AP's 216th book of science// Why Stellar Evolution has the dynamics of Intelligent life only to move them in a few thousand years.

AP wrote a sci-fi thriller called Americium that highlights many of the issues covered in this book.

This is a Why Question book. For I am fascinated by painting myself into this corner and no escape without walking on wet paint.

I know for certain these things.

1) Stars and Sun shine by Faraday law not fusion and that means our Sun will go into Red Giant Phase soon.

2) That Advanced Intelligent life on Earth has come about within 10,000 years time geologically.

3) No sooner does Sun and Earth have intelligent life, so intelligent that we can nucleosynthesize heavier atoms than plutonium, that we are faced with the Sun threatening all life on Earth.

So here is the Why Question? Why bother with advanced intelligent life if you mean to snuff out that life in the next few thousand years time?

And ever since I wrote that book Americium Saves Humanity, that question had been bugging me ever since.

If all is true, would most certainly explain why Earth never had visitors of aliens, as far as we know. Because if true, every advanced life will be making a move migration to their outer planets and satellites just to stay alive. No time to explore the Universe, but all the time just to stay alive.

Will Humanity colonize Europa and Ganymede in time, or will humanity become extinct in a few thousand years?

And the only hope for all the rest of the plants and animals on Earth is to catch a ride with humanity as it attempts to colonize Europa, or be scorched to death back on Earth.

4) I know as a fact that NASA reports a yearly increase in Solar Radiation is 0.005% yearly increase. That may not sound like much but the number that is the Solar radiation is a huge number, so a little of a huge number is still a large number. And we see evidence of this deadly rise in radiation in that we lost 25% of all insect biomass in the past 10 years.

So the purpose of this book is to attempt to give a scientific explanation for why the Universe is so constructed as to give advanced intelligent life and then snuff out that life, if not able to colonize in time, snuff out that life.

As if to say, what was the purpose?

And the purpose I come up with is that the Universe has its own pace in which new heavy elements must be created by life. Our pace is too fast. And so, we are destined to have to move to migrate to Europa and set up new home and after thousands of years, get back to nucleosynthesis of the elements far beyond plutonium.

That is the only thing I can think of at the moment to have all stars with a planet of advanced intelligent life have to move to an outer planet and its satellites.

So I am writing this book to see if I can pinpoint that dynamics in the 6 EM laws of physics. If I can pinpoint that dynamics in the laws of electricity and magnetism would be actually a huge crystal ball of our future, not only our future but every lifeform in the Cosmos.

I would have to pinpoint a ladder progression of planets and satellites as they move in orbits around the Sun and each in turn be swallowed by the Sun..

I would have to pinpoint some science terms in the EM equations that says as soon as a planet gets advanced intelligent life, it is only 10,000 years before the star goes Red Giant Phase.

And most important of all, I need some science law that says, the elements beyond plutonium have to be produced in a slow and timely manner.

AP

Now the way this is going to work, is that I have a idea of how the future unfolds and then I go and inspect the mathematics of the 6 ElectroMagnetic EM Equations. If I can spot the math in those equations, then I assert that is what the future will unfurl.

For example: I see a Ladder Descent of the satellites and the planets moving into orbits in a chain descent order. First Mercury is swallowed by the Sun and then Venus moves into the orbit what Mercury used to be and the Moon moving closer to Venus and simultaneously Earth moves into what used to be Venus's orbit, while Mars moves into the orbit of what Earth used to be. Only these new orbits are somewhat different. But the idea basically is that all the planets and their satellites moves into lower orbits.

So, here, I look in the 6 EM laws of physics to see if there is something in them that looks like this pattern. And already we can anticipate there is such a pattern because the Dirac Magnetic Monopoles of atoms in the Old Physics Bohr model is somewhat this pattern already. So that if you remove a monopole close in, then the others jump orbit, to a lower orbit. So in this sense, the mathematics already of Old Physics matches this pattern.

But let us look at another example. The example of Advanced Intelligent Life can only exist in a solar system in which that star is the same size of star as the Sun. In other words, we look at a dwarf star and it cannot have advanced life for that star system never had the energy to create life of intelligent life in its planets and moons. And only a star system that has the size, mass of our Sun or larger can have given rise to advanced intelligent life. So here I need something in the EM Equations, that allows for the organization of carbon atoms that can reproduce, grow, and move, and evolve. To reach a stage of development where you have abundance plant life and animal life and animals the size of apes that pick up rocks and stones and throws them to advantage. This reminds me of activation energy in Chemistry..

Another example of once you reached advanced intelligent life, then why must that life then face a challenge of live or die? So you have advanced intelligent life for 10,000 years and then all of a sudden that progress requires the life to move and migrate to different planets and moons. Is there something in the EM equations that require-- immediately you have advanced intelligence, you must move out and away, move to Europa in order to live more.

AP

So, this book is my wonderment of this tiny small narrow window of life by Humanity.

I do know the average life expectancy of a species before the species goes extinct as taken from the fossil record is about 5 million years. Some species live to 10 million years, some to only 1.

The evolution of humanity from ape occurred in a span of time of 10 million years. So in these terms, Humanity as a species is soon to expire. But since we dominate the planet and have advanced intelligence, we all would think we have much much more time.

But if the claims and evidence of this book suggests, we have only thousands of years more, not millions.

And what this book wants to try to establish, is that there are some mathematics in the Laws of Electricity and Magnetism that once advanced intelligent life is formed in a star system like the Sun, that no faster is the species alive and well, that it is under threat of going extinct along with all the other life on that planet, unless they move out to a cooler planet or satellite.

So I want to know if there is something in chemistry or physics that matches this peril that humanity faces. The Sun having brought forth humanity, and in a blink of the eye, threatening to extinct not only humanity but all life on Earth.

Is there something in chemistry about thermodynamics if a reaction will take place, and then activation energy.

AP

So now, yes of course, we are mere mortals, just humans with a passing knowledge of science, and just a human mind at looking at the Universe at large.. And what we see in our human eyes and mind is a world of living versus nonliving. We imagine we have free-will and that chance and luck operates vast swathes of the Universe.

But say for a moment we were Gods, Atom-Gods who look upon the Universe far differently from a living creature like a human. For the Atom God sees no chance, no probability but a clockwork Universe running from a 231Pu Atom Totality running to grow into the next Atom Totality of an Element 95 or 96 Atom Totality. So what is on the mind of this Atom God is to see it smoothly going in growth from 94 to 95 or 96 (not sure if the Atom Totality has to be an even number).

So what is on the mind of the Atom God is a nice uniform growth of our present day Atom Totality into the next Atom Totality, and that means humanity must get off of Earth and colonize Europa before humanity makes element 119 and higher.

For the Atom God does not see life and nonlife, but rather sees a sack of mostly carbon and H2O and calcium and iron and other elements, sacks of atoms that have motion and can construct other atom sacks. A Atom God does not see Darwin evolution of survival of the fittest or reproductive success or genetic recombination. Instead the Atom God sees that this corner of the Cosmos is in balance with and uniformity with other corners of the Cosmos in terms of the number of atoms and what types of atoms are there.

And so the Atom God looks down on the Solar System and sees that if humanity were to make Element 119, would upset the Cosmic clothe and web of interrelated events, and so every solar system that has advanced intelligent life can manufacture elements of 95 to 118 but then must have a pause of at least 10,000 years before any can make element 119, for that would not upset the Cosmic Clockwork and Uniformity. For the creation of the Next Atom Totality must be a All Encompassing Uniform Creation. And this is likely to be confirmed in the EM laws of Physics, that those 6 laws render the creation of advanced intelligent life only with a star the size of the Sun or larger, but then, because of the process of starshine, that star must soon after go into Red Giant Phase, even though it just created advanced intelligent life on one of its planets.

So what I am especially looking for in the EM equations is this need of Uniformity in Space, broad patches of Space need to be Uniform in content and work Clockwork Connected.

This is the only way I can make sense of the idea that the Sun brought Humanity alive, and now the Sun is going to either kill humanity or chase humanity to Europa if humanity wants to live longer.

P.S. I would be surprised if all of human religion and literature had no creation story of what I wrote above. Usually, every theory of science, has some sort of past history "likeness of story".

AP

Alright, this should have a immediate and direct correlation between the size and mass of a star that harbors advanced intelligent life and we define advanced intelligent life as life capable of engineering the manufacture of atomic elements 95 through to 118.

And only when a star gets to be Red Giant Phase, can any life that has colonized its outer planets or moons and still lived, can they engineer elements beyond 118.

Here is a direct mass correlation between star and the ability of any life living near that star to produce Elements 118 and beyond.

Now I read last night of the newest telescope going up into space of the James Webb Space Telescope, and it will probably be renamed as the Archimedes Plutonium Telescope, for most people do not want a "bureaucrats name on science equipment" of this importance. The Hubble or Kepler or Galileo, now we need the Archimedes Plutonium telescope.

What this telescope needs to do first is see if it can improve on the radiation increase in the Sun figure of 0.005% yearly increase. But although it will be in the shadow of Earth at L2.

Then its second priority is to make clear that the galaxies form about 4 Rings for which CalTech's Jarrett has already mapped 1 Cosmic Ring. We need to see the 4 Cosmic Rings with this new telescope thus proving the Big Bang is big crap and the Atom Totality theory is the true theory of science.

AP, King of Science, especially Physics

Interstellar travel is totally out of the question and a strong answer why never any alien visitors. And a strong supporting evidence of the thesis of this book, that all life is destined to stay put in their star system and to happily work away at producing elements 119 and beyond.

So now, fission propulsion systems for spacecraft are out of the question.

Looking at the nearest star to Earth. Proxima Centauri is nearest with a distance of 4.24 light years away. Our fastest spaceship is Voyager and would take it 73,000 years to reach this star.

Contrary to movies of Startrek where humanity is criss crossing the cosmos, the exact opposite is the case. We will never be traveling to Outer Space except for the solar system confines.

And there is likely no living creature that can live to 73,000 years, especially confined in a spaceship.

So already we see the signs of impossibility of space travel and are stuck to our Solar System.

AP

Which reminds me, we need a book to esteem the logic of whether space exploration outside the Solar System is ever possible.

I mean, in the 20th century we have movie propaganda after propaganda about aliens, about Star Trek, about all kinds of alien encounters. But no-one with a logical brain to debate the issue. Can any advanced intelligent life travel beyond the confines of its solar system.

And because the facts are cold hard facts that 73,000 years before we as in Voyager spacecraft can reach our nearest star, and that no life on Earth could live that long, especially confined to some spacecraft.

And that no propulsion system can speed up that travel with 73,000 years the minimum.

The oldest known living creature on Earth is a bristlecone pine of approx 5,000-6,000 years old, no where near 73,000 years.

I do not know what is the oldest animal? Perhaps some turtle?

But the major point is, we swamp ourselves in science fantasy and delusion and then we carry over that delusion into actual science questions, such as "Why have no aliens visited Earth?"

And so if we had debated the issue of why no aliens instead of brainwashed by movies of Star Trek we would have realized, that there never will be space travel by Advanced Intelligent Life and all of them stuck and confined to their Star System.

So it is good that I make a book just on the very topic.

And it is rather confounding that we as a civilization has ventured and veered off into this romantic fantasy of meeting aliens, spaceships to alien worlds. Yet never a logical bright and astute assessment of whether Space travel beyond the Solar System made any science sense at all.

AP

Limitation Physics and Discrete Physics.

Now Discrete Physics already has a name in Quantum Mechanics, as quantum mechanics. But huge parts of Old Physics has physics that should not be classified or categorized as Quantum Mechanics. Such as the Uncertainty Principle and this should have been in a separate category of physics. I would call it Limitation Physics. For example, we can learn and know about the Universe beyond our solar system, yet never able to travel to these far off places. Another example, we can learn and know about atoms, although never able to build a microscope that focuses upon a single gold atom and reveals to us that it is a torus geometry. Such physics should never have been categorized as part of Quantum Mechanics, or the better term of Discrete Mechanics.

For here, physics gets into the troubles and problems and error that mathematics fell into in the 20th century of the continuum. Math never realizing that numbers have holes and gaps in between successor numbers, not an infinitude of more numbers. And the Uncertainty Principle is just a error filled idea pandering to the continuum.

Today I begin Limitation Physics in preparation for the junior or senior year college of TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS.

I begin here because yesterday I outlined why and how advanced intelligent life is stuck in habitation of only its Solar System and cannot travel outside of that System. Yet, we can know of the world beyond our limitations.

We can know of "beyond our Solar System" even though we cannot physically travel there.

In this sense we should call it a Limitation Physics, not a Uncertainty Principle.

Now the Uncertainty Principle of Old Physics was so vastly misunderstood and exaggerated in importance. It exists, only in a minor form and has no mystery surrounding it. This is a problem of scientists who have no logical brains or weak logical brains, and when such scientists pen a theory of Uncertainty, they would easily botch it up and becoming a crank crackpot theory.

There is a part of the Uncertainty Principle which is correct. A small tiny part, and that part is often seen on television or in the field of Nature when we observe wild animals. The part where we alter the behavior of the wild animal simply due to our prescence, makes the wild animals behave differently than if we were not there. The part that says that if you measure something and interfer in the item itself, you will have changed the measurement. And that part is logically sound.

But then again, in Old Physics, few if any of those physicists had a Logical Mind to reason what their laws and principles should be. And because of that lack of logic ability, they elevate a minor idea-- Uncertainty -- elevate it and put it on pedestals to worship when in reality it is a minor idea..

And in Old Physics, as the reader well knows, in Old Physics not much logic was applied to the Uncertainty Principle and a bunch of goofballs of physics then in the 20th century made this Principle a science fantasy, due only to a lack of Logical mind to reason what this principle means.

It is a limitation principle but not a law of physics. And this is where Old Physics really went wrong, thinking that Uncertainty was a actual law of physics. When the principle merely means we have limitations on measuring things.

So I am preparing myself for junior or senior year college physics. Because I know that Feynman went overboard on Uncertainty as well as every physicist of the 20th century. Logic was not a study by physicists in the 20th century. Most everyone in physics was not required to take formal logic in college to lead physicists to a study of whether they can think straight and think clearly.

So I start this here in this book where I am looking for why the Cosmos is so rigged that a Sun can give advanced intelligent life yet in a matter of a few thousand years, requires that life to move out to Europa if humanity wants to live some more. And it appears the answer is in these Limitations. Advanced Intelligent life needs a star the size of our Sun, but that moment of advanced intelligent life on Earth is a fleeting moment before we are moved and migrated to Europa. The Constraints the Limitations of what is needed for advanced intelligent life has in the cookbooks, also, baked into it-- a huge migration to Europa if you want to live some more.

Of course, the Old Physics Uncertainty Principle is utterly deaf dumb and silent to any of limitations of physics.

AP, King of Science, especially Physics
