Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

An algorithm must be seen to be believed. -- D. E. Knuth

tech / sci.physics / Re: You are using the phrase "water vapor,' in an ambiguous manner, you convoluted nitwit.

SubjectAuthor
* Re: You are using the phrase "water vapor,' in an ambiguous manner, you convolutJames McGinn
`* Re: You are using the phrase "water vapor,' in an ambiguous manner, you convolutJim Pennino
 `* Re: You are using the phrase "water vapor,' in an ambiguous manner, you convolutSolving Tornadoes
  `- Re: You are using the phrase "water vapor,' in an ambiguous manner, you convolutJim Pennino

1
Re: You are using the phrase "water vapor,' in an ambiguous manner, you convoluted nitwit.

<d8697cae-bebe-4786-a6a4-c1e6c4c2649an@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=8090&group=sci.physics#8090

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCX2472Cxihih0cC5jqINgJE1UHxBeE9h6Ndm7PuoR/YgeJ6hxlGE9jEWKuzCjjubYxG80xRSi0c5rLO9xioQ4DaJKiDo76Oo9lDWKMbMC89
X-Received: by 2002:ad4:5305:0:b0:68f:2ca5:4ec7 with SMTP id y5-20020ad45305000000b0068f2ca54ec7mr243195qvr.10.1708359533810;
Mon, 19 Feb 2024 08:18:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWoLXKBgBKptxBCOV+k35I7xPWrbPHToqJ6cn/QuhIhtE6aAfwTr3Ajwh7rKLBcP8Ur/RY7jLFDFhjL0iW2FBM0Lyxu5O3anwEPrrcHXw==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6871:6aa:b0:21e:9a5c:3267 with SMTP id
l42-20020a05687106aa00b0021e9a5c3267mr112251oao.3.1708359533571; Mon, 19 Feb
2024 08:18:53 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 08:18:53 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <636457cb-b8ed-4725-a054-6e573f294a2bn@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=12.38.208.106; posting-account=HjfJvQkAAACgRsSeTfzvk1twKQeOPqHV
NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.38.208.106
References: <3b68759b-4b48-4402-a6db-330a7b128da3n@googlegroups.com> <636457cb-b8ed-4725-a054-6e573f294a2bn@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <d8697cae-bebe-4786-a6a4-c1e6c4c2649an@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: You are using the phrase "water vapor,' in an ambiguous manner,
you convoluted nitwit.
From: jimmcgi...@gmail.com (James McGinn)
Injection-Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 16:18:53 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 2423
 by: James McGinn - Mon, 19 Feb 2024 16:18 UTC

On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 8:43:04 PM UTC-8, Paul Alsing wrote:
> On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 6:50:21 PM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote:
> > On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 2:46:08 PM UTC-8, Jim Pennino wrote:
> >
> > > Water vapor can exist in the air even when the air is too dry
> >
> > You are using the phrase "water vapor,' in an ambiguous manner, you convoluted nitwit.
> >
> > Find another hobby, moron.
> There is nothing ambiguous about the definition of the phrase "water vapor".

I stated that it is your usage that is ambiguous.

> As per virtually every textbook in the freakin' world, water vapor is the gaseous form of water... nothing complicated about that!

And you admit that your evidence is not empirical. It's consensus.

Consensus isn't science.

Re: You are using the phrase "water vapor,' in an ambiguous manner, you convoluted nitwit.

<0tccak-97n41.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=8092&group=sci.physics#8092

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: jim...@gonzo.specsol.net (Jim Pennino)
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Subject: Re: You are using the phrase "water vapor,' in an ambiguous manner, you convoluted nitwit.
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 08:40:34 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 33
Message-ID: <0tccak-97n41.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net>
References: <3b68759b-4b48-4402-a6db-330a7b128da3n@googlegroups.com> <636457cb-b8ed-4725-a054-6e573f294a2bn@googlegroups.com> <d8697cae-bebe-4786-a6a4-c1e6c4c2649an@googlegroups.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="19954b791f1bd3362193daa560dd4f32";
logging-data="2079613"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19vc71Wto9ZuS7sIAh/esIi"
User-Agent: tin/2.6.2-20220130 ("Convalmore") (Linux/5.15.0-94-lowlatency (x86_64))
Cancel-Lock: sha1:dMouh0NJjdkVEceYrfJQxup2tm4=
 by: Jim Pennino - Mon, 19 Feb 2024 16:40 UTC

James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 8:43:04 PM UTC-8, Paul Alsing wrote:
>> On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 6:50:21 PM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote:
>> > On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 2:46:08 PM UTC-8, Jim Pennino wrote:
>> >
>> > > Water vapor can exist in the air even when the air is too dry
>> >
>> > You are using the phrase "water vapor,' in an ambiguous manner, you convoluted nitwit.
>> >
>> > Find another hobby, moron.
>> There is nothing ambiguous about the definition of the phrase "water vapor".
>
> I stated that it is your usage that is ambiguous.
>
>> As per virtually every textbook in the freakin' world, water vapor is the gaseous form of water... nothing complicated about that!
>
> And you admit that your evidence is not empirical. It's consensus.

Nope, that is your delusions talking, crackpot.

>
> Consensus isn't science.

Science is performing experiments that give the same results no matter
who performs them, cackpot.

It is your delusions that dismiss such actions as "consensus" crackpot.

It is interesting to note that it took you 14 months to come up with
this delusional nonsense, crackpot.

Re: You are using the phrase "water vapor,' in an ambiguous manner, you convoluted nitwit.

<fce6ce12-fa99-438f-9960-fff5b5cfbb1an@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=8121&group=sci.physics#8121

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVro7NQKnvm5eHtdr9iB+iYf6oiwFmX4jDWquQ8vIjmohwcs0Vy2BREfUzwMN7nk/YgOfjb4IRBBIMlv6ufW3SUbd886XrHLi8XoGsR1g==
X-Received: by 2002:ad4:5c64:0:b0:68e:f0a4:46a9 with SMTP id i4-20020ad45c64000000b0068ef0a446a9mr533646qvh.7.1708396611621;
Mon, 19 Feb 2024 18:36:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCX4mwAbbGk55NXu1D08qFSNh1UrverJAD8reMl2h7QMAXktRgrjaoKW3pKPXrH3XzumM+m8o6GjEV3SBmLHOFy6jSM2BWLN/m6iQh1dlw==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:7b46:b0:21e:9918:75b7 with SMTP id
ji6-20020a0568707b4600b0021e991875b7mr51564oab.2.1708396611396; Mon, 19 Feb
2024 18:36:51 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!1.us.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!border-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 18:36:51 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <0tccak-97n41.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=12.38.208.106; posting-account=nuilbQoAAAAcvs6elFUy_CMABTfy34Zf
NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.38.208.106
References: <3b68759b-4b48-4402-a6db-330a7b128da3n@googlegroups.com>
<636457cb-b8ed-4725-a054-6e573f294a2bn@googlegroups.com> <d8697cae-bebe-4786-a6a4-c1e6c4c2649an@googlegroups.com>
<0tccak-97n41.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <fce6ce12-fa99-438f-9960-fff5b5cfbb1an@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: You are using the phrase "water vapor,' in an ambiguous manner,
you convoluted nitwit.
From: solvingt...@gmail.com (Solving Tornadoes)
Injection-Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 02:36:51 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lines: 38
 by: Solving Tornadoes - Tue, 20 Feb 2024 02:36 UTC

On Monday, February 19, 2024 at 8:46:09 AM UTC-8, Jim Pennino wrote:
> James McGinn <jimmc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 8:43:04 PM UTC-8, Paul Alsing wrote:
> >> On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 6:50:21 PM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote:
> >> > On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 2:46:08 PM UTC-8, Jim Pennino wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Water vapor can exist in the air even when the air is too dry
> >> >
> >> > You are using the phrase "water vapor,' in an ambiguous manner, you convoluted nitwit.
> >> >
> >> > Find another hobby, moron.
> >> There is nothing ambiguous about the definition of the phrase "water vapor".
> >
> > I stated that it is your usage that is ambiguous.
> >
> >> As per virtually every textbook in the freakin' world, water vapor is the gaseous form of water... nothing complicated about that!
> >
> > And you admit that your evidence is not empirical. It's consensus.
> Nope, that is your delusions talking, crackpot.
>
> >
> > Consensus isn't science.
>
> Science is performing experiments that give the same results no matter
> who performs them, cackpot.
>
> It is your delusions that dismiss such actions as "consensus" crackpot.
>
> It is interesting to note that it took you 14 months to come up with
> this delusional nonsense, crackpot.
What are you talking about, you babbling moron.?

Re: You are using the phrase "water vapor,' in an ambiguous manner, you convoluted nitwit.

<2gndak-a0561.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=8127&group=sci.physics#8127

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics
Path: i2pn2.org!rocksolid2!news.neodome.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: jim...@gonzo.specsol.net (Jim Pennino)
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Subject: Re: You are using the phrase "water vapor,' in an ambiguous manner, you convoluted nitwit.
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 20:47:32 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 37
Message-ID: <2gndak-a0561.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net>
References: <3b68759b-4b48-4402-a6db-330a7b128da3n@googlegroups.com> <636457cb-b8ed-4725-a054-6e573f294a2bn@googlegroups.com> <d8697cae-bebe-4786-a6a4-c1e6c4c2649an@googlegroups.com> <0tccak-97n41.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <fce6ce12-fa99-438f-9960-fff5b5cfbb1an@googlegroups.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="be5b47dffdad2c9a5964258e25f179ab";
logging-data="2471685"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19PQbpPUGgsC+8nWXOuoLzz"
User-Agent: tin/2.6.2-20220130 ("Convalmore") (Linux/5.15.0-94-lowlatency (x86_64))
Cancel-Lock: sha1:krg1XZOZMTf3CITT5N4KAhn1dAA=
 by: Jim Pennino - Tue, 20 Feb 2024 04:47 UTC

Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Monday, February 19, 2024 at 8:46:09 AM UTC-8, Jim Pennino wrote:
>> James McGinn <jimmc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 8:43:04 PM UTC-8, Paul Alsing wrote:
>> >> On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 6:50:21 PM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote:
>> >> > On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 2:46:08 PM UTC-8, Jim Pennino wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > > Water vapor can exist in the air even when the air is too dry
>> >> >
>> >> > You are using the phrase "water vapor,' in an ambiguous manner, you convoluted nitwit.
>> >> >
>> >> > Find another hobby, moron.
>> >> There is nothing ambiguous about the definition of the phrase "water vapor".
>> >
>> > I stated that it is your usage that is ambiguous.
>> >
>> >> As per virtually every textbook in the freakin' world, water vapor is the gaseous form of water... nothing complicated about that!
>> >
>> > And you admit that your evidence is not empirical. It's consensus.
>> Nope, that is your delusions talking, crackpot.
>>
>> >
>> > Consensus isn't science.
>>
>> Science is performing experiments that give the same results no matter
>> who performs them, cackpot.
>>
>> It is your delusions that dismiss such actions as "consensus" crackpot.
>>
>> It is interesting to note that it took you 14 months to come up with
>> this delusional nonsense, crackpot.
> What are you talking about, you babbling moron.?

The simple fact that you are replying to a 14 month old post, delusional
crackpot.

1
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.81
clearnet tor