Why is UCR John Baez never able to do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus? Is he too lazy or is he just plain too stupid and ignorant, not even understanding that Calculus is geometry and requires him to do a geometry proof. Gee, the education standards at UCR are very low, for John can not even admit a slant cut in cone is a OVAL, never the ellipse. Here again, John is too lazy to scroll up a sheet of paper into a cone and drop a Kerr lid inside and see for himself?

Is that the story of John Baez life in science-- lazy plus stupid?

On Monday, June 10, 1996 at 2:00:00 AM UTC-5, john baez wrote:
> In article <4pj2a6$l...@huron.eel.ufl.edu> afn0...@afn.org (Jason N. Jiggins) writes:
> > I've jumped into calculus this term and not a week into the course the
> >instructor is writing hieroglyphic-like equations on the board.
> > I can handle "lim" and "x-->oo", but he's using upside-down capital
> >"A's", backward capital "E's" and backward "epsilons"!! Here's his
> >translation:
> > upside-down "A" means "For every"
> > backward "E" means "there exists"
> > backward "epsilon" means "such that"
> >
> > Is this something he just made up or is this standard notation?
> He must be making this up to deliberately confuse you, as some sort of
> sadistic practical joke. I suggest that you go to the chair of the
> department or the dean and complain. Upside-down and backwards letters!
> Backwards Greek letters! I suppose that next he'll be using upside-down
> Chinese characters.
> Just kidding; all this stuff is perfectly standard. You'll get used to
> it. If anyone ever uses a notation you don't understand, don't be
> afraid to ask what it means.

3rd published book

AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Ever since Ancient Greek Times it was thought the slant cut into a cone is the ellipse. That was false. For the slant cut in every cone is a Oval, never an Ellipse. This book is a proof that the slant cut is a oval, never the ellipse. A slant cut into the Cylinder is in fact a ellipse, but never in a cone.

Length: 21 pages

File Size: 1620 KB
Print Length: 21 pages
Publication Date: March 11, 2019
Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07PLSDQWC
Text-to-Speech: Enabled
X-Ray: Not Enabled
Word Wise: Not Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled

#8-2, 11th published book

World's First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus// Math proof series, book 2 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 19May2021. This is AP's 11th published book of science.
Preface:
Actually my title is too modest, for the proof that lies within this book makes it the World's First Valid Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for in my modesty, I just wanted to emphasis that calculus was geometry and needed a geometry proof. Not being modest, there has never been a valid proof of FTC until AP's 2015 proof. This also implies that only a geometry proof of FTC constitutes a valid proof of FTC.

Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math so long as they had a huge mass of mistakes, errors, fakes and con-artist trickery such as the "limit analysis". To give a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus requires math be cleaned-up and cleaned-out of most of math's mistakes and errors. So in a sense, a Geometry FTC proof is a exercise in Consistency of all of Mathematics. In order to prove a FTC geometry proof, requires throwing out the error filled mess of Old Math. Can the Reals be the true numbers of mathematics if the Reals cannot deliver a Geometry proof of FTC? Can the functions that are not polynomial functions allow us to give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a Coordinate System in 2D have 4 quadrants and still give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a equation of mathematics with a number that is _not a positive decimal Grid Number_ all alone on the right side of the equation, at all times, allow us to give a Geometry proof of the FTC?

Cover Picture: Is my hand written, one page geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, the world's first geometry proof of FTC, 2013-2015, by AP.

Length: 137 pages

Product details
ASIN : B07PQTNHMY
Publication date : March 14, 2019
Language : English
File size : 1307 KB
Text-to-Speech : Enabled
Screen Reader : Supported
Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
X-Ray : Not Enabled
Word Wise : Not Enabled
Print length : 137 pages
Lending : Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #128,729 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#2 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
#134 in Calculus (Books)
#20 in Calculus (Kindle Store)