Gilbert Strang of MIT, you are ALL just retarded. :)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The New Calculus is just gaining popularity day after day. I am on the right of history. Everyone that has opposed me on this shit pile called sci.math will be assigned to the dustbin of history. I never forget and NEVER forgive. I change not.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://drive.google.com/file/d/1CIul68phzuOe6JZwsCuBuXUR8X-AkgEO/
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "vile Jew counts"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "retards"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Really, John?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ask questions about math, not about the vile Jew cunt on this newsgroup. I have nothing but the utmost contempt for them. As for you, stop being a stupid lackey and try to think for yourself.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "42 <=> 42 is not logical" ??
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Are you insane? Really?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > If 42 <=> 42, then what the hell does 42 imply, you silly boy? LMAO.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > a <=> a is logical.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Just as logical as [f(x+h)-f(x)]/h <=> f'(x) + Q(x,h).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you want to be like that dumb Greek bastard from Crete university (Prof. Michalis Lambros)?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > He thinks the same way as you do. He looks like Hitler in his faculty photo. He acted like Hitler too when he banned me from the Greek forum:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://www.mathematica.gr/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=65422
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > See, this is what happens when mainstream mathematics becomes a cult. No different from the Nazis.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "42 <=> 42" is not a logical statement no? What truth value does "42" have?
> > > > > > > > > > > > 42 = 4x10 + 2
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > It is TRUE.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 42 cannot imply 32:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 42 = 4x10 + 2 =/= 32 = 3x10 + 2
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Sheesh. You're a prize idiot.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > "42 = 4x10 + 2" is a logical statement, "42" is not..
> > > > > > > > > > Ooh! You just hammered a nail into your foot!
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I can't believe you are this stupid! Tsk, tsk.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > IF as you say "42 = 4x10 + 2" is a logical statement" THEN "42" is definitely a logical statement because it means "4x10 + 2".
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > x = x means x must be logical since it has a value. Tsk, tsk.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > ROFLMAO.
> > > > > > > > > 42 is a number. It has no truth value. An equality has a truth value.
> > > > > > > > It does not need to have a "truth value", you idiot. It is a logical statement.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > What's obviously hilarious is that you claim "42 = 4x10 + 2" is a logical statement" and deny that "[f(x+h)-f(x)]/h=f'(x) + Q(x,h)" is a logical statement.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > You can't get more cranky than this! LMAO.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > "[f(x+h)-f(x)]/h=f'(x) + Q(x,h)" is NOT a logical statement.
> > > > > Well, it is. It's just that "[f(x+h)-f(x)]/h <--> f'(x) + Q(x,h)" isn't.
> > > > "[f(x+h)-f(x)]/h=f'(x) + Q(x,h)" is most definitely the same as "[f(x+h)-f(x)]/h <=> f'(x) + Q(x,h)".
> > > >
> > > > Kindergarten example:
> > > >
> > > > 4+3 => 2 + 5 AND 2+5 => 4+3
> > > >
> > > > 4+3 <=> 2+5
> > > >
> > > > You keep making a fool of yourself, but that's what cranks and trolls do. It's their modus operandi.
> > > >
> > > > Grow a brain, idiot!!!
> > > "4+3 <=> 2+5" is a nonsensical statement.
> > Huh??!!! You mean to tell me that 4+3 DOES NOT imply 7 and that 2+5 DOES NOT imply 7?
> >
> > Seriously?? You're a clown, boy!
> > > "4+3=2+5" is a logical statement.
> > Of course, because 4+3 => 7 AND 2+5 => 7
> "4+3" doesn't imply anything, because it can't imply anything.

>If we were in court, I would stop at this point and say "I rest my case your Honour". ROFLMAO.

And mathematicians and logicians would look at you like you're an idiot.

>First of all, you have no clue and never had any clue what is a <<number>>, but let's overlook this for a moment and consider the latter part

It is not as big of a deal as you make it out to be. Your obsession here is strange to say the least.

>4+3 most definitely implies 7

Implies is a boolean operator, not an arithmetic one.

>NO. 4+3=9 is NOT a logical statement in <<mathematics>> and I am not talking about anything else here.

it is, because 4+3=9 is FALSE, a boolean value.

>I am not discussing Boolean logic or electronic engineering because neither is mathematics.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boolean_algebra

In mathematics and mathematical logic, Boolean algebra is the branch of algebra in which the values of the variables are the truth values true and false, usually denoted 1 and 0, respectively.[1] Instead of elementary algebra, where the values of the variables are numbers and the prime operations are addition and multiplication, the main operations of Boolean algebra are the conjunction (and) denoted as ∧, the disjunction (or) denoted as ∨, and the negation (not) denoted as ¬. It is thus a formalism for describing logical operations, in the same way that elementary algebra describes numerical operations.

It is very much part of mathematics.