Looking for a new publisher for AP's "Pterosaurs" as Kindle Amazon unfairly blocked it without so much as a single reason for why they are blocking it-- Sahil, Kindle, Dec 2021.

PTEROSAURS; Paleontology mistake for it never flew, it sailed and oar-rowed with their Sail (not a wing for flying); paleontology series, book 2
by Archimedes Plutonium

Last revision was 11Dec2021. And this is AP's 65th published book on science.

Preface: I was reading a Scientific American article of October, 2019 on Pterosaurs, giant animals, some the size of giraffes flying. This upset my logical mind and knew there was a big mistake in this. Thus, I wrote this book to put some logical commonsense into the field of paleontology on the subject of flying dinosaurs.

Cover Picture is my iphone picture of that magazine article.

--------------------------
Table of Contents
--------------------------

1) Why the increasing number of Paleontology Mistakes, due to the rise of the Internet as worldwide forum to argue with a cloistered science.

2) The AP Conjecture on Pterosaurs.

3) Sails, or rowing-oars, not wings.

4) A logical and physiological difference between a Sail and a Wing.

5) Mechanism to evolve Sails, not wings.

6) Pteroid bone and flexor tendon for rowing oar.

7) What the Pterosaurs ate is revealing.

8) The huge widespread prevalence of Shallow Seas in geological time.

--------
Text
--------

1) Why the increasing number of Paleontology Mistakes, due to the rise of the Internet as worldwide forum to argue with a cloistered science.

Not just biology or paleontology have problems with interpretation of data. We see this even in Physics the most hard core of core sciences, because AP wrote several books on how horribly misinterpreted was Ohm's law where its term "resistance" needed details, and then there was Rutherford's interpretation of the alpha particle bouncing back to source of the alpha particle gun fired into a gold leaf foil that caused Rutherford to interpret the atom as having a nucleus, when it never has a nucleus, for the alpha particle struck a flat torus of muons going around in circles inside a proton ring torus and that is what caused the Rutherford, Geiger, Marsden alpha particles to return to source. But then the interpretation by Rutherford was all wrong, for he interpreted that angle recoil of the alpha particle as meaning atoms possess nuclei, when atoms do not possess nuclei, in fact the center of all atoms is a vacuum as the donut hole of proton toruses. The true electron of atoms are the muons and these muons circle around inside a proton torus, thrusting through the torus in a Faraday law and producing magnetic monopoles. Some of these magnetic monopoles can be of a magnitude of 0.5MeV which we often observe and measure in experiments.

Interpretation requires huge amounts of logic, from a logical minded scientist, and all sciences seem to suffer by not having scientists with a supreme logical mind to do the science. Scientists are very good at collecting and recording data, but often, horribly poor in interpreting that data and observations in a difficult science.

And interpretation in paleontology is exacerbated to the extreme because paleontology is a science that is closed to public view for the most part, to the extreme, where scientists do collect the data in the field and then lock that data up, not allowing the world public to ever view and access and evaluate the data. And so the scientist makes up his/her interpretation and whether utterly wrong, that interpretation is what is published and the rest of the world expected to follow along.

This was the case with the saber tooth tiger, and still is. Where illogical and social motivated scientists have surrounded this normal tiger of the ancient past with the teeth that belongs to a walrus. All because a normal tiger would never make headlines worldwide, but a outrageous tiger that never existed in the wild possessing the teeth the size of a walrus would make gobs and gobs of money and publicity and fame.

Same thing here with a animal that purported to have wings, Pterosaurs and could not fly as all aerodynamic engineers can testify that such a size and weight could never fly in the air, yet the scientists in possession of these fossils interpret it as a "animal that flew". Never having logical brains that those massive appendages could be used for sailing or oar-rowing, no, illogical scientists want a splashy fame driven and money driven story-- they flew.

So, why the sudden huge amount of attention in Paleontology over fake science? For AP wrote of the fakery of the Saber Tooth Tiger story.

--- quoting my book on saber tooth tiger ---

Was the Saber-Toothed-Tiger, Smilodon, Paleontologists most laughable mistake? // Was the 4 tusked Gomphothere the 2nd joke? Paleontology series, book 1 Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Ever since I was a teenager in High School, I was troubled with the saber-toothed tiger-- how evolution could have built such an animal. But I was not logical in mind as a teenager, and had to wait until now to let my logical mind survey that perplexing question. To an extraordinary claim in science-- huge teeth that an animal cannot cope with, requires extra-special evidence and proofs of science. How can evolution theory (even though it is a rule or algorithm) (see my Superdeterminism replaces Darwin Evolution book), how can evolution produce an animal with teeth that "get in the way of everything" as the animal goes through life. So, I am asking the science community to completely re-examine the fossil evidence of Smilodon. I do not have that evidence available, but the entire Paleontology community can make the evidence available. For what I suspect is that the tiger never had saber-teeth and that those teeth found in digs or tar pits, were the teeth of Entelodonts or some ungulate horn or walrus type animal teeth. In other words, I question the claim there ever existed a cat with huge canine teeth.

Cover Picture: What spurred me onto this small book was a few days ago seeing the cover of Science News showing a Saber-Toothed Tiger. And how utterly ridiculous for a tiger to have those teeth. And just as ridiculous that grown scientists believe such nonsense without questioning it.
--- end quoting my book on saber tooth tiger ---

So, what is the cause of all this recent fomenting of fakery in Paleontology? The cause, I am reasonably sure is the fact that ever since the 1990s, all of the sciences, not just paleontology are open forum to the entire world, and that it is extremely difficult going forward in 1990 and thereafter for scientists to lock up and put into a safe where the world cannot assess and evaluate and argue with the field scientists who come to make their horrible interpretations to gain money fame and glory.

All sciences are now Open Forum to the World Public. No longer can a cloistered group of scientists hold that the saber tooth tiger was not a normal tiger who preyed upon walrus animals while it lived and those walrus teeth were found nearby the skull of a normal tiger. No longer can scientists tell a story of Pterosaurs flying without having some one with a more logical mind arguing they never flew at all.

In the past you can do that, cover the eyes of the world public and lock up your fossils under lock and key and never prompted to debate the storyline you try to foist on the world public for money, fame games.

The Internet that is world wide free access to all, is making every science and every story of science, an open forum of debate.

Newsgroups: sci.physics
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 12:56:13 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: latest Paleontology mistake Pterosaurs-- Scientific American gaffe
joke in Oct2019//AP's 2nd book in a series of Paleontology mistakes
From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium...@gmail.com>

Latest Paleontology mistake Pterosaurs-- Scientific American gaffe joke in Oct2019//AP's 2nd book in a series of Paleontology mistakes.

Well, these paleontology mistakes are rapidly coming to the foreground as of lately.

This year I published a Kindle book on the Smilodon joke-- saying it was probably the tooth of a walrus type animal that the smilodon preyed upon.  

Then there was the 4 tusked Gomphothere, how ludicrous is that. If paleontologists found a kitchen sink in a fossil dig, they would likely ascribe the ancient elephant sported a kitchen sink.

And last night I was reading this utterly ridiculous notion of a flying creatures Pterosaurs, the weight of a giraffe and size of a giraffe taking to the air. I mean, well, seldom is LOGIC a required course in College to get a degree in science, and it shows.

65th published book

PTEROSAURS; Paleontology mistake for it never flew, it sailed and oar-rowed with their Sail (not a wing for flying); paleontology series, book 2 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 11Dec2021. And this is AP's 65th published book, mostly on science.
Preface: I was reading a Scientific American article of October, 2019 on Pterosaurs, giant animals, some the size of giraffes flying. This upset my logical mind and knew there was a big mistake in this. Thus, I wrote this book to put some logical commonsense into the field of paleontology.

Cover Picture is my picture of that magazine article.

--------------------------
Table of Contents
--------------------------

1) Why the increasing number of Paleontology Mistakes, due to the rise of the Internet as worldwide forum to argue with a cloistered science.

2) The AP Conjecture on Pterosaurs.

3) Sails, or rowing-oars, not wings.

4) A logical and physiological difference between a Sail and a Wing.

5) Mechanism to evolve Sails, not wings.

6) Pteroid bone and flexor tendon for rowing oar.

7) What the Pterosaurs ate is revealing.

8) The huge widespread prevalence of Shallow Seas in geological time.

Product details
ASIN : B07YDL2412
Publication date : September 25, 2019
Language : English
File size : 808 KB
Simultaneous device usage : Unlimited
Text-to-Speech : Enabled
Screen Reader : Supported
Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
X-Ray : Not Enabled
Word Wise : Enabled
Print length : 20 pages
Lending : Enabled
Best Sellers Rank: #192,001 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #3 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #5 in Biophysics (Kindle Store)
◦ #8 in Molecular Biology (Kindle Store)

Funny how Kindle Amazon can just up and block a book that so many other people have read already. Block it without so much as a single reason or explanation for why they blocked it. For Sahil never gave any reason for blocking.

So is Kindle Amazon have capricious employees? Or is Kindle Amazon trying to steal AP's work of science on Pterosaurs, for Kindle is not playing up and fair about AP's book of science.

AP

Yes, I up and wrote this book in 2019, with many readers already having read the book.

And now, here in December of 2021, Kindle Amazon decides to block the book.

My best guess is that some Kindle Amazon employee is capricious and jeolous of AP's Pterosaur science book. For absolutely no reason for blocking the book was given.


Product details
ASIN : B07YDL2412
Publication date : September 25, 2019
Language : English
File size : 808 KB
Simultaneous device usage : Unlimited
Text-to-Speech : Enabled
Screen Reader : Supported
Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
X-Ray : Not Enabled
Word Wise : Enabled
Print length : 20 pages
Lending : Enabled
Best Sellers Rank: #192,001 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #3 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #5 in Biophysics (Kindle Store)
◦ #8 in Molecular Biology (Kindle Store)

Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com>
7:15 PM (now)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
On Dec18 I emailed to Kindle why my Pterosaur book was delayed for so long and this is the reply Kindle Amazon gave me. Next thing I know, the book is blocked on 21 December 2021. Blocked even though many readers had already read the book, perhaps some have even bought the book. So is there a rogue employee at Amazon Kindle, or is Kindle bowing to any outside pressure of false claims of copyright or something else?

How does a Amazon Kindle book that is read by many people, suddenly disappear as blocked without so much a explanation.

KDP Case #11792915 Correspondence
Inbox

KDP Customer Support <support+5003n...@kdp-support.amazon.com>
Sat, Dec 18, 4:24 AM (3 days ago)

to me
Hello Archimedes,

I hope you are doing good.

I understand your concern about your book (Pterosaurs) and would like to apologize for the inconvenience you had due to the status of your book.

We may need additional review time to ensure the submitted content does not violate our guidelines.

Your book will be reviewed soon, and we will contact you if we need any other information.

Thank you for your understanding.

I wish you a wonderful day.

Stay healthy!

Thanks for using Amazon KDP,

Your feedback helps us improve our service.

Click here to rate our service

Sahil
Kindle Direct Publishing
http://kdp.amazon.com

To learn more, check our Help pages: https://kdp.amazon.com/help

To engage with our KDP Community: https://www.kdpcommunity.com

To contact us again about this question, reply directly to this email.
For new questions, please visit: https://kdp.amazon.com/contact-us

-----Previous Message-----

ASIN / ISBN / book title:

Description of issue or inquiry: Hi, I am the author Archimedes Plutonium and wondering why my book Pterosaurs seems stuck and frozen in "review" for it has been more than 72 hours, thanks
