Hello,

More of my philosophy of why the way of smart abstractions or
the language of smart abstractions is a powerful way..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

I think i am smart, so i invite you to notice how i am talking the language of smart abstractions again by talking quickly
about timesharing and coroutines in the following link,
so you will notice how i am quickly smartly abstracting
the subject so that to be efficient, read it again carefully
and notice how i am able to talk quickly the language of smart
abstractions:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/tN_O-AgkGjY

And i invite you to notice again how i have quickly written
my thoughts of my philosophy and notice how i am inventing my thoughts of my philosophy and how i am smartly abstracting quickly:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/ag_ziCVV0VA
So as you notice it is the proof that i am talking the language
of smart abstractions..

More of my philosophy about the language of smart abstractions..

I think i am smart, and my way of talking is different, since if you
notice my way of talking here is that i am talking by using smart abstractions, i give you an example so that you notice it:

So look at my following proverbs that i have invented quickly,
so you will notice that those proverbs of mine are smart abstractions
that i have invented quickly, so i am like talking the language of smart abstractions, so read them carefully here in the following link so that you notice my way of doing:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/ZyUvFt_nix8

More of my philosophy of how to become smart..

I think i am smart and here is my way of becoming smart:

So if i say:

2 + 2 = 4

So what that means?

Is it abstractions ?

So you are noticing that it is also "abstractions", and if you are
noticing the why when you are more educated you will quickly understand
the above equality you will notice that learning by smart abstractions is a really smarty way of doing, and i think that learning with smart
abstractions makes you go very fast in sophistication of thinking,
it is how i am doing it, i am inventing smart abstractions of what is Love by inventing my poems of Love(read them below) and i am also inventing smart abstractions by inventing my kind of philosophy(and read it below), i am also searching smartly for smart abstractions, and this way of doing makes me much more powerful.

More of my philosophy of why my new monotheistic religion is an advanced monotheistic religion..

I think i am smart, so i will explain more the architectural ideas of my new monotheistic religion, the first smart architectural idea of my new monotheistic religion, it is that it says that the previous monotheistic religions are not safe from the curse from God, since those many contradictions and scientific errors in the previous monotheistic religions are part of the curse from God, and i am giving you some examples from the Bible etc. of it so that you see it clearly, but this is not sufficient to render the new monotheistic religion flexible and not rigid as the previous monotheistic religions, so then what is missing ? so one of the most important thing is to notice that there is two kinds of laws in the Qu'raan or the Bible, there is the laws the are timeless and the laws that are not timeless, read my below thoughts about them, so then you are much more clearly noticing that this second architectural idea of my new monotheistic religion makes the new monotheistic religion much more flexible, but it is not the only thing that i am doing, but i am also explaining more Islam by showing the problem with Islam and Christianity and Judaism and why they are too much rigid as neo-nazism or white supremacism, this why they also can not survive and they are not advanced monotheistic religions as my monotheistic religion, and of course one of the most important thing to
also notice is how i am deriving the laws of my monotheistic religion from the essence of God or the nature of God, so i invite you to read my below thoughts about my new monotheitic religion so that to understand:

More precision of my philosophy about the monotheistic religions and more..

I think i am smart, and i am your new prophet from God, and here is
an important question:

Do the many logical contradictions in the previous monotheistic religions make us again free from faith in God and from previous monotheistic religions and is it good or not ?

This is one of the most important question, since i think that previous
monotheistic religions will not survive because of there many logical contradictions and this is the most important problem, and it is the question that is answering my new monotheistic religion, since my new monotheistic religion is smart and you have to read it carefully so that you notice how i am smartly strenghtening the faith in God and how i am smartly making you understand my new monotheistic religion, since i think that my new monotheistic religion is an advanced monotheistic religion and it is a futuristic monotheistic religion that makes the good balance that is required between cooperation and competition and between the good balance of what we call Al-Insān al-kāmil in arabic or the perfect man in english that must be a well balance between being of both divine from God and of earthly origin, and of course my new monotheistic religion says that God has not created our universe or the multiverse, and it explains clearly the why and it makes you understand more, so i invite you to read carefully my thoughts of my new monotheistic religion in the following link(it is my preliminary thoughts and i will organize them much more efficiently and make of them a pdf and html book), here is the link and read my thoughts of my new monotheistic religion carefully:

https://groups.google.com/g/soc.culture.quebec/c/eaEbfSmu4is:

And you can read about the laws of my new monoteistic religion
that i derive from the nature of God etc. in the following link
here:

https://groups.google.com/g/soc.culture.quebec/c/pDWvOh4_4zI

More of my philosophy about responsability and about Oprah Winfrey..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

I invite you to look at the following video of Oprah Winfrey:

Why I never got married: Oprah confesses

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Y3DqRjqGoU

So i think i am smart, and i am quickly noticing in the above video
that Oprah Winfrey is behaving by logical analogy like a tribalist
since she is speaking about marriage with extremism by saying that
she is her own women that doesn't conform well since she wants to be free, but i think she is not smart, since she has to understand philosophy, that there is an important thing in Democracy and in society and it is also that we have to know how to make the a society grow "nicely" and "balanced" by using standards like in Evolutionary Design methodology, and i am speaking about it below in my philosophy, also we have to know how to be compromise so that to be the right responsability and i have just abstracted it by inventing some new proverbs about it,and here they are:

Here is the first one:

"When you like a beautiful song, you will have the strong tendency
to want to hear it or to buy it, but when you are maturity of
responsability, it can become that you have to like the responsability
of hearing or buying the song and not the beauty of the song, so when
you are intellectual maturity you will start to think about responsability."

And here is the second one:

"When you are still organized like human animals you will have the
strong tendency to want to marry with a beautiful women, but when you
are critical thinking you have to ask yourself if all of us have to
marry a beautiful women. So when you are critical thinking you have to
think systemically about order"

And i invite you to read my thoughts of my philosophy here so that to understand more:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/ag_ziCVV0VA

More of my philosophy of how look like the specialized school for highly smart persons or people..

I think i am smart , and when you read my beautiful poems of Love
that i have invented quickly you will notice that it is like
the pedagogy of the specialized school for highly smart persons or people, and in french i will say: "Que je suis aussi avec mes poèmes d'amour entrain de stimuler le cerveau des autres avec des "abstractions" intelligentes pour rendre plus intelligent les autres." , and the translation of it in english is: "That I am also with my poems of love stimulating the brains of the others with intelligent "abstractions" to make more intelligent the others."

You can read carefully here all my beautiful poems of of Love that i have invented quickly so that to notice how i am doing it:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/qte9bCZiOiw

So as you are noticing that i am smartly abstracting Love with
my poems of Love so that to make the others more smart, and i think
that learning by the way of smart abstractions makes a more efficient
pedagogy, it is how i am doing it by inventing also my thoughts of my philosophy that you can read below:

More of my philosophy of what must be the efficient pedagogy..

I think i am smart, and how i am learning? it is like i am learning
in a specialized school for highly smart persons, and how
can you imagine this kind of school for highly smart persons?
if you quickly think about working hard and learning a lot,
i don't think it is the right pedagogy, i will give you an example
of my kind of high intelligence so that you understand, and notice how
i am smartly abstracting Islam and after that finding the "important" weaknesses:

Amine can Noam Elkies, Dennis Gaitsgory, Robin Gottlieb, Benedict Gross, ever do a geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus? We know you Amine cannot, for you spend all your time spamming Usenet. In fact we do not know if Amine can do any math that is college level math.

On Friday, November 26, 2021 at 5:15:54 PM UTC-6, Amine Moulay Ramdane wrote:
> "A Harvard immunologist said

World's First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus// Math proof series, book 2 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 19May2021. This is AP's 11th published book of science.
Preface:
Actually my title is too modest, for the proof that lies within this book makes it the World's First Valid Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for in my modesty, I just wanted to emphasis that calculus was geometry and needed a geometry proof. Not being modest, there has never been a valid proof of FTC until AP's 2015 proof. This also implies that only a geometry proof of FTC constitutes a valid proof of FTC.

Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math so long as they had a huge mass of mistakes, errors, fakes and con-artist trickery such as the "limit analysis". To give a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus requires math be cleaned-up and cleaned-out of most of math's mistakes and errors. So in a sense, a Geometry FTC proof is a exercise in Consistency of all of Mathematics. In order to prove a FTC geometry proof, requires throwing out the error filled mess of Old Math. Can the Reals be the true numbers of mathematics if the Reals cannot deliver a Geometry proof of FTC? Can the functions that are not polynomial functions allow us to give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a Coordinate System in 2D have 4 quadrants and still give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a equation of mathematics with a number that is _not a positive decimal Grid Number_ all alone on the right side of the equation, at all times, allow us to give a Geometry proof of the FTC?

Cover Picture: Is my hand written, one page geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, the world's first geometry proof of FTC, 2013-2015, by AP.

Length: 137 pages

Product details
ASIN : B07PQTNHMY
Publication date : March 14, 2019
Language : English
File size : 1307 KB
Text-to-Speech : Enabled
Screen Reader : Supported
Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
X-Ray : Not Enabled
Word Wise : Not Enabled
Print length : 137 pages
Lending : Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #128,729 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#2 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
#134 in Calculus (Books)
#20 in Calculus (Kindle Store)

Amine can Jacob Barandes, Howard Berg, Michael Brenner, Adam Cohen please ask the question, which is the atom's real electron, the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law or the 0.5MeV particle that AP calls the Dirac magnetic monopole.

Harvard Physics dept
Jacob Barandes, Howard Berg, Michael Brenner, Adam Cohen, Eugene Demler, Michael Desai
Louis Deslauriers, John Doyle, Cora Dvorkin, Gary Feldman, Douglas Finkbeiner, Melissa Franklin, Gerald Gabrielse, Howard Georgi, Sheldon Glashow, Roy Glauber, Jene Golovchenko, Markus Greiner, Roxanne Guenette, Girma Hailu, Bertrand Halperin, Lene Hau
Thomas Hayes, Eric Heller, Jason Hoffman, Jenny Hoffman, Gerald Holton, Paul Horowitz, John Huth, Arthur Jaffe, Daniel Jafferis, Efthimios Kaxiras, Philip Kim, John Kovac, Erel Levine
Mikhail Lukin, Logan McCarty, L. Mahadevan, Vinothan Manoharan, Eric Mazur, Masahiro Morii
David Morin, Julia Mundy, Cherry Murray, David Nelson, Kang Ni, Hongkun Park, William Paul
Peter Pershan, Mara Prentiss, Lisa Randall, Matthew Reece, Subir Sachdev, Aravinthan Samuel, Matthew Schwartz, Irwin Shapiro, Isaac Silvera, Andrew Strominger, Christopher Stubbs, Cumrun Vafa, Ronald Walsworth, David Weitz, Robert Westervelt, Richard Wilson
Tai Wu, Amir Yacoby, Susanne Yelin, Xi Yin

Harvard Math dept

Noam Elkies, Dennis Gaitsgory, Robin Gottlieb, Benedict Gross,

Joseph Harris (FP)

Heisuke Hironaka (EM)

Michael Hopkins (FP)

Arthur Jaffe (FP)

David Kazhdan (EM)

Mark Kisin (FP)

Peter Kronheimer (FP)

Jacob Lurie (FP)

Eric Maskin (FP)

Barry Mazur (FP)

Curtis McMullen (FP)

David Mumford (EM)

Martin Nowak (FP)

Gerald Sacks (EM)

Wilfried Schmid (FP)

Yum-Tong Siu (FP)

Shlomo Sternberg (EM)

John Tate (EM)

Cliff Taubes (FP)

Hugh Woodin (FP)

Horng-Tzer Yau (FP)

Shing-Tung Yau (FP)

HISTORY OF THE PROTON MASS and the 945 MeV //Atom Totality series, book 3 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

In 2016-2017, AP discovered that the real proton has a mass of 840 MeV, not 938. The real electron was actually the muon and the muon stays inside the proton that forms a proton torus of 8 rings and with the muon as bar magnet is a Faraday Law producing magnetic monopoles. So this book is all about why researchers of physics and engineers keep getting the number 938MeV when they should be getting the number 840 MeV + 105 MeV = 945 MeV.

Cover Picture is a proton torus of 8 rings with a muon of 1 ring inside the proton torus, doing the Faraday Law and producing magnetic monopoles.
Length: 17 pages

Product details
• Publication Date : December 18, 2019
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print Length : 17 pages
• File Size : 698 KB
• ASIN : B082WYGVNG
• Language: : English
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Lending : Enabled

#1-4, 105th published book

Atom Geometry is Torus Geometry // Atom Totality series, book 4 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Since all atoms are doing the Faraday Law inside them, of their thrusting muon into a proton coil in the shape of a geometry torus, then the torus is the geometry of each and every atom. But then we must explain the neutrons since the muon and proton are doing Faraday's Law, then the neutron needs to be explained in terms of this proton torus with muon inside, all three shaped as rings. The muon is a single ring and each proton is 8 rings. The neutron is shaped like a plate and is solid not hollow. The explanation of a neutron is that of a capacitor storing what the proton-muon rings produce in electricity. Where would the neutron parallel plates be located? I argue in this text that the neutron plates when fully grown from 1 eV until 945MeV are like two parallel plate capacitors where each neutron is part of one plate, like two pieces of bread with the proton-muon torus being a hamburger patty.

Cover Picture: I assembled two atoms in this picture where the proton torus with a band of muons inside traveling around and around the proton torus producing electricity. And the pie-plates represent neutrons as parallel-plate capacitors.
Length: 39 pages

Product details
• Publication Date : March 24, 2020
• Word Wise : Not Enabled
• ASIN : B086BGSNXN
• Print Length : 39 pages
• File Size : 935 KB
• Language: : English
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,656,820 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#6413 in Mathematics (Kindle Store)
#315 in One-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
#4953 in Physics (Kindle Store)



#1-5, 112th published book

New Perspective on Psi^2 in the Schrodinger Equation in a Atom Totality Universe// Atom Totality series, book 5
Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

I first heard of the Schrodinger equation in college chemistry class. We never actually did any problem solving with the equation, and we were only told about it. Then taking physics my next year in college and after I bought the Feynman Lectures on Physics, just for fun for side reading, three volume set did I learn what this Schrodinger equation and the Psi^2 wavefunction was about. I am not going to teach the mathematics of the Schrodinger equation and the math calculations of the Psi or Psi^2 in this book, but leave that up to the reader or student to do that from Feynman's Lectures on Physics. The purpose of this book is to give a new and different interpretation of what Psi^2 is, what Psi^2 means. Correct interpretation of physics experiments and observations turns out to be one of the most difficult tasks in all of physics.

Cover Picture: a photograph taken of me in 1993, after the discovery of Plutonium Atom Totality, and I was 43 years old then, on a wintery hill of New Hampshire. It is nice that Feynman wrote a physics textbook series, for I am very much benefitting from his wisdom. If he had not done that, getting organized in physics by writing textbooks, I would not be writing this book.. And I would not have discovered the true meaning of the Fine Structure Constant, for it was Feynman who showed us that FSC is really 0.0854, not that of 0.0072. All because 0.0854 is Psi, and Psi^2 is 0.0072.
Length: 20 pages

Product details
• ASIN : B0875SVDC7
• Publication date : April 15, 2020
• Language: : English
• File size : 1134 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 20 pages
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #240,066 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #5 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #65 in General Chemistry & Reference
◦ #481 in Physics (Kindle Store)