AP's 151st book:

TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// 1st year College// Physics textbook series, book 4
by Archimedes Plutonium

Preface: This is AP's 151st book of science published. It is one of my most important books of science because 1st year college physics is so impressionable on students, if they should continue with physics, or look elsewhere for a career. And also, physics is a crossroad to all the other hard core sciences, where physics course is mandatory such as in chemistry or even biology. I have endeavored to make physics 1st year college to be as easy and simple to learn. Good luck.

Cover picture is the template book of Halliday & Resnick, 1988, 3rd edition Fundamentals of Physics and sitting on top are cut outs of "half bent circles, bent at 90 degrees" to imitate magnetic monopoles. Magnetic Monopoles revolutionizes physics education, and separates-out, what is Old Physics from what is New Physics.

The world needs a new standard in physics education since Feynman set the standard in 1960s with his "Lectures on Physics" that lasted until about 1990 and then AP's Atom Totality theory caused Feynman's Lectures to be completely outdated. And so much has changed in physics since 1960s that AP now sets the new world standard in physics education with this series of textbooks.

To be a Master of physics or Calculus or Mathematics, has to be seen in "signs and signals". Can you correct the mistakes and errors of Old Physics, of Old Calculus, of Old Math? If you cannot clean up the fakery of Old Physics, of Old Calculus, of Old Math, you have no business, no reason to write a physics, calculus or math textbook. There is an old legend in England about King Arthur, and the legend goes, that the King is the one who pulls Excalibur out of the iron anvil. Pulling the sword out of the anvil is a metaphor for Cleaning up all the mistakes and errors of Old Physics, of Old Calculus, of Old Math.

Should you write a textbook on Calculus, if you cannot see that the slant cut in a cone is a oval, never the ellipse? Of course not. Should you write a Calculus textbook if you cannot do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus? Of course not. Should you write a physics textbook if you cannot ask the question, which is the atom's real true electron, is it the muon or the 0.5MeV particle that AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole.

Feynman wrote the last textbook in 1960s to guide physics forward, and although Feynman did not clean up much of Old Physics, he did direct the way forward in that Electricity and Magnetism in his Quantum Electrodynamics was the way forward. It would have been nice for Feynman to have found that it is impossible for a 0.5MeV particle to be the atom's electron moving near the speed of light outside the proton of hydrogen and still remain an atom, thus all atoms collapse. It would have been nice for Feynman to say the muon is the real atom's electron and that the 0.5MeV particle was Dirac's magnetic monopole. But it just was not in the fated cards of Feynman's physics. Yet, his textbook served the leadership of physics from 1960 to 1990. Time we have the new replacement of physics textbook.

Now, in 2021, we need a new textbook that carries all of physics forward into the future for the next 100 years, and that is what this textbook is.

I will use Halliday and Resnick textbook as template to garner work exercise problems for 1st year and 2nd year college. For 3rd and senior year college physics I will directly use Feynman's Lectures and QED, quantum electrodynamics. Correcting Feynman and setting the stage that all of physics is-- All is Atom and Atoms are nothing but Electricity and Magnetism.

Much and most of 20th century physics was error filled and illogical physics, dead end , stupid paths such as General Relativity, Big Bang, Black holes, gravity waves, etc etc. Dead end stupidity is much of Old Physics of the 20th century. What distinguishes Feynman, is he kept his head above the water by concentrating almost exclusively on Electrodynamics. He remarked words to the effect== "QED is the most precise, most accurate theory in all of physics". And, that is true, given All is Atom, and Atoms are nothing but Electricity and Magnetism.

This textbook is going to set the world standard on college physics education. Because I have reduced the burden of mathematics, reduced it to be almost what I call -- difficult-free-math. I mean, easy-math. Meaning that all functions and equations of math and physics are just polynomials. All functions of math and physics are polynomials. Making calculus super super easy because all you ever do is plug in the Power rules for derivative and integral, so that physics math is able to be taught in High School. In other words, physics with almost no math at all-- so to speak, or what can be called as easy as learning add, subtract, multiply, divide.

What makes both math and physics extremely hard to learn and understand is when mathematics never cleans itself up, and never tries to make itself easy. If all of math can be made as easy as add, subtract, multiply, divide, no one would really complain about math or physics. But because math is overrun by kooks (definition of kook: is a person who cares more about fame and fortune than about truth in science), that math has become a incomprehensible trash pile and the worst of all the sciences, and because the math is so difficult, it carried over into physics, making physics difficult.

You see, one of the greatest omissions of science in the 20th and 21st century was the idea that math can be reduced to a Simplicity of education. That math need not be hard and difficult. Yet no-one in the 20th and 21st century ever had that idea of simplicity, (with the possible exception of Harold Jacobs) that math had run out-of-bounds as a science and was more of a science fiction subject for kook mathematicians. Had become absurdly difficult because of the reason that kooks gain fame and fortune on making math difficult. Mathematicians never thought their job was to make math simple and easy, instead, the kooks of math piled on more trash and garbage to make math a twilight zone of science.

When you make all of math be just polynomial equations and functions, you make math the easiest of the major sciences, which then follows up by making physics easy as possible.

--------------------------
Table of Contents
--------------------------

Part I, Introduction, and about physics.

a) About this textbook and series of Physics textbooks.

b) Brief history lesson of 20th century physics.

c) How we make the mathematics super easy.

d) Horrible concept of "charge" in Old Physics, and thrown out of New Physics.

e) We increasingly have to use Biology DNA knowledge to unravel the physics light wave.

Part II, 6 Laws of EM theory.

f) The 6 laws of ElectroMagnetic theory and their Units, EM theory.

g) The four differential equations laws of EM theory.

h) Defining the units of Coulomb and Ampere as C = A*seconds; and the Elementary-Coulomb.

i) Faraday Constant Experiment in classroom.

j) Matching the physics Algebra of units with the physics Geometry of units..

k) The EM Spectrum, Electromagnetic Spectrum.

Part III, 1st Law of EM theory.

l) 1st Law of EM theory; law of Magnetic Monopole and units are B = kg/ C*s = kg/ A*s^2.

m) Series versus parallel connection of closed loop.

n) Short Circuit.

Part IV, 2nd Law of EM theory.

o) 2nd Law of EM theory; New Ohm's Law V = CBE, the Capacitor-battery law..

p) Review of Geometry volume in 3D and path in 2D.

Part V, 3rd Law of EM theory.

q) 3rd law of EM theory, Faraday's law, C' = (V/(BE))'.

r) Short history lesson of Old Physics, 1860s Maxwell Equations.

s) New Rutherford-Geiger-Marsden Experiment observing Faraday Law.

t) Math Algebra for making one physical concept be perpendicular to another physical concept.

u) EM laws derive the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus.

v) Principle of Maximum Electricity and Torus geometry so essential in Atomic Physics.

Part VI

w) 4th law of EM theory; Ampere-Maxwell law B' = (V/(CE))'.

Part VII

x) 5th law of EM theory; Coulomb-gravity law; E' = (V/(CB))'.

y) Centripetal versus Centrifugal force explained.

Part VIII

z) 6th Law of EM theory, electric generator law; differential equation of New Ohm's Law V' = (CBE)'.

aa) Reinventing the Multivariable Calculus.

bb) Atomic bomb physics.

måndag 27 september 2021 kl. 08:59:07 UTC+2 skrev Archimedes Plutonium:
> AP's 151st book:
>
> TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// 1st year College// Physics textbook series, book 4
> by Archimedes Plutonium
>
>
> Preface: This is AP's 151st book of science published. It is one of my most important books of science because 1st year college physics is so impressionable on students, if they should continue with physics, or look elsewhere for a career. And also, physics is a crossroad to all the other hard core sciences, where physics course is mandatory such as in chemistry or even biology. I have endeavored to make physics 1st year college to be as easy and simple to learn. Good luck.
>
> Cover picture is the template book of Halliday & Resnick, 1988, 3rd edition Fundamentals of Physics and sitting on top are cut outs of "half bent circles, bent at 90 degrees" to imitate magnetic monopoles. Magnetic Monopoles revolutionizes physics education, and separates-out, what is Old Physics from what is New Physics.
>
> The world needs a new standard in physics education since Feynman set the standard in 1960s with his "Lectures on Physics" that lasted until about 1990 and then AP's Atom Totality theory caused Feynman's Lectures to be completely outdated. And so much has changed in physics since 1960s that AP now sets the new world standard in physics education with this series of textbooks.
>
> To be a Master of physics or Calculus or Mathematics, has to be seen in "signs and signals". Can you correct the mistakes and errors of Old Physics, of Old Calculus, of Old Math? If you cannot clean up the fakery of Old Physics, of Old Calculus, of Old Math, you have no business, no reason to write a physics, calculus or math textbook. There is an old legend in England about King Arthur, and the legend goes, that the King is the one who pulls Excalibur out of the iron anvil. Pulling the sword out of the anvil is a metaphor for Cleaning up all the mistakes and errors of Old Physics, of Old Calculus, of Old Math.
>
> Should you write a textbook on Calculus, if you cannot see that the slant cut in a cone is a oval, never the ellipse? Of course not. Should you write a Calculus textbook if you cannot do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus? Of course not. Should you write a physics textbook if you cannot ask the question, which is the atom's real true electron, is it the muon or the 0.5MeV particle that AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole.
>
> Feynman wrote the last textbook in 1960s to guide physics forward, and although Feynman did not clean up much of Old Physics, he did direct the way forward in that Electricity and Magnetism in his Quantum Electrodynamics was the way forward. It would have been nice for Feynman to have found that it is impossible for a 0.5MeV particle to be the atom's electron moving near the speed of light outside the proton of hydrogen and still remain an atom, thus all atoms collapse. It would have been nice for Feynman to say the muon is the real atom's electron and that the 0.5MeV particle was Dirac's magnetic monopole. But it just was not in the fated cards of Feynman's physics. Yet, his textbook served the leadership of physics from 1960 to 1990. Time we have the new replacement of physics textbook.
>
> Now, in 2021, we need a new textbook that carries all of physics forward into the future for the next 100 years, and that is what this textbook is.
>
> I will use Halliday and Resnick textbook as template to garner work exercise problems for 1st year and 2nd year college. For 3rd and senior year college physics I will directly use Feynman's Lectures and QED, quantum electrodynamics. Correcting Feynman and setting the stage that all of physics is-- All is Atom and Atoms are nothing but Electricity and Magnetism.
>
> Much and most of 20th century physics was error filled and illogical physics, dead end , stupid paths such as General Relativity, Big Bang, Black holes, gravity waves, etc etc. Dead end stupidity is much of Old Physics of the 20th century. What distinguishes Feynman, is he kept his head above the water by concentrating almost exclusively on Electrodynamics. He remarked words to the effect== "QED is the most precise, most accurate theory in all of physics". And, that is true, given All is Atom, and Atoms are nothing but Electricity and Magnetism.
>
> This textbook is going to set the world standard on college physics education. Because I have reduced the burden of mathematics, reduced it to be almost what I call -- difficult-free-math. I mean, easy-math. Meaning that all functions and equations of math and physics are just polynomials. All functions of math and physics are polynomials. Making calculus super super easy because all you ever do is plug in the Power rules for derivative and integral, so that physics math is able to be taught in High School. In other words, physics with almost no math at all-- so to speak, or what can be called as easy as learning add, subtract, multiply, divide.
>
> What makes both math and physics extremely hard to learn and understand is when mathematics never cleans itself up, and never tries to make itself easy. If all of math can be made as easy as add, subtract, multiply, divide, no one would really complain about math or physics. But because math is overrun by kooks (definition of kook: is a person who cares more about fame and fortune than about truth in science), that math has become a incomprehensible trash pile and the worst of all the sciences, and because the math is so difficult, it carried over into physics, making physics difficult.
>
> You see, one of the greatest omissions of science in the 20th and 21st century was the idea that math can be reduced to a Simplicity of education. That math need not be hard and difficult. Yet no-one in the 20th and 21st century ever had that idea of simplicity, (with the possible exception of Harold Jacobs) that math had run out-of-bounds as a science and was more of a science fiction subject for kook mathematicians. Had become absurdly difficult because of the reason that kooks gain fame and fortune on making math difficult. Mathematicians never thought their job was to make math simple and easy, instead, the kooks of math piled on more trash and garbage to make math a twilight zone of science.
>
> When you make all of math be just polynomial equations and functions, you make math the easiest of the major sciences, which then follows up by making physics easy as possible.
>
>
> --------------------------
> Table of Contents
> --------------------------
>
> Part I, Introduction, and about physics.
>
> a) About this textbook and series of Physics textbooks.
>
> b) Brief history lesson of 20th century physics.
>
> c) How we make the mathematics super easy.
>
> d) Horrible concept of "charge" in Old Physics, and thrown out of New Physics.
>
> e) We increasingly have to use Biology DNA knowledge to unravel the physics light wave.
>
> Part II, 6 Laws of EM theory.
>
> f) The 6 laws of ElectroMagnetic theory and their Units, EM theory.
>
> g) The four differential equations laws of EM theory.
>
> h) Defining the units of Coulomb and Ampere as C = A*seconds; and the Elementary-Coulomb.
>
> i) Faraday Constant Experiment in classroom.
>
> j) Matching the physics Algebra of units with the physics Geometry of units.
>
> k) The EM Spectrum, Electromagnetic Spectrum.
>
> Part III, 1st Law of EM theory.
>
> l) 1st Law of EM theory; law of Magnetic Monopole and units are B = kg/ C*s = kg/ A*s^2.
>
> m) Series versus parallel connection of closed loop.
>
> n) Short Circuit.
>
> Part IV, 2nd Law of EM theory.
>
> o) 2nd Law of EM theory; New Ohm's Law V = CBE, the Capacitor-battery law.
>
> p) Review of Geometry volume in 3D and path in 2D.
>
> Part V, 3rd Law of EM theory.
>
> q) 3rd law of EM theory, Faraday's law, C' = (V/(BE))'.
>
> r) Short history lesson of Old Physics, 1860s Maxwell Equations.
>
> s) New Rutherford-Geiger-Marsden Experiment observing Faraday Law.
>
> t) Math Algebra for making one physical concept be perpendicular to another physical concept.
>
> u) EM laws derive the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus.
>
> v) Principle of Maximum Electricity and Torus geometry so essential in Atomic Physics.
>
> Part VI
>
> w) 4th law of EM theory; Ampere-Maxwell law B' = (V/(CE))'.
>
> Part VII
>
> x) 5th law of EM theory; Coulomb-gravity law; E' = (V/(CB))'.
>
> y) Centripetal versus Centrifugal force explained.
>
> Part VIII
>
> z) 6th Law of EM theory, electric generator law; differential equation of New Ohm's Law V' = (CBE)'.
>
> aa) Reinventing the Multivariable Calculus.
>
> bb) Atomic bomb physics.
This thread is 29 years old, AP.