Just to measure the level of idiocy of BBT supporters here.

When the ORIGINAL DOT went off and created space, time, mass and energy
in 10E-32 seconds, to form the universe 13.5 billion years ago, how much
energy do you believe that was stored in such point-like singularity?

Now, which is the amount of matter-energy that "current" universe holds?

Then THINK: How can I be so stupid to believe in such NON SENSE?

El martes, 12 de abril de 2022 a las 13:20:28 UTC-4, Richard Hertz escribió:
> Just to measure the level of idiocy of BBT supporters here.
>
> When the ORIGINAL DOT went off and created space, time, mass and energy
> in 10E-32 seconds, to form the universe 13.5 billion years ago, how much
> energy do you believe that was stored in such point-like singularity?
>
> Now, which is the amount of matter-energy that "current" universe holds?
>
> Then THINK: How can I be so stupid to believe in such NON SENSE?

Well you are not only stupid but a complete ignorant troll!!!

On 4/12/2022 12:20 PM, Richard Hertz wrote:
> Just to measure the level of idiocy of BBT supporters here.
>
> When the ORIGINAL DOT went off and created space, time, mass and energy
> in 10E-32 seconds, to form the universe 13.5 billion years ago, how much
> energy do you believe that was stored in such point-like singularity?
>
> Now, which is the amount of matter-energy that "current" universe holds?
>
> Then THINK: How can I be so stupid to believe in such NON SENSE?

You can make better sense of the BBT and other scientific theories if
you accept that science is a work in progress, not a final answer.

On Tuesday, April 12, 2022 at 2:39:08 PM UTC-3, Paparios wrote:
> El martes, 12 de abril de 2022 a las 13:20:28 UTC-4, Richard Hertz escribió:
> > Just to measure the level of idiocy of BBT supporters here.
> >
> > When the ORIGINAL DOT went off and created space, time, mass and energy
> > in 10E-32 seconds, to form the universe 13.5 billion years ago, how much
> > energy do you believe that was stored in such point-like singularity?
> >
> > Now, which is the amount of matter-energy that "current" universe holds?
> >
> > Then THINK: How can I be so stupid to believe in such NON SENSE?
> Well you are not only stupid but a complete ignorant troll!!!

Miguelito, keep trying to make sense with your 40 years old thesis (at Canada), so your plagiarism
of Token Bus LAN network may work. You're running out of time.

Regarding BBT, it's too big an issue for an idiot like you to meddle with it, asshole.

Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> wrote:

> Just to measure the level of idiocy of BBT supporters here.
>
> When the ORIGINAL DOT went off and created space, time, mass and energy
> in 10E-32 seconds, to form the universe 13.5 billion years ago, how much
> energy do you believe that was stored in such point-like singularity?
>
> Now, which is the amount of matter-energy that "current" universe holds?
>
> Then THINK: How can I be so stupid to believe in such NON SENSE?

Educated: Both are zero, by GRT.
The positive energies are balanced
by the negative gravitational potential energies.
But this is a difficult and highly technical subject,

Jan

On Tuesday, April 12, 2022 at 3:31:05 PM UTC-3, J. J. Lodder wrote:
> Richard Hertz <hert...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Just to measure the level of idiocy of BBT supporters here.
> >
> > When the ORIGINAL DOT went off and created space, time, mass and energy
> > in 10E-32 seconds, to form the universe 13.5 billion years ago, how much
> > energy do you believe that was stored in such point-like singularity?
> >
> > Now, which is the amount of matter-energy that "current" universe holds?
> >
> > Then THINK: How can I be so stupid to believe in such NON SENSE?
> Educated: Both are zero, by GRT.
> The positive energies are balanced
> by the negative gravitational potential energies.
> But this is a difficult and highly technical subject,
>
> Jan

At the DOT there isn't even quantum gravity. No known expression of matter/energy resides there.

I'd give a chance to the suggestion of matter-antimatter co-existing at the DOT.

When it went off, two universes were created: this one and an anti-universe, where everything is upside down
and time flows in the negative path. Then, it could make sense that the total energy of the DOT was zero.

The anti-universe is absolutely invisible for us, but symmetric in any possible way.

There are "negative" self of everything co-existing, but without any physical coexistence in space and time.

That would be beautifully paradoxical and balanced.

However, it's hard for me to imagine what an anti-Dono or anti-Moroney could be.

Maybe they even are good beings, and anti-antirelativists. Beautiful and karmatic.

For every die-hard relativist, God provided such compensation.

Because God is behind everything, static or dynamic, everywhere.

Richard Hertz wrote:
>
> Just to measure the level of idiocy of BBT supporters here.
>
> When the ORIGINAL DOT went off and created space, time, mass and energy
> in 10E-32 seconds, to form the universe 13.5 billion years ago, how much
> energy do you believe that was stored in such point-like singularity?
>
> Now, which is the amount of matter-energy that "current" universe holds?
>
> Then THINK: How can I be so stupid to believe in such NON SENSE?

space wasn't created...it was expanded.

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
the unchallengeable.