3- AP's 199th book A book of New Age, New Wave math conjectures

Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
Sep 9, 2021, 2:57:45 AM
to Plutonium Atom Universe
Making up a brand new conjecture is a lot easier than proving a conjecture, but here I think I am going to prove my below, after some modifications.

> So let me make this my 199th book of science, a new era of Math Conjectures since AP solved all the Old Math conjectures outstanding. We need a new era to wile away the time of math professors.
>
> Since the last conjecture I solved was Collatz, let me start with a New Era, New Wave of conjectures starting with a conjecture that looks like a Collatz type of problem.
> On Wednesday, September 8, 2021 at 1:56:49 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > Having Conquered Collatz conjecture by AP in 2016, thoroughly conquering and destroying Collatz with AP's famous 4 Consecutive Evens in a Row Proof. That AP is drafting a New Age type of Collatz conjecture to keep rumdummy math professors active for another 100 years in their "no logical brains to be in mathematics".
> >
> > Now AP is well known for making the most difficult math conjectures, unproven for 2,000 years look like a piece of cake in solving. AP is well known for that. Or in the case of Riemann Hypothesis and Twin Primes Infinitude, where AP offers not only a proof, but two alternative proofs, instead of 1, yet the rest of the math community pulling out there hair for just a beginning lead into a proof.
> >
> > AP's fearsome conquering of math conjectures that no math professor even has a hope of indulging is matched by AP's simplicity of proof. I mean, well, there you have a childish silly idiotic Wiles proof of Fermat's Last Theorem in 150 pages of mind numbing nonsense because Wiles proof is a scam, scam scam spam on par with John Gabriel scam spam that even street suckers, and loolipop suckers of Simon Singh and Kevin Hartnett soak in as if on a Bermuda vacation. Whereas AP's true proof of math of Fermat's Last Theorem is just a sentence long 2+2=2x2=4 yet no N+N+N= NxNxN = M allows for solutions to Pythagorean theorem but none for exp 3 and higher. And something that even crumby science reporters like Simon Singh or Kevin Hartnett can carry home and put bacon on the table for their households.
> >
> > So AP is more than a conqueror, more than Peter the Great or Ivan the Terrible or veni, vedi, vici, as Julius Caesar famously said crossing the Mississippi, et tu, Brute.
> >
> > So AP is assembling a New Wave, a New Age Conjecture to keep math pinheads occupied in their driverless cars to and from the university down the turnpike, or in train terminals.
> >
> > AP's conjecture
> >
> > We take Successive Evens 4 in a row and add and multiply.
> >
> > 2+4 = 6 4+6 = 10 6+8 = 14
> > 2x4 = 8 4x6 = 24 6x8 = 48
> >
> > then the next set of 4 consecutive evens
> >
> > 10+12 =22 14 +16=30 18+20=38
> > 10x12=120 14x16=224 18x20=360
> >
> > Now we do the same thing with odd numbers
> >
> > 1+3 = 4 5+7=12 9+11=20
> > 1x3= 3 5x7= 35 9x11=99
> >

So in this conjecture I wanted a flavor of Galois Algebra but also a flavor of Collatz. And if I make some modifications I believe I can prove this conjecture.

> Now AP threw out Galois Algebra as unnecessary crap, for the mistake of Galois was to be ignorant of a axiom of mathematics of algebra. All equations of mathematics must never have a zero all alone on the rightside of the equation, worse yet is to have negative numbers all alone on the rightside of the equation. Or, any number that is not a positive Decimal Grid Number all alone on the rightside of the equation is not a equation of mathematics.
>
> Call it the Axiom of Equation. All valid equations of math are ones in which there is a positive non zero Decimal Grid Number all alone on the rightside of the equation at all times. (If you are Chinese, then leftside.)
>
> So the mistake Galois made was he never knew or learned this essential axiom of mathematics, and thus, he wasted his life in mathematics on Galois algebras.
>
> The solution or proof of Collatz of 1937 is a one sentence proof that in all and any 4 consecutive Even numbers, one of them is a factor of 8 and will slide you down faster to 1 than ever landing on a even number. So all Counting Numbers have this backbone of 4 consecutive Evens in a row.
>
> So, can we make a modern day New Wave, New Era Collatz type of conjecture and bring in Galois also? Although Collatz is relatively recent in 1937 while Galois goes back to the 1800s.
>
> So yesterday I started making a algebra type matrix with that of consecutive evens and consecutive odds.
>
> 2+4 = 6, 4+6 = 10, 6+8 = 14
> 2x4 = 8, 4x6 = 24, 6x8 = 48
>
> 1+3 = 4, 3+5 =8, 5+7=12,
> 1x3= 3, 3x5=15, 5x7=35
>
> So, let us input Galois 4 by 4 matrix. And couple it with Collatz 4 consecutive Evens and 4 consecutive Odds in a row.
>
> Now we can only use addition and multiplication.
>
> Conjecture-- there exists a unique pattern that encompasses all the counting numbers starting with 3. In the above I can only obtain 3,4,5, 6, missing 7, missing 9, missing 11, etc. The pattern is not the default pattern of 2+2k for even and 1+2k for odd. Or, is the default pattern the only such that includes all the counting numbers starting with 3.
>

Let me modify that Conjecture considerably for I have the hankering that only the Default Pattern exists 2+2k for all evens and 1+2k for all odds. That is it, end of story.

However if I bring in the Concept of Infinity borderline 1*10^604, this conjecture takes on a brand new story line, and a surprizing story line at that.

The only thing we save from Collatz is the 3N+1 only we use the 3 in division for all odd numbers.
Of course we use 2 for all even numbers.

Now one beauty of the Decimal Grid System as the true numbers of mathematics, that I can predict what happens in 1*10^604 by pretending 10 is the infinity borderline and thus 100 as 10^2 is the algebraic completeness (Galois)..

So Old Math had only 2+2K and 1+2K for all evens and all odds.

But if we started at infinity (pretend 10) and start at the algebraic closure 100 and divide by 3 as we descend to 10 do we all the Odd numbers 1,3,5, 7,9 in 10 Grid. So as we descend from 100 we are dividing 3 into so called infinity numbers and as we reach 27 we get 9 and 21 we get 7 and 15 we get 5 and have to take 1 and 3 as givens. Now as we descend and divide by 2 starting at 20 we get 10 then at 16 we get 8 and at 12 we get 6. And we have to take 4 and 2 as given.

So here I shift the original conjecture to that of being this new one.

Modified Conjecture of Collatz and Galois: If we start at Infinity Borderline and divide by 3, we get all the odd numbers except for a few givens as we descend from the algebraic closure. And dividing by 2 we get all the evens except for a few givens. And a side question, in our descent we do not have to start at algebraic closure but can start far lower and what specifically is that lower number? For example in 10 Grid we could start at 20 instead of 100 for we pick up 9 from 18/2. But this is risky, for maybe in the 100 Grid with algebraic closure 10000, that we do not get 99 by division of 2.

So whereas Old Math had 2+2K and 1+2K, that New Math also has closure/3 = all odd and closure/2= all evens except for a few givens.

AP

Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
Sep 9, 2021, 6:00:41 PM (2 days ago)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
Since AP conquered most of Old Math conjectures, time for AP to assemble the new set of Conjectures to be proven for the future.

to Plutonium Atom Universe
Having Conquered Collatz conjecture by AP in 2016, thoroughly conquering and destroying Collatz with AP's famous 4 Consecutive Evens in a Row Proof. That AP is drafting a New Age type of Collatz conjecture to keep rumdummy math professors active for...

Archimedes Plutonium
Sep 8, 2021, 1:56:49 PM
to sci.math
Having Conquered Collatz conjecture by AP in 2016, thoroughly conquering and destroying Collatz with AP's famous 4 Consecutive Evens in a Row Proof. That AP is drafting a New Age type of Collatz conjecture to keep rumdummy math professors active for another 100 years in their "no logical brains to be in mathematics".

Now AP is well known for making the most difficult math conjectures, unproven for 2,000 years look like a piece of cake in solving. AP is well known for that. Or in the case of Riemann Hypothesis and Twin Primes Infinitude, where AP offers not only a proof, but two alternative proofs, instead of 1, yet the rest of the math community pulling out there hair for just a beginning lead into a proof.

AP's fearsome conquering of math conjectures that no math professor even has a hope of indulging is matched by AP's simplicity of proof. I mean, well, there you have a childish silly idiotic Wiles proof of Fermat's Last Theorem in 150 pages of mind numbing nonsense because Wiles proof is a scam, scam scam spam on par with John Gabriel scam spam that even street suckers, and loolipop suckers of Simon Singh and Kevin Hartnett soak in as if on a Bermuda vacation. Whereas AP's true proof of math of Fermat's Last Theorem is just a sentence long 2+2=2x2=4 yet no N+N+N= NxNxN = M allows for solutions to Pythagorean theorem but none for exp 3 and higher. And something that even crumby science reporters like Simon Singh or Kevin Hartnett can carry home and put bacon on the table for their households.

On Sunday, September 12, 2021 at 4:39:14 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Earlier today I wrote this conjecture on a missing regular polyhedron, to make 6 in total in existence.
> > CONJECTURE #12
> >
> > Statement: There are 6 regular polyhedron in all. Old Math missed a regular polyhedra of 0 face and infinitude sides of a regular polygon. We think of this object as a sphere, but it is a sphere-like polyhedra. In some respects this Sphere-Polyhedra is the dual of the Tetrahedron just as the Cube is the dual of the Octahedron, and just as the Dodecahedron is the dual of the Icosahedron.
> >
> > In true math, there are no curves at all but only straightline segments strung along together to form what we conceive and perceive of as curves. The circle is a 1*10^604 string of tiny straight line segments. The sphere is formed in the same way. The sides are so tiny that we perceive them as a smooth curve when curves never ever existed. The true numbers of mathematics are discrete numbers with holes in between every number and its successor number, again, causing no smooth curve to ever exist.
> >
> > The sphere is actually a Regular Polyhedron of no face, 0 face and composed of these regular polygon circles.
> >
> > Actually, the proof of this conjecture should be easy because, as most of these conjectures involving the Real True numbers of mathematics have to be the Decimal Grid Numbers that allows for the Calculus to exist, that requirement is the proof of this Conjecture, that Old Math missed the 6th regular polyhedron.
> >
> > And this is reasonable in the sense that 6 is the magic number of math and physics.
> >
> > And another proof of this conjecture is the proof-method done in Ancient Greek times of the other 5 regular polyhedra involving angles, the constraint and restriction of angles making the 5 regular polyhedra, except they forgot to include a polyhedra of 180 degrees + 180 degrees = 360 degrees.
> >
> Now it maybe difficult to see how a tetrahedron is the dual of a Sphere-Polyhedron since it has 0 faces. A Regular Tetrahedron has 4 faces, 6 edges, 4 vertices. A Sphere Polyhedron composed of circles that are a 1*10^604 regular polygon with that many sides, since it has 0 faces, has 0 edges and 0 vertices.
>
> So how can the Regular Tetrahedron be dual to the Sphere Polyhedron?
>
> Conjecture #12.2
>
> Statement: looking at a picture of how we solve for the formula of volume of a sphere in Harold Jacobs book GEOMETRY, 1987, page 567 where pyramid type figures are made in construction of the sphere volume emanating from center of sphere. This picture offers us a clue as to how the tetrahedron is dual to the Sphere-Polyhedron.
>
> Apparently AP has discovered a new important name of a geometric figure never known or seen before in math history, the Sphere-Polyhedron.

CONJECTURE # 12.3

The above suggests the formation of a Sphere-Polyhedron is somehow constructed by a Grid System net. A net that is placed on the surface of a sphere and where each point is spaced at least a distance of 1*10^-604 away from the next point. In the mind we can picture this but in practical reality it is difficult to do this for the entire sphere. We can do it in practice for a small portion of the sphere surface cover the surface in a equally spaced grid of points and between those point intersections is empty space (even though it is a fiber in a net).

STATEMENT of Conjecture: Every sphere can be covered in a Decimal Grid System of numbers where each point is equally spaced from its neighboring points.

AP
King of Science, especially Physics

🤡 of Math and 🃏 of Physics Archimedes "Court Jester of Math" Plutonium
<plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails at math and science:
>
> Earlier today I wrote this conjecture on a missing regular
polyhedron, to make 6 in total in existence.
>
>> CONJECTURE #12
>>
>> Statement: There are 6 regular polyhedron in all. Old Math missed a
regular polyhedra of 0 face and infinitude sides of a regular polygon.
We think of this object as a sphere, but it is a sphere-like polyhedra.
In some respects this Sphere-Polyhedra is the dual of the Tetrahedron
just as the Cube is the dual of the Octahedron, and just as the
Dodecahedron is the dual of the Icosahedron.

Silly Plutonium, the dual of the tetrahedron is the tetrahedron. So
what is the dual of your made-up 6th regular polyhedron? Do you even
know what the dual of a polyhedron even is? I didn't think so.

>>
>> In true math, there are no curves at all but

WARNING TO STUDENTS, PARENTS and TEACHERS: Archimedes Plutonium is
offering to teach your children his broken physics and math. BEWARE! He
will corrupt the minds of your children! Mr. Plutonium is not content to
be a failure of math and physics all by himself. He wants everyone else
to fail as well! He teaches bizarre false physics and math, such as
atoms contain the unstable muon, the ellipse isn't a conic section, that
there
are no negative numbers, no complex numbers, that a sine wave isn't
sinusoidal but semicircles, cycloids or parabolas (depending on his
mood), plus many, many other instances of bad math and physics.

Plutonium has previously tried to corrupt our youth by posting his books
on Usenet. That has failed until now, perhaps in part due to the fact
Usenet is an old, dying medium few modern students even know of, much
less use. However, Mr. Plutonium has somehow duped Amazon into providing
his dangerous books for free on Kindle. This has greatly increased the
danger to our students!

One of his dangerous tricks is teach false Boolean logic such as 10 AND 2
= 12. His method at doing this is particularly insidious. He'll post a
false statement that nobody believes, such as 10 OR 2 = 12, say that it
is false (which it is), but then he'll try to replace it with another
similar false statement such as 10 AND 2 = 12, in order to really confuse
future computer scientists. Plutonium is taking advantage of the fact
that AND means different things in Boolean logic and elementary
arithmetic, as AND is an informal synonym for plus/addition. It is
important for future computer scientists to remember that in the bitwise
Boolean logic used by modern computers, 10 OR 2 = 10 and 10 AND 2 = 2. Of
course in pure Boolean logic the only possible values are true and false
(1 or 0), so in pure Boolean logic the statements "10 AND 2" and "10 OR
2" don't even make sense. Don't let evil Plutonium's bad logic confuse
you!

Additionally, Plutonium has started a Cult of Failure. He is trying to
convince students to worship his evil pagan Plutonium atom god of
failure. This cult is anti-science and anti-mathematics. Its only goal is
to promote failure in math and science.

Nobody knows why he wishes to corrupt the minds of our youth like this.
Perhaps he is envious of their potential success, which he never had
because he is a failure at math and science. Plutonium is not content to
be a failure at math and physics all by himself. He wants everyone to
fail as well. Some claim he is an agent of China, in order for them to
dominate the world economy. Maybe he is a minion of Kim Jong Un of North
Korea. Most likely he is an agent of Putin and Russia, because he has
previously attempted to summon Russian robots in 2017 "to create a new,
true mathematics" in an attempt to destroy mathematics. But the point is,
stay away, if he offers to give or sell you his dangerous books.
Especially now since they are available for free from otherwise
legitimate Amazon.
>
> AP
> King of Pretend Science, especially Pretend Physics

Kibo Parry on >Harry McLaughlin, John E. Mitchell, Bruce Piper, David A Schmidt, Daniel Stevenson> fails at math and science:

On Sunday, September 12, 2021 at 10:06:12 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> 🤡 Rensselaer of Math and 🃏 Princeton of Physics "Court Jester of Math"
>Morris A Washington, Esther A. Wertz, Christian M. Wetzel, Ingrid Wilke>fails at math and science:
> >

Kibo Parry M on MIT Gilbert Strang "fuckdog" Cynthia Barnhart flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test

On Sunday, September 12, 2021 at 5:11:35 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> 🤡 of Math and 🃏 of Physics MIT "Court Jester of Math" Princeton Univ
> Simon Kochen, Joseph Kohn, János Kollár, Elliott Lieb, Adam Marcus> fails at math and science:

Kibo Parry M> 🐔Oxford Uni of Math and 🦃 Andrew Wiles of Physics "math hater"
> Andrew Wiles of Oxford Uni> tarded:

On Sunday, March 18, 2018 at 12:25:46 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
On Sunday, September 12, 2021 at 2:37:07 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> 🐔 Oxford Uni of Math and 🦃 Andrew Wiles of Physics "math hater"
> Andrew Wiles of Oxford Uni> tarded:

Kibo Parry M> 🦎 UCLA of Math and 🐍 Princeton Univ of Physics "hater of math"
> MIT & Harvard> fails at math and science:

AP writes: every post by Stalker kibo is put through the shredder and spit out. For the statement to be made that STALKING is unacceptable behavior, in fact, criminal behavior in society, whereever and whenever it rears its ugly head. Every stalker should be pommelled or sedated by a psychiatrist, in XXsmall straightjacket.


On Sunday, September 12, 2021 at 2:00:16 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> 🦎 Terence Tao of Math and 🐍 John Baez of Physics "hater of math"
> NSF pays stalkers> fails at math and science:

>🃏 Terence Tao of Physics 🤡 NSF Dorothy E Aronson of Math "Court Jester of Physics"
> NSF Dr. Panchanathan > fails at math and science:

SAYS the 28 year nonstop paid for stalker Kibo Parry M.

On Thursday, September 9, 2021 at 10:22:24 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> 🧟‍♂️ Andrew Wiles of Math and 👻 Lloyd Whitman of Physics

> 🧛🏻‍♂️ Thomas Hales of Math and 👻 John Stillwell of Physics "math hater"
On Tuesday, September 7, 2021 at 7:37:43 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> 🧛🏻‍♂️ John J. Veysey of Math and 👻 Scott Stanley of Physics "math hater"
>John J. Veysey, Scott Stanley > tarded:

AP writes: 28 year long nonstop paid for stalker Kibo Parry Moroney has a hard time of keeping up with the treadmill of AP's paper shredder that spits out the Kibo spam in regurgitated milk form. Hope there is enough cream in the milk for NSF.

Is Dr. Panchanathan NSF paying Kibo Parry M. a $100. per stalker spam post he emits? Making kibo richer than all college professors actually teaching math in classrooms.

>🃏 Brian Stone of Physics 🤡 NSF Dorothy E Aronson of Math "Court Jester of Physics"
> NSF Dr. Panchanathan > fails at math and science:

On Sunday, September 5, 2021 at 10:34:19 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> 🤡 NSF Dorothy E Aronson of Math and 🃏 Brian Stone of Physics "Court Jester of Physics"
> NSF Dr. Panchanathan > fails at math and science:

> 💀 F. Fleming Crim of Math and ☠️ Dr. Panchanathan of Physics "Putin's Stooge"
On Saturday, September 4, 2021 at 8:51:26 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> 💀 F. Fleming Crim of Math and ☠️ Dr. Panchanathan of Physics "Putin's Stooge"
> Brian Stone> blithered:

NSF fraud waste abuse of taxpayer money $100 per stalker post-- Champagne,Hewitt,Crago
On Saturday, July 31, 2021 at 2:17:31 PM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrote:
> STUDENTS BEWARE: Don't be a victim

NSF fraud waste abuse of taxpayer money $100 per stalker post--

Canada's NSF-- Francois-Philippe Champagne, Ted Hewitt, Martha Crago, Frederic Bouchard, Cinthia Duclos, Normand Labrie
USA--NSF Dr. Panchanathan, F. Fleming Crim, Dorothy E Aronson, Brian Stone, James S Ulvestad, Rebecca Lynn Keiser, Vernon D. Ross, Lloyd Whitman, John J. Veysey, Scott Stanley

---quoting Wikipedia ---
Controversy
Many government and university installations blocked, threatened to block, or attempted to shut-down The World's Internet connection until Software Tool & Die was eventually granted permission by the National Science Foundation to provide public Internet access on "an experimental basis."
--- end quote ---

AP writes: AP no longer tolerates endless stalker spam and runs them through a shredder of their vicious content and reposts them, so that the people responsible for hiring a stalker can taste their own fruit.

> Sacking Dr. Panchanathan of NSF of Math and 🕱 of Physics USA dept of Educ "anti math"

AP no longer tolerates a 28 year nonstop insane stalker like Kibo Parry M. and shreds his posts and regurgitates them.

On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
> Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
> of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.

Threatening AP's life:

Kibo Parry Moroney threatening the life of AP. Dartmouth College Kibo Parry Moroney, threatening the life of AP with this nonstop 28 year long hate spew stalking.

On Sunday, June 13, 2021 at 12:55:53 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "FireD your ass"

Dartmouth College: Philip J. Hanlon, Joseph Helble, Asher Auel, Peter Doyle, Anne Gelb, Marcia Groszek, Ethan Levien, Peter J Mucha, Rosa C. Orellana, Scott D. Pauls, Daniel N. Rockmore, Thomas R. Shemanske, John, D Trout, Erik van Erp, John Voight, Dorothy I. Wallace, David L. Webb, Dana P. Williams, Peter Winkler
Miles P. Blencowe, Robert R. Caldwell, Brian Charles Chabover, Richard Denton, Robert A. Fesen, Marcelo Gleiser, Ryan Hickox, Mary K. Hudson, James William LaBelle, Kristina Anne Lynch, Robyn Millan, Hans Mueller, Elisabeth Newton, Roberto Onofrio, Alex Rimberg, Barrett N. Rogers, John R. Thorstensen, Lorenza Viola, Martin N. Wybourne, Joseph D. Harris, Walter E. Lawrence, David C. Montgomery, Gary Alan Wegner

Donald Trump, the stalker in chief with constant hate spew causing the Capitol Building be stormed and 3 police officer deaths, and now, the constant hate spew of Kibo Parry Moroney & Earle Jones, looking for some deranged follower to laugh at a kibo joke then storm AP. That is why Kibo delighted in talking to Governor of South Dakota Kristi Noem from kibo postings for the exact address of AP and where the other stalker Jan Burse started to post houses for sale nearby to AP, so as to instruct the deranged unhinged Kibo wannabe gang member.

AP should not have to live where anyday a unhinged Kibo goofball is stalking out AP.

Kibo is an immense threat to the life of AP, for his aim along with his gang of Jan Burse, Dan Christensen, Earle Jones, Ross is to tap into some young lost loner that is unhinged.

On Sunday, June 13, 2021 at 12:55:53 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "FireD your ass"

Kibo Parry Moroney along with his gang of stalkers, 28 years nonstop threatening the life of AP, with his nonstop Hate Spew. I do not want to have to meet with a twisted recruit caused by Kibo Parry Moroney, Earle Jones, Jan Burse, Dan Christensen, Ross, at my backdoor. And just as Donald Trump stirred hatred for 4 years causing the Capitol Building to be stormed, Kibo Parry Moroney is stirring hatred for a assault on Dartmouth College, Earle Jones psychoceramics target practice at Stanford Univ.

On Sunday, June 13, 2021 at 12:49:59 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> FailurePlutonium, Psychoceramics
> "FireD your ass"

Earle Jones & Kibo Parry Moroney, not much different than Donald Trump stirring up the hatred to storm the Capital Building, and now we have Jones & Parry whipping up the hatred for 28 years to what? Violence on Stanford Univ or AP? Stalkers are too dumb to know, their endgame is violence especially as they recruit young ones to join their stalker hate team.

If it is Stanford Univ or even Dartmouth College, would it be a first for those institutions? I mean, this is 2021, and Kibo Parry Moroney is still lost in 1990s with "Dartmouth finally fired his ass". And then the Kibo Parry along with Jan Burse maps out a mapp to AP's home-- as to say-- like Donald Trump-- "down Pennsylvania Ave".

Or like Earle Jones setting up psychoceramics all over Stanford Univ for what Earle? For target practice, Earle being such a oaf, not realizing his ratcheted hatred ends up in violence.

FBI, Google, Stanford Univ, Dartmouth College, you have the power to stop this hatred ratcheting from these fools of 28 years of stalking AP, for if not stopped, I hate to see the end result of this 28 year long nonstop hatred of AP.

A few years back, on my doorstep was a crowd of 3 college youngsters, laughing and giggling and knocking on the door. I know the mentality of young people out on a prank, and they wanted me to come out, but, knowing that fools like Parry and Jones have whipped up so much hatred in the last 28 years, that something told me, --- talk to them through the window pane, because in all likelihood, this crowd of 3 maybe a whipped up crowd like the hatemongers who stormed the Capitol under the Trump hatred. So, I kept asking the one, what was his name and what did he want, and never any direct answer, so I told the bunch, leave or I call the police.