Kibo Parry M on> 🧛🏻‍♂️ of Math 👻 Terence Tao "math hater"
Re: Terence Tao "stupid insane imp of math" flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
On Friday, October 8, 2021 at 12:39:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> 🧛🏻‍♂️ of Math and 👻 of Physics Terence Tao "math hater"
> Terence Tao > fails:
> If you took two years of logic, why are you so illogical? Do you just do
> the exact opposite of what you learned? Is that why you think the truth
> table for OR is the truth table for AND?
> Wiles still stupid, yes, he cannot even drop a lid into paper cone
> On Thursday, October 7, 2021 at 12:35:01 PM UTC-5, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > still stupid
>
> AP writes: yes, UCLA Dr. Tao and Andrew Wiles has no math brain, too dumb to even drop a lid into paper cone and see it is a Oval, never the ellipse.. And England makes a fool like this a knight. Why not make every village idiot a knight.

AP writes: AP no longer tolerates criminal stalkers like Kibo or Zelos Malum and shreds their hatred and spits it back into their laps.

AP writes: So so stupid in math and logic is Terence Tao and Andrew Wiles, why, he knows, he knows a cone has but 1 axis of symmetry, yet that mindless fool thinks a slant cut in cone is going to deliver 2 axes of symmetry ellipse. UCLA's Dr. Tao is so deluded and messed up in mathematics that he thinks 1 axis can deliver 2 axes of symmetry. Dr. Tao is too stupid to understand that AP proved the slant cut is the Oval, never the ellipse.

Why Terry Tao is so blithering dumb in math, he knows calculus is geometry, yet the nitwit never acknowledges that calculus fundamental theorem requires a geometry proof, not the "limit analysis" that Terry pulls out of his arse.

3rd published book

AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Ever since Ancient Greek Times it was thought the slant cut into a cone is the ellipse. That was false. For the slant cut in every cone is a Oval, never an Ellipse. This book is a proof that the slant cut is a oval, never the ellipse. A slant cut into the Cylinder is in fact a ellipse, but never in a cone.

Length: 21 pages

File Size: 1620 KB
Print Length: 21 pages
Publication Date: March 11, 2019
Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07PLSDQWC
Text-to-Speech: Enabled
X-Ray: Not Enabled
Word Wise: Not Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled

#8-2, 11th published book

World's First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus// Math proof series, book 2 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 19May2021. This is AP's 11th published book of science.
Preface:
Actually my title is too modest, for the proof that lies within this book makes it the World's First Valid Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for in my modesty, I just wanted to emphasis that calculus was geometry and needed a geometry proof. Not being modest, there has never been a valid proof of FTC until AP's 2015 proof. This also implies that only a geometry proof of FTC constitutes a valid proof of FTC.

Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math so long as they had a huge mass of mistakes, errors, fakes and con-artist trickery such as the "limit analysis". To give a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus requires math be cleaned-up and cleaned-out of most of math's mistakes and errors. So in a sense, a Geometry FTC proof is a exercise in Consistency of all of Mathematics. In order to prove a FTC geometry proof, requires throwing out the error filled mess of Old Math. Can the Reals be the true numbers of mathematics if the Reals cannot deliver a Geometry proof of FTC? Can the functions that are not polynomial functions allow us to give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a Coordinate System in 2D have 4 quadrants and still give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a equation of mathematics with a number that is _not a positive decimal Grid Number_ all alone on the right side of the equation, at all times, allow us to give a Geometry proof of the FTC?

Cover Picture: Is my hand written, one page geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, the world's first geometry proof of FTC, 2013-2015, by AP.

Length: 137 pages

Product details
ASIN : B07PQTNHMY
Publication date : March 14, 2019
Language : English
File size : 1307 KB
Text-to-Speech : Enabled
Screen Reader : Supported
Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
X-Ray : Not Enabled
Word Wise : Not Enabled
Print length : 137 pages
Lending : Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #128,729 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#2 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
#134 in Calculus (Books)
#20 in Calculus (Kindle Store)