On Wednesday, February 9, 2022 at 10:48:38 PM UTC-7, Napoleon Donoparte wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, February 9, 2022 at 7:33:52 PM UTC-8, hit...@yahoo.com wrote:
> >
> > On Wednesday, February 9, 2022 at 11:09:08 AM UTC-7, Dono. wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wednesday, February 9, 2022 at 10:04:12 AM UTC-8, Gary Harnagel wrote:
> > > >
> > > > "neutrino mass square value of (-1.0 + 0.9 - 1.1) eV². From this we derive an upper
> > > > limit of 1.1 eV (90% confidence level) on the absolute mass scale of neutrinos."
> > > >
> > > Yes, cretinoid,
> > >
> > > 1.1, as in real number, not imaginary. Keep it up (the entertainment), dumbestfuck.
> >
> > The measured value is m² = -1.0 eV² with error bars +9.9, -1.1 eV², from which they DERIVE
> > said UPPER LIMIT.
>
> So, you will not ask the Katrin people to explain to you the meaning of m^2?

I don't need to bother them with such a moronic question. It's obvious to anyone with
a modicum of intellectual capacity. Sorry that you don't have even that.

YOU are the ignoramus that's contradicting the conventional understanding, so it's YOUR
job. Go on, tell them your Colonel Klink and you demand to know what m² means. Don't
mind that they'll try to hide a few snickers when you ask them.

> You will continue to ignore the very good explanation of Standard Model description
> of the neutrino mass eigenvalues?

More ignorance from the Donoparte. The mass of the neutrino in the SM was zero.
Experimental observations gave the theorist quite a shock and mass has to be shoe-
horned in.

> This stubbornness is what makes you into a crank.

Klinker-breath is wrong. Stubbornness is necessary when defending the truth
against incompetent yammerheads like Donofart.

> > "Jealousy is a disease" -- Robert A. Heinlein
>
> I have nothing to be jealous of, you are simply a pathetic crank.

Sure you do. It's obvious to everyone but you :-)))

"The jealous are possessed by a mad devil and a dull spirit at the same time."
-- Johann Kaspar Lavater

You're the one going around foaming at the mouth with vile imprecations and
cyber-bullying. NEVER a civil discussion. Yes, indeed, a mad devil :-) )

On Thursday, February 10, 2022 at 7:00:12 AM UTC-8, crank Gary Harnagel basked in his ignorance:
> On Wednesday, February 9, 2022 at 10:48:38 PM UTC-7, Dono wrote:
> >
> > On Wednesday, February 9, 2022 at 7:33:52 PM UTC-8, hit...@yahoo.com wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wednesday, February 9, 2022 at 11:09:08 AM UTC-7, Dono. wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wednesday, February 9, 2022 at 10:04:12 AM UTC-8, Gary Harnagel wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > "neutrino mass square value of (-1.0 + 0.9 - 1.1) eV². From this we derive an upper
> > > > > limit of 1.1 eV (90% confidence level) on the absolute mass scale of neutrinos."
> > > > >
> > > > Yes, cretinoid,
> > > >
> > > > 1.1, as in real number, not imaginary. Keep it up (the entertainment), dumbestfuck.
> > >
> > > The measured value is m² = -1.0 eV² with error bars +9.9, -1.1 eV², from which they DERIVE
> > > said UPPER LIMIT.
> >
> > So, you will not ask the Katrin people to explain to you the meaning of m^2?
> I don't need to bother them

Typical crank attitude, Gary. Continue to bask in your imbecility. In the meanwhile, your crap paper will continue to languish in the vixra cesspool, where it belongs.

On Thursday, February 10, 2022 at 8:13:04 AM UTC-7, Dishonest Donoparte distorted:
>
> On Thursday, February 10, 2022 at 7:00:12 AM UTC-8, Gary Harnagel told the whole truth:
> >
> > On Wednesday, February 9, 2022 at 10:48:38 PM UTC-7, Dono wrote:
> > >
> > > So, you will not ask the Katrin people to explain to you the meaning of m^2?
> >
> > I don't need to bother them

Dishonest Donodweeb conveniently snipped my answer to relieve his shame. Fortunately,
Google keeps a record:

I don't need to bother them with such a moronic question. It's obvious to anyone with
a modicum of intellectual capacity. Sorry that you don't have even that.

Typical dishonest behavior from the wannabe atheist. He doesn't realize atheists
need moral behavior, too. He fails at atheism AND physics :-))

On Thursday, February 10, 2022 at 7:01:10 PM UTC-8, crank Gary Harnagel persisted in his imbecility:

> I don't need to bother them

....because they will explain to you that you are an imbecile who put together a piece of shit paper that languishes in the vixra repository for crank authors

On Thursday, February 10, 2022 at 10:08:20 PM UTC-7, DeprecaterDono misrepresented:
>
> On Thursday, February 10, 2022 at 7:01:10 PM UTC-8, Gary Harnagel actually wrote:
> >
> > I don't need to bother them with such a moronic question. It's obvious to anyone with
> > a modicum of intellectual capacity. Sorry that you don't have even that.

But despicable, dishonest DonoDunce snipped everything except.

> > I don't need to bother them

So he could pretend that:

> ...because they will explain to you that you are an imbecile who put together a piece of
> shit paper that languishes in the vixra repository for crank authors

The pipsqueak Diminutive Donoparte continues his campaign to tear down rational
voices so his foolish squawking won't be judged (correctly) as raucous noise.

On Friday, February 11, 2022 at 1:15:18 PM UTC-8, crank Gary Harnagel wrote:

> > > I don't need to bother them
> So he could pretend that:
> > ...because they will explain to you that you are an imbecile who put together a piece of
> > shit paper that languishes in the vixra repository for crank authors

I am simply debunking your crank paper <shrug>. Enjoy your residence in the vixra cesspool.

On Friday, February 11, 2022 at 3:59:44 PM UTC-7, Donofarte outgassed:
>
> I am simply debunking your crank paper <shrug>.

As anyone with a brain can see, Donophony isn't debunking the paper(s), his
responses are ad hominem: to the man rather than to the issue. He is incapable
of presenting a cogent and valid critique of scientific matters.

Surely he remembers his scurrilous bellicosity that KATRIN, etc. measured the
difference between the squares of the eigenstate masses, which was transparently
ludicrous. Now he's at it again with more silliness claiming the physicists are
measuring something other than the electron antineutrino.

And he also ludicrously claimed that the speed of neutrinos has actually been
measured and is slower than that of light. Completely false allegation. This is
how Dodo-breath does science: he makes stuff up and when someone calls
his bluff he attacks them personally.

Always-wrong DON'tknOw doesn't know, and he is clueless that he doesn't know.
He's a wannabe scientist -- no degree, no peer-reviewed publications, and no friends
because he attacks everyone but is incompetent to attack any idea.

> Enjoy your residence in the vixra cesspool.

Enjoy your residence in the personal cesspool of your own making, sociopath.

On Saturday, February 12, 2022 at 6:13:45 AM UTC-8, crank Gary Harnagel cranked himself harder:
> On Friday, February 11, 2022 at 3:59:44 PM UTC-7, Dono wrote:
> >
> > I am simply debunking your crank paper <shrug>.
> As anyone with a brain can see, Dono isn't debunking my shit paper(s),

I already did, multiple times , pointing out your errors:

1. YOUR Botched Minkowski diagrams
2. YOUR Claiming that superluminal communication doesn't violate causality
3. YOUR Claiming that neutrino has an imaginary mass

Face it Gary, you are a crank and your paper is a piece of crap. This is why it is relegated to the vixra cesspool.

On Saturday, February 12, 2022 at 9:07:09 AM UTC-7, Dono. wrote:
>
> I already did, multiple times , pointing out your errors:
>
> 1. YOUR Botched Minkowski diagrams

I'm sorry you can't accept that learning is a process.

> 2. YOUR Claiming that superluminal communication doesn't violate causality

I'm sorry that you can't accept that theories are not universally true. Many peer-
reviewed authors have expressed that such phenomena don't violate causality,
but I don't agree with their reasoning. So the fact that you don't agree with MY
reasoning is irrelevant.
> 3. YOUR Claiming that neutrino has an imaginary mass

That's what the present state of the science says. Again, peer-reviewed authors
have made the same claim. So your insistence that peer-reviewed authors state
plainly and boldly that neutrinos may have imaginary mass is met. The problem
is that you only want to accept those that agree with YOUR bias.

> Face it Gary, you are a crank

Personal attacks are irrelevant in science. In the absence of experimental evidence,
only cogent argument counts. All you've done is make biased opinions.

> and your paper is a piece of crap.

Repetition of biased opinion isn't scientific evidence.

> This is why it is relegated to the vixra cesspool.

You're just jealous that you can't write a paper that even meets that low standard,
whereas I've written papers refereed and published. :-)

On Saturday, February 12, 2022 at 8:19:58 PM UTC-8, hit...@yahoo.com wrote:

> You're just jealous that you can't write a paper that even meets that low standard,

You seem proud of the crap you wrote, thanks for the entertainment, crank.

On Saturday, February 12, 2022 at 10:16:58 PM UTC-7, Dono. wrote:
>
> On Saturday, February 12, 2022 at 8:19:58 PM UTC-8, hit...@yahoo.com wrote:
> >
> > You're just jealous that you can't write a paper that even meets that low
> > standard,
>
> You seem proud of the crap you wrote,

I revel in the fact that an extremely-biased person who misunderstands it believes
it to be crap.

> thanks for the entertainment, crank.

You're welcome. I hope to provide you with further hyena laughs.

On Sunday, February 13, 2022 at 11:10:38 AM UTC-8, crank Gary Harnagel kept eating shit:
> On Saturday, February 12, 2022 at 10:16:58 PM UTC-7, Dono. wrote:
> >
> > On Saturday, February 12, 2022 at 8:19:58 PM UTC-8, hit...@yahoo.com wrote:
> > >
> > > You're just jealous that you can't write a paper that even meets that low
> > > standard,
> >
> > You seem proud of the crap you wrote,
> I revel in the fact that I posted a lot of crap.
Thanks for the entertainment, crank. Keep it up, dumbestfuck!

On Sunday, February 13, 2022 at 4:24:04 PM UTC-7, Dono. wrote:
>
> On Sunday, February 13, 2022 at 11:10:38 AM UTC-8, Gary Harnagel wrote:
> > didn't write this:
> > I revel in the fact that I posted a lot of crap.

Unethical Dono changes what others write in an attempt to smear them.
But it all comes back in Dishonest Dono's face. Google keeps a record.

> Thanks for the entertainment, crank. Keep it up, dumbestfuck!

Unethical Dono continues to attack the person rather than the issues.
Will he NEVER learn that what goes around comes around?

On Sunday, February 13, 2022 at 3:40:22 PM UTC-8, hit...@yahoo.com wrote:
> On Sunday, February 13, 2022 at 4:24:04 PM UTC-7, Dono. wrote:
> >
> > On Sunday, February 13, 2022 at 11:10:38 AM UTC-8, Gary Harnagel wrote:
> > > didn't write this:
> > > I revel in the fact that I posted a lot of crap.
> Unethical Dono changes what others write in an attempt to smear them.
> But it all comes back in Dishonest Dono's face. Google keeps a record.
> > Thanks for the entertainment, crank. Keep it up, dumbestfuck!
> Unethical Dono continues to attack the person rather than the issues.

I already pointed out the imbecilities in your Minkowski diagrams, crank.