Cuckoo!

It's me!

Well, I therefore transfer to you the promised file of the nine
transformations by change of repository.

You can put it in your files, it's free.

Simply, don't talk too much about it to your wives, women can't hold their
tongues, and they would be able to go and say that I'm being interesting
on physics forums.

And then afterwards, it will fall into the ears of Jean-Pierre, who will
still say that I am being arrogantly narcissist.

And that, I do not want.

<http://news2.nemoweb.net/jntp?PTPBoyfgIHPwEtbXA6aLDMlNzSw@jntp/Data.Media:1>

<http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=PTPBoyfgIHPwEtbXA6aLDMlNzSw@jntp>

R.H.

--
"Mais ne nous y trompons pas. Il n'y a pas que de la violence
avec des armes. Il y a des situations de violence".
Abbé Pierre.

On Monday, March 28, 2022 at 2:57:22 PM UTC-4, Richard Hachel wrote:

> <http://news2.nemoweb.net/jntp?PTPBoyfgIHPvEtbXA6aLDMlNzSw@jntp/Data.Media:1>
>
> <http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=PTPBoyfgIHPvEtbXA6aLDMlNzSw@jntp>

Links don't work.

Le 28/03/2022 à 20:58, rotchm a écrit :
> On Monday, March 28, 2022 at 2:57:22 PM UTC-4, Richard Hachel wrote:
>
>> <http://news2.nemoweb.net/jntp?PTPBoyfgIHPvEtbXA6aLDMlNzSw@jntp/Data.Media:1>
>>
>> <http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=PTPBoyfgIHPvEtbXA6aLDMlNzSw@jntp>
>
> Links don't work.

> <http://news2.nemoweb.net/jntp?PTPBoyfgIHPwEtbXA6aLDMlNzSw@jntp/Data.Media:1>
>
> <http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=PTPBoyfgIHPwEtbXA6aLDMlNzSw@jntp>

Links work

<http://news2.nemoweb.net/jntp?y52r6Iefuh8-UR0_jFqPbqc7scM@jntp/Data.Media:1>

R.H.

--
"Mais ne nous y trompons pas. Il n'y a pas que de la violence
avec des armes. Il y a des situations de violence".
Abbé Pierre.
<http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=y52r6Iefuh8-UR0_jFqPbqc7scM@jntp>

Richard "Hachel" Lengrand (M.D.) wrote:
> Le 28/03/2022 à 20:58, rotchm a écrit :
>> On Monday, March 28, 2022 at 2:57:22 PM UTC-4, Richard Hachel wrote:
>>
>>> <http://news2.nemoweb.net/jntp?PTPBoyfgIHPvEtbXA6aLDMlNzSw@jntp∕Data.Media:1>
>>>
>>> <http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=PTPBoyfgIHPvEtbXA6aLDMlNzSw@jntp>
>>
>> Links don't work.
>
>> <http://news2.nemoweb.net/jntp?PTPBoyfgIHPwEtbXA6aLDMlNzSw@jntp∕Data.Media:1>
>>
>>
>> <http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=PTPBoyfgIHPwEtbXA6aLDMlNzSw@jntp>
>
> Links work
>
> <http://news2.nemoweb.net/jntp?y52r6Iefuh8-UR0_jFqPbqc7scM@jntp∕Data.Media:1>

No they don't.

On Monday, 28 March 2022 at 21:28:58 UTC+2, Python wrote:
> Richard "Hachel" Lengrand (M.D.) wrote:
> > Le 28/03/2022 à 20:58, rotchm a écrit :
> >> On Monday, March 28, 2022 at 2:57:22 PM UTC-4, Richard Hachel wrote:
> >>
> >>> <http://news2.nemoweb.net/jntp?PTPBoyfgIHPvEtbXA6aLDMlNzSw@jntp∕Data.Media:1>
> >>>
> >>> <http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=PTPBoyfgIHPvEtbXA6aLDMlNzSw@jntp>
> >>
> >> Links don't work.
> >
> >> <http://news2.nemoweb.net/jntp?PTPBoyfgIHPwEtbXA6aLDMlNzSw@jntp∕Data.Media:1>
> >>
> >>
> >> <http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=PTPBoyfgIHPwEtbXA6aLDMlNzSw@jntp>
> >
> > Links work
> >
> > <http://news2.nemoweb.net/jntp?y52r6Iefuh8-UR0_jFqPbqc7scM@jntp∕Data.Media:1>
>
> No they don't.

Oh, stinker Python is opening its muzzle again,
and trying to pretend he knows something.
Tell me, poor stinker, what is your definition of
a "theory" in the terms of Peano arithmetic?
See: if a theorem is going to be a part of a theory,
it has to be formulable in the language of the
theory. Do you get it? Or are you too stupid even for
that, poor stinker?

Le 28/03/2022 à 21:28, Python (Jean-Pierre Messager) a écrit :
>>> Links don't work.

>>>
>>>
>>> <http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=PTPBoyfgIHPwEtbXA6aLDMlNzSw@jntp>
>>
>> Links work
>>

>
> No they don't.

Toujours aussi fou, ce Jean-Pierre...

R.H.

Richard "Hachel" Lengrand (M.D.):
....
>>>> <http://news2.nemoweb.net∕?DataID=PTPBoyfgIHPwEtbXA6aLDMlNzSw@jntp>
>>>
>>> Links work
>>>
>
>>
>> No they don't.
>
> Toujours aussi fou

You're still as mad as ever, it makes no doubt.

Your patients should know.

Python <python@example.invalid> wrote:
> Richard "Hachel" Lengrand (M.D.):
> ...
>>>>> <http://news2.nemoweb.net∕?DataID=PTPBoyfgIHPwEtbXA6aLDMlNzSw@jntp>
>>>>
>>>> Links work
>>>>
>>
>>>
>>> No they don't.
>>
>> Toujours aussi fou
>
> You're still as mad as ever, it makes no doubt.
>
> Your patients should know.
>
>

I’m fairly certain he does not mind being called out for being a tad
insane, just as long as you don’t imply he’s stupid.

--
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Le 28/03/2022 à 21:46, Odd Bodkin a écrit :
> I’m fairly certain he does not mind being called out for being a tad
> insane, just as long as you don’t imply he’s stupid.

Odd, you know very well that I'm not stupid.

It's Jean-Pierre who absolutely wants to pass me off as uneducated,
sniffff...

He is unable to understand my nine transformations, and that makes him
sad, and aggressive.

He thinks I'm threatening his life.

Resniffff...

R.H.

On Monday, March 28, 2022 at 11:57:22 AM UTC-7, Richard Hachel wrote:
> Cuckoo!
>
> It's me!
You sure are.

Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> wrote:
> Le 28/03/2022 à 21:46, Odd Bodkin a écrit :
>> I’m fairly certain he does not mind being called out for being a tad
>> insane, just as long as you don’t imply he’s stupid.
>
> Odd, you know very well that I'm not stupid.

That’s right. Nor have I ever implied you are.

What you are, is uneducated in physics. That is something you could
correct, but choose not to.

What you are also, is mentally distraught, and a symptom of that is
thinking you understand something deeply even though you are profoundly
uneducated in the subject. You would also take steps to correct being
mentally distraught, but you choose not to.

Those choices are failures of character, not stupidity.

>
> It's Jean-Pierre who absolutely wants to pass me off as uneducated,
> sniffff...
>
> He is unable to understand my nine transformations, and that makes him
> sad, and aggressive.
>
> He thinks I'm threatening his life.
>
> Resniffff...
>
> R.H.
>

--
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Le 28/03/2022 à 23:28, Odd Bodkin a écrit :
> That’s right. Nor have I ever implied you are.
>
> What you are, is uneducated in physics. That is something you could
> correct, but choose not to.
>
> What you are also, is mentally distraught, and a symptom of that is
> thinking you understand something deeply even though you are profoundly
> uneducated in the subject. You would also take steps to correct being
> mentally distraught, but you choose not to.
>
> Those choices are failures of character, not stupidity.

No no.
I am very stupid.
It's being very stupid not understand the theory of relativity, and NOT
wanting to learn.
I am very stupid.
I think you are being too accommodating.

R.H.

Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> wrote:
> Le 28/03/2022 à 23:28, Odd Bodkin a écrit :
>> That’s right. Nor have I ever implied you are.
>>
>> What you are, is uneducated in physics. That is something you could
>> correct, but choose not to.
>>
>> What you are also, is mentally distraught, and a symptom of that is
>> thinking you understand something deeply even though you are profoundly
>> uneducated in the subject. You would also take steps to correct being
>> mentally distraught, but you choose not to.
>>
>> Those choices are failures of character, not stupidity.
>
> No no.
> I am very stupid.
> It's being very stupid not understand the theory of relativity, and NOT
> wanting to learn.

No, it’s not stupidity.

It may be timidity. It may be passive-aggressive digging in of heels. It
may be fear of frustration and work.

Those are failures of character, not of intellect.

But until you choose differently, it is a fact that you will not understand
relativity. Nor will anyone give you any regard for any false claims of
deep understanding. Because people do not respect or give credence to
people with certain flaws of character.

> I am very stupid.
> I think you are being too accommodating.
>
> R.H.
>

--
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

On Monday, 28 March 2022 at 21:39:23 UTC+2, Python wrote:
> Richard "Hachel" Lengrand (M.D.):
> ...
> >>>> <http://news2.nemoweb.net∕?DataID=PTPBoyfgIHPwEtbXA6aLDMlNzSw@jntp>
> >>>
> >>> Links work
> >>>
> >
> >>
> >> No they don't.
> >
> > Toujours aussi fou
> You're still as mad as ever, it makes no doubt.

Oh, stinker Python is opening its muzzle again,
and trying to pretend he knows something.
Tell me, poor stinker, what is your definition of
a "theory" in the terms of Peano arithmetic?
See: if a theorem is going to be a part of a theory,
it has to be formulable in the language of the
theory. Do you get it? Or are you too stupid even for
that, poor stinker?

Le 29/03/2022 à 06:49, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
> On Monday, 28 March 2022 at 21:39:23 UTC+2, Python wrote:
>> Richard "Hachel" Lengrand (M.D.):
>> ...
>> >>>> <http://news2.nemoweb.net∕?DataID=PTPBoyfgIHPwEtbXA6aLDMlNzSw@jntp>
>> >>>
>> >>> Links work
>> >>>
>> >
>> >>
>> >> No they don't.
>> >
>> > Toujours aussi fou
>> You're still as mad as ever, it makes no doubt.
>
> Oh, stinker Python is opening its muzzle again,
> and trying to pretend he knows something.
> Tell me, poor stinker, what is your definition of
> a "theory" in the terms of Peano arithmetic?
> See: if a theorem is going to be a part of a theory,
> it has to be formulable in the language of the
> theory. Do you get it? Or are you too stupid even for
> that, poor stinker?

For Python (Jean-Pierre Messager, a Frenchman), the only interest of the
forums is to criticize maliciously all the productions of others.

Of course, this is of very little interest.

It's a fool.

Here, on Anglo-Saxon forums, I don't know, but in France, he is known for
his psychopathic and harassing tendencies in the medical sense of the
word.

It was Jacques Lavau who studied his case the best on usenet (I don't have
the time, but I think we could write a book).

R.H.

Den 28.03.2022 21:04, skrev Richard Hachel:
> Le 28/03/2022 à 20:58, rotchm a écrit :
>> On Monday, March 28, 2022 at 2:57:22 PM UTC-4, Richard Hachel wrote:
>>
>>> <http://news2.nemoweb.net/jntp?PTPBoyfgIHPvEtbXA6aLDMlNzSw@jntp/Data.Media:1>
>>>
>>> <http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=PTPBoyfgIHPvEtbXA6aLDMlNzSw@jntp>
>>
>> Links don't work.
>

The reason the links don't work is that they are insecure http sites
with no SSL certificate and no encryption.
Most browsers with security software will only connect to secure
https sites with valid SSL certificate.

--
Paul

https://paulba.no/

Le 29/03/2022 à 15:26, "Paul B. Andersen" a écrit :
>
>
> Den 28.03.2022 21:04, skrev Richard Hachel:
>> Le 28/03/2022 à 20:58, rotchm a écrit :
>>> On Monday, March 28, 2022 at 2:57:22 PM UTC-4, Richard Hachel wrote:
>>>
>>>> <http://news2.nemoweb.net/jntp?PTPBoyfgIHPvEtbXA6aLDMlNzSw@jntp/Data.Media:1>
>>>>
>>>> <http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=PTPBoyfgIHPvEtbXA6aLDMlNzSw@jntp>
>>>
>>> Links don't work.
>>
>
> The reason the links don't work is that they are insecure http sites
> with no SSL certificate and no encryption.
> Most browsers with security software will only connect to secure
> https sites with valid SSL certificate.

Paul, don't let me think you're that stupid?

Can't you see that the addresses are deliberately falsified by this crank?

<http://news2.nemoweb.net/jntp?5jLkRZew1ZFVWieiXXfairJ2eK0@jntp/Data.Media:1>

R.H.

--
"Mais ne nous y trompons pas. Il n'y a pas que de la violence
avec des armes. Il y a des situations de violence".
Abbé Pierre.
<http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=5jLkRZew1ZFVWieiXXfairJ2eK0@jntp>

Le 29/03/2022 à 15:26, "Paul B. Andersen" a écrit :

Paul, you didn't notice the banknote was fake.

Look better.

<http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=PTPBoyfgIHPwEtbXA6aLDMlNzSw@jntp>
<http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=PTPBoyfgIHPvEtbXA6aLDMlNzSw@jntp>

R.H.

Den 29.03.2022 15:38, skrev Richard Hachel:
> Le 29/03/2022 à 15:26, "Paul B. Andersen" a écrit :
>>
>>
>> Den 28.03.2022 21:04, skrev Richard Hachel:
>>> Le 28/03/2022 à 20:58, rotchm a écrit :
>>>> On Monday, March 28, 2022 at 2:57:22 PM UTC-4, Richard Hachel wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> <http://news2.nemoweb.net/jntp?PTPBoyfgIHPvEtbXA6aLDMlNzSw@jntp/Data.Media:1>
>>>>>
>>>>> <http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=PTPBoyfgIHPvEtbXA6aLDMlNzSw@jntp>
>>>>
>>>> Links don't work.
>>>
>>
>> The reason the links don't work is that they are insecure http sites
>> with no SSL certificate and no encryption.
>> Most browsers with security software will only connect to secure
>> https sites with valid SSL certificate.
>
> Paul, don't let me think you're that stupid?
>
> Can't you see that the addresses are deliberately falsified by this crank?

May well be.
But I didn't try the link quoted above,
I tried the link in your original post.

>
> <http://news2.nemoweb.net/jntp?5jLkRZew1ZFVWieiXXfairJ2eK0@jntp/Data.Media:1>

This is the response I get from the link above:

| Suspicious page blocked for your protection
|
https://news2.nemoweb.net/jntp?5jLkRZew1ZFVWieiXXfairJ2eK0@jntp/Data.Media:1
| | Your connection to this web page is not safe due to an unmatching
security certificate.
| This means that the certificate was issued for a different web address
than the one it is being used for,
| and you run the risk of exposing your data by accessing this page.

My browser will not connect to unsecure http - sites,
so it changes http to https as you can see above.
And then an SSL certificate is missing, and it will
not pass my security software.

There ARE less secure browsers that will open the link (Chrome),
and I can override the warning and insist that the link
should be opened (which I am reluctant to do.)

My comment above is correct.
You should consider unsecure http-sites to be obsolete,
even if there are a few of them left on the net.

See the 'shame list':
https://www.androidauthority.com/sites-still-on-http-889265/

So get yourself an SSL certificate.

--
Paul

https://paulba.no/

On Tuesday, March 29, 2022 at 10:03:06 AM UTC-4, Richard Hachel wrote:
> Le 29/03/2022 à 15:26, "Paul B. Andersen" a écrit :
> Paul, you didn't notice the banknote was fake.
>
> Look better.
>
> <http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=PTPBoyfgIHPwEtbXA6aLDMlNzSw@jntp>
> <http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=PTPBoyfgIHPvEtbXA6aLDMlNzSw@jntp>

Neither of those links work.
I tried the first one, and it did not work. I even tried it on several browsers. It does not work. So I tried changing a few letters to see if it works. And it still doesn't work. Don't you know how to set up a good internet address? Don't you know how to set up a good server? Or valid certificates?

Le 29/03/2022 à 21:15, "Paul B. Andersen" a écrit :

http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=PTPBoyfgIHPwEtbXA6aLDMlNzSw@jntp

Chez moi ça marche sur mes deux navigateurs.

R.H.

Paul B. Andersen wrote:

> Den 28.03.2022 21:04, skrev Richard Hachel:
>> Le 28/03/2022 à 20:58, rotchm a écrit :
>>> On Monday, March 28, 2022 at 2:57:22 PM UTC-4, Richard Hachel wrote:
>>>>
<http://news2.nemoweb.net/jntp?PTPBoyfgIHPvEtbXA6aLDMlNzSw@jntp/Data.Media:1>
>>>>
>>>> <http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=PTPBoyfgIHPvEtbXA6aLDMlNzSw@jntp>
>>>
>>> Links don't work.
>>
>
> The reason the links don't work is that they are insecure http sites
> with no SSL certificate and no encryption.

BULLSHIT. The reason is that the person complaining is using FAULTY
software.

> Most browsers with security software will only connect to secure
> https sites with valid SSL certificate.

BULLSHIT, as you have been explained MULTIPLE times before.

Repeating nonsense does not make it true.

*facepalm*

PointedEars
--
Heisenberg is out for a drive when he's stopped by a traffic cop.
The officer asks him "Do you know how fast you were going?"
Heisenberg replies "No, but I know where I am."
(from: WolframAlpha)

Paul B. Andersen wrote:

> My comment above is correct.

It is NOT.

> You should consider unsecure http-sites to be obsolete,
> even if there are a few of them left on the net.

Please shut up until you have a minimum clue. TIA.

PointedEars
--
Heisenberg is out for a drive when he's stopped by a traffic cop.
The officer asks him "Do you know how fast you were going?"
Heisenberg replies "No, but I know where I am."
(from: WolframAlpha)

Den 30.03.2022 07:24, skrev Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn:
> Paul B. Andersen wrote:
>
>> You should consider unsecure http-sites to be obsolete,
>> even if there are a few of them left on the net.
>
> Please shut up until you have a minimum clue. TIA.
>
>
> PointedEars

Any particular reason why you snipped this:?

See the 'shame list':
https://www.androidauthority.com/sites-still-on-http-889265/

--
Paul

https://paulba.no/

Paul B. Andersen wrote:

> Den 30.03.2022 07:24, skrev Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn:
>> Paul B. Andersen wrote:
>>> You should consider unsecure http-sites to be obsolete,
>>> even if there are a few of them left on the net.
>> Please shut up until you have a minimum clue. TIA.
>
> Any particular reason why you snipped this:?
>
> See the 'shame list':
> https://www.androidauthority.com/sites-still-on-http-889265/

Despite the domain name, it is not authoritative.
And it does not support your claim/argument.

PointedEars
--
Q: What did the nuclear physicist post on the laboratory door
when he went camping?
A: 'Gone fission'.
(from: WolframAlpha)