Message-ID:

6 May, 2024: The networking issue during the past two days has been identified and appears to be fixed. Will keep monitoring.

tech / sci.physics.relativity / Poincare and non-euclidean geometries in physics

Poincare and non-euclidean geometries in physics

<8b9b03ed-5efb-4829-b787-6187ea999137n@googlegroups.com>

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=77052&group=sci.physics.relativity#77052

copy link Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity

X-Received: by 2002:ae9:f715:: with SMTP id s21mr9238698qkg.542.1641664255200;
Sat, 08 Jan 2022 09:50:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a0c:beca:: with SMTP id f10mr62772412qvj.97.1641664255083;
Sat, 08 Jan 2022 09:50:55 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2022 09:50:54 -0800 (PST)
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=89.206.14.16; posting-account=I3DWzAoAAACOmZUdDcZ-C0PqAZGVsbW0
NNTP-Posting-Host: 89.206.14.16
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <8b9b03ed-5efb-4829-b787-6187ea999137n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Poincare and non-euclidean geometries in physics
From: maluwozn...@gmail.com (Maciej Wozniak)
Injection-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2022 17:50:55 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 13

by: Maciej Wozniak - Sat, 8 Jan 2022 17:50 UTC

https://brocku.ca/MeadProject/Poincare/Poincare_1905_06.html

"It is needless to add that every one would look upon this solution as the more advantageous."

Every one but an crazie screaming that common sense is
a collection of prejudices, and a bunch of his mindless
minions.

"Euclidean geometry, therefore, has nothing to fear from fresh experiments."

But fanatic idiots can always be some threat.

Re: Poincare and non-euclidean geometries in physics

<srcjlk$8ve$1@gioia.aioe.org>

copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=77058&group=sci.physics.relativity#77058

copy link Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity

Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!7a25jG6pUKCqa0zKnKnvdg.user.46.165.242.75.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: pyt...@example.invalid (Python)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Poincare and non-euclidean geometries in physics
Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2022 19:03:38 +0100
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <srcjlk$8ve$1@gioia.aioe.org>
References: <8b9b03ed-5efb-4829-b787-6187ea999137n@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="9198"; posting-host="7a25jG6pUKCqa0zKnKnvdg.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org";
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:91.0)
Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.4.1
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
Content-Language: en-GB

by: Python - Sat, 8 Jan 2022 18:03 UTC

Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>
> https://brocku.ca/MeadProject/Poincare/Poincare_1905_06.html
>
>
> "It is needless to add that every one would look upon this solution as the more advantageous."
>
> Every one but an crazie screaming that common sense is
> a collection of prejudices, and a bunch of his mindless
> minions.
>
>
> "Euclidean geometry, therefore, has nothing to fear from fresh experiments."

Sure. Right. How could experiments relate to axiomatic system? Only
a idiotic fanatic idiot could think otherwise, like Maciej Wozniak, who
knows *nothing* on maths and logic.

> But fanatic idiots can always be some threat.

You are not a threat, Maciej. You are an old fart posting rants on
Usenet.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poincar%C3%A9_disk_model
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein_synchronisation
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poincar%C3%A9_conjecture

Meanwhile Maciej Wozniak is still pretending to praise Poincaré
while thinking that all he worked on is bs. Maciej is a demented
old ignorant stupid fart.

Re: Poincare and non-euclidean geometries in physics

<b6ec2f49-e42f-445f-bef2-fc9653ba56e7n@googlegroups.com>

copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=77068&group=sci.physics.relativity#77068

copy link Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity

X-Received: by 2002:ac8:7c89:: with SMTP id y9mr7179233qtv.581.1641665807478;
Sat, 08 Jan 2022 10:16:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:ad4:5bac:: with SMTP id 12mr62981429qvq.20.1641665807345;
Sat, 08 Jan 2022 10:16:47 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2022 10:16:47 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <srcjlk$8ve$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=89.206.14.16; posting-account=I3DWzAoAAACOmZUdDcZ-C0PqAZGVsbW0
NNTP-Posting-Host: 89.206.14.16
References: <8b9b03ed-5efb-4829-b787-6187ea999137n@googlegroups.com> <srcjlk$8ve$1@gioia.aioe.org>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <b6ec2f49-e42f-445f-bef2-fc9653ba56e7n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Poincare and non-euclidean geometries in physics
From: maluwozn...@gmail.com (Maciej Wozniak)
Injection-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2022 18:16:47 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 32

by: Maciej Wozniak - Sat, 8 Jan 2022 18:16 UTC

On Saturday, 8 January 2022 at 19:03:35 UTC+1, Python wrote:
> Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> >
> > https://brocku.ca/MeadProject/Poincare/Poincare_1905_06.html
> >
> >
> > "It is needless to add that every one would look upon this solution as the more advantageous."
> >
> > Every one but an crazie screaming that common sense is
> > a collection of prejudices, and a bunch of his mindless
> > minions.
> >
> >
> > "Euclidean geometry, therefore, has nothing to fear from fresh experiments."
> Sure. Right. How could experiments relate to axiomatic system?

Sure. Right. How could experiments relate to axiomatic system?
Poincare has explained quite well, why it can't.
Only a idiotic fanatic idiot could think otherwise, like Einstein and
his insane minions, including some really pathetic stinker not even
knowing what sqrt function is.

> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poincar%C3%A9_disk_model
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein_synchronisation
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poincar%C3%A9_conjecture

"It is needless to add that every one would look upon this
solution as the more advantageous."

Every one but an insanee crazie screaming that common sense
is a collection of prejudices, and a bunch of his mindless
minions.

Re: Poincare and non-euclidean geometries in physics

<srckqh$ru5$1@gioia.aioe.org>

copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=77071&group=sci.physics.relativity#77071

copy link Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity

Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!7a25jG6pUKCqa0zKnKnvdg.user.46.165.242.75.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: pyt...@example.invalid (Python)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Poincare and non-euclidean geometries in physics
Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2022 19:23:19 +0100
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <srckqh$ru5$1@gioia.aioe.org>
References: <8b9b03ed-5efb-4829-b787-6187ea999137n@googlegroups.com>
<srcjlk$8ve$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<b6ec2f49-e42f-445f-bef2-fc9653ba56e7n@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="28613"; posting-host="7a25jG6pUKCqa0zKnKnvdg.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org";
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:91.0)
Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.4.1
Content-Language: en-GB
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2

by: Python - Sat, 8 Jan 2022 18:23 UTC

Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> On Saturday, 8 January 2022 at 19:03:35 UTC+1, Python wrote:
>> Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>>>
>>> https://brocku.ca/MeadProject/Poincare/Poincare_1905_06.html
>>>
>>>
>>> "It is needless to add that every one would look upon this solution as the more advantageous."
>>>
>>> Every one but an crazie screaming that common sense is
>>> a collection of prejudices, and a bunch of his mindless
>>> minions.
>>>
>>>
>>> "Euclidean geometry, therefore, has nothing to fear from fresh experiments."
>> Sure. Right. How could experiments relate to axiomatic system?
>
> Sure. Right. How could experiments relate to axiomatic system?
> Poincare has explained quite well, why it can't.
> Only a idiotic fanatic idiot could think otherwise, like Einstein and
> his [snip profanity],

Neither Einstein nor anyone ever pretended that SR (or Riemann's work)
make EG invalid. How can you be so illiterate???

> including some really pathetic stinker not even
> knowing what sqrt function is.

The "stinker" (did you really check you English-Polish
dictionary on this word Maciej?) is the one who cannot
handle basic of math properly, I mean *you* Maciej.

>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poincar%C3%A9_disk_model
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein_synchronisation
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poincar%C3%A9_conjecture
>
> "It is needless to add that every one would look upon this
> solution as the more advantageous."

Context? What are you talking about?

> Every one but an insanee crazie screaming that common sense
> is a collection of prejudices, and a bunch of his mindless
> minions.

You are a demented kook, Maciej.

Re: Poincare and non-euclidean geometries in physics

<fb0cd25b-6aec-4837-82cf-e58df4fb7346n@googlegroups.com>

copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=77076&group=sci.physics.relativity#77076

copy link Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity

X-Received: by 2002:a37:c50:: with SMTP id 77mr49517217qkm.717.1641666756040;
Sat, 08 Jan 2022 10:32:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:1ccb:: with SMTP id g11mr35890977qvd.97.1641666755922;
Sat, 08 Jan 2022 10:32:35 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2022 10:32:35 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <srckqh$ru5$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=89.206.14.16; posting-account=I3DWzAoAAACOmZUdDcZ-C0PqAZGVsbW0
NNTP-Posting-Host: 89.206.14.16
References: <8b9b03ed-5efb-4829-b787-6187ea999137n@googlegroups.com>
<srcjlk$8ve$1@gioia.aioe.org> <b6ec2f49-e42f-445f-bef2-fc9653ba56e7n@googlegroups.com>
<srckqh$ru5$1@gioia.aioe.org>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <fb0cd25b-6aec-4837-82cf-e58df4fb7346n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Poincare and non-euclidean geometries in physics
From: maluwozn...@gmail.com (Maciej Wozniak)
Injection-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2022 18:32:36 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 46

by: Maciej Wozniak - Sat, 8 Jan 2022 18:32 UTC

On Saturday, 8 January 2022 at 19:23:16 UTC+1, Python wrote:
> Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> > On Saturday, 8 January 2022 at 19:03:35 UTC+1, Python wrote:
> >> Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> >>>
> >>> https://brocku.ca/MeadProject/Poincare/Poincare_1905_06.html
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> "It is needless to add that every one would look upon this solution as the more advantageous."
> >>>
> >>> Every one but an crazie screaming that common sense is
> >>> a collection of prejudices, and a bunch of his mindless
> >>> minions.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> "Euclidean geometry, therefore, has nothing to fear from fresh experiments."
> >> Sure. Right. How could experiments relate to axiomatic system?
> >
> > Sure. Right. How could experiments relate to axiomatic system?
> > Poincare has explained quite well, why it can't.
> > Only a idiotic fanatic idiot could think otherwise, like Einstein and
> > his [snip profanity],
>
> Neither Einstein nor anyone ever pretended that SR (or Riemann's work)
> make EG invalid.

They only pretended it's invalid "in the world we inhabit".
Poor idiots.

> > including some really pathetic stinker not even
> > knowing what sqrt function is.
> The "stinker" (did you really check you English-Polish
> dictionary on this word Maciej?) is the one who cannot
> handle basic of math properly

No; did you really check dictionary on this word, poor
stinker? It has a different meaning than "a person
who doesn't know math", of course, this is matching
you as well.

> > "It is needless to add that every one would look upon this
> > solution as the more advantageous."
> Context? What are you talking about?

Are you really too dumb to manage a direct link, too?
Let's try again.
https://brocku.ca/MeadProject/Poincare/Poincare_1905_06.html

Re: Poincare and non-euclidean geometries in physics

<srclo8$1ajt$1@gioia.aioe.org>

copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=77079&group=sci.physics.relativity#77079

copy link Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity

Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!7a25jG6pUKCqa0zKnKnvdg.user.46.165.242.75.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: pyt...@example.invalid (Python)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Poincare and non-euclidean geometries in physics
Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2022 19:39:11 +0100
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <srclo8$1ajt$1@gioia.aioe.org>
References: <8b9b03ed-5efb-4829-b787-6187ea999137n@googlegroups.com>
<srcjlk$8ve$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<b6ec2f49-e42f-445f-bef2-fc9653ba56e7n@googlegroups.com>
<srckqh$ru5$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<fb0cd25b-6aec-4837-82cf-e58df4fb7346n@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="43645"; posting-host="7a25jG6pUKCqa0zKnKnvdg.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org";
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:91.0)
Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.4.1
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
Content-Language: fr

by: Python - Sat, 8 Jan 2022 18:39 UTC

Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> On Saturday, 8 January 2022 at 19:23:16 UTC+1, Python wrote:
>> Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>>> On Saturday, 8 January 2022 at 19:03:35 UTC+1, Python wrote:
>>>> Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://brocku.ca/MeadProject/Poincare/Poincare_1905_06.html
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "It is needless to add that every one would look upon this solution as the more advantageous."
>>>>>
>>>>> Every one but an crazie screaming that common sense is
>>>>> a collection of prejudices, and a bunch of his mindless
>>>>> minions.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Euclidean geometry, therefore, has nothing to fear from fresh experiments."
>>>> Sure. Right. How could experiments relate to axiomatic system?
>>>
>>> Sure. Right. How could experiments relate to axiomatic system?
>>> Poincare has explained quite well, why it can't.
>>> Only a idiotic fanatic idiot could think otherwise, like Einstein and
>>> his [snip profanity],
>>
>> Neither Einstein nor anyone ever pretended that SR (or Riemann's work)
>> make EG invalid.
>
> They only pretended it's invalid "in the world we inhabit".

Nope.

> Poor idiots.

Put it singular, use it as a signature.

>>> including some really pathetic stinker not even
>>> knowing what sqrt function is.
>> The "stinker" (did you really check you English-Polish
>> dictionary on this word Maciej?) is the one who cannot
>> handle basic of math properly
>
> No; did you really check dictionary on this word, poor
> stinker? It has a different meaning than "a person
> who doesn't know math", of course, this is matching
> you as well.

It makes *you* a stinker, it is not the *definition* of
stinker. You have issues with language Maciej.

>>> "It is needless to add that every one would look upon this
>>> solution as the more advantageous."
>> Context? What are you talking about?
>
> Are you really too dumb to manage a direct link, too?
> Let's try again.
> https://brocku.ca/MeadProject/Poincare/Poincare_1905_06.html

Let's see:

"... modify the laws of optics, and suppose that light is not rigorously
propagated in a straight line".

This is exactly what has been done.
Poincaré: 1. Einstein: 1. Python: 1. Wozniak: 0.

Re: Poincare and non-euclidean geometries in physics

<fb89c46f-99d2-4f18-a1b4-16c85279f649n@googlegroups.com>

copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=77082&group=sci.physics.relativity#77082

copy link Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity

X-Received: by 2002:ac8:7d84:: with SMTP id c4mr60020551qtd.94.1641667760917;
Sat, 08 Jan 2022 10:49:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:7dd1:: with SMTP id c17mr59710170qte.508.1641667760754;
Sat, 08 Jan 2022 10:49:20 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2022 10:49:20 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <srclo8$1ajt$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=89.206.14.16; posting-account=I3DWzAoAAACOmZUdDcZ-C0PqAZGVsbW0
NNTP-Posting-Host: 89.206.14.16
References: <8b9b03ed-5efb-4829-b787-6187ea999137n@googlegroups.com>
<srcjlk$8ve$1@gioia.aioe.org> <b6ec2f49-e42f-445f-bef2-fc9653ba56e7n@googlegroups.com>
<srckqh$ru5$1@gioia.aioe.org> <fb0cd25b-6aec-4837-82cf-e58df4fb7346n@googlegroups.com>
<srclo8$1ajt$1@gioia.aioe.org>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <fb89c46f-99d2-4f18-a1b4-16c85279f649n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Poincare and non-euclidean geometries in physics
From: maluwozn...@gmail.com (Maciej Wozniak)
Injection-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2022 18:49:20 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 50

by: Maciej Wozniak - Sat, 8 Jan 2022 18:49 UTC

On Saturday, 8 January 2022 at 19:39:08 UTC+1, Python wrote:
> Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> > On Saturday, 8 January 2022 at 19:23:16 UTC+1, Python wrote:
> >> Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> >>> On Saturday, 8 January 2022 at 19:03:35 UTC+1, Python wrote:
> >>>> Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> https://brocku.ca/MeadProject/Poincare/Poincare_1905_06.html
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> "It is needless to add that every one would look upon this solution as the more advantageous."
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Every one but an crazie screaming that common sense is
> >>>>> a collection of prejudices, and a bunch of his mindless
> >>>>> minions.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> "Euclidean geometry, therefore, has nothing to fear from fresh experiments."
> >>>> Sure. Right. How could experiments relate to axiomatic system?
> >>>
> >>> Sure. Right. How could experiments relate to axiomatic system?
> >>> Poincare has explained quite well, why it can't.
> >>> Only a idiotic fanatic idiot could think otherwise, like Einstein and
> >>> his [snip profanity],
> >>
> >> Neither Einstein nor anyone ever pretended that SR (or Riemann's work)
> >> make EG invalid.
> >
> > They only pretended it's invalid "in the world we inhabit".
> Nope.

:) So, is Euclidean geometry a valid geometry of our
universe, poor stinker? According to you and your idiot
gurus, od course.

> >>> "It is needless to add that every one would look upon this
> >>> solution as the more advantageous."
> >> Context? What are you talking about?
> >
> > Are you really too dumb to manage a direct link, too?
> > Let's try again.
> > https://brocku.ca/MeadProject/Poincare/Poincare_1905_06.html
> Let's see:
>
> "... modify the laws of optics, and suppose that light is not rigorously
> propagated in a straight line".
>
> This is exactly what has been done.

Buhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.
You're even stupider than I thought. Well, well.

Re: Poincare and non-euclidean geometries in physics

<srcmie$1mgf$2@gioia.aioe.org>

copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=77085&group=sci.physics.relativity#77085

copy link Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity

Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!7a25jG6pUKCqa0zKnKnvdg.user.46.165.242.75.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: pyt...@example.invalid (Python)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Poincare and non-euclidean geometries in physics
Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2022 19:53:09 +0100
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <srcmie$1mgf$2@gioia.aioe.org>
References: <8b9b03ed-5efb-4829-b787-6187ea999137n@googlegroups.com>
<srcjlk$8ve$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<b6ec2f49-e42f-445f-bef2-fc9653ba56e7n@googlegroups.com>
<srckqh$ru5$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<fb0cd25b-6aec-4837-82cf-e58df4fb7346n@googlegroups.com>
<srclo8$1ajt$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<fb89c46f-99d2-4f18-a1b4-16c85279f649n@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="55823"; posting-host="7a25jG6pUKCqa0zKnKnvdg.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org";
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:91.0)
Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.4.1
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
Content-Language: fr

by: Python - Sat, 8 Jan 2022 18:53 UTC

Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> On Saturday, 8 January 2022 at 19:39:08 UTC+1, Python wrote:
>> Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>>> On Saturday, 8 January 2022 at 19:23:16 UTC+1, Python wrote:
>>>> Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>>>>> On Saturday, 8 January 2022 at 19:03:35 UTC+1, Python wrote:
>>>>>> Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://brocku.ca/MeadProject/Poincare/Poincare_1905_06.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "It is needless to add that every one would look upon this solution as the more advantageous."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Every one but an crazie screaming that common sense is
>>>>>>> a collection of prejudices, and a bunch of his mindless
>>>>>>> minions.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Euclidean geometry, therefore, has nothing to fear from fresh experiments."
>>>>>> Sure. Right. How could experiments relate to axiomatic system?
>>>>>
>>>>> Sure. Right. How could experiments relate to axiomatic system?
>>>>> Poincare has explained quite well, why it can't.
>>>>> Only a idiotic fanatic idiot could think otherwise, like Einstein and
>>>>> his [snip profanity],
>>>>
>>>> Neither Einstein nor anyone ever pretended that SR (or Riemann's work)
>>>> make EG invalid.
>>>
>>> They only pretended it's invalid "in the world we inhabit".
>> Nope.
>
> :) So, is Euclidean geometry a valid geometry of our
> universe, poor stinker? According to you and your idiot
> gurus, od course.
>
>>>>> "It is needless to add that every one would look upon this
>>>>> solution as the more advantageous."
>>>> Context? What are you talking about?
>>>
>>> Are you really too dumb to manage a direct link, too?
>>> Let's try again.
>>> https://brocku.ca/MeadProject/Poincare/Poincare_1905_06.html
>> Let's see:
>>
>> "... modify the laws of optics, and suppose that light is not rigorously
>> propagated in a straight line".
>>
>> This is exactly what has been done.
>
> Buhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.

Nurses!!! Emergency in room 42!!!

Re: Poincare and non-euclidean geometries in physics

<8403c32d-3c99-41fb-9441-cf46e826e67dn@googlegroups.com>

copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=77087&group=sci.physics.relativity#77087

copy link Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity

X-Received: by 2002:a37:bd05:: with SMTP id n5mr47197603qkf.293.1641668403026;
Sat, 08 Jan 2022 11:00:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:29ce:: with SMTP id gh14mr2100115qvb.35.1641668402873;
Sat, 08 Jan 2022 11:00:02 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2022 11:00:02 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <srcmie$1mgf$2@gioia.aioe.org>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=89.206.14.16; posting-account=I3DWzAoAAACOmZUdDcZ-C0PqAZGVsbW0
NNTP-Posting-Host: 89.206.14.16
References: <8b9b03ed-5efb-4829-b787-6187ea999137n@googlegroups.com>
<srcjlk$8ve$1@gioia.aioe.org> <b6ec2f49-e42f-445f-bef2-fc9653ba56e7n@googlegroups.com>
<srckqh$ru5$1@gioia.aioe.org> <fb0cd25b-6aec-4837-82cf-e58df4fb7346n@googlegroups.com>
<srclo8$1ajt$1@gioia.aioe.org> <fb89c46f-99d2-4f18-a1b4-16c85279f649n@googlegroups.com>
<srcmie$1mgf$2@gioia.aioe.org>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <8403c32d-3c99-41fb-9441-cf46e826e67dn@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Poincare and non-euclidean geometries in physics
From: maluwozn...@gmail.com (Maciej Wozniak)
Injection-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2022 19:00:03 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 57

by: Maciej Wozniak - Sat, 8 Jan 2022 19:00 UTC

On Saturday, 8 January 2022 at 19:53:05 UTC+1, Python wrote:
> Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> > On Saturday, 8 January 2022 at 19:39:08 UTC+1, Python wrote:
> >> Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> >>> On Saturday, 8 January 2022 at 19:23:16 UTC+1, Python wrote:
> >>>> Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> >>>>> On Saturday, 8 January 2022 at 19:03:35 UTC+1, Python wrote:
> >>>>>> Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> https://brocku.ca/MeadProject/Poincare/Poincare_1905_06.html
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> "It is needless to add that every one would look upon this solution as the more advantageous."
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Every one but an crazie screaming that common sense is
> >>>>>>> a collection of prejudices, and a bunch of his mindless
> >>>>>>> minions.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> "Euclidean geometry, therefore, has nothing to fear from fresh experiments."
> >>>>>> Sure. Right. How could experiments relate to axiomatic system?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Sure. Right. How could experiments relate to axiomatic system?
> >>>>> Poincare has explained quite well, why it can't.
> >>>>> Only a idiotic fanatic idiot could think otherwise, like Einstein and
> >>>>> his [snip profanity],
> >>>>
> >>>> Neither Einstein nor anyone ever pretended that SR (or Riemann's work)
> >>>> make EG invalid.
> >>>
> >>> They only pretended it's invalid "in the world we inhabit".
> >> Nope.
> >
> > :) So, is Euclidean geometry a valid geometry of our
> > universe, poor stinker? According to you and your idiot
> > gurus, od course.
> >
> >>>>> "It is needless to add that every one would look upon this
> >>>>> solution as the more advantageous."
> >>>> Context? What are you talking about?
> >>>
> >>> Are you really too dumb to manage a direct link, too?
> >>> Let's try again.
> >>> https://brocku.ca/MeadProject/Poincare/Poincare_1905_06.html
> >> Let's see:
> >>
> >> "... modify the laws of optics, and suppose that light is not rigorously
> >> propagated in a straight line".
> >>
> >> This is exactly what has been done.
> >
> > Buhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.
> Nurses!!! Emergency in room 42!!!

:) So, is Euclidean geometry a valid geometry of our
universe, poor stinker? According to you and your idiot
gurus, od course.
No answer, poor stinker? Of course.

Re: Poincare and non-euclidean geometries in physics

<srcnlh$6hd$1@gioia.aioe.org>

copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=77089&group=sci.physics.relativity#77089

copy link Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity

Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!7a25jG6pUKCqa0zKnKnvdg.user.46.165.242.75.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: pyt...@example.invalid (Python)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Poincare and non-euclidean geometries in physics
Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2022 20:11:51 +0100
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <srcnlh$6hd$1@gioia.aioe.org>
References: <8b9b03ed-5efb-4829-b787-6187ea999137n@googlegroups.com>
<srcjlk$8ve$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<b6ec2f49-e42f-445f-bef2-fc9653ba56e7n@googlegroups.com>
<srckqh$ru5$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<fb0cd25b-6aec-4837-82cf-e58df4fb7346n@googlegroups.com>
<srclo8$1ajt$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<fb89c46f-99d2-4f18-a1b4-16c85279f649n@googlegroups.com>
<srcmie$1mgf$2@gioia.aioe.org>
<8403c32d-3c99-41fb-9441-cf46e826e67dn@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="6701"; posting-host="7a25jG6pUKCqa0zKnKnvdg.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org";
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:91.0)
Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.4.1
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
Content-Language: fr

by: Python - Sat, 8 Jan 2022 19:11 UTC

Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> On Saturday, 8 January 2022 at 19:53:05 UTC+1, Python wrote:
>> Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>>> On Saturday, 8 January 2022 at 19:39:08 UTC+1, Python wrote:
>>>> Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>>>>> On Saturday, 8 January 2022 at 19:23:16 UTC+1, Python wrote:
>>>>>> Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>>>>>>> On Saturday, 8 January 2022 at 19:03:35 UTC+1, Python wrote:
>>>>>>>> Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://brocku.ca/MeadProject/Poincare/Poincare_1905_06.html
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "It is needless to add that every one would look upon this solution as the more advantageous."
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Every one but an crazie screaming that common sense is
>>>>>>>>> a collection of prejudices, and a bunch of his mindless
>>>>>>>>> minions.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "Euclidean geometry, therefore, has nothing to fear from fresh experiments."
>>>>>>>> Sure. Right. How could experiments relate to axiomatic system?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sure. Right. How could experiments relate to axiomatic system?
>>>>>>> Poincare has explained quite well, why it can't.
>>>>>>> Only a idiotic fanatic idiot could think otherwise, like Einstein and
>>>>>>> his [snip profanity],
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Neither Einstein nor anyone ever pretended that SR (or Riemann's work)
>>>>>> make EG invalid.
>>>>>
>>>>> They only pretended it's invalid "in the world we inhabit".
>>>> Nope.
>>>
>>> :) So, is Euclidean geometry a valid geometry of our
>>> universe, poor stinker? According to you and your idiot
>>> gurus, od course.
>>>
>>>>>>> "It is needless to add that every one would look upon this
>>>>>>> solution as the more advantageous."
>>>>>> Context? What are you talking about?
>>>>>
>>>>> Are you really too dumb to manage a direct link, too?
>>>>> Let's try again.
>>>>> https://brocku.ca/MeadProject/Poincare/Poincare_1905_06.html
>>>> Let's see:
>>>>
>>>> "... modify the laws of optics, and suppose that light is not rigorously
>>>> propagated in a straight line".
>>>>
>>>> This is exactly what has been done.
>>>
>>> Buhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.
>> Nurses!!! Emergency in room 42!!!
>
> [snip evading]

"... modify the laws of optics, and suppose that light is not rigorously
propagated in a straight line"

Poincaré: 1. Wozniak: 0.

Anyway, you've made a fool of yourself again. Poincaré would have
punch you in the face, disgusting "stinker".

Re: Poincare and non-euclidean geometries in physics

<e45066b4-1643-42ca-980f-79ec911cb224n@googlegroups.com>

copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=77092&group=sci.physics.relativity#77092

copy link Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity

X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:404e:: with SMTP id i14mr48257780qko.111.1641669345419;
Sat, 08 Jan 2022 11:15:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:3008:: with SMTP id ke8mr63013034qvb.49.1641669345344;
Sat, 08 Jan 2022 11:15:45 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2022 11:15:45 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <srcnlh$6hd$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2601:1c0:c803:ab80:85cf:adfc:b93c:e1c6;
posting-account=Dg6LkgkAAABl5NRBT4_iFEO1VO77GchW
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2601:1c0:c803:ab80:85cf:adfc:b93c:e1c6
References: <8b9b03ed-5efb-4829-b787-6187ea999137n@googlegroups.com>
<srcjlk$8ve$1@gioia.aioe.org> <b6ec2f49-e42f-445f-bef2-fc9653ba56e7n@googlegroups.com>
<srckqh$ru5$1@gioia.aioe.org> <fb0cd25b-6aec-4837-82cf-e58df4fb7346n@googlegroups.com>
<srclo8$1ajt$1@gioia.aioe.org> <fb89c46f-99d2-4f18-a1b4-16c85279f649n@googlegroups.com>
<srcmie$1mgf$2@gioia.aioe.org> <8403c32d-3c99-41fb-9441-cf46e826e67dn@googlegroups.com>
<srcnlh$6hd$1@gioia.aioe.org>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <e45066b4-1643-42ca-980f-79ec911cb224n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Poincare and non-euclidean geometries in physics
From: mitchrae...@gmail.com (mitchr...@gmail.com)
Injection-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2022 19:15:45 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 0

by: mitchr...@gmail.com - Sat, 8 Jan 2022 19:15 UTC

Curved and flat geometries are unified.

Re: Poincare and non-euclidean geometries in physics

<7d5c8bac-7baa-4179-8e19-fdfe27f84f87n@googlegroups.com>

copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=77099&group=sci.physics.relativity#77099

copy link Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity

X-Received: by 2002:ac8:7d47:: with SMTP id h7mr61427241qtb.486.1641670060384;
Sat, 08 Jan 2022 11:27:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:1ccb:: with SMTP id g11mr36031326qvd.97.1641670060266;
Sat, 08 Jan 2022 11:27:40 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2022 11:27:40 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <srcnlh$6hd$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=89.206.14.16; posting-account=I3DWzAoAAACOmZUdDcZ-C0PqAZGVsbW0
NNTP-Posting-Host: 89.206.14.16
References: <8b9b03ed-5efb-4829-b787-6187ea999137n@googlegroups.com>
<srcjlk$8ve$1@gioia.aioe.org> <b6ec2f49-e42f-445f-bef2-fc9653ba56e7n@googlegroups.com>
<srckqh$ru5$1@gioia.aioe.org> <fb0cd25b-6aec-4837-82cf-e58df4fb7346n@googlegroups.com>
<srclo8$1ajt$1@gioia.aioe.org> <fb89c46f-99d2-4f18-a1b4-16c85279f649n@googlegroups.com>
<srcmie$1mgf$2@gioia.aioe.org> <8403c32d-3c99-41fb-9441-cf46e826e67dn@googlegroups.com>
<srcnlh$6hd$1@gioia.aioe.org>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <7d5c8bac-7baa-4179-8e19-fdfe27f84f87n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Poincare and non-euclidean geometries in physics
From: maluwozn...@gmail.com (Maciej Wozniak)
Injection-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2022 19:27:40 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 64

by: Maciej Wozniak - Sat, 8 Jan 2022 19:27 UTC

On Saturday, 8 January 2022 at 20:11:48 UTC+1, Python wrote:
> Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> > On Saturday, 8 January 2022 at 19:53:05 UTC+1, Python wrote:
> >> Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> >>> On Saturday, 8 January 2022 at 19:39:08 UTC+1, Python wrote:
> >>>> Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> >>>>> On Saturday, 8 January 2022 at 19:23:16 UTC+1, Python wrote:
> >>>>>> Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Saturday, 8 January 2022 at 19:03:35 UTC+1, Python wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> https://brocku.ca/MeadProject/Poincare/Poincare_1905_06.html
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> "It is needless to add that every one would look upon this solution as the more advantageous."
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Every one but an crazie screaming that common sense is
> >>>>>>>>> a collection of prejudices, and a bunch of his mindless
> >>>>>>>>> minions.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> "Euclidean geometry, therefore, has nothing to fear from fresh experiments."
> >>>>>>>> Sure. Right. How could experiments relate to axiomatic system?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Sure. Right. How could experiments relate to axiomatic system?
> >>>>>>> Poincare has explained quite well, why it can't.
> >>>>>>> Only a idiotic fanatic idiot could think otherwise, like Einstein and
> >>>>>>> his [snip profanity],
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Neither Einstein nor anyone ever pretended that SR (or Riemann's work)
> >>>>>> make EG invalid.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> They only pretended it's invalid "in the world we inhabit".
> >>>> Nope.
> >>>
> >>> :) So, is Euclidean geometry a valid geometry of our
> >>> universe, poor stinker? According to you and your idiot
> >>> gurus, od course.
> >>>
> >>>>>>> "It is needless to add that every one would look upon this
> >>>>>>> solution as the more advantageous."
> >>>>>> Context? What are you talking about?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Are you really too dumb to manage a direct link, too?
> >>>>> Let's try again.
> >>>>> https://brocku.ca/MeadProject/Poincare/Poincare_1905_06.html
> >>>> Let's see:
> >>>>
> >>>> "... modify the laws of optics, and suppose that light is not rigorously
> >>>> propagated in a straight line".
> >>>>
> >>>> This is exactly what has been done.
> >>>
> >>> Buhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.
> >> Nurses!!! Emergency in room 42!!!
> >
> > [snip evading]
> "... modify the laws of optics, and suppose that light is not rigorously
> propagated in a straight line"

[Instead proudly announcing some non-euclidean space].
So, is Euclidean geometry a valid geometry of our
universe, poor stinker? According to you and your idiot
gurus, od course.
Still no answer, poor stinker?

Re: Poincare and non-euclidean geometries in physics

<9039d4af-bd23-4002-a5ca-f6a377f82519n@googlegroups.com>

copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=77215&group=sci.physics.relativity#77215

copy link Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity

X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:dcf:: with SMTP id 15mr65727778qvt.47.1641756646192;
Sun, 09 Jan 2022 11:30:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5783:: with SMTP id v3mr2159558qta.116.1641756646012;
Sun, 09 Jan 2022 11:30:46 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2022 11:30:45 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <7d5c8bac-7baa-4179-8e19-fdfe27f84f87n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2601:1c0:c803:ab80:4177:9092:ff6b:e6ef;
posting-account=Dg6LkgkAAABl5NRBT4_iFEO1VO77GchW
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2601:1c0:c803:ab80:4177:9092:ff6b:e6ef
References: <8b9b03ed-5efb-4829-b787-6187ea999137n@googlegroups.com>
<srcjlk$8ve$1@gioia.aioe.org> <b6ec2f49-e42f-445f-bef2-fc9653ba56e7n@googlegroups.com>
<srckqh$ru5$1@gioia.aioe.org> <fb0cd25b-6aec-4837-82cf-e58df4fb7346n@googlegroups.com>
<srclo8$1ajt$1@gioia.aioe.org> <fb89c46f-99d2-4f18-a1b4-16c85279f649n@googlegroups.com>
<srcmie$1mgf$2@gioia.aioe.org> <8403c32d-3c99-41fb-9441-cf46e826e67dn@googlegroups.com>
<srcnlh$6hd$1@gioia.aioe.org> <7d5c8bac-7baa-4179-8e19-fdfe27f84f87n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <9039d4af-bd23-4002-a5ca-f6a377f82519n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Poincare and non-euclidean geometries in physics
From: mitchrae...@gmail.com (mitchr...@gmail.com)
Injection-Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2022 19:30:46 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 66

by: mitchr...@gmail.com - Sun, 9 Jan 2022 19:30 UTC

On Saturday, January 8, 2022 at 11:27:41 AM UTC-8, maluw...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Saturday, 8 January 2022 at 20:11:48 UTC+1, Python wrote:
> > Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> > > On Saturday, 8 January 2022 at 19:53:05 UTC+1, Python wrote:
> > >> Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> > >>> On Saturday, 8 January 2022 at 19:39:08 UTC+1, Python wrote:
> > >>>> Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> > >>>>> On Saturday, 8 January 2022 at 19:23:16 UTC+1, Python wrote:
> > >>>>>> Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> > >>>>>>> On Saturday, 8 January 2022 at 19:03:35 UTC+1, Python wrote:
> > >>>>>>>> Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> https://brocku.ca/MeadProject/Poincare/Poincare_1905_06.html
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> "It is needless to add that every one would look upon this solution as the more advantageous."
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Every one but an crazie screaming that common sense is
> > >>>>>>>>> a collection of prejudices, and a bunch of his mindless
> > >>>>>>>>> minions.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> "Euclidean geometry, therefore, has nothing to fear from fresh experiments."
> > >>>>>>>> Sure. Right. How could experiments relate to axiomatic system?
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Sure. Right. How could experiments relate to axiomatic system?
> > >>>>>>> Poincare has explained quite well, why it can't.
> > >>>>>>> Only a idiotic fanatic idiot could think otherwise, like Einstein and
> > >>>>>>> his [snip profanity],
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Neither Einstein nor anyone ever pretended that SR (or Riemann's work)
> > >>>>>> make EG invalid.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> They only pretended it's invalid "in the world we inhabit".
> > >>>> Nope.
> > >>>
> > >>> :) So, is Euclidean geometry a valid geometry of our
> > >>> universe, poor stinker? According to you and your idiot
> > >>> gurus, od course.
> > >>>
> > >>>>>>> "It is needless to add that every one would look upon this
> > >>>>>>> solution as the more advantageous."
> > >>>>>> Context? What are you talking about?
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Are you really too dumb to manage a direct link, too?
> > >>>>> Let's try again.
> > >>>>> https://brocku.ca/MeadProject/Poincare/Poincare_1905_06.html
> > >>>> Let's see:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> "... modify the laws of optics, and suppose that light is not rigorously
> > >>>> propagated in a straight line".
> > >>>>
> > >>>> This is exactly what has been done.
> > >>>
> > >>> Buhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.
> > >> Nurses!!! Emergency in room 42!!!
> > >
> > > [snip evading]
> > "... modify the laws of optics, and suppose that light is not rigorously
> > propagated in a straight line"
> [Instead proudly announcing some non-euclidean space].
> So, is Euclidean geometry a valid geometry of our
> universe, poor stinker? According to you and your idiot
> gurus, od course.
> Still no answer, poor stinker?

The hypersphere isn't flat but the universe is...

Subject	Author
Poincare and non-euclidean geometries in physics	Maciej Wozniak
Re: Poincare and non-euclidean geometries in physics	Python
Re: Poincare and non-euclidean geometries in physics	Maciej Wozniak
Re: Poincare and non-euclidean geometries in physics	Python
Re: Poincare and non-euclidean geometries in physics	Maciej Wozniak
Re: Poincare and non-euclidean geometries in physics	Python
Re: Poincare and non-euclidean geometries in physics	Maciej Wozniak
Re: Poincare and non-euclidean geometries in physics	Python
Re: Poincare and non-euclidean geometries in physics	Maciej Wozniak
Re: Poincare and non-euclidean geometries in physics	Python
Re: Poincare and non-euclidean geometries in physics	mitchr...@gmail.com
Re: Poincare and non-euclidean geometries in physics	Maciej Wozniak
Re: Poincare and non-euclidean geometries in physics	mitchr...@gmail.com