Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

God requireth not a uniformity of religion. -- Roger Williams


tech / sci.math / Zero gravity is man's mistake

SubjectAuthor
* Zero gravity is man's mistakemitchr...@gmail.com
+* MitchR can Gene D. Block, Marc Tessier-Lavigne, Carol Christ, ThomasArchimedes Plutonium
|`- Re: MitchR can Gene D. Block, Marc Tessier-Lavigne, Carol Christ,mitchr...@gmail.com
`* Re: Zero gravity is man's mistakeHarif Kuloo
 `* Re: Zero gravity is man's mistakemitchr...@gmail.com
  +* Re: Zero gravity is man's mistakekonyberg
  |`- Re: Zero gravity is man's mistakemitchr...@gmail.com
  `- Re: Zero gravity is man's mistakezelos...@gmail.com

1
Zero gravity is man's mistake

<12606834-ef3b-4c1c-acea-857330ea1b09n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=84298&group=sci.math#84298

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.math
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5ccf:: with SMTP id s15mr2092816qta.220.1638304225066;
Tue, 30 Nov 2021 12:30:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:df44:: with SMTP id w65mr1598055ybg.515.1638304223960;
Tue, 30 Nov 2021 12:30:23 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!paganini.bofh.team!news.dns-netz.com!news.freedyn.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed8.news.xs4all.nl!news-out.netnews.com!news.alt.net!fdc2.netnews.com!peer03.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.math
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 12:30:23 -0800 (PST)
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2601:1c0:c803:ab80:df:80a2:b09d:438c;
posting-account=Dg6LkgkAAABl5NRBT4_iFEO1VO77GchW
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2601:1c0:c803:ab80:df:80a2:b09d:438c
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <12606834-ef3b-4c1c-acea-857330ea1b09n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Zero gravity is man's mistake
From: mitchrae...@gmail.com (mitchr...@gmail.com)
Injection-Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 20:30:25 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Received-Bytes: 1138
 by: mitchr...@gmail.com - Tue, 30 Nov 2021 20:30 UTC

if gravity is everywhere.
Only zero or no weight would be real...
It needs to become objective...

Mitchell Raemsch

MitchR can Gene D. Block, Marc Tessier-Lavigne, Carol Christ, Thomas F. Rosenbaum, Mary Papazian ask the question, which is the atom's real electron, the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law or the 0.5MeV particle that AP

<48b0e58e-c572-434b-aab7-87e90845cba4n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=84300&group=sci.math#84300

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.math
X-Received: by 2002:ad4:5aa4:: with SMTP id u4mr2020586qvg.7.1638304646601;
Tue, 30 Nov 2021 12:37:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:abcb:: with SMTP id v69mr1690620ybi.628.1638304646405;
Tue, 30 Nov 2021 12:37:26 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!paganini.bofh.team!news.dns-netz.com!news.freedyn.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed8.news.xs4all.nl!news-out.netnews.com!news.alt.net!fdc2.netnews.com!peer02.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.math
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 12:37:26 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <12606834-ef3b-4c1c-acea-857330ea1b09n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2600:387:b:5:0:0:0:ba;
posting-account=fsC03QkAAAAwkSNcSEKmlcR-W_HNitEd
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2600:387:b:5:0:0:0:ba
References: <12606834-ef3b-4c1c-acea-857330ea1b09n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <48b0e58e-c572-434b-aab7-87e90845cba4n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: MitchR can Gene D. Block, Marc Tessier-Lavigne, Carol Christ, Thomas
F. Rosenbaum, Mary Papazian ask the question, which is the atom's real
electron, the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law
or the 0.5MeV particle that AP
From: plutoniu...@gmail.com (Archimedes Plutonium)
Injection-Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 20:37:26 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 42552
 by: Archimedes Plutonium - Tue, 30 Nov 2021 20:37 UTC

MitchR can Marc Tessier-Lavigne, Carol Christ, Gene D. Block, Thomas F. Rosenbaum, Mary Papazian ask the question, which is the atom's real electron, the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law or the 0.5MeV particle that AP calls the Dirac magnetic monopole. Or are they wasting too much time on your MitchR Monty Python Physics. Or is Gene D. Block too much of a modern day failed fool of science to ever ask a question on true real electron?



>
> Why cannot Stanford ask simple questions, how stupid are they? Stanford physics dept. Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian.
> 

> HISTORY OF THE PROTON MASS and the 945 MeV //Atom Totality series, book 3 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> In 2016-2017, AP discovered that the real proton has a mass of 840 MeV, not 938. The real electron was actually the muon and the muon stays inside the proton that forms a proton torus of 8 rings and with the muon as bar magnet is a Faraday Law producing magnetic monopoles. So this book is all about why researchers of physics and engineers keep getting the number 938MeV when they should be getting the number 840 MeV + 105 MeV = 945 MeV.
>
> Cover Picture is a proton torus of 8 rings with a muon of 1 ring inside the proton torus, doing the Faraday Law and producing magnetic monopoles.
> Length: 17 pages
>
> Product details
> • Publication Date : December 18, 2019
> • Word Wise : Enabled
> • Print Length : 17 pages
> • File Size : 698 KB
> • ASIN : B082WYGVNG
> • Language: : English
> • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> • Screen Reader : Supported
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Lending : Enabled
>
> #1-4, 105th published book
>
> Atom Geometry is Torus Geometry // Atom Totality series, book 4 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> Since all atoms are doing the Faraday Law inside them, of their thrusting muon into a proton coil in the shape of a geometry torus, then the torus is the geometry of each and every atom. But then we must explain the neutrons since the muon and proton are doing Faraday's Law, then the neutron needs to be explained in terms of this proton torus with muon inside, all three shaped as rings. The muon is a single ring and each proton is 8 rings. The neutron is shaped like a plate and is solid not hollow. The explanation of a neutron is that of a capacitor storing what the proton-muon rings produce in electricity. Where would the neutron parallel plates be located? I argue in this text that the neutron plates when fully grown from 1 eV until 945MeV are like two parallel plate capacitors where each neutron is part of one plate, like two pieces of bread with the proton-muon torus being a hamburger patty.
>
> Cover Picture: I assembled two atoms in this picture where the proton torus with a band of muons inside traveling around and around the proton torus producing electricity. And the pie-plates represent neutrons as parallel-plate capacitors.
> Length: 39 pages
>
> Product details
> • Publication Date : March 24, 2020
> • Word Wise : Not Enabled
> • ASIN : B086BGSNXN
> • Print Length : 39 pages
> • File Size : 935 KB
> • Language: : English
> • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> • Screen Reader : Supported
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> • Lending : Enabled
> Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,656,820 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> #6413 in Mathematics (Kindle Store)
> #315 in One-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
> #4953 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> 

>
> #1-5, 112th published book
>
> New Perspective on Psi^2 in the Schrodinger Equation in a Atom Totality Universe// Atom Totality series, book 5
> Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> I first heard of the Schrodinger equation in college chemistry class. We never actually did any problem solving with the equation, and we were only told about it. Then taking physics my next year in college and after I bought the Feynman Lectures on Physics, just for fun for side reading, three volume set did I learn what this Schrodinger equation and the Psi^2 wavefunction was about. I am not going to teach the mathematics of the Schrodinger equation and the math calculations of the Psi or Psi^2 in this book, but leave that up to the reader or student to do that from Feynman's Lectures on Physics. The purpose of this book is to give a new and different interpretation of what Psi^2 is, what Psi^2 means. Correct interpretation of physics experiments and observations turns out to be one of the most difficult tasks in all of physics.
>
> Cover Picture: a photograph taken of me in 1993, after the discovery of Plutonium Atom Totality, and I was 43 years old then, on a wintery hill of New Hampshire. It is nice that Feynman wrote a physics textbook series, for I am very much benefitting from his wisdom. If he had not done that, getting organized in physics by writing textbooks, I would not be writing this book. And I would not have discovered the true meaning of the Fine Structure Constant, for it was Feynman who showed us that FSC is really 0.0854, not that of 0.0072. All because 0.0854 is Psi, and Psi^2 is 0.0072.
> Length: 20 pages
>
> Product details
> • ASIN : B0875SVDC7
> • Publication date : April 15, 2020
> • Language: : English
> • File size : 1134 KB
> • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> • Screen Reader : Supported
> • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Word Wise : Enabled
> • Print length : 20 pages
> • Lending : Enabled
> • Best Sellers Rank: #240,066 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> ◦ #5 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> ◦ #65 in General Chemistry & Reference
> ◦ #481 in Physics (Kindle Store)
>
> #1-6, 135th published book
>
> QED in Atom Totality theory where proton is a 8 ring torus and electron = muon inside proton doing Faraday Law// Atom Totality series, book 6 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) 

> Since the real true electron of atoms is the muon and is a one ring bar magnet thrusting through the 8 ring torus of a proton, we need a whole entire new model of the hydrogen atom. Because the Bohr model with the 0.5MeV particle jumping orbitals as the explanation of Spectral Lines is all wrong. In this vacuum of explaining spectral line physics, comes the AP Model which simply states that the hydrogen atom creates Spectral lines because at any one instant of time 4 of the 8 proton rings is "in view" and the electricity coming from those 4 view rings creates spectral line physics.
>
> Cover Picture: Is a imitation of the 8 ring proton torus, with my fingers holding on the proton ring that has the muon ring perpendicular and in the equatorial plane of the proton rings, thrusting through. This muon ring is the same size as the 8 proton rings making 9 x 105MeV = 945MeV of energy.. The muon ring has to be perpendicular and lie on the equator of the proton torus. Surrounding the proton-torus would be neutrons as skin or coating cover and act as capacitors in storing the electricity produced by the proton+muon.
>
>
> Product details
> • ASIN : B08K47K5BB
> • Publication date : September 25, 2020
> • Language : English
> • File size : 587 KB
> • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> • Screen Reader : Supported
> • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Word Wise : Not Enabled
> • Print length : 25 pages
> • Lending : Enabled
> • Best Sellers Rank: #291,001 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> ◦ #13 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> ◦ #52 in General Chemistry & Reference
> ◦ #334 in General Chemistry
>
>
>
> #1-7, 138th published book
> The true NUCLEUS of Atoms are inner toruses moving around in circles of a larger outer torus// Rutherford, Geiger, Marsden Experiment revisited // Atom Totality Series, book 7 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> The geometry of Atoms of the Table of Chemical Elements is torus geometry.. We know this to be true for the torus geometry forms the maximum electricity production when using the Faraday Law. We see this in Old Physics with their tokamak toruses attempting to make fusion, by accelerating particles of the highest possible acceleration for the torus is that geometry. But the torus is the geometry not only of maximum acceleration but of maximum electrical generation by having a speeding bar magnet go around and around inside a torus== the Faraday law, where the torus rings are the copper closed wire loop. The protons of atoms are 8 loops of rings in a torus geometry, and the electron of atoms is the muon as bar magnet, almost the same size as the proton loops but small enough to fit inside proton loops. It is torus geometry that we investigate the geometry of all atoms.
> Length: 41 pages
>
> Product details
> • Publication Date : October 9, 2020
> • File Size : 828 KB
> • Word Wise : Not Enabled
> • Print Length : 41 pages
> • ASIN : B08KZT5TCD
> • Language: : English
> • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> • Screen Reader : Supported
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Lending : Enabled
>
> #1-8, 1st published book
>
> Atom Totality Universe, 8th edition, 2017// A history log book: Atom Totality Series book 8 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
>
> Last revision 7Apr2021. This was AP's first published science book.
>
> Advisory: This is a difficult book to read and is AP's research log book of the Atom Totality in 2016-2017. I want to keep it for its history value. AP advises all readers wanting to know the Plutonium Atom Totality theory to go to the 9th edition that is the latest up to date account of this theory. The reason AP wants to keep the 8th edition is because of Historical Value, for in this book, while writing it, caused the discovery of the real electron is the muon of atoms. The real proton of atoms is 840MeV and not the 938MeV that most books claim. The particle discovered by JJ Thomson in 1897 thinking he discovered the electron of atoms was actually the Dirac magnetic monopole at 0.5MeV. This discovery changes every, every science that uses atoms and electricity and magnetism, in other words, every science.
>
> Foreward:
> I wrote the 8th edition of Atom Totality and near the end of writing it in 2017, I had my second greatest physics discovery. I learned the real electron of atoms was the muon at 105MeV and not the tiny 0.5MeV particle that J.J.Thomson found in 1897. So I desperately tried to include that discovery in my 8th edition and it is quite plain to see for I tried to write paragraphs after each chapter saying as much. I knew in 2017, that it was a great discovery, changing all the hard sciences, and reframing and restructuring all the hard sciences.
> Length: 632 pages
>
>
> Product details
> File Size: 1132 KB
> Print Length: 632 pages
> Publication Date: March 11, 2019
> Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
> Language: English
> ASIN: B07PLP9NDR
> Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
> X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

> Word Wise: Enabled
> Lending: Enabled
> Screen Reader: Supported 
> Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
> Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #578,229 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> #1610 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> #8526 in Physics (Books)
> #18851 in Biological Sciences (Books)
>
> #2-1, 137th published book
>
> Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
>
>
> #1 New Release in Electromagnetic Theory
>
> This will be AP's 137th published book on science. And the number 137 is special to me for it is the number of QED, Quantum Electrodynamics as the inverse fine structure constant. I can always remember 137 as that special constant of physics and so I can remember where Teaching True Physics was started by me.
>
> Time has come for the world to have the authoritative textbooks for all of High School and College education. Written by the leading physics expert of the time. The last such was Feynman in the 1960s with Feynman Lectures on Physics. The time before was Maxwell in 1860s with his books and Encyclopedia Britannica editorship. The time is ripe in 2020 for the new authoritative texts on physics. It will be started in 2020 which is 60 years after Feynman. In the future, I request the physics community updates the premier physics textbook series at least every 30 years. For we can see that pattern of 30 years approximately from Faraday in 1830 to Maxwell in 1860 to Planck and Rutherford in about 1900, to Dirac in 1930 to Feynman in 1960 and finally to AP in 1990 and 2020. So much happens in physics after 30 years, that we need the revisions to take place in a timely manner. But also, as we move to Internet publishing such as Amazon's Kindle, we can see that updates can take place very fast, as editing can be a ongoing monthly or yearly activity. I for one keep constantly updating all my published books, at least I try to.
>
> Feynman was the best to make the last authoritative textbook series for his concentration was QED, Quantum Electrodynamics, the pinnacle peak of physics during the 20th century. Of course the Atom Totality theory took over after 1990 and all of physics; for all sciences are under the Atom Totality theory.
> And as QED was the pinnacle peak before 1990, the new pinnacle peak is the Atom Totality theory. The Atom Totality theory is the advancement of QED, for the Atom Totality theory primal axiom says -- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but Electricity and Magnetism.
> Length: 64 pages
>
> Product details
> • File Size : 790 KB
> • Publication Date : October 5, 2020
> • Word Wise : Enabled
> • Print Length : 64 pages
> • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> • Screen Reader : Supported
> • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Language: : English
> • ASIN : B08KS4YGWY
> • Lending : Enabled
> • Best Sellers Rank: #430,602 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> ◦ #39 in Electromagnetic Theory
> ◦ #73 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
> ◦ #74 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
>
> #2-2, 145th published book
>
>
> TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS//Junior High School// Physics textbook series, book 2
> Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> What I am doing is clearing the field of physics, clearing it of all the silly mistakes and errors and beliefs that clutter up physics. Clearing it of its fraud and fakeries and con-artistry. I thought of doing these textbooks starting with Senior year High School, wherein I myself started learning physics. But because of so much fraud and fakery in physics education, I believe we have to drop down to Junior year High School to make a drastic and dramatic emphasis on fakery and con-artistry that so much pervades science and physics in particular. So that we have two years in High School to learn physics. And discard the nonsense of physics brainwash that Old Physics filled the halls and corridors of education.
>
> Product details
> • ASIN : B08PC99JJB
> • Publication date : November 29, 2020
> • Language: : English
> • File size : 682 KB
> • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> • Screen Reader : Supported
> • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Word Wise : Enabled
> • Print length : 78 pages
> • Lending : Enabled
> • Best Sellers Rank: #185,995 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> ◦ #42 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
> ◦ #344 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> ◦ #2,160 in Physics (Books)
>
> #2-3, 146th published book
>
> TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Senior High School// Physics textbook series, book 3
> Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> I believe that in knowing the history of a science is knowing half of that science. And that if you are amiss of knowing the history behind a science, you have only a partial understanding of the concepts and ideas behind the science. I further believe it is easier to teach a science by teaching its history than any other means of teaching. So for senior year High School, I believe physics history is the best way of teaching physics. And in later years of physics courses, we can always pick up on details. So I devote this senior year High School physics to a history of physics, but only true physics. And there are few books written on the history of physics, so I chose Asimov's The History of Physics, 1966 as the template book for this textbook. Now Asimov's book is full of error and mistakes, and that is disappointing but all of Old Physics is full of error. On errors and mistakes of Old Physics, the best I can do is warn the students, and the largest warning of all is that whenever someone in Old Physics says "electron" what they are talking about is really the Dirac magnetic monopole. And whenever they talk about the Rutherford-Bohr model of the atom, they are talking about huge huge grave mistakes, for the true atom is protons as 8 ringed toruses with a muon stuck inside of a proton doing the Faraday law and producing those magnetic monopoles as electricity. I use Asimov's book as a template but in the future, I hope to rewrite this textbook using no template at all, that is if I have time in the future.
> Cover Picture: Is the book The History of Physics, by Isaac Asimov, 1966 and on top of the book are 4 cut-outs of bent circles representing magnetic monopoles which revolutionizes modern physics, especially the ElectroMagnetic theory.
>
> Product details
> • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B08RK33T8V
> • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 28, 2020
> • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> • File size ‏ : ‎ 794 KB
> • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • Print length ‏ : ‎ 123 pages
> • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • Best Sellers Rank: #4,167,235 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> ◦ #15,099 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> ◦ #91,163 in Physics (Books)
>
>
> #2-4, 151st published book
>
> TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// 1st year College// Physics textbook series, book 4
> Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> Preface: This is AP's 151st book of science published. It is one of my most important books of science because 1st year college physics is so impressionable on students, if they should continue with physics, or look elsewhere for a career. And also, physics is a crossroad to all the other hard core sciences, where physics course is mandatory such as in chemistry or even biology. I have endeavored to make physics 1st year college to be as easy and simple to learn. In this endeavor to make physics super easy, I have made the writing such that you will see core ideas in all capital letters as single sentences as a educational tool. And I have made this textbook chapter writing follow a logical pattern of both algebra and geometry concepts, throughout. The utmost importance of logic in physics needs to be seen and understood. For I have never seen a physics book, prior to this one that is logical. Every Old Physics textbook I have seen is scatter-brained in topics and in writing. I use as template book of Halliday & Resnick because a edition of H&R was one I was taught physics at University of Cincinnati in 1969. And in 1969, I had a choice of majors, do I major in geology, or mathematics, or in physics, for I will graduate from UC in 1972. For me, geology was too easy, but physics was too tough, so I ended up majoring in mathematics. If I had been taught in 1969 using this textbook that I have written, I would have ended up majoring in physics, my first love. For physics is not hard, not hard at all, once you clear out the mistakes and the obnoxious worthless mathematics that clutters up Old Physics, and the illogic that smothers much of Old Physics.
>
> Maybe it was good that I had those impressions of physics education of poor education, which still exists throughout physics today. Because maybe I am forced to write this book, because of that awful experience of learning physics in 1969. Without that awful experience, maybe this textbook would have never been written by me.
>
> Cover picture is the template book of Halliday & Resnick, 1988, 3rd edition Fundamentals of Physics and sitting on top are cut outs of "half bent circles, bent at 90 degrees" to imitate magnetic monopoles. Magnetic Monopoles revolutionizes physics education, and separates-out, what is Old Physics from what is New Physics.
>
> Product details
> • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09JW5DVYM
> • Publication date ‏ : ‎ October 19, 2021
> • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> • File size ‏ : ‎ 1033 KB
> • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • Print length ‏ : ‎ 386 pages
> • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
>
> #3-1, 2nd published book

>
> True Chemistry: Chemistry Series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> Physics and chemistry made a mistake in 1897 for they thought that J.J. Thomson's small particle of 0.5MeV was the electron of atoms. By 2017, Archimedes Plutonium discovered that the rest mass of 940 for neutron and proton was really 9 x 105MeV with a small sigma-error. Meaning that the real proton is 840MeV, real electron is 105 MeV= muon, and that little particle Thomson discovered was in fact the Dirac magnetic monopole. Dirac circa 1930s was looking for a magnetic monopole, and sadly, Dirac passed away before 2017, because if he had lived to 2017, he would have seen his long sought for magnetic monopole which is everywhere.
>
> Cover picture: shows 3 isomers of CO2 and the O2 molecule.
>
> Length: 1150 pages
>
>
> Product details
> • File Size : 2167 KB
> • ASIN : B07PLVMMSZ
> • Publication Date : March 11, 2019
> • Word Wise : Enabled
> • Print Length : 1150 pages
> • Language: : English
> • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Lending : Enabled
> Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #590,212 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> #181 in General Chemistry & Reference
> #1324 in General Chemistry
> #1656 in Physics (Kindle Store)
>
>
> y z
> | /
> | /
> |/______ x
>
> More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci..physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies.
>
> In sci.math, sci.physics there is only stalking hate spew along with Police Drag Net Spam of no value and other than hate spew there is Police drag net spam day and night.
>
> I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of stalkers and spammers, Police Drag Net Spam that floods each and every day, book and solution manual spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. And the taxpayer funded hate spew stalkers who ad hominem you day and night on every one of your posts.
>
> There is no discussion of science in sci.math or sci.physics, just one long line of hate spewing stalkers followed up with Police Drag Net Spam (easy to spot-- very offtopic-- with hate charged content). And countries using sci.physics & sci.math as propaganda platforms, such as tampering in elections with their mind-rot.
>
> Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
> https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
> Archimedes Plutonium
>
> Stanford's_Marc Tessier-Lavigne, Persis Drell,Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff,, is McGinn correct that Stanford is failed & incompetent to confirm real proton is 840MeV, real electron=105MeV and .5MeV was Dirac's magnetic monopole
>
> Re: James McGinn, the blubbery cesspool mind of a moron packed inside a single cell atop a foghorn mouth// why California schools have not yet confirmed real proton = 840MeV, electron= muon and .5MeV was Dirac's monopole
> 157k views
> Oct 14, 2019, 10:08:30 AM
> by Pete Smith
> > I fart you.
>
> On Wednesday, May 29, 2019 at 10:55:04 AM UTC-5, James McGinn wrote:
> > >
> > > And you too proved yourself incompetent and desperate in that you failed to discuss any of the substance of the argument (the subject of which is way, way over your head).
>
> AP writes: Is the reason Stanford Univ has not yet confirmed real proton is 840MeV not 938, because its scientists like McGinn says is blithering nattering nutter fools-- drinking coffee and eating Danish rolls rather than uncovering the true proton is 840MeV stuck with the real electron as muon doing a Faraday Law dance inside the atom making electricity and the .5MeV particle is Dirac's magnetic monopole.
>
> o-:^>___?
> `~~c--^c'
> Navy dog says: yes, I enjoy my Danish rolls with blended coffee, steaks and eggs in the California sun instead of real physics of the atom
>
> Stanford University, math dept.
>
> Gregory Brumfiel, Daniel Bump, Emmanuel Candès, Gunnar Carlsson, Moses Charikar, Sourav Chatterjee, Tom Church, Ralph Cohen, Brian Conrad, Brian Conrey, Amir Dembo, Persi Diaconis, Yakov Eliashberg, Robert Finn, Jacob Fox, Laura Fredrickson, Søren Galatius, George Schaeffer, Or Hershkovits, David Hoffman, Eleny Ionel, Renata Kallosh, Yitzhak Katznelson, Vladimir Kazeev, Michael Kemeny, Steven Kerckhoff, Susie Kimport, Jun Li, Tai-Ping Liu, Mark Lucianovic, Jonathan Luk, Frederick Manners, Rafe Mazzeo, James R. Milgram, Maryam Mirzakhani, Stefan Mueller, Christopher Ohrt, Donald Ornstein, George Papanicolaou, Lenya Ryzhik, Richard Schoen, Leon Simon, Rick Sommer, Kannan Soundararajan, Tadashi Tokieda, Cheng-Chiang Tsai, Ravi Vakil, András Vasy, Akshay Venkatesh, Jan Vondrák, Brian White, Wojciech Wieczorek, Jennifer Wilson, Alex Wright, Lexing Ying, Xuwen Zhu
>
>
> President: Marc Tessier-Lavigne (neuroscience)
> Provost: Persis Drell (physics)
>
> Stanford physics dept.
>
> Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian
>
> CalTech math dept
>
> Michael Aschbacher, Alexei Borodin, Danny Calegari
> Matthias Flach, Anton N. Kapustin, Alexander Kechris
> Alexei Kitaev, Matilde Marcolli, Nikolai Makarov, Vladimir Markovic, Hiroshi Oguri, Eric Rains, Dinakar Ramakrishnan
> Barry Simon, Richard Wilson, Tom Graber, Sergei Gukov,
> Elena Mantovan, Yi NI,
>
> Caltech Physics Dept
>
> Barry Barish, Felix Boehm, Steven Frautschi
> Murray Gell-Mann, David Goodstein, Thomas Phillips,
> John Schwarz, Barry Simon, Kip Thorne, Petr Vogel,
> Rochus Vogt, Ward Whaling, Michael E. Brown,
> Konstantin Batygin
>
>
> UCLA chancellor: Gene D. Block (biology)
>
> UCLA Physics dept
> Ernest Abers, Elihu Abrahams, Katsushi Arisaka, Michalis Bachtis
> Eric Becklin, Zvi Bern, Rubin Braunstein, Stuart Brown, Robijn Bruinsma
> Charles Buchanan, Wesley Campbell, Troy Carter, Sudip Chakravarty
> W. Gilbert Clark, John Cornwall, Robert Cousins, Eric D'Hoker
> Robert Finkelstein, Christian Fronsdal, Walter Gekelman, Graciela Gelmini
> George Gruner, Michael Gutperle, Brad Hansen, Jay Hauser, Karoly Holczer
> Huan Huang, Eric Hudson, George Igo, Per Kraus, Alexander Kusenko
> Thomas Mason, George Morales, Warren Mori, Steven Moszkowski
> Christoph Niemann, Kumar Patel, Roberto Peccei, Claudio Pellegrini
> Seth Putterman, B. Regan, James Rosenzweig, Joseph Rudnick
> David Saltzberg, William Slater, Reiner Stenzel, Terry Tomboulis, Jean Turner
>


Click here to read the complete article
Re: MitchR can Gene D. Block, Marc Tessier-Lavigne, Carol Christ, Thomas F. Rosenbaum, Mary Papazian ask the question, which is the atom's real electron, the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law or the 0.5MeV particle that AP

<2134bd39-e59b-4ea0-9a3a-6dee8735f260n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=84304&group=sci.math#84304

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.math
X-Received: by 2002:a37:b5c3:: with SMTP id e186mr1935185qkf.747.1638306095286;
Tue, 30 Nov 2021 13:01:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:f414:: with SMTP id q20mr1983513ybd.206.1638306095192;
Tue, 30 Nov 2021 13:01:35 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!peer02.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.math
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 13:01:35 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <48b0e58e-c572-434b-aab7-87e90845cba4n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2601:1c0:c803:ab80:df:80a2:b09d:438c;
posting-account=Dg6LkgkAAABl5NRBT4_iFEO1VO77GchW
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2601:1c0:c803:ab80:df:80a2:b09d:438c
References: <12606834-ef3b-4c1c-acea-857330ea1b09n@googlegroups.com> <48b0e58e-c572-434b-aab7-87e90845cba4n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <2134bd39-e59b-4ea0-9a3a-6dee8735f260n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: MitchR can Gene D. Block, Marc Tessier-Lavigne, Carol Christ,
Thomas F. Rosenbaum, Mary Papazian ask the question, which is the atom's real
electron, the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law
or the 0.5MeV particle that AP
From: mitchrae...@gmail.com (mitchr...@gmail.com)
Injection-Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 21:01:35 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Received-Bytes: 1537
 by: mitchr...@gmail.com - Tue, 30 Nov 2021 21:01 UTC

Where does gravity go away?
It doesn't.
No gravity zero just weight...

Mitchell Raemsch

Re: Zero gravity is man's mistake

<so7kis$12eu$1@gioia.aioe.org>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=84357&group=sci.math#84357

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.math
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!bUS7DI78tqWXKNJlr+z1kA.user.46.165.242.75.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: bbc...@uioas.ar (Harif Kuloo)
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: Zero gravity is man's mistake
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2021 10:59:41 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <so7kis$12eu$1@gioia.aioe.org>
References: <12606834-ef3b-4c1c-acea-857330ea1b09n@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="35294"; posting-host="bUS7DI78tqWXKNJlr+z1kA.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org";
User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.11 (MacIntel)
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
 by: Harif Kuloo - Wed, 1 Dec 2021 10:59 UTC

mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:

> if gravity is everywhere. Only zero or no weight would be real...
> It needs to become objective...

you can move around without gravity. Inertia is not gravity.

Re: Zero gravity is man's mistake

<cfbae5ce-8e64-4adb-9866-4b7516df5260n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=84377&group=sci.math#84377

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.math
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:a50:: with SMTP id j16mr8608951qka.766.1638391670120;
Wed, 01 Dec 2021 12:47:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:abcb:: with SMTP id v69mr10115623ybi.628.1638391669992;
Wed, 01 Dec 2021 12:47:49 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.math
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2021 12:47:49 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <so7kis$12eu$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2601:1c0:c803:ab80:d9d7:da41:8fe4:5028;
posting-account=Dg6LkgkAAABl5NRBT4_iFEO1VO77GchW
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2601:1c0:c803:ab80:d9d7:da41:8fe4:5028
References: <12606834-ef3b-4c1c-acea-857330ea1b09n@googlegroups.com> <so7kis$12eu$1@gioia.aioe.org>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <cfbae5ce-8e64-4adb-9866-4b7516df5260n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Zero gravity is man's mistake
From: mitchrae...@gmail.com (mitchr...@gmail.com)
Injection-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2021 20:47:50 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 8
 by: mitchr...@gmail.com - Wed, 1 Dec 2021 20:47 UTC

On Wednesday, December 1, 2021 at 2:59:50 AM UTC-8, Harif Kuloo wrote:
> mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > if gravity is everywhere. Only zero or no weight would be real...
> > It needs to become objective...
> you can move around without gravity. Inertia is not gravity.

Nobody can get out of gravity...
God creates gravity.

Re: Zero gravity is man's mistake

<ea9971d2-eb02-4220-b716-a100b49ef667n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=84386&group=sci.math#84386

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.math
X-Received: by 2002:ad4:5969:: with SMTP id eq9mr9405436qvb.4.1638397437340;
Wed, 01 Dec 2021 14:23:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:6152:: with SMTP id v79mr10952765ybb.400.1638397437147;
Wed, 01 Dec 2021 14:23:57 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.math
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2021 14:23:56 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <cfbae5ce-8e64-4adb-9866-4b7516df5260n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=89.162.34.59; posting-account=SGAV2AoAAAAM9tF0rkmjA-8OWMPYCCdd
NNTP-Posting-Host: 89.162.34.59
References: <12606834-ef3b-4c1c-acea-857330ea1b09n@googlegroups.com>
<so7kis$12eu$1@gioia.aioe.org> <cfbae5ce-8e64-4adb-9866-4b7516df5260n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <ea9971d2-eb02-4220-b716-a100b49ef667n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Zero gravity is man's mistake
From: konyb...@online.no (konyberg)
Injection-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2021 22:23:57 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 11
 by: konyberg - Wed, 1 Dec 2021 22:23 UTC

onsdag 1. desember 2021 kl. 21:47:55 UTC+1 skrev mitchr...@gmail.com:
> On Wednesday, December 1, 2021 at 2:59:50 AM UTC-8, Harif Kuloo wrote:
> > mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> > > if gravity is everywhere. Only zero or no weight would be real...
> > > It needs to become objective...
> > you can move around without gravity. Inertia is not gravity.
> Nobody can get out of gravity...
> God creates gravity.

But two large masses can create a zero gravity to a small mass. Lagrange points.
KON

Re: Zero gravity is man's mistake

<c0804130-4637-4d65-a70d-5a213d257665n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=84396&group=sci.math#84396

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.math
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:b8b:: with SMTP id k11mr9572959qkh.746.1638403303838;
Wed, 01 Dec 2021 16:01:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:df44:: with SMTP id w65mr11399816ybg.515.1638403303724;
Wed, 01 Dec 2021 16:01:43 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!news.mixmin.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.math
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2021 16:01:43 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <ea9971d2-eb02-4220-b716-a100b49ef667n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2601:1c0:c803:ab80:d9d7:da41:8fe4:5028;
posting-account=Dg6LkgkAAABl5NRBT4_iFEO1VO77GchW
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2601:1c0:c803:ab80:d9d7:da41:8fe4:5028
References: <12606834-ef3b-4c1c-acea-857330ea1b09n@googlegroups.com>
<so7kis$12eu$1@gioia.aioe.org> <cfbae5ce-8e64-4adb-9866-4b7516df5260n@googlegroups.com>
<ea9971d2-eb02-4220-b716-a100b49ef667n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <c0804130-4637-4d65-a70d-5a213d257665n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Zero gravity is man's mistake
From: mitchrae...@gmail.com (mitchr...@gmail.com)
Injection-Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2021 00:01:43 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
 by: mitchr...@gmail.com - Thu, 2 Dec 2021 00:01 UTC

On Wednesday, December 1, 2021 at 2:24:04 PM UTC-8, konyberg wrote:
> onsdag 1. desember 2021 kl. 21:47:55 UTC+1 skrev mitchr...@gmail.com:
> > On Wednesday, December 1, 2021 at 2:59:50 AM UTC-8, Harif Kuloo wrote:
> > > mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> > >
> > > > if gravity is everywhere. Only zero or no weight would be real...
> > > > It needs to become objective...
> > > you can move around without gravity. Inertia is not gravity.
> > Nobody can get out of gravity...
> > God creates gravity.
> But two large masses can create a zero gravity to a small mass. Lagrange points.
> KON

That is wrong gravity. Lagrange 2 does not work as an orbit.
James Webb is going to fail on its basis.

Mitchell Raemsch

Re: Zero gravity is man's mistake

<e4de6aca-a7ed-4436-8a07-18ee6171fa7cn@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=84427&group=sci.math#84427

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.math
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:11c4:: with SMTP id n4mr12109425qtk.56.1638423054769;
Wed, 01 Dec 2021 21:30:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:4d84:: with SMTP id a126mr13094025ybb.654.1638423054586;
Wed, 01 Dec 2021 21:30:54 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.math
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2021 21:30:54 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <cfbae5ce-8e64-4adb-9866-4b7516df5260n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=79.136.72.131; posting-account=9KdpAQoAAAAHk6UQCkS1dsKOLsVDFEUN
NNTP-Posting-Host: 79.136.72.131
References: <12606834-ef3b-4c1c-acea-857330ea1b09n@googlegroups.com>
<so7kis$12eu$1@gioia.aioe.org> <cfbae5ce-8e64-4adb-9866-4b7516df5260n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <e4de6aca-a7ed-4436-8a07-18ee6171fa7cn@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Zero gravity is man's mistake
From: zelos.ma...@gmail.com (zelos...@gmail.com)
Injection-Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2021 05:30:54 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 9
 by: zelos...@gmail.com - Thu, 2 Dec 2021 05:30 UTC

onsdag 1 december 2021 kl. 21:47:55 UTC+1 skrev mitchr...@gmail.com:
> On Wednesday, December 1, 2021 at 2:59:50 AM UTC-8, Harif Kuloo wrote:
> > mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> > > if gravity is everywhere. Only zero or no weight would be real...
> > > It needs to become objective...
> > you can move around without gravity. Inertia is not gravity.
> Nobody can get out of gravity...
> God creates gravity.
I do not create gravity at all

1
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.8
clearnet tor