Message-ID:

6 May, 2024: The networking issue during the past two days has been identified and appears to be fixed. Will keep monitoring.

tech / sci.physics.relativity / Re: Doesn't QM wave entanglement hold together its material

Doesn't QM wave entanglement hold together its material

<5670e10c-64ae-4c4f-ac7e-94a6597a108bn@googlegroups.com>

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=75243&group=sci.physics.relativity#75243

copy link Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity

X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:1a87:: with SMTP id s7mr1297374qtc.304.1640295320666;
Thu, 23 Dec 2021 13:35:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:ad4:5dc4:: with SMTP id m4mr3346236qvh.61.1640295320583;
Thu, 23 Dec 2021 13:35:20 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2021 13:35:20 -0800 (PST)
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2601:1c0:c803:ab80:f8bd:5d70:24d1:2274;
posting-account=Dg6LkgkAAABl5NRBT4_iFEO1VO77GchW
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2601:1c0:c803:ab80:f8bd:5d70:24d1:2274
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <5670e10c-64ae-4c4f-ac7e-94a6597a108bn@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Doesn't QM wave entanglement hold together its material
From: mitchrae...@gmail.com (mitchr...@gmail.com)
Injection-Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2021 21:35:20 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 3

by: mitchr...@gmail.com - Thu, 23 Dec 2021 21:35 UTC

Re: Doesn't QM wave entanglement hold together its material

<sq725l$1cvj$4@gioia.aioe.org>

copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=75333&group=sci.physics.relativity#75333

copy link Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity

Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!tKeDShd/hwLggvz1at/JTQ.user.46.165.242.75.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: uir...@cvb.we (Dudley Baage)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Doesn't QM wave entanglement hold together its material
Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2021 12:17:57 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <sq725l$1cvj$4@gioia.aioe.org>
References: <5670e10c-64ae-4c4f-ac7e-94a6597a108bn@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="46067"; posting-host="tKeDShd/hwLggvz1at/JTQ.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org";
User-Agent: SoupGate-Win32/1.05 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:68.0)
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2

by: Dudley Baage - Sat, 25 Dec 2021 12:17 UTC

mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:

> Without light matter QM wave material holds together as a whole...

yes, true fact. However, put the subject line in the body, to understand
faster the whole thing.

Yes, the entanglement is not EM signal based, or other form of "signal".
However, they apparently are connected, hence a signal must exist, unless
the circuitry is premeditated, which involves some action in he past.

Good post. I look forward to cooperate.

Re: Doesn't QM wave entanglement hold together its material

<ea62559b-6ec6-4963-afdd-62ccf2032ba5n@googlegroups.com>

copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=75361&group=sci.physics.relativity#75361

copy link Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity

X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:1705:: with SMTP id h5mr9647772qtk.331.1640460256209;
Sat, 25 Dec 2021 11:24:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:7dd1:: with SMTP id c17mr8510565qte.508.1640460256083;
Sat, 25 Dec 2021 11:24:16 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2021 11:24:15 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <sq725l$1cvj$4@gioia.aioe.org>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2601:1c0:c803:ab80:19b4:3f7b:de:c5e0;
posting-account=Dg6LkgkAAABl5NRBT4_iFEO1VO77GchW
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2601:1c0:c803:ab80:19b4:3f7b:de:c5e0
References: <5670e10c-64ae-4c4f-ac7e-94a6597a108bn@googlegroups.com> <sq725l$1cvj$4@gioia.aioe.org>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <ea62559b-6ec6-4963-afdd-62ccf2032ba5n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Doesn't QM wave entanglement hold together its material
From: mitchrae...@gmail.com (mitchr...@gmail.com)
Injection-Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2021 19:24:16 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 15

by: mitchr...@gmail.com - Sat, 25 Dec 2021 19:24 UTC

On Saturday, December 25, 2021 at 4:17:59 AM UTC-8, Dudley Baage wrote:
> mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > Without light matter QM wave material holds together as a whole...
> yes, true fact. However, put the subject line in the body, to understand
> faster the whole thing.
>

No Observer necessary... Bohr was wrong.
Einstein was right in history.
Light disentangles wave-matter.. nobody had to watch...
Where there is more light there is less entanglement.
The 2 slit experiment done without observers showed
the truth of OCR failure...

Mitchell Raemsch

Subject	Author
Doesn't QM wave entanglement hold together its material	mitchr...@gmail.com
Re: Doesn't QM wave entanglement hold together its material	Dudley Baage
Re: Doesn't QM wave entanglement hold together its material	mitchr...@gmail.com