novaBBS - sci.math - non-commutative systems; algebras; geometries...

non-commutative systems; algebras; geometries...

<1b21cd3b-80a5-4cf6-8002-b79edc30f41bn@googlegroups.com>

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=84966&group=sci.math#84966

X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:2427:: with SMTP id gy7mr2339165qvb.38.1638911292055; Tue, 07 Dec 2021 13:08:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:cb55:: with SMTP id b82mr55979945ybg.8.1638911291772; Tue, 07 Dec 2021 13:08:11 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!news.uzoreto.com!tr1.eu1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr3.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.math
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2021 13:08:11 -0800 (PST)
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=137.103.113.40; posting-account=n26igQkAAACeF9xA2Ms8cKIdBH40qzwr
NNTP-Posting-Host: 137.103.113.40
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <1b21cd3b-80a5-4cf6-8002-b79edc30f41bn@googlegroups.com>
Subject: non-commutative systems; algebras; geometries...
From: timbandt...@gmail.com (Timothy Golden)
Injection-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2021 21:08:12 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lines: 16

by: Timothy Golden - Tue, 7 Dec 2021 21:08 UTC

I wonder to what degree does an early commitment to the usage of division imply a commitment to non-commutative systems. If this is true than is the early adoption of the rational value by the real numbers a mistake? Should it always be the case that a reverse operator exists that is in fact commutative? If so then what of the entire branch of non-commutative works? They merely are using an inverse operator? These are my early thoughts on a new stab at an old system known as the real value. That the notion of perfect values are those which do not commute within their construction; this I think is a rather interesting vector of awareness.

Of course this argument could seem cryptic to one who comes to this thread from scratch, so I will refer you back to, say,
"Challenging the rational value as fundamental"
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.math/c/AQUS7tNTqaM
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.math/search?q=subject%3AChallenging%20subject%3Athe%20subject%3Arational%20subject%3Avalue%20subject%3Aas%20subject%3Afundamental

"Silent gratitude isn't very much use to anyone." -- G. B. Stearn

tech / sci.math / non-commutative systems; algebras; geometries...

tech / sci.math / non-commutative systems; algebras; geometries...

Subject	Author
non-commutative systems; algebras; geometries...	Timothy Golden