add to AP's 148th book//Plutonium Atom Totality Universe, 9th edition 2021, Atom Totality Series, book 1 Kindle Edition https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe

It is coming up to 7Nov so an appropriate time to go down this logic trail. And we have to ask the question of all colleges worldwide as to how much logic is taught to their students in hope of having them "think straight and think clear". As was seen by the obscene interloper, of his hamburger is a single atom logic, and who claims to be a engineer from Stanford Univ. that most schools never require their students to take logic. Personally, I myself had two years of formal logic at UC 1968-1972. I took the 2nd year logic of "symbolic logic" and liked it so much that I took 1st year logic the following year to make sure I did not miss anything. But at UC, the math majors and the science majors were not required to take any logic at all. And the 2nd year logic at UC was mostly filled up by lawyers, people wanting to become lawyers.

So, what are the statistics of teaching logic in school? Are they something like that of 1% of all graduates of college have taken a course of logic? And the number of people who took Symbolic Logic in college? Is that number perhaps 0.1%, which is 1 in a thousand college graduates took Symbolic Logic to learn how to think straight think clear.

Now here I am going to apply some Logical Reasoning that I had learned in college from taking 2 years of formal logic.

And I am going to say, who makes up requirements for a College Education? Does every school make up their own requirements?

And is not the purpose of an Education that of producing people who "think straight and think clear".

So we have the situation around the world that we graduate people from college in all manner of fields of study, but only 1 out of a 1000 of those graduated college persons has a chance of thinking straight and thinking clearly of whatever they are focused upon.

So let me go over this logical argument below that I posted earlier this day. And as I say, Nov7 is soon approaching as the most important holiday in the calendar year of the Plutonium Atom Totality Universe.

On Monday, October 4, 2021 at 8:13:52 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
>
> LOGIC at play
>
> Atomic Theory is a Universal quantifier of Every thing, every matter is made up of atoms.
>
> The Universe itself is a Universal quantifier.
>
> A hamburger is not a universal.
>
> So what is in play is the Universal Physics law of Atomic Theory.
>
> And the Universe itself for the Universe is a universal.
>
> So if the Atomic theory is True, which Feynman said in his opening pages of Lectures on Physics. As the single most important fact in all of science-- the atomic theory. Then when we add the fact that the Universe has matter. We come to a fork in the road.
>
> Is the Atomic Theory Law of physics Universal or does it have an exception.
>
> For the Universe surely is Universal and the Universe certainly contains matter.
>
> Can only come to two conclusions. The universe is the exception to the law of Atomic Theory. Or, the Atomic Theory has no exceptions and the Universe itself is just one big atom.
>
> Those never trained in formal logic can never understand that when AP places Atomic Theory up against the Universe itself, that such is a special relationship of Logic.
>
> Not a Cretin in Ancient Greek times or a street urchin in Faraday time, nor a college professor who never took formal logic in modern times placing atomic theory up against a hamburger.
> Cretins cannot understand you are placing the Universal law of Physics up against a Universal quantifier-- the Universe itself.

So let me streamline my earlier post above, streamline it so that bells start to ring and lights come on in those that never pursued formal logic, or probably could never really understand how one thinks straight and thinks clearly.

Without loss of generality we can omit the Void or the Space that atoms exist. There are voids inside of atoms and there are voids outside of atoms for, most of Space is empty of atoms until you get to galaxies and stars and planets. But inside of atoms, equally there is much empty space.
But to people who lack the ability to think straight and clear, the Void and Space only confuses them even more. Distracts them from the main argument.. Just like the hamburger person from Stanford Univ. would be distracted by just about any thing.

So we no longer need to talk about Space, about Void in addressing the main logic of this deduction. It is a deduction, just as pure as a math proof of the Pythagorean theorem is a pure deduction. For much of Symbolic Logic at University of Cincinnati circa 1970 was teaching how to make a pure deductive proof. Proofs even better, in my consideration than the Pythagorean Theorem or infinitude of primes back in 1970. And so much better that I had to take 1st year Logic in case I had missed something, not covered in 2nd year logic.

So let us go through the proof that the Universe, the cosmos as Carl Sagan talked about in his TV movie episodes. The proof that the Universe has to be a Single Big Atom.

The Atomic Theory according to Feynman Lectures on Physics goes like this.

All things are made up of Atoms and all the atoms of that thing can be listed as single-atoms in space.

AP writes: alright, that Feynman statement is a Universal law of Physics. And some people, nay, most people do not understand or recognize what a law of Physics means. For a law of physics has no exceptions. For if you find "a thing" it must be made up of atoms so that you can list every atom in that thing.

Now we can go down and enumerate every atom inside that thing. It maybe a single atom from the start and we do not have to make a list, or a multitude of atoms and we can enumerate and list every atom of that thing. So it maybe a compound or a mixture of atoms as we study in chemistry.

But the profound fact is, All Things are made up of Single Atoms.

Now we come to a different subject, we come to the Universe itself. And in formal Symbolic Logic we have connectors and we have quantifiers. Two quantifiers are the Existential quantifier and the Universal quantifier.

The Universe is a universal quantifier of itself. Every law of Physics can be written by a Universal Quantifier.

The Atomic theory is a universal quantifier over all things found in the universe (we omitted Void and Space). And the Atomic Theory is able to list every Single Atom in the Universe.

So we observe the Universe and note for a fact it contains matter and atoms.. We note for a fact that the Universe is a "thing" just as the "thing" in the Atomic theory-- All things are made up of Single Atoms.

So we have 2 Universal statements in lock step of one another interceded by the fact that the Universe contains Single Atoms that can be all listed.

1) Atomic theory-- All things are made up of single atoms.
2) Atomic theory is a Universal law of Physics
3) Universe is a universal quantifier
4) The Universe contains Single atoms.
Questions
5) Is the Universe itself a Single Atom? For the Universe is a thing as noted by it has matter, mass of single atoms on a list.
6) If the Universe is not a Single Atom, means the Atomic theory needs to be pared down with a exception for it is no longer a Universal Law of Physics. So that the Universe itself does not obey the Atomic Theory.
7) If the Universe is a Single Atom itself, then the Atomic theory remains a Universal law of Physics.

P.S. most people wane in their ability to do logical thought, ---simple, straight and clear as they age. For AP, my powers of logic seem to be just now cresting in a maximum and shows no signs of deterioration. Perhaps it is because of my hamartoma of the liver, or perhaps it is because I am 1/2 eunuch and that my mind no longer is centered on a "sexual life" but rather full devoted to a "science life".

The above proof that the universe is a single atom, is not an easy proof. But a magnificiently beautiful proof. Perhaps the most magnificient beauty in all of Science.

In religions, they are troubled by not being able to prove God. Well the above is a science, logic proof of God, only not a God many can recognize.

AP
King of Science, especially Physics

148th published book

Plutonium Atom Totality Universe, 9th edition 2021, Atom Totality Series, book 1 Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Preface:

Physics book that explains what the universe is, and how it works. This is a continuation of the Atomic Theory by Democritus in Ancient Greek times. It adds one more fact to the Atomic Theory picture. That the Universe itself is one gigantic big atom. The picture is that the Universe, in total is one big atom that contains more atoms, inside itself. It completes the logic of science that Dr. Feynman wrote-- all things are made up of atoms -- and so, to complete that idea -- all things and the universe itself is an atom.

In this edition of year 2021, AP actually proves the Atom Totality theory, and therefore, a simultaneously _disproof_ of the Big Bang theory. The proof is simple, in that Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but rather, instead, shine from the Faraday law going on inside each and every proton in the Universe. The muon is the true electron of atoms and is the bar magnet in Faraday's law while the proton is a 840MeV particle in the geometry shape of 8 ring coil torus that is the closed loop coil in Faraday's Law. NASA scientists have discovered the Sun is a yearly increase in radiation of 0.005% yearly, and is why 25% of all insects have perished in the last decade 2010-2020. Stars and Sun shine from Faraday law, not from fusion and that is how the Universe itself grows. So, we cannot logically have two different mechanisms for the creation of the Universe. We cannot have electricity magnetism of Faraday law and then some silly "explosion of Big Bang" to create and grow the universe.

tisdag 5 oktober 2021 kl. 09:45:59 UTC+2 skrev Archimedes Plutonium:
> add to AP's 148th book//Plutonium Atom Totality Universe, 9th edition 2021, Atom Totality Series, book 1 Kindle Edition https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
>
>
> It is coming up to 7Nov so an appropriate time to go down this logic trail. And we have to ask the question of all colleges worldwide as to how much logic is taught to their students in hope of having them "think straight and think clear". As was seen by the obscene interloper, of his hamburger is a single atom logic, and who claims to be a engineer from Stanford Univ. that most schools never require their students to take logic. Personally, I myself had two years of formal logic at UC 1968-1972. I took the 2nd year logic of "symbolic logic" and liked it so much that I took 1st year logic the following year to make sure I did not miss anything. But at UC, the math majors and the science majors were not required to take any logic at all. And the 2nd year logic at UC was mostly filled up by lawyers, people wanting to become lawyers.
>
> So, what are the statistics of teaching logic in school? Are they something like that of 1% of all graduates of college have taken a course of logic? And the number of people who took Symbolic Logic in college? Is that number perhaps 0.1%, which is 1 in a thousand college graduates took Symbolic Logic to learn how to think straight think clear.
>
> Now here I am going to apply some Logical Reasoning that I had learned in college from taking 2 years of formal logic.
>
> And I am going to say, who makes up requirements for a College Education? Does every school make up their own requirements?
>
> And is not the purpose of an Education that of producing people who "think straight and think clear".
>
> So we have the situation around the world that we graduate people from college in all manner of fields of study, but only 1 out of a 1000 of those graduated college persons has a chance of thinking straight and thinking clearly of whatever they are focused upon.
>
> So let me go over this logical argument below that I posted earlier this day. And as I say, Nov7 is soon approaching as the most important holiday in the calendar year of the Plutonium Atom Totality Universe.
>
> On Monday, October 4, 2021 at 8:13:52 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> >
> > LOGIC at play
> >
> > Atomic Theory is a Universal quantifier of Every thing, every matter is made up of atoms.
> >
> > The Universe itself is a Universal quantifier.
> >
> > A hamburger is not a universal.
> >
> > So what is in play is the Universal Physics law of Atomic Theory.
> >
> > And the Universe itself for the Universe is a universal.
> >
> > So if the Atomic theory is True, which Feynman said in his opening pages of Lectures on Physics. As the single most important fact in all of science-- the atomic theory. Then when we add the fact that the Universe has matter. We come to a fork in the road.
> >
> > Is the Atomic Theory Law of physics Universal or does it have an exception.
> >
> > For the Universe surely is Universal and the Universe certainly contains matter.
> >
> > Can only come to two conclusions. The universe is the exception to the law of Atomic Theory. Or, the Atomic Theory has no exceptions and the Universe itself is just one big atom.
> >
> > Those never trained in formal logic can never understand that when AP places Atomic Theory up against the Universe itself, that such is a special relationship of Logic.
> >
> > Not a Cretin in Ancient Greek times or a street urchin in Faraday time, nor a college professor who never took formal logic in modern times placing atomic theory up against a hamburger.
> > Cretins cannot understand you are placing the Universal law of Physics up against a Universal quantifier-- the Universe itself.
>
> So let me streamline my earlier post above, streamline it so that bells start to ring and lights come on in those that never pursued formal logic, or probably could never really understand how one thinks straight and thinks clearly.
>
> Without loss of generality we can omit the Void or the Space that atoms exist. There are voids inside of atoms and there are voids outside of atoms for, most of Space is empty of atoms until you get to galaxies and stars and planets. But inside of atoms, equally there is much empty space.
> But to people who lack the ability to think straight and clear, the Void and Space only confuses them even more. Distracts them from the main argument. Just like the hamburger person from Stanford Univ. would be distracted by just about any thing.
>
> So we no longer need to talk about Space, about Void in addressing the main logic of this deduction. It is a deduction, just as pure as a math proof of the Pythagorean theorem is a pure deduction. For much of Symbolic Logic at University of Cincinnati circa 1970 was teaching how to make a pure deductive proof. Proofs even better, in my consideration than the Pythagorean Theorem or infinitude of primes back in 1970. And so much better that I had to take 1st year Logic in case I had missed something, not covered in 2nd year logic.
>
> So let us go through the proof that the Universe, the cosmos as Carl Sagan talked about in his TV movie episodes. The proof that the Universe has to be a Single Big Atom.
>
> The Atomic Theory according to Feynman Lectures on Physics goes like this..
>
> All things are made up of Atoms and all the atoms of that thing can be listed as single-atoms in space.
>
> AP writes: alright, that Feynman statement is a Universal law of Physics. And some people, nay, most people do not understand or recognize what a law of Physics means. For a law of physics has no exceptions. For if you find "a thing" it must be made up of atoms so that you can list every atom in that thing.
>
> Now we can go down and enumerate every atom inside that thing. It maybe a single atom from the start and we do not have to make a list, or a multitude of atoms and we can enumerate and list every atom of that thing. So it maybe a compound or a mixture of atoms as we study in chemistry.
>
> But the profound fact is, All Things are made up of Single Atoms.
>
> Now we come to a different subject, we come to the Universe itself. And in formal Symbolic Logic we have connectors and we have quantifiers. Two quantifiers are the Existential quantifier and the Universal quantifier.
>
> The Universe is a universal quantifier of itself. Every law of Physics can be written by a Universal Quantifier.
>
> The Atomic theory is a universal quantifier over all things found in the universe (we omitted Void and Space). And the Atomic Theory is able to list every Single Atom in the Universe.
>
> So we observe the Universe and note for a fact it contains matter and atoms. We note for a fact that the Universe is a "thing" just as the "thing" in the Atomic theory-- All things are made up of Single Atoms.
>
> So we have 2 Universal statements in lock step of one another interceded by the fact that the Universe contains Single Atoms that can be all listed.
>
> 1) Atomic theory-- All things are made up of single atoms.
> 2) Atomic theory is a Universal law of Physics
> 3) Universe is a universal quantifier
> 4) The Universe contains Single atoms.
> Questions
> 5) Is the Universe itself a Single Atom? For the Universe is a thing as noted by it has matter, mass of single atoms on a list.
> 6) If the Universe is not a Single Atom, means the Atomic theory needs to be pared down with a exception for it is no longer a Universal Law of Physics. So that the Universe itself does not obey the Atomic Theory.
> 7) If the Universe is a Single Atom itself, then the Atomic theory remains a Universal law of Physics.
>
> P.S. most people wane in their ability to do logical thought, ---simple, straight and clear as they age. For AP, my powers of logic seem to be just now cresting in a maximum and shows no signs of deterioration. Perhaps it is because of my hamartoma of the liver, or perhaps it is because I am 1/2 eunuch and that my mind no longer is centered on a "sexual life" but rather full devoted to a "science life".
>
> The above proof that the universe is a single atom, is not an easy proof. But a magnificiently beautiful proof. Perhaps the most magnificient beauty in all of Science.
>
> In religions, they are troubled by not being able to prove God. Well the above is a science, logic proof of God, only not a God many can recognize.
>
> AP
> King of Science, especially Physics
>
> 148th published book
>
>
>
> Plutonium Atom Totality Universe, 9th edition 2021, Atom Totality Series, book 1 Kindle Edition
>
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
>
>
> Preface:
>
> Physics book that explains what the universe is, and how it works. This is a continuation of the Atomic Theory by Democritus in Ancient Greek times. It adds one more fact to the Atomic Theory picture. That the Universe itself is one gigantic big atom. The picture is that the Universe, in total is one big atom that contains more atoms, inside itself. It completes the logic of science that Dr. Feynman wrote-- all things are made up of atoms -- and so, to complete that idea -- all things and the universe itself is an atom.
>
>
>
> In this edition of year 2021, AP actually proves the Atom Totality theory, and therefore, a simultaneously _disproof_ of the Big Bang theory. The proof is simple, in that Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but rather, instead, shine from the Faraday law going on inside each and every proton in the Universe. The muon is the true electron of atoms and is the bar magnet in Faraday's law while the proton is a 840MeV particle in the geometry shape of 8 ring coil torus that is the closed loop coil in Faraday's Law. NASA scientists have discovered the Sun is a yearly increase in radiation of 0.005% yearly, and is why 25% of all insects have perished in the last decade 2010-2020. Stars and Sun shine from Faraday law, not from fusion and that is how the Universe itself grows. So, we cannot logically have two different mechanisms for the creation of the Universe. We cannot have electricity magnetism of Faraday law and then some silly "explosion of Big Bang" to create and grow the universe.
>
>
>
> Also, in the course of providing supporting evidence of the Atom Totality theory, my research had to revise and correct the entire Maxwell Equations, and revise and correct the theory, the quantum electrodynamics theory.
>
>
>
> Cover Picture: Again I used 8 rings from plumbing hardware to represent the 8 rings of a proton torus ring and visualize each ring as a dot cloud pattern instead of a continuous ring, and the holes in some of those rings helps facilitate that image. Notice the muon ring is inside the proton torus perpendicular at the equator, going around and around the proton torus at nearly the speed of light in the Faraday law, producing electricity.
>
>
>
> Length: 316 pages
>
>
>
> Product details
>
> ASIN : B08T82M2LP
> Publication date : January 16, 2021
> Language: : English
> File size : 887 KB
> Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> Screen Reader : Supported
> Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> X-Ray : Not Enabled
> Word Wise : Enabled
> Print length : 316 pages
> Lending : Enabled
>
>
> y z
> | /
> | /
> |/______ x
>
> More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci..physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies.
>
> In sci.math, sci.physics there is only stalking hate spew along with Police Drag Net Spam of no value and other than hate spew there is Police drag net spam day and night.
>
> I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of stalkers and spammers, Police Drag Net Spam that floods each and every day, book and solution manual spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. And the taxpayer funded hate spew stalkers who ad hominem you day and night on every one of your posts.
>
> There is no discussion of science in sci.math or sci.physics, just one long line of hate spewing stalkers followed up with Police Drag Net Spam (easy to spot-- very offtopic-- with hate charged content). And countries using sci.physics & sci.math as propaganda platforms, such as tampering in elections with their mind-rot.
>
> Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
> https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
> Archimedes Plutonium
still as crazy as ever

On Tuesday, October 5, 2021 at 2:53:31 AM UTC-5, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> still as crazy as ever

Now I probably need your pal and buddy and possibly gay lover of Jan Burse down in Zurich Switzerland from your site in Uppsala Sweden. For Jan plays around a lot on Researchgate.

Now do not think this is a ad hominem on you Zelos, far from it. I am asking on a purely scientific point of view. And the reason I bring in Jan Burse into the question.

For I wrote a book on How Homosexual-- as caused by a reverse in wiring of the cells of the brain. Such as reverse polarity.

This can be done on a TV where it projects left to right instead of right to left or it shows black where otherwise should be white color. A reverse in electricity.

So what I am wondering Zelos, purely science question, nothing personal, is whether any homosexual that was made a eunuch, (their balls smashed as in Sweden and Norway smash the balls of their reindeer herds), Zelos, will the homosexual still think of men as partners once they are made eunuch. And maybe Burse's Researchgate has that information on the tip of his tongue available.

AP
King of Science, especially Physics, and where others struggle in Logic, is just a aftertaste for AP

tisdag 5 oktober 2021 kl. 10:06:47 UTC+2 skrev Archimedes Plutonium:
> On Tuesday, October 5, 2021 at 2:53:31 AM UTC-5, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > still as crazy as ever
> Now I probably need your pal and buddy and possibly gay lover of Jan Burse down in Zurich Switzerland from your site in Uppsala Sweden. For Jan plays around a lot on Researchgate.
>
> Now do not think this is a ad hominem on you Zelos, far from it. I am asking on a purely scientific point of view. And the reason I bring in Jan Burse into the question.
>
> For I wrote a book on How Homosexual-- as caused by a reverse in wiring of the cells of the brain. Such as reverse polarity.
>
> This can be done on a TV where it projects left to right instead of right to left or it shows black where otherwise should be white color. A reverse in electricity.
>
> So what I am wondering Zelos, purely science question, nothing personal, is whether any homosexual that was made a eunuch, (their balls smashed as in Sweden and Norway smash the balls of their reindeer herds), Zelos, will the homosexual still think of men as partners once they are made eunuch. And maybe Burse's Researchgate has that information on the tip of his tongue available.
>
> AP
> King of Science, especially Physics, and where others struggle in Logic, is just a aftertaste for AP
why are you so homophobic?

🐒 of Math and 🦍 of Physics Archimedes "AnalButtfuckManure" Plutonium
<plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails at math and science:

> On Tuesday, October 5, 2021 at 2:53:31 AM UTC-5, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
>> still as crazy as ever
>
> Now I probably need your pal and buddy and possibly gay lover of Jan Burse down in Zurich Switzerland from your site in Uppsala Sweden. For Jan plays around a lot on Researchgate.

Are you advertising for a bedwarmer again? The long cold South Dakota
winter is about to start, so I suspect lots of gay people like yourself
must be looking for bedwarmers. But please, don't carry out your search
here. Don't keep trying to make this group into a gay pickup bar.
>
> Now do not think this is a ad hominem on you Zelos, far from it. I am asking on a purely scientific point of view. And the reason I bring in Jan Burse into the question.
>
> For I wrote a book on How Homosexual

Why do you claim not to be doing an ad hominem and try to do an ad
hominem attack? Except nobody cares who is gay any more so your likely
false allegations are useless.

> This can be done on a TV where it projects left to right instead of right to left or it shows black where otherwise should be white color. A reverse in electricity.

Abusing what I told you earlier, I see.

<snip more offtopic crap>