Today's Proceedings of the (US) National Academy of Science has an interesting commentary from an academic in Finland.

https://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/118/49/e2116940118.full.pdf

It's not saying anything all that new, but it is saying that the evidence has become a lot more compelling recently.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

On Wednesday, December 8, 2021 at 3:10:55 PM UTC+11, John Doe wrote:
> Anthony William Sloman <bill....@ieee.org> wrote:
> >
> > Today's Proceedings of the (US) National Academy of Science has an interesting commentary from an academic in Finland.
> >
> > https://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/118/49/e2116940118.full.pdf
> >
> > It's not saying anything all that new, but it is saying that the evidence has become a lot more compelling recently.

<snipped most of the usual drivel>

> This chronic liar cannot be reasoned with...

John Doe does have his script but even he should have noticed that posting a link to a peer-reviewed publication doesn't offer much of an opportunity to lie, and one wonders what he thinks that "reasoning with it" would have involved.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

The John Doe troll stated the following in message-id
<sdhn7c$pkp$4@dont-email.me>:

> The troll doesn't even know how to format a USENET post...

And the John Doe troll stated the following in message-id
<sg3kr7$qt5$1@dont-email.me>:

> The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from
> breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is
> CLUELESS...

And yet, the clueless John Doe troll has itself posted yet another
incorrectly formatted USENET posting on Wed, 8 Dec 2021 04:10:49 -0000
(UTC) in message-id <sopb89$lum$10@dont-email.me>.

This posting is a public service announcement for any google groups
readers who happen by to point out that the John Doe troll does not even
follow it's own rules that it uses to troll other posters.

ldqCfVx3UGul

On Tuesday, December 7, 2021 at 6:40:32 PM UTC-8, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
> Today's Proceedings of the (US) National Academy of Science has an interesting commentary from an academic in Finland.
>
> https://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/118/49/e2116940118.full.pdf
>
> It's not saying anything all that new, but it is saying that the evidence has become a lot more compelling recently.
>
> --
> SNIPPERMAN, Sydney

Anyone who advocates nuking their OWN country can't be taken seriously...

On Friday, December 10, 2021 at 1:40:03 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
> On Tuesday, December 7, 2021 at 6:40:32 PM UTC-8, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
> > Today's Proceedings of the (US) National Academy of Science has an interesting commentary from an academic in Finland.
> >
> > https://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/118/49/e2116940118.full.pdf
> >
> > It's not saying anything all that new, but it is saying that the evidence has become a lot more compelling recently.
>
> Anyone who advocates nuking their OWN country can't be taken seriously...

Flyguy lives in the US, which conducted quite a few nuclear tests on it's own territory. It follows that Flyguy can't be taken seriously - not that anybody would.

Maybe there's a court order that requires him to remind everybody that he shouldn't be taken serious at frequent intervals. He's certainly being scrupulous about observing it.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

On Thursday, December 9, 2021 at 9:24:27 PM UTC-8, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
> On Friday, December 10, 2021 at 1:40:03 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
> > On Tuesday, December 7, 2021 at 6:40:32 PM UTC-8, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
> > > Today's Proceedings of the (US) National Academy of Science has an interesting commentary from an academic in Finland.
> > >
> > > https://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/118/49/e2116940118.full.pdf
> > >
> > > It's not saying anything all that new, but it is saying that the evidence has become a lot more compelling recently.
> >
> > Anyone who advocates nuking their OWN country can't be taken seriously...
> Flyguy lives in the US, which conducted quite a few nuclear tests on it's own territory. It follows that Flyguy can't be taken seriously - not that anybody would.
>
> Maybe there's a court order that requires him to remind everybody that he shouldn't be taken serious at frequent intervals. He's certainly being scrupulous about observing it.
>
> --
> SNIPPERMAN, Sydney

Hey SNIPPERMAN, I live in a society that locks PSYCHOTIC people such as yourself up.

On Saturday, December 11, 2021 at 2:58:34 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
> On Thursday, December 9, 2021 at 9:24:27 PM UTC-8, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
> > On Friday, December 10, 2021 at 1:40:03 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, December 7, 2021 at 6:40:32 PM UTC-8, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
> > > > Today's Proceedings of the (US) National Academy of Science has an interesting commentary from an academic in Finland.
> > > >
> > > > https://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/118/49/e2116940118.full.pdf
> > > >
> > > > It's not saying anything all that new, but it is saying that the evidence has become a lot more compelling recently.
> > >
> > > Anyone who advocates nuking their OWN country can't be taken seriously...
> >
> > Flyguy lives in the US, which conducted quite a few nuclear tests on it's own territory. It follows that Flyguy can't be taken seriously - not that anybody would.
> >
> > Maybe there's a court order that requires him to remind everybody that he shouldn't be taken serious at frequent intervals. He's certainly being scrupulous about observing it.
>
> Hey Sloman, I live in a society that locks PSYCHOTIC people such as yourself up.

Tom Seim does seem to be psychotic enough that he sees the institution that protects the rest of society from him as actually locking sane people out, rather than keeping lunatics like him confined.

One would have to psychotic to share Tom Seim's delusions. Not sharing them isn't evidence of being psychotic - quite the reverse.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

On Saturday, December 11, 2021 at 12:51:18 AM UTC-8, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
> On Saturday, December 11, 2021 at 2:58:34 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
> > On Thursday, December 9, 2021 at 9:24:27 PM UTC-8, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
> > > On Friday, December 10, 2021 at 1:40:03 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday, December 7, 2021 at 6:40:32 PM UTC-8, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
> > > > > Today's Proceedings of the (US) National Academy of Science has an interesting commentary from an academic in Finland.
> > > > >
> > > > > https://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/118/49/e2116940118.full.pdf
> > > > >
> > > > > It's not saying anything all that new, but it is saying that the evidence has become a lot more compelling recently.
> > > >
> > > > Anyone who advocates nuking their OWN country can't be taken seriously...
> > >
> > > Flyguy lives in the US, which conducted quite a few nuclear tests on it's own territory. It follows that Flyguy can't be taken seriously - not that anybody would.
> > >
> > > Maybe there's a court order that requires him to remind everybody that he shouldn't be taken serious at frequent intervals. He's certainly being scrupulous about observing it.
> >
> > Hey Sloman, I live in a society that locks PSYCHOTIC people such as yourself up.
>
> Tom Seim does seem to be psychotic enough that he sees the institution that protects the rest of society from him as actually locking sane people out, rather than keeping lunatics like him confined.
>
> One would have to psychotic to share Tom Seim's delusions. Not sharing them isn't evidence of being psychotic - quite the reverse.
>
> --
> SNIPPERMAN, Sydney

Anyone who wants to NUKE their own country IS psychotic, which means YOU.

On Sunday, December 12, 2021 at 6:04:45 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
> On Saturday, December 11, 2021 at 12:51:18 AM UTC-8, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
> > On Saturday, December 11, 2021 at 2:58:34 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
> > > On Thursday, December 9, 2021 at 9:24:27 PM UTC-8, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
> > > > On Friday, December 10, 2021 at 1:40:03 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
> > > > > On Tuesday, December 7, 2021 at 6:40:32 PM UTC-8, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
> > > > > > Today's Proceedings of the (US) National Academy of Science has an interesting commentary from an academic in Finland.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/118/49/e2116940118.full.pdf
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It's not saying anything all that new, but it is saying that the evidence has become a lot more compelling recently.
> > > > >
> > > > > Anyone who advocates nuking their OWN country can't be taken seriously...
> > > >
> > > > Flyguy lives in the US, which conducted quite a few nuclear tests on it's own territory. It follows that Flyguy can't be taken seriously - not that anybody would.
> > > >
> > > > Maybe there's a court order that requires him to remind everybody that he shouldn't be taken serious at frequent intervals. He's certainly being scrupulous about observing it.
> > >
> > > Hey Sloman, I live in a society that locks PSYCHOTIC people such as yourself up.
> >
> > Tom Seim does seem to be psychotic enough that he sees the institution that protects the rest of society from him as actually locking sane people out, rather than keeping lunatics like him confined.
> >
> > One would have to psychotic to share Tom Seim's delusions. Not sharing them isn't evidence of being psychotic - quite the reverse.
>
> Anyone who wants to NUKE their own country IS psychotic, which means YOU.

So you think that the US and Australian governments who used their own territory for nuclear tests were uniformly psychotic?

I have made this point before, and you seem totally incapable of taking it on board. This is the sort of behaviour that one can expect from an idiot, but I'm happy to characterise you as a psychopathic idiot - you do seem happy to characterise other people in derogatory ways on the basis that you don't understand what they are saying.

I do understand that what you are saying is that you would like to be taken seriously, but - granting the twaddle you post - there's zero chance of that ever happening.

Try to wish for something you can achieve - like a quick death while cleaning your concealed carry weapon, or a slightly messier one when you act out your delusion about still being a certified pilot.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney