https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_Worldwide_List_of_Alternative_Theori/KnzBDjnGIgYC?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=egas%40pacbell.net&pg=PA1811&printsec=frontcover

is there any way possible to tell the difference between the experts and the cranks if
you cannot understand either one????

That's the trick to getting a grant...make it impossible for anyone to understand what you written. (even yourself)

throw in some math..dat really gets them confused.

I got an Alternative_Theory where people come from...
it is simple and can be explained completely scientifically, and
it agrees with Nature...

People come from the air.

(There’s a little bit from the ground, some minerals and so forth.)

(i bet that book has been banned by Amazon, too many cranks are in it...)

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
the unchallengeable.

On Monday, February 21, 2022 at 9:35:26 PM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote:
> https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_Worldwide_List_of_Alternative_Theori/KnzBDjnGIgYC?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=egas%40pacbell.net&pg=PA1811&printsec=frontcover
>
>
> is there any way possible to tell the difference between the experts and the cranks if
> you cannot understand either one????
>
>
> That's the trick to getting a grant...make it impossible for anyone to understand what you written. (even yourself)
>
>
> throw in some math..dat really gets them confused.
>
>
> I got an Alternative_Theory where people come from...
> it is simple and can be explained completely scientifically, and
> it agrees with Nature...
>
>
> People come from the air.
>
> (There’s a little bit from the ground, some minerals and so forth..)
>
>
>
>
> (i bet that book has been banned by Amazon, too many cranks are in it...)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> the unchallengeable.

Anyone pretending to be a scientist that post here is a crank. No serious scientist would post here, unless heavily hidden behind VPN
or caming clear with their real names (very few).

I know two of the last kind and zero from the first kind. But I know pretenders that hide with nicknames in the first kind.

And you?

Richard Hertz wrote:
>
> On Monday, February 21, 2022 at 9:35:26 PM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote:
> > https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_Worldwide_List_of_Alternative_Theori/KnzBDjnGIgYC?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=egas%40pacbell.net&pg=PA1811&printsec=frontcover
> >
> >
> > is there any way possible to tell the difference between the experts and the cranks if
> > you cannot understand either one????
> >
> >
> > That's the trick to getting a grant...make it impossible for anyone to understand what you written. (even yourself)
> >
> >
> > throw in some math..dat really gets them confused.
> >
> >
> > I got an Alternative_Theory where people come from...
> > it is simple and can be explained completely scientifically, and
> > it agrees with Nature...
> >
> >
> > People come from the air.
> >
> > (There’s a little bit from the ground, some minerals and so forth.)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > (i bet that book has been banned by Amazon, too many cranks are in it...)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > the unchallengeable.
>
> Anyone pretending to be a scientist that post here is a crank. No serious scientist would post here, unless heavily hidden behind VPN
> or caming clear with their real names (very few).
>
> I know two of the last kind and zero from the first kind. But I know pretenders that hide with nicknames in the first kind.
>
> And you?

Me??? I'm not anonymous. I just have a 'handle' required by Google and
Usenet.

I've been using the same handle, ip and server for a loooooong time.

ask anybody.

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
the unchallengeable.

On Monday, February 21, 2022 at 10:10:02 PM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote:
> Richard Hertz wrote:
> >
> > On Monday, February 21, 2022 at 9:35:26 PM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_Worldwide_List_of_Alternative_Theori/KnzBDjnGIgYC?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=egas%40pacbell.net&pg=PA1811&printsec=frontcover
> > >
> > >
> > > is there any way possible to tell the difference between the experts and the cranks if
> > > you cannot understand either one????
> > >
> > >
> > > That's the trick to getting a grant...make it impossible for anyone to understand what you written. (even yourself)
> > >
> > >
> > > throw in some math..dat really gets them confused.
> > >
> > >
> > > I got an Alternative_Theory where people come from...
> > > it is simple and can be explained completely scientifically, and
> > > it agrees with Nature...
> > >
> > >
> > > People come from the air.
> > >
> > > (There’s a little bit from the ground, some minerals and so forth.)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > (i bet that book has been banned by Amazon, too many cranks are in it....)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > > the unchallengeable.
> >
> > Anyone pretending to be a scientist that post here is a crank. No serious scientist would post here, unless heavily hidden behind VPN
> > or caming clear with their real names (very few).
> >
> > I know two of the last kind and zero from the first kind. But I know pretenders that hide with nicknames in the first kind.
> >
> > And you?
> Me??? I'm not anonymous. I just have a 'handle' required by Google and
> Usenet.
>
> I've been using the same handle, ip and server for a loooooong time.
>
> ask anybody.
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> and challenge
> the unchallengeable.
I'm not talking about you! I passed the link of the book you cite, don't forget. I'm talking about OTHER people that pretend to be a scientist.

The Starmaker wrote:
>
> Richard Hertz wrote:
> >
> > On Monday, February 21, 2022 at 9:35:26 PM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_Worldwide_List_of_Alternative_Theori/KnzBDjnGIgYC?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=egas%40pacbell.net&pg=PA1811&printsec=frontcover
> > >
> > >
> > > is there any way possible to tell the difference between the experts and the cranks if
> > > you cannot understand either one????
> > >
> > >
> > > That's the trick to getting a grant...make it impossible for anyone to understand what you written. (even yourself)
> > >
> > >
> > > throw in some math..dat really gets them confused.
> > >
> > >
> > > I got an Alternative_Theory where people come from...
> > > it is simple and can be explained completely scientifically, and
> > > it agrees with Nature...
> > >
> > >
> > > People come from the air.
> > >
> > > (There’s a little bit from the ground, some minerals and so forth.)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > (i bet that book has been banned by Amazon, too many cranks are in it...)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > > the unchallengeable.
> >
> > Anyone pretending to be a scientist that post here is a crank. No serious scientist would post here, unless heavily hidden behind VPN
> > or caming clear with their real names (very few).
> >
> > I know two of the last kind and zero from the first kind. But I know pretenders that hide with nicknames in the first kind.
> >
> > And you?
>
> Me??? I'm not anonymous. I just have a 'handle' required by Google and
> Usenet.
>
> I've been using the same handle, ip and server for a loooooong time.
>
> ask anybody.

But since you mentioned me...I've just recently have been getting a lot of vists from just one city, Cupertino, CA. Do you know anybody who lives in Cupertino, CA????

Recent Visitors
To view comprehensive statistics , login and click on the Visitors icon.
Visitors: 2
Last Visitor:
Cupertino, CA
Visitors: 2
Last Visitor:
Cupertino, CA
Visitors: 1
Last Visitor:
Cupertino, CA
Visitors: 1
Last Visitor:
Cupertino, CA
Visitors: 1
Last Visitor:
Cupertino, CA
Visitors: 1
Last Visitor:
Cupertino, CA
Visitors: 1
Last Visitor:
Cupertino, CA

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
the unchallengeable.

On Monday, February 21, 2022 at 10:23:13 PM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote:
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > Richard Hertz wrote:
> > >
> > > On Monday, February 21, 2022 at 9:35:26 PM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_Worldwide_List_of_Alternative_Theori/KnzBDjnGIgYC?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=egas%40pacbell.net&pg=PA1811&printsec=frontcover
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > is there any way possible to tell the difference between the experts and the cranks if
> > > > you cannot understand either one????
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > That's the trick to getting a grant...make it impossible for anyone to understand what you written. (even yourself)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > throw in some math..dat really gets them confused.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I got an Alternative_Theory where people come from...
> > > > it is simple and can be explained completely scientifically, and
> > > > it agrees with Nature...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > People come from the air.
> > > >
> > > > (There’s a little bit from the ground, some minerals and so forth.)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > (i bet that book has been banned by Amazon, too many cranks are in it...)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > > > the unchallengeable.
> > >
> > > Anyone pretending to be a scientist that post here is a crank. No serious scientist would post here, unless heavily hidden behind VPN
> > > or caming clear with their real names (very few).
> > >
> > > I know two of the last kind and zero from the first kind. But I know pretenders that hide with nicknames in the first kind.
> > >
> > > And you?
> >
> > Me??? I'm not anonymous. I just have a 'handle' required by Google and
> > Usenet.
> >
> > I've been using the same handle, ip and server for a loooooong time.
> >
> > ask anybody.
> But since you mentioned me...I've just recently have been getting a lot of vists from just one city, Cupertino, CA. Do you know anybody who lives in Cupertino, CA????
>
>
> Recent Visitors
>
> To view comprehensive statistics , login and click on the Visitors icon.
> Visitors: 2
> Last Visitor:
> Cupertino, CA
> Visitors: 2
> Last Visitor:
> Cupertino, CA
> Visitors: 1
> Last Visitor:
> Cupertino, CA
> Visitors: 1
> Last Visitor:
> Cupertino, CA
> Visitors: 1
> Last Visitor:
> Cupertino, CA
> Visitors: 1
> Last Visitor:
> Cupertino, CA
> Visitors: 1
> Last Visitor:
> Cupertino, CA
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> the unchallengeable.
I know at least two assholes, one worse than the other.

The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

> https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_Worldwide_List_of_Alternative_Theori/
KnzBDjnGIgYC?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=egas%40pacbell.net&pg=PA1811&printsec=frontcover

9500 names on 2679 pages.
Gives an idea about how irrelevant this forum is.

> is there any way possible to tell the difference between the experts and
> the cranks if you cannot understand either one????

There is no need to.
It is up to those nobodies to show that they are somebody.

Let them show some results,

Jan

On Tuesday, 22 February 2022 at 10:56:18 UTC+1, J. J. Lodder wrote:
> The Starmaker <star...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>
> > https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_Worldwide_List_of_Alternative_Theori/
> KnzBDjnGIgYC?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=egas%40pacbell.net&pg=PA1811&printsec=frontcover
>
> 9500 names on 2679 pages.
> Gives an idea about how irrelevant this forum is.
> > is there any way possible to tell the difference between the experts and
> > the cranks if you cannot understand either one????
> There is no need to.
> It is up to those nobodies to show that they are somebody.

While the only chance of nobody to be somebody is
following The Shit of an insane guru; it's obvious.

The Starmaker wrote:

> is there any way possible to tell the difference between the experts and
> the cranks if you cannot understand either one????
> That's the trick to getting a grant...make it impossible for anyone to
> understand what you written. (even yourself)

Ukraine is not a NATO member, and after what happened, they will never be
a NATO member, because the fictitious nazi driven capitalist oligarch
Ukraine's days are numbered. Its stolen territory will be given back to
Poland, Hungary, Slovenia, Romania and Russia.

On Tuesday, February 22, 2022 at 6:10:30 AM UTC-8, Cesario Fenot wrote:
> The Starmaker wrote:
>
> > is there any way possible to tell the difference between the experts and
> > the cranks if you cannot understand either one????
> > That's the trick to getting a grant...make it impossible for anyone to
> > understand what you written. (even yourself)
> Ukraine is not a NATO member, and after what happened, they will never be
> a NATO member, because the fictitious nazi driven capitalist oligarch
> Ukraine's days are numbered. Its stolen territory will be given back to
> Poland, Hungary, Slovenia, Romania and Russia.

Experts are the problem. You have it backwards...

J. J. Lodder wrote:
>
> The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>
> > https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_Worldwide_List_of_Alternative_Theori/
> KnzBDjnGIgYC?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=egas%40pacbell.net&pg=PA1811&printsec=frontcover
>
> 9500 names on 2679 pages.
> Gives an idea about how irrelevant this forum is.
>
> > is there any way possible to tell the difference between the experts and
> > the cranks if you cannot understand either one????
>
> There is no need to.
> It is up to those nobodies to show that they are somebody.
>
> Let them show some results,
>
> Jan

I got a good idea...
One can download the free PDF version of The_Worldwide_List_of_Alternative_Theories and
extract all the emails,
then send an email
to all of them
and invite them
to this newsgroup!

As a present to the odd bodkin.

bury him with cranks!

We're talking about Worldwide Looney Tunes!!!!

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
the unchallengeable.

On Tuesday, February 22, 2022 at 6:44:24 PM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote:
> J. J. Lodder wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker <star...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> >
> > > https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_Worldwide_List_of_Alternative_Theori/
> > KnzBDjnGIgYC?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=egas%40pacbell.net&pg=PA1811&printsec=frontcover
> >
> > 9500 names on 2679 pages.
> > Gives an idea about how irrelevant this forum is.
> >
> > > is there any way possible to tell the difference between the experts and
> > > the cranks if you cannot understand either one????
> >
> > There is no need to.
> > It is up to those nobodies to show that they are somebody.
> >
> > Let them show some results,
> >
> > Jan
> I got a good idea...
> One can download the free PDF version of The_Worldwide_List_of_Alternative_Theories and
> extract all the emails,
> then send an email
> to all of them
> and invite them
> to this newsgroup!
>
> As a present to the odd bodkin.
>
> bury him with cranks!
>
> We're talking about Worldwide Looney Tunes!!!!
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> the unchallengeable.

Didn't you mean Evan Dobkin, instead?