Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

FORTH IF HONK THEN


tech / sci.astro.amateur / Re: Have to wonder if computer-derived images are real

SubjectAuthor
o Re: Have to wonder if computer-derived images are realMitchAlsup

1
Re: Have to wonder if computer-derived images are real

<2b387e40-6c3c-4051-9c7f-e0e8cdc6268dn@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=7579&group=sci.astro.amateur#7579

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.astro.amateur
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:3181:: with SMTP id bi1mr22316570qkb.691.1643859555262;
Wed, 02 Feb 2022 19:39:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:df43:: with SMTP id w64mr2298497ybg.303.1643859555049;
Wed, 02 Feb 2022 19:39:15 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.astro.amateur
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2022 19:39:14 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <defeb526-4e17-4e54-ae80-4953477b6a5cn@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2600:1700:291:29f0:80d5:8b42:92ed:f97b;
posting-account=H_G_JQkAAADS6onOMb-dqvUozKse7mcM
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2600:1700:291:29f0:80d5:8b42:92ed:f97b
References: <defeb526-4e17-4e54-ae80-4953477b6a5cn@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <2b387e40-6c3c-4051-9c7f-e0e8cdc6268dn@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Have to wonder if computer-derived images are real
From: MitchAl...@aol.com (MitchAlsup)
Injection-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2022 03:39:15 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lines: 44
 by: MitchAlsup - Thu, 3 Feb 2022 03:39 UTC

On Monday, January 31, 2022 at 7:51:23 PM UTC-6, RichA wrote:
> https://phys.org/news/2022-01-universe-sharper-focus-algorithms-supercomputers.html
<
If one knew the precise PSF (point spread function) associated at each pixel* in the image,
there are correlation(*) algorithms that can remove even the diffraction effects converting
the typical Airy 2-D wave into a Lawrencian spread function. The problem is that the calculations
are "very time consuming". Requiring a 2-D Fourier Transform, a height×width conjugate multiply
for every pixel in the image, and an 2-D inverse Fourier Transform. height×width is the size where
the PSF function is greater than ¼ the noise level in that area of the image.
<
If the PSF is identical across the whole image (like from a Three Mirror Anastigmat) this
calculation can be performed with a 2-D Fourier transform, a conjugate multiply, and an
inverse Fourier transform.
<
* the PSF is identical at each radial offset from the center of the image.
(*)Correlation is a close relative of convolution.
<
I used to do this kind of stuff for an fast sweep NMR machine just out of college more
than 45 years ago in 1-D. For a 4096×1 pixel "image" the calculations took more than
7 seconds on a Sigma 5 minicomputer. When setup correctly, we could correct even the
phase of the detector and remove the oscillations of the resonant exponential decay.
This allows us to take (thousands) of images (sometimes hours), add them up, and the
make the image "look" like the sweep took infinitely long (no ringing). A PSF in in the
same class of data/image as a ringing Lawrencian line.
<
But still, you cannot improve the image more that the Lawrencian without inducing ringing,
but you can add other filtering functions to the calculation almost for free.

1
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.8
clearnet tor