Message-ID:

Be careful when a loop exits to the same place from side and bottom.

tech / rec.crafts.metalworking / Re: "[T]he right secured by the Second Amendment is not unlimited."

Re: "[T]he right secured by the Second Amendment is not unlimited."

<cJz4M.52544$qjm2.45860@fx09.iad>

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=7569&group=rec.crafts.metalworking#7569

copy link Newsgroups: misc.survivalism rec.crafts.metalworking talk.politics.guns alt.politics alt.california alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

Path: i2pn2.org!rocksolid2!news.neodome.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!feeder1.feed.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!peer01.ams4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx09.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/102.10.1
From: ckg...@f???rbes.com (Carol Kinsey Goman)
Subject: Re: "[T]he right secured by the Second Amendment is not unlimited."
Newsgroups: misc.survivalism,rec.crafts.metalworking,talk.politics.guns,alt.politics,alt.california,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
References: <0fCdnaizl76TvkvNnZ2dnUVZ5rSdnZ2d@giganews.com>
<44bcd8lkmhedi3p5nv59lkvjvmmvdv2vcn@4ax.com>
<gbidnVuwYfIfsEvNnZ2dnUVZ5vednZ2d@giganews.com> <kb5b6o$6dv$1@dont-email.me>
<JcOdnTEGD4PkxkvNnZ2dnUVZ5gednZ2d@giganews.com> <kb69bg$e9v$1@dont-email.me>
<bJqdnXlWdKD5pErNnZ2dnUVZ5rKdnZ2d@giganews.com> <kb818t$knk$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <kb818t$knk$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 63
Message-ID: <cJz4M.52544$qjm2.45860@fx09.iad>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@fastusenet.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 03 May 2023 20:44:56 UTC
Organization: fastusenet - www.fastusenet.org
Date: Wed, 3 May 2023 13:44:56 -0700
X-Received-Bytes: 3651

by: Carol Kinsey Goman - Wed, 3 May 2023 20:44 UTC

On 12/23/2012 2:40 PM, Scout wrote:
>
> "Carol Kinsey Goman" <ckg@förbes.com> wrote in message
> news:bJqdnXlWdKD5pErNnZ2dnUVZ5rKdnZ2d@giganews.com...
>> On 12/22/2012 10:46 PM, Scout wrote:
>>>
>>> "Carol Kinsey Goman" <ckg@förbes.com> wrote in message
>>> news:JcOdnTEGD4PkxkvNnZ2dnUVZ5gednZ2d@giganews.com...
>>>> On 12/22/2012 2:10 PM, Scout wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> "Carol Kinsey Goman" <ckg@förbes.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:gbidnVuwYfIfsEvNnZ2dnUVZ5vednZ2d@giganews.com...
>>>>>> On 12/22/2012 1:56 PM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>>>>>>> Carol Kinsey Goman <ckg@förbes.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Some limitation on the types of arms protected by the second
>>>>>>>> amendment is clearly within the
>>>>>>>> scope of the amendment.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Another gun grabber straw man.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Not a straw man at all. And I'm not a "gun grabber" - I own guns,
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> would like to own some more, although I can't see dumping a whole lot
>>>>>> of money into it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No right is "unlimited."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Many of your fellow crazed proto-Nazi gun nuts wish to believe that
>>>>>> the gun rights secured by the second amendment *are* unlimited.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sorry, but I believe people were contesting your assertion that such
>>>>> limitations existed within the 2nd.
>>>>
>>>> Of *course* they exist "within" the second, you idiot. They *have* to
>>>> exist "within" it, else how else could the court see them?
>>>
>>> Exactly. So please present the text from the 2nd Amendment in which the
>>> court saw such limitations.
>>
>> I guess you're not familiar with the text of the amendment:
>>
>> A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a
>> free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall
>> not be infringed.
>
> Certainly,

You're not.

>>> I mean, you claim it's there, and you assert to be such an expert about,
>>> so where's the text in the 2nd that imposes that limit?
>>
>> No, I'm citing the court opinion, written by an expert.
>
> Then your assertion it's in the 2nd

I never asserted it's in the amendment. It's in the right. Because it's in the
right that the amendment is about, then the amendment takes it as given. It's
the assertion of Mr. Justice Scalia that it's in the right. He's correct.

Subject	Author
Re: "[T]he right secured by the Second Amendment is not unlimited."	Carol Kinsey Goman