On Monday, April 18, 2022 at 5:47:30 PM UTC-3, Michael Moroney wrote:
> On 4/18/2022 3:11 AM, Richard Hertz wrote:

<snip>

> > Tell me Moroney, for a person that allegedly "have a work on IT", how come do you spend most of the time ONLINE between
> > 1:00 AM and 6:00 AM?
> I never sleep. :-)
>
> And yourself? You appear to keep similar hours, if I recall you should be UTC-4 or so. And do you really know where I am?

You are one hour East of Bodkin's place. UTC-5 Winter time, UTC-4 Summer time.

Now, I'm 1 hour ahead of you (UTC-3).

I won't disclosure any other details, like State, County, City.

I had enough with Dono (sa_ge), UTC-8 Winter time.

You peak posting around 3:00 AM, then go to bed around 5 or 6:00 AM. Then wake up and resume posting around 10/11 AM.
And you post steadily since noon.

Creepy, isn't it?

Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Monday, April 18, 2022 at 5:47:30 PM UTC-3, Michael Moroney wrote:
>> On 4/18/2022 3:11 AM, Richard Hertz wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
>>> Tell me Moroney, for a person that allegedly "have a work on IT", how
>>> come do you spend most of the time ONLINE between
>>> 1:00 AM and 6:00 AM?
>> I never sleep. :-)
>>
>> And yourself? You appear to keep similar hours, if I recall you should
>> be UTC-4 or so. And do you really know where I am?
>
> You are one hour East of Bodkin's place. UTC-5 Winter time, UTC-4 Summer time.
>
> Now, I'm 1 hour ahead of you (UTC-3).
>
> I won't disclosure any other details, like State, County, City.
>
> I had enough with Dono (sa_ge), UTC-8 Winter time.
>
> You peak posting around 3:00 AM, then go to bed around 5 or 6:00 AM. Then
> wake up and resume posting around 10/11 AM.
> And you post steadily since noon.
>
> Creepy, isn't it?
>
>
>

I post while I work. I am my employer. The idea of having this freedom
seems completely foreign to you. You act as though people who post have to
worry about who might be looking over their shoulder. You poor, whipped
soul.

--
Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables

On Monday, April 18, 2022 at 3:53:44 AM UTC-7, Richard Hachel wrote:
> Le 18/04/2022 à 07:40, JanPB a écrit :
>
> >> Today, I'm probably the only one in the world to master SR correctly.
> >
> > Finally the proof. Yet another standard-issue crank.
> Do you listen to others before judging them?

You've been posting here practically 24/7 for many months now.
My opinion is based ONLY on your posts, of course (that's how
the Internet works). The fact is your posts about relativity are
unmitigated nonsense. It's also a fact that nothing can prove the
errors of your ways to you - that's another standard problem with
incompetent people which been known for centuries. People like
Goethe and Newton wrote about it.

> Do you know what I think?
>
> You clearly know my grievances?
>
> No.

Of course I don't. But that's a different subject. Here the discussion
is about relativity. OTOH when e person insists that 2+2=7, something
seems to be wrong with the cognitive system there. Esp. when coupled
with the incessant anti-Einstein-frothing-in-the-mouth, it just appears
mentally deranged.

> So it is better that you shut up and do not denigrate without knowing.

No, I won't. Welcome to the Internet. If you don't like it - leave. Or simply
open your own web page whose posts you can control.

--
Jan

On Monday, April 18, 2022 at 12:11:48 AM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote:

> 1) You don't have a fucking life to live, incel. So you spend half time here and the rest on gay bars.

Look who's talking!

On Monday, April 18, 2022 at 7:25:12 PM UTC-3, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:

<snip>

> I post while I work. I am my employer. The idea of having this freedom
> seems completely foreign to you. You act as though people who post have to
> worry about who might be looking over their shoulder. You poor, whipped soul.

So, you post 20/30 times per day, reasoning and taking your time to write about 1,200 lines on your iPad. I think you invest
about 5 hours a day, as you also parse most of the posts. You're more vigilant here than a fucking owl.

Also, you read a science book per week. I assume that you take your time to digest no less than 250 pages with math.
It requires to understand the 35 pages/day that you read, metabolize them and make a coherent picture: 3 hours/day.

Can you tell me when the fuck do you work in manufacturing and sales of fine wood toys and shit?

You are a liar and a deceiver.

You work as a paid shill/troll like Moroney, making 3.50 per post.

Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Monday, April 18, 2022 at 7:25:12 PM UTC-3, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
>> I post while I work. I am my employer. The idea of having this freedom
>> seems completely foreign to you. You act as though people who post have to
>> worry about who might be looking over their shoulder. You poor, whipped soul.
>
> So, you post 20/30 times per day, reasoning and taking your time to write
> about 1,200 lines on your iPad.

No5 much time, but yes.

> I think you invest
> about 5 hours a day, as you also parse most of the posts. You're more
> vigilant here than a fucking owl.

That’s a VAST overestimate of the time I invest in this.

>
> Also, you read a science book per week.

Well, not quite.
But over all books, about two a week.

> I assume that you take your time to digest no less than 250 pages with math.
> It requires to understand the 35 pages/day that you read, metabolize them
> and make a coherent picture: 3 hours/day.

2-2.5 hrs per day.

>
> Can you tell me when the fuck do you work in manufacturing and sales of
> fine wood toys and shit?

There are 17-18 waking hours. I spend about 5-9 hrs per day working,
depending. You figure it out.

>
> You are a liar and a deceiver.
>
> You work as a paid shill/troll like Moroney, making 3.50 per post.
>
>

--
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> wrote:
> Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Monday, April 18, 2022 at 7:25:12 PM UTC-3, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>>> I post while I work. I am my employer. The idea of having this freedom
>>> seems completely foreign to you. You act as though people who post have to
>>> worry about who might be looking over their shoulder. You poor, whipped soul.
>>
>> So, you post 20/30 times per day, reasoning and taking your time to write
>> about 1,200 lines on your iPad.
>
> No5 much time, but yes.
>
>> I think you invest
>> about 5 hours a day, as you also parse most of the posts. You're more
>> vigilant here than a fucking owl.
>
> That’s a VAST overestimate of the time I invest in this.
>
>>
>> Also, you read a science book per week.
>
> Well, not quite.
> But over all books, about two a week.
>
>> I assume that you take your time to digest no less than 250 pages with math.
>> It requires to understand the 35 pages/day that you read, metabolize them
>> and make a coherent picture: 3 hours/day.
>
> 2-2.5 hrs per day.
>
>>
>> Can you tell me when the fuck do you work in manufacturing and sales of
>> fine wood toys and shit?
>
> There are 17-18 waking hours. I spend about 5-9 hrs per day working,
> depending. You figure it out.
>
>>
>> You are a liar and a deceiver.
>>
>> You work as a paid shill/troll like Moroney, making 3.50 per post.
>>
>>
>
>
>

Please, whatever you do, don’t base your estimates of my time on Usenet on
what it takes YOU to compile your posts.

--
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

On Monday, April 18, 2022 at 9:38:13 PM UTC-3, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
> Odd Bodkin <bodk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Richard Hertz <hert...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Monday, April 18, 2022 at 7:25:12 PM UTC-3, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
> >>
> >> <snip>
> >>
> >>> I post while I work. I am my employer. The idea of having this freedom
> >>> seems completely foreign to you. You act as though people who post have to
> >>> worry about who might be looking over their shoulder. You poor, whipped soul.
> >>
> >> So, you post 20/30 times per day, reasoning and taking your time to write
> >> about 1,200 lines on your iPad.
> >
> > No5 much time, but yes.
> >
> >> I think you invest
> >> about 5 hours a day, as you also parse most of the posts. You're more
> >> vigilant here than a fucking owl.
> >
> > That’s a VAST overestimate of the time I invest in this.
> >
> >>
> >> Also, you read a science book per week.
> >
> > Well, not quite.
> > But over all books, about two a week.
> >
> >> I assume that you take your time to digest no less than 250 pages with math.
> >> It requires to understand the 35 pages/day that you read, metabolize them
> >> and make a coherent picture: 3 hours/day.
> >
> > 2-2.5 hrs per day.
> >
> >>
> >> Can you tell me when the fuck do you work in manufacturing and sales of
> >> fine wood toys and shit?
> >
> > There are 17-18 waking hours. I spend about 5-9 hrs per day working,
> > depending. You figure it out.
> >
> >>
> >> You are a liar and a deceiver.
> >>
> >> You work as a paid shill/troll like Moroney, making 3.50 per post.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> Please, whatever you do, don’t base your estimates of my time on Usenet on
> what it takes YOU to compile your posts.
> --
> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

1 minute, 26 seconds.

On April 17, Michael Moroney wrote:
> I do notice, however, I tend to learn a lot from someone knowledgeable
> responding to a crank, trying (in vain) to correct a crank's mistake.
> Often I miss a sleight of hand from a crank and the knowledgeable person
> catches it.

Concur.

The cranks are mostly nitwits, I don't bother. But occasionally,
you find one like Kookee Wookee, who was a wacko, but ingenious.
Then Tom R or Jan would slap him down, that's illuminating.

--
Rich

Den 18.04.2022 01:28, skrev Richard Hachel:
>
> Today, I'm probably the only one in the world to master SR correctly.
>
'nuff said!

--
Paul

https://paulba.no/

On 4/20/2022 3:47 PM, RichD wrote:
> On April 17, Michael Moroney wrote:
>> I do notice, however, I tend to learn a lot from someone knowledgeable
>> responding to a crank, trying (in vain) to correct a crank's mistake.
>> Often I miss a sleight of hand from a crank and the knowledgeable person
>> catches it.
>
> Concur.
>
> The cranks are mostly nitwits, I don't bother. But occasionally,
> you find one like Kookee Wookee, who was a wacko, but ingenious.
> Then Tom R or Jan would slap him down, that's illuminating.
>
Yes Koobee was a contradiction. Seemingly very smart at math and parts
of physics, but was obsessed with one "nitwit, plagiarist and liar" and
never could get past that.