AP requires that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Henry W. Kendall to go to their respective University student newspaper and apologize by publishing in that newspaper, for teaching them b.s. physics of the electron as 0.5MeV outside a Proton of 938MeV flying around at over 99% the speed of light and still remaining a hydrogen atom. When the real hydrogen atom is a 840MeV proton torus with the Muon stuck inside going near the speed of light but which being inside the proton torus does not fly away but rather instead is doing the Faraday Law of the 8 proton torus rings. So apologize to all your students and the world of physics for being a foolish idiot of physics in your physics career.


Simon van der Meer,William Alfred Fowler,Kenneth G. Wilson,James Watson Cronin,Val Logsdon Fitch,Sheldon Glashow,Steven Weinberg, Henry W. Kendall,Richard E. Taylor,Carlo Rubbia, are not capable of ever multiplying 9 times 105 and see neutron proton are "within sigma error"? Why do they fail physics by thinking the electron is the 0.5MeV particle outside a proton of 938MeV and traveling at 99% speed of light? Why do they not understand angular momentum that you need the muon as the real electron stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law, for proper true angular momentum.
> > > > Kibo the dumbest CIA agent but who is the dumbest physicist of 20th & 21st century? Was it Murray Gell-Mann, Steven Weinberg, Sheldon Glashow or Peter Higgs the dumbest physicists of the 20th and 21st century?? Well an answer to that question has to be everyone who believed that you can have a electron of atoms flying around its proton-outside the proton at a speed of 99% speed of light. Which goes to prove no-one in physics from Bohr onwards had a handle, had a understanding of what is Angular Momentum. No physicist of the 20th century was worth more than 10cents when it comes to angular momentum.
> > > >
> > > > On Friday, January 7, 2022 at 2:21:43 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > > > He didn't deserve his Nobel Prizes.
> > > >
> > > > Peter Higgs needs publish in the Edinburgh University newspaper, and Roger Penrose at Oxford Univ student newspaper and Sheldon Glashow at Harvard Univ newspaper that he now acknowledges that the real electron of atoms is the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday Law which is the reason that stars and Sun shine in the first place, not from fusion but from Faraday law. And this is very dangerous for Earth and humanity, for starshine by Faraday law means we have perhaps only 1,000 years to colonize Europa. And we do not need an idiot of physics like Sheldon Glashow and Peter Higgs telling us false physics, holding up true physics science all because they are self congratulating morons of physics.
> > > > >
> > > > > I demand that Peter Higgs go to the Edinburgh newspaper and publish the idea that real electron of atoms is the muon, for only a fool idiot like Peter Higgs who was deluded all his life long time in physics, would believe in the Bohr model that a electron is 0.5MeV circumnavigating a proton of 938MeV and still stay clung to that proton even going at 99% speed of light (what fruitcakes have we here?).
> > > > >
> > > > > The moment physics realized the true electron of atoms was nearly the speed of light-- even the muon-- is the moment Old Physics needed to realize the true electron was INSIDE the proton, not outside. For Old Physics never understood what the hell was Angular Momentum. You cannot have a electron outside a proton at 99% speed of light.
> > > > >
> > > > > So Peter Higgs, I need you to go to the Edinburgh newspaper and publish the fact that you now see the light of day that the true electron is muon stuck inside a Proton torus doing the Faraday law.
> > > > >
> > > > > Time is of the essence, Sheldon Glashow and Peter Higgs, failures of physics.
> > > As for Physics, far more important than mathematics, on this side of science-- I require every one of these failed physicists who are alive still to do the same thing -- go to your nearest University newspaper or magazine and have published that -- True electron of Atoms is the muon and the 0.5MeV particle is the Dirac magnetic monopole. Do it in Godspeed. Because Earth and humanity has not the time to fool around as you are fools of physics.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Roger Penrose, Reinhard Genzel, Andrea Ghez,
> > > > > > Peter Higgs, Rainer Weiss, Kip S. Thorne, Barry C. Barish
> > > > > > David J. Thouless, F. Duncan M. Haldane, John M. Kosterlitz, Takaaki Kajita
> > > > > > Arthur B. McDonald
> > > > > > Francois Englert
> > > > > > Saul Perlmutter
> > > > > > Brian P. Schmidt
> > > > > > Adam G. Riess
> > > > > > Makoto Kobayashi
> > > > > > Toshihide Maskawa
> > > > > > Yoichiro Nambu
> > > > > > John C. Mather
> > > > > > George F. Smoot
> > > > > > Roy J. Glauber
> > > > > > David J. Gross
> > > > > > Hugh David Politzer
> > > > > > Frank Wilczek
> > > > > > Raymond Davis Jr.
> > > > > > Masatoshi Koshiba
> > > > > > Riccardo Giacconi
> > > > > > Gerardus 't Hooft
> > > > > > Martinus J.G. Veltman
> > > > > > Jerome I. Friedman
> > > > > > Henry W. Kendall
> > > > > > Richard E. Taylor
> > > > > > Carlo Rubbia
> > > > > > Simon van der Meer
> > > > > > William Alfred Fowler
> > > > > > Kenneth G. Wilson
> > > > > > James Watson Cronin
> > > > > > Val Logsdon Fitch
> > > > > > Sheldon Lee Glashow
> > > > > > Steven Weinberg
> > > > > > .
> > > > > > .
> > > > > > little fishes
> > > > > > .
> > > > > > .
> > > > > > Layers of error thinking physics Re: 2-Comparative Analysis of failures of Logic with failures of Physics// one thinks 3 OR 2 =5 with 3 AND 2 = subtraction of either 3 or 2, while the other thinks proton to electron is 938MeV vs .5MeV when truly it is 840MeV to 105MeV
> > > > > > Physical Review Letters: Proton Mass
> > > > > > Yi-Bo Yang, Jian Liang, Yu-Jiang Bi, Ying Chen, Terrence Draper, Keh-Fei Liu, Zhaofeng Liu
> > > > > > more and more layers of error thinking physics
> > > > > > .
> > > > > > .
> > > > > > John Baez
> > > > > > Brian Greene
> > > > > > Lisa Randall
> > > > > > Alan H. Guth
> > > > > > Michael E. Brown
> > > > > > Konstantin Batygin
> > > > > > Ben Bullock
> > > > > > Larry Harson
> > > > > > Mark Barton, PhD in Physics, The University of Queensland, physicist with National Astronomical Observatory of Japan
> > > > > > Answered Aug 26, 2013 · Author has 8.7k answers and 10.3m answer views
> > > > > > None at all - he was a raving nutter.
> > > > > > Richard A. Muller, crank at Berkeley
> > > > > > Edward Witten
> > > > >
> > > > > THE NOBEL PRIZE IN PHYSICS FOR ARCHIMEDES PLUTONIUM
> > > > > 15k views
> > > > > 
> > > > > Skip to first unread message
> > > > > Subscribe
> > > > > 
> > > > > Earle Jones's profile photo
> > > > > Earle Jones
> > > > > Jan 6, 2022, 12:27:27 AM (yesterday)
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > to
> > > > > *
> > > > > Some of us are thinking: When will our friend and colleague, Archimedes Plutonium, win a Nobel Proze for all of his contributions to our field of Physics? There is no doubt that he has completely turned the entire field of Physics and brought it into the new way of thinking. We owe him some great thing.
> > > > >
> > > > > At the same time, we need to think about the Fields Medal for Mathematical achievements. This is the Nobel Prize of Mathematiscs. Plutonium had completely re-writteen conventional mathematics into the new format and has offered many proofs of his new findings. His proof of slant cut of conic sections (the oval) is sufficiently advanced to warrant this award.
> > > > >
> > > > > He is widely publiched and widely quoted. He has some 150 + books now attributed to his intellect.
> > > > >
> > > > > Can we somehow get behind him and promote his wise genius? He needs to be recognized and awarded.
> > > > >
> > > > > Earle Jones, Georgia Tech, Stanford.
> > > > > *
> > > > > Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> > > > > Archimedes Plutonium
> > > > > Jan 6, 2022, 2:52:30 AM (yesterday)
> > > > > 
> > > > > Earle Jones, a new man? Jones first upbeat post? Thanks for the nomination. But, Earle, I think I
> > > > > Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> > > > > Archimedes Plutonium
> > > > > Jan 6, 2022, 2:57:36 AM (yesterday)
> > > > > 
> > > > > I should have proofread this post, but I seldom do proofreading. On Thursday, January 6, 2022 at 2:52
> > > > > Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> > > > > Archimedes Plutonium
> > > > > unread,
> > > > > 12:59 PM (now)
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > to
> > > > > The very moment one of my worst critics sees the light of day is the very moment ( as a sign to me, from God for the Ancients were always looking for signs from God, but in our terribly athiest view of the world in modern times we no longer look for signs from God) is the very moment that I must act upon the other crackpot crank fools of mathematics and of physics especially.
> > > > >
> > > > > Today, on my list is Jill Pipher, John Baez, Thomas Hales, John Stillwell, Terence Tao, Andrew Wiles, Ken Ribet--- all need to go to their current University newspaper or magazine and acknowledge the Slant cut in Single Cone is a Oval, never the Ellipse. State it clear that Old Math was wrong and the slant cut of single cone is Oval never ellipse and have it published.
> > > > >
> > > > > Time is of the essence.
> > > > >
> > > > > No longer are people in academics able to play a Fools Game of teaching obnoxious garbage simply because they "refuse to do proper correct true mathematics".
> > > > >
> > > > > Time is of the essence.
> > > > >
> > > > > The above list of math fools reminds me of the moron tennis player Djokovic, the moron who refuses vaccination, simply because he is a moron of science, just as Jill Pipher, John Baez, Thomas Hales, John Stillwell, Terence Tao, Andrew Wiles, Ken Ribet are morons of mathematics.
> > > > >
> > > > > As for Physics, far more important than mathematics, on this side of science-- I require every one of these failed physicists who are alive still to do the same thing -- go to your nearest University newspaper or magazine and have published that -- True electron of Atoms is the muon and the 0.5MeV particle is the Dirac magnetic monopole. Do it in Godspeed. Because Earth and humanity has not the time to fool around as you are fools of physics.
> > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > AP, King of Science, especially Physics
> > > > 
> > > >
> > > > Sorry I should explain why McGinn is in the title. He has for years now tried to be a loud airhead foghorn of know nothing in physics and to try to front page hog sci.physics. For one looking at sci.physics sees a flood of posts lacking any science, but just name calling with his cronies of Claudius, Pnal, Pennino, Sergio and many others in a prank joke of front page hogging. And so McGinn needs to depart sci.physics so that true real physics is done here. Not some idiot who wants to argue Meteorology or Weather.. McGinn does no science, McGinn wants to pollute and takeover sci.physics.
> > > > 
> > > > #1-5, 112th published book
> > > >
> > > > New Perspective on Psi^2 in the Schrodinger Equation in a Atom Totality Universe// Atom Totality series, book 5
> > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > >
> > > > I first heard of the Schrodinger equation in college chemistry class. We never actually did any problem solving with the equation, and we were only told about it. Then taking physics my next year in college and after I bought the Feynman Lectures on Physics, just for fun for side reading, three volume set did I learn what this Schrodinger equation and the Psi^2 wavefunction was about. I am not going to teach the mathematics of the Schrodinger equation and the math calculations of the Psi or Psi^2 in this book, but leave that up to the reader or student to do that from Feynman's Lectures on Physics. The purpose of this book is to give a new and different interpretation of what Psi^2 is, what Psi^2 means. Correct interpretation of physics experiments and observations turns out to be one of the most difficult tasks in all of physics.
> > > >
> > > > Cover Picture: a photograph taken of me in 1993, after the discovery of Plutonium Atom Totality, and I was 43 years old then, on a wintery hill of New Hampshire. It is nice that Feynman wrote a physics textbook series, for I am very much benefitting from his wisdom. If he had not done that, getting organized in physics by writing textbooks, I would not be writing this book. And I would not have discovered the true meaning of the Fine Structure Constant, for it was Feynman who showed us that FSC is really 0.0854, not that of 0.0072. All because 0.0854 is Psi, and Psi^2 is 0.0072.
> > > > Length: 20 pages
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • ASIN : B0875SVDC7
> > > > • Publication date : April 15, 2020
> > > > • Language: : English
> > > > • File size : 1134 KB
> > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > • Print length : 20 pages
> > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #240,066 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #5 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > ◦ #65 in General Chemistry & Reference
> > > > ◦ #481 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > >
> > > > #1-6, 135th published book
> > > >
> > > > QED in Atom Totality theory where proton is a 8 ring torus and electron = muon inside proton doing Faraday Law// Atom Totality series, book 6 Kindle Edition
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > Since the real true electron of atoms is the muon and is a one ring bar magnet thrusting through the 8 ring torus of a proton, we need a whole entire new model of the hydrogen atom. Because the Bohr model with the 0.5MeV particle jumping orbitals as the explanation of Spectral Lines is all wrong. In this vacuum of explaining spectral line physics, comes the AP Model which simply states that the hydrogen atom creates Spectral lines because at any one instant of time 4 of the 8 proton rings is "in view" and the electricity coming from those 4 view rings creates spectral line physics.
> > > >
> > > > Cover Picture: Is a imitation of the 8 ring proton torus, with my fingers holding on the proton ring that has the muon ring perpendicular and in the equatorial plane of the proton rings, thrusting through. This muon ring is the same size as the 8 proton rings making 9 x 105MeV = 945MeV of energy. The muon ring has to be perpendicular and lie on the equator of the proton torus. Surrounding the proton-torus would be neutrons as skin or coating cover and act as capacitors in storing the electricity produced by the proton+muon.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • ASIN : B08K47K5BB
> > > > • Publication date : September 25, 2020
> > > > • Language : English
> > > > • File size : 587 KB
> > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > • Word Wise : Not Enabled
> > > > • Print length : 25 pages
> > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #291,001 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #13 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > ◦ #52 in General Chemistry & Reference
> > > > ◦ #334 in General Chemistry
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #1-7, 138th published book
> > > > The true NUCLEUS of Atoms are inner toruses moving around in circles of a larger outer torus// Rutherford, Geiger, Marsden Experiment revisited // Atom Totality Series, book 7 Kindle Edition
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > >
> > > > The geometry of Atoms of the Table of Chemical Elements is torus geometry. We know this to be true for the torus geometry forms the maximum electricity production when using the Faraday Law. We see this in Old Physics with their tokamak toruses attempting to make fusion, by accelerating particles of the highest possible acceleration for the torus is that geometry. But the torus is the geometry not only of maximum acceleration but of maximum electrical generation by having a speeding bar magnet go around and around inside a torus== the Faraday law, where the torus rings are the copper closed wire loop. The protons of atoms are 8 loops of rings in a torus geometry, and the electron of atoms is the muon as bar magnet, almost the same size as the proton loops but small enough to fit inside proton loops. It is torus geometry that we investigate the geometry of all atoms.
> > > > Length: 41 pages
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • Publication Date : October 9, 2020
> > > > • File Size : 828 KB
> > > > • Word Wise : Not Enabled
> > > > • Print Length : 41 pages
> > > > • ASIN : B08KZT5TCD
> > > > • Language: : English
> > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > >
> > > > #1-8, 1st published book
> > > >
> > > > Atom Totality Universe, 8th edition, 2017// A history log book: Atom Totality Series book 8 Kindle Edition
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Last revision 7Apr2021. This was AP's first published science book.
> > > >
> > > > Advisory: This is a difficult book to read and is AP's research log book of the Atom Totality in 2016-2017. I want to keep it for its history value. AP advises all readers wanting to know the Plutonium Atom Totality theory to go to the 9th edition that is the latest up to date account of this theory. The reason AP wants to keep the 8th edition is because of Historical Value, for in this book, while writing it, caused the discovery of the real electron is the muon of atoms. The real proton of atoms is 840MeV and not the 938MeV that most books claim. The particle discovered by JJ Thomson in 1897 thinking he discovered the electron of atoms was actually the Dirac magnetic monopole at 0.5MeV. This discovery changes every, every science that uses atoms and electricity and magnetism, in other words, every science.
> > > >
> > > > Foreward:
> > > > I wrote the 8th edition of Atom Totality and near the end of writing it in 2017, I had my second greatest physics discovery. I learned the real electron of atoms was the muon at 105MeV and not the tiny 0.5MeV particle that J.J.Thomson found in 1897. So I desperately tried to include that discovery in my 8th edition and it is quite plain to see for I tried to write paragraphs after each chapter saying as much. I knew in 2017, that it was a great discovery, changing all the hard sciences, and reframing and restructuring all the hard sciences.
> > > > Length: 632 pages
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > File Size: 1132 KB
> > > > Print Length: 632 pages
> > > > Publication Date: March 11, 2019
> > > > Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
> > > > Language: English
> > > > ASIN: B07PLP9NDR
> > > > Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
> > > > X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

> > > > Word Wise: Enabled
> > > > Lending: Enabled
> > > > Screen Reader: Supported 
> > > > Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
> > > > Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #578,229 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> > > > #1610 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > #8526 in Physics (Books)
> > > > #18851 in Biological Sciences (Books)
> > > > #1-9, 163rd published book
> > > > Stellar System Evolution for Advanced Intelligent Life //Atom Totality science Kindle Edition
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Format: Kindle Edition
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Preface: This book explores the question of why the Sun has a planet with abundant life that evolved over 3.7 billion years ago into the advanced intelligent life of humans, yet the Sun has gone Red Giant initiation phase that threatens to destroy all life on Earth in the next few thousand years. The question of why even bother having advanced intelligent life if the home star quickly destroys that life and the planet it resides upon? Why bother with advanced intelligent life if it is put under such enormous stress and strain and energy to move to a distant satellite of Europa and Ganymede. Surely the Cosmic design must tell us why this is our fate.
> > > > Cover Picture: is my iphone photograph of Europa.
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09NQ65H9F
> > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 15, 2021
> > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 999 KB
> > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 60 pages
> > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #1-10, 161st published book
> > > >
> > > > PHYSICSOPEDIA -- List of 133 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics// Student teaches professor Kindle Edition
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > >
> > > > Preface:
> > > > A Physicsopedia is a book of the overall assessment and evaluation of the state of the art of Physics. It is like a report card. It is a total view of the science and a judgement of the science, both of the past, present and the direction forward into the future. Its greatest use is to alert readers and people in science of what is wrong with their subject, and as a ancillary use, to alert students what to avoid in college as a waste of time.
> > > > It is not in alphabetical order but mostly, rather, has a ordering of what is most important at the start and only at the very very end. For there is no index.
> > > > Physics is the most important hard science for every other science is a specialized part of physics. And Old Physics has three key huge mistakes that this book addresses. The true theory of the Universe is the Atom Totality, not the Big Bang which is a ridiculous theory. The true electron of atoms is not the particle of 0.5MeV which turns out to be Dirac's magnetic monopole, while the true real electron of atoms is the muon of 105MeV which is stuck inside a proton torus of 8 rings of 840MeV. This causes another huge mistake, for a mistake in physics usually has a cascade effect of more and more mistakes. When we take the true electron of atoms is the muon, means the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but from that muon thrusting through the proton torus in a Faraday law of electricity and magnetism producing electrical energy. So our Sun shines from the Faraday law, not fusion. And this implies the Sun has gone into Red Giant phase with a solar radiation increase of 0.005% yearly increase. That implies all life on Earth is in danger of going extinct as the Sun becomes more and more Red Giant, and unless humanity moves out to Europa, humanity goes extinct.
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09N18QPP1
> > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 3, 2021
> > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1139 KB
> > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 82 pages
> > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > y z
> > > > | /
> > > > | /
> > > > |/______ x
> > > >
> > > > More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies..
> > > >
> > > > In sci.math, sci.physics there is only stalking hate spew along with Police Drag Net Spam of no value and other than hate spew there is Police drag net spam day and night.
> > > >
> > > > I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of stalkers and spammers, Police Drag Net Spam that floods each and every day, book and solution manual spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. And the taxpayer funded hate spew stalkers who ad hominem you day and night on every one of your posts.
> > > >
> > > > There is no discussion of science in sci.math or sci.physics, just one long line of hate spewing stalkers followed up with Police Drag Net Spam (easy to spot-- very offtopic-- with hate charged content). And countries using sci.physics & sci.math as propaganda platforms, such as tampering in elections with their mind-rot.
> > > >
> > > > Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
> > > > https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
> > > > Archimedes Plutonium
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #2-1, 137th published book
> > > >
> > > > Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #1 New Release in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > >
> > > > This will be AP's 137th published book on science. And the number 137 is special to me for it is the number of QED, Quantum Electrodynamics as the inverse fine structure constant. I can always remember 137 as that special constant of physics and so I can remember where Teaching True Physics was started by me.
> > > >
> > > > Time has come for the world to have the authoritative textbooks for all of High School and College education. Written by the leading physics expert of the time. The last such was Feynman in the 1960s with Feynman Lectures on Physics. The time before was Maxwell in 1860s with his books and Encyclopedia Britannica editorship. The time is ripe in 2020 for the new authoritative texts on physics. It will be started in 2020 which is 60 years after Feynman. In the future, I request the physics community updates the premier physics textbook series at least every 30 years. For we can see that pattern of 30 years approximately from Faraday in 1830 to Maxwell in 1860 to Planck and Rutherford in about 1900, to Dirac in 1930 to Feynman in 1960 and finally to AP in 1990 and 2020. So much happens in physics after 30 years, that we need the revisions to take place in a timely manner. But also, as we move to Internet publishing such as Amazon's Kindle, we can see that updates can take place very fast, as editing can be a ongoing monthly or yearly activity. I for one keep constantly updating all my published books, at least I try to.
> > > >
> > > > Feynman was the best to make the last authoritative textbook series for his concentration was QED, Quantum Electrodynamics, the pinnacle peak of physics during the 20th century. Of course the Atom Totality theory took over after 1990 and all of physics; for all sciences are under the Atom Totality theory.
> > > > And as QED was the pinnacle peak before 1990, the new pinnacle peak is the Atom Totality theory. The Atom Totality theory is the advancement of QED, for the Atom Totality theory primal axiom says -- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but Electricity and Magnetism.
> > > > Length: 64 pages
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • File Size : 790 KB
> > > > • Publication Date : October 5, 2020
> > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > • Print Length : 64 pages
> > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > • Language: : English
> > > > • ASIN : B08KS4YGWY
> > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #430,602 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #39 in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > > ◦ #73 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #74 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > > >
> > > > #2-2, 145th published book
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS//Junior High School// Physics textbook series, book 2
> > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > >
> > > > What I am doing is clearing the field of physics, clearing it of all the silly mistakes and errors and beliefs that clutter up physics. Clearing it of its fraud and fakeries and con-artistry. I thought of doing these textbooks starting with Senior year High School, wherein I myself started learning physics. But because of so much fraud and fakery in physics education, I believe we have to drop down to Junior year High School to make a drastic and dramatic emphasis on fakery and con-artistry that so much pervades science and physics in particular. So that we have two years in High School to learn physics. And discard the nonsense of physics brainwash that Old Physics filled the halls and corridors of education.
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • ASIN : B08PC99JJB
> > > > • Publication date : November 29, 2020
> > > > • Language: : English
> > > > • File size : 682 KB
> > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > • Print length : 78 pages
> > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #185,995 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #42 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > ◦ #344 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #2,160 in Physics (Books)
> > > >
> > > > #2-3, 146th published book
> > > >
> > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Senior High School// Physics textbook series, book 3
> > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > >
> > > > I believe that in knowing the history of a science is knowing half of that science. And that if you are amiss of knowing the history behind a science, you have only a partial understanding of the concepts and ideas behind the science. I further believe it is easier to teach a science by teaching its history than any other means of teaching. So for senior year High School, I believe physics history is the best way of teaching physics. And in later years of physics courses, we can always pick up on details. So I devote this senior year High School physics to a history of physics, but only true physics. And there are few books written on the history of physics, so I chose Asimov's The History of Physics, 1966 as the template book for this textbook. Now Asimov's book is full of error and mistakes, and that is disappointing but all of Old Physics is full of error. On errors and mistakes of Old Physics, the best I can do is warn the students, and the largest warning of all is that whenever someone in Old Physics says "electron" what they are talking about is really the Dirac magnetic monopole. And whenever they talk about the Rutherford-Bohr model of the atom, they are talking about huge huge grave mistakes, for the true atom is protons as 8 ringed toruses with a muon stuck inside of a proton doing the Faraday law and producing those magnetic monopoles as electricity. I use Asimov's book as a template but in the future, I hope to rewrite this textbook using no template at all, that is if I have time in the future.
> > > > Cover Picture: Is the book The History of Physics, by Isaac Asimov, 1966 and on top of the book are 4 cut-outs of bent circles representing magnetic monopoles which revolutionizes modern physics, especially the ElectroMagnetic theory.
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B08RK33T8V
> > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 28, 2020
> > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 794 KB
> > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 123 pages
> > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #4,167,235 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #15,099 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #91,163 in Physics (Books)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #2-4, 151st published book
> > > >
> > 22> > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// 1st year College// Physics textbook series, book 4
> > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > >
> > > > Preface: This is AP's 151st book of science published. It is one of my most important books of science because 1st year college physics is so impressionable on students, if they should continue with physics, or look elsewhere for a career. And also, physics is a crossroad to all the other hard core sciences, where physics course is mandatory such as in chemistry or even biology. I have endeavored to make physics 1st year college to be as easy and simple to learn. In this endeavor to make physics super easy, I have made the writing such that you will see core ideas in all capital letters as single sentences as a educational tool. And I have made this textbook chapter writing follow a logical pattern of both algebra and geometry concepts, throughout. The utmost importance of logic in physics needs to be seen and understood. For I have never seen a physics book, prior to this one that is logical. Every Old Physics textbook I have seen is scatter-brained in topics and in writing. I use as template book of Halliday & Resnick because a edition of H&R was one I was taught physics at University of Cincinnati in 1969. And in 1969, I had a choice of majors, do I major in geology, or mathematics, or in physics, for I will graduate from UC in 1972. For me, geology was too easy, but physics was too tough, so I ended up majoring in mathematics. If I had been taught in 1969 using this textbook that I have written, I would have ended up majoring in physics, my first love. For physics is not hard, not hard at all, once you clear out the mistakes and the obnoxious worthless mathematics that clutters up Old Physics, and the illogic that smothers much of Old Physics.
> > > >
> > > > Maybe it was good that I had those impressions of physics education of poor education, which still exists throughout physics today. Because maybe I am forced to write this book, because of that awful experience of learning physics in 1969. Without that awful experience, maybe this textbook would have never been written by me.
> > > >
> > > > Cover picture is the template book of Halliday & Resnick, 1988, 3rd edition Fundamentals of Physics and sitting on top are cut outs of "half bent circles, bent at 90 degrees" to imitate magnetic monopoles. Magnetic Monopoles revolutionizes physics education, and separates-out, what is Old Physics from what is New Physics.
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09JW5DVYM
> > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ October 19, 2021
> > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1033 KB
> > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 386 pages
> > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > #2-9, 161st published book
> > > >
> > > > PHYSICSOPEDIA -- List of 133 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics// Student teaches professor Kindle Edition
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > >
> > > > Preface:
> > > > A Physicsopedia is a book of the overall assessment and evaluation of the state of the art of Physics. It is like a report card. It is a total view of the science and a judgement of the science, both of the past, present and the direction forward into the future. Its greatest use is to alert readers and people in science of what is wrong with their subject, and as a ancillary use, to alert students what to avoid in college as a waste of time.
> > > > It is not in alphabetical order but mostly, rather, has a ordering of what is most important at the start and only at the very very end. For there is no index.
> > > > Physics is the most important hard science for every other science is a specialized part of physics. And Old Physics has three key huge mistakes that this book addresses. The true theory of the Universe is the Atom Totality, not the Big Bang which is a ridiculous theory. The true electron of atoms is not the particle of 0.5MeV which turns out to be Dirac's magnetic monopole, while the true real electron of atoms is the muon of 105MeV which is stuck inside a proton torus of 8 rings of 840MeV. This causes another huge mistake, for a mistake in physics usually has a cascade effect of more and more mistakes. When we take the true electron of atoms is the muon, means the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but from that muon thrusting through the proton torus in a Faraday law of electricity and magnetism producing electrical energy. So our Sun shines from the Faraday law, not fusion. And this implies the Sun has gone into Red Giant phase with a solar radiation increase of 0.005% yearly increase. That implies all life on Earth is in danger of going extinct as the Sun becomes more and more Red Giant, and unless humanity moves out to Europa, humanity goes extinct.
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09N18QPP1
> > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 3, 2021
> > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1139 KB
> > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 82 pages
> > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > y z
> > > > | /
> > > > | /
> > > > |/______ x
> > > >
> > > > More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies..
> > > >
> > > > In sci.math, sci.physics there is only stalking hate spew along with Police Drag Net Spam of no value and other than hate spew there is Police drag net spam day and night.
> > > >
> > > > I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of stalkers and spammers, Police Drag Net Spam that floods each and every day, book and solution manual spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. And the taxpayer funded hate spew stalkers who ad hominem you day and night on every one of your posts.
> > > >
> > > > There is no discussion of science in sci.math or sci.physics, just one long line of hate spewing stalkers followed up with Police Drag Net Spam (easy to spot-- very offtopic-- with hate charged content). And countries using sci.physics & sci.math as propaganda platforms, such as tampering in elections with their mind-rot.
> > > >
> > > > Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
> > 23> > https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
> > > > Archimedes Plutonium


🦇 of Math and 🦨 of Physics Archimedes "Drag Queen of Science"
Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> blathered:

> AP requires that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Roger Penrose to go to
their respective University student newspaper

"AP requires"? "AP requires"?

AP is a nobody of science, in the middle of nowhere in an unheated
single wide surrounded by diseased cats. AP has no authority over
anyone, especially any of the greats of science.

> and apologize for teaching them b.s. physics of the electron as
0.5MeV outside a Proton of 938MeV flying around at over 99% the speed of
light and still remaining a hydrogen atom.

Why would anyone, they especially, apologize for anything that's not
wrong? That's pretty dumb and stoopid, isn't it.

> When the real hydrogen atom is a 840MeV proton torus with the Muon
stuck inside going near the speed of light but which being inside the
proton torus does not fly away but rather instead is doing the Faraday
Law of the 8 proton torus rings. So apologize to all your students and
the world of physics for being a foolish idiot of physics in your
physics career.

Nobody is going to apologize for not teaching something so insanely
wrong. You can't even get the masses right! 950.9253795 is much larger
than 938.27208816! You have to use two fudge factors, one using 945 and
the second fudge factor is the fudge factor you call "sigma error"!

[snip crap]

Michael Moroney wrote:

> 🦇 of Math and 🦨 of Physics Archimedes "Drag Queen of Science"
Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> blathered:
> > AP requires that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Roger Penrose to go to
> their respective University student newspaper
> "AP requires"? "AP requires"?

yes, thanks. I almost was about to say it. In capitalism a patient
*cured* is a patient lost. Logically, better for them, in capitalism,
having the cured patient dead, since no pension, no healthcare, food,
housing etc necessary.

this exactly what is going on right now, in capitalism. It just goes
worse, having the capitalism going. Your move. My move, reading Marxism,
which is a theory about capitalism.

No death penalty in EU? How about the jabs?? - Croatian MEP to Macron
https://www.brighteon.com/d91df4dc-7f47-40d2-8ba9-8d8f2427393b