Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

My little brother got this fortune: nohup rm -fr /& So he did...


tech / sci.physics.relativity / Re: Stationary Points in Space

SubjectAuthor
* Stationary Points in SpaceEd Lake
+- Re: Stationary Points in SpaceStan Fultoni
+* Re: Stationary Points in SpaceStan Fultoni
|+* Re: Stationary Points in SpaceEd Lake
||+* Re: Stationary Points in SpaceStan Fultoni
|||`* Re: Stationary Points in SpaceEd Lake
||| +* Re: Stationary Points in SpaceStan Fultoni
||| |`* Re: Stationary Points in SpaceEd Lake
||| | +- Re: Stationary Points in SpacePython
||| | +* Re: Stationary Points in SpaceStan Fultoni
||| | |`* Re: Stationary Points in SpaceEd Lake
||| | | +* Re: Stationary Points in SpaceOdd Bodkin
||| | | |`* Re: Stationary Points in SpaceEd Lake
||| | | | +* Re: Stationary Points in SpaceOdd Bodkin
||| | | | |`* Re: Stationary Points in SpaceEd Lake
||| | | | | `* Re: Stationary Points in SpaceOdd Bodkin
||| | | | |  `* Re: Stationary Points in SpaceEd Lake
||| | | | |   +* Re: Stationary Points in SpaceStan Fultoni
||| | | | |   |+* Re: Stationary Points in SpaceEd Lake
||| | | | |   ||`* Re: Stationary Points in SpaceOdd Bodkin
||| | | | |   || `* Re: Stationary Points in SpaceEd Lake
||| | | | |   ||  +* Re: Stationary Points in SpaceOdd Bodkin
||| | | | |   ||  |`* Re: Stationary Points in SpaceEd Lake
||| | | | |   ||  | `* Re: Stationary Points in SpaceOdd Bodkin
||| | | | |   ||  |  `* Re: Stationary Points in SpaceEd Lake
||| | | | |   ||  |   `- Re: Stationary Points in SpaceOdd Bodkin
||| | | | |   ||  `* Re: Stationary Points in SpaceMichael Moroney
||| | | | |   ||   `* Re: Stationary Points in SpaceEd Lake
||| | | | |   ||    `- Re: Stationary Points in SpaceMichael Moroney
||| | | | |   |`* Re: Stationary Points in SpaceTom Roberts
||| | | | |   | `- Re: Stationary Points in SpaceStan Fultoni
||| | | | |   `* Re: Stationary Points in SpaceOdd Bodkin
||| | | | |    `* Re: Stationary Points in SpaceEd Lake
||| | | | |     `- Re: Stationary Points in SpaceOdd Bodkin
||| | | | `* Re: Stationary Points in SpaceTom Roberts
||| | | |  `* Re: Stationary Points in SpaceEd Lake
||| | | |   +* Re: Stationary Points in Spacewhodat
||| | | |   |`- Re: Stationary Points in SpaceOdd Bodkin
||| | | |   `* Re: Stationary Points in SpaceMichael Moroney
||| | | |    `* Re: Stationary Points in SpaceEd Lake
||| | | |     +* Re: Stationary Points in SpaceOdd Bodkin
||| | | |     |`* Re: Stationary Points in SpaceEd Lake
||| | | |     | +* Re: Stationary Points in SpaceOdd Bodkin
||| | | |     | |`* Re: Stationary Points in SpaceEd Lake
||| | | |     | | +* Re: Stationary Points in SpacePaparios
||| | | |     | | |+* Re: Stationary Points in SpaceEd Lake
||| | | |     | | ||+* Re: Stationary Points in SpacePython
||| | | |     | | |||`- Re: Stationary Points in SpaceMaciej Wozniak
||| | | |     | | ||`- Re: Stationary Points in SpaceOdd Bodkin
||| | | |     | | |+- Re: Stationary Points in SpacePaparios
||| | | |     | | |+* Re: Stationary Points in SpaceEd Lake
||| | | |     | | ||`- Re: Stationary Points in SpaceOdd Bodkin
||| | | |     | | |`- Re: Stationary Points in SpacePaparios
||| | | |     | | `* Re: Stationary Points in SpaceOdd Bodkin
||| | | |     | |  `* Re: Stationary Points in SpaceThe Starmaker
||| | | |     | |   `* Re: Stationary Points in SpaceOdd Bodkin
||| | | |     | |    `* Re: Stationary Points in SpaceThe Starmaker
||| | | |     | |     `* Re: Stationary Points in SpaceOdd Bodkin
||| | | |     | |      `* Re: Stationary Points in SpaceThe Starmaker
||| | | |     | |       +- Re: Stationary Points in SpaceThe Starmaker
||| | | |     | |       `* Re: Stationary Points in SpaceOdd Bodkin
||| | | |     | |        `* Re: Stationary Points in SpaceThe Starmaker
||| | | |     | |         +- Re: Stationary Points in SpaceThe Starmaker
||| | | |     | |         `* Re: Stationary Points in SpaceOdd Bodkin
||| | | |     | |          `* Re: Stationary Points in SpacePaparios
||| | | |     | |           `* Re: Stationary Points in SpaceThe Starmaker
||| | | |     | |            `* Re: Stationary Points in SpaceThe Starmaker
||| | | |     | |             `- Re: Stationary Points in SpaceThe Starmaker
||| | | |     | `- Re: Stationary Points in SpaceMichael Moroney
||| | | |     `- Re: Stationary Points in SpaceMichael Moroney
||| | | +* Re: Stationary Points in SpaceMichael Moroney
||| | | |`* Re: Stationary Points in SpaceEd Lake
||| | | | +- Re: Stationary Points in SpaceOdd Bodkin
||| | | | +* Re: Stationary Points in SpaceMichael Moroney
||| | | | |`* Re: Stationary Points in SpaceEd Lake
||| | | | | `* Re: Stationary Points in SpaceMichael Moroney
||| | | | |  `* Re: Stationary Points in SpaceEd Lake
||| | | | |   `- Re: Stationary Points in SpaceMichael Moroney
||| | | | `* Re: Stationary Points in SpaceMichael Moroney
||| | | |  +- Re: Stationary Points in SpaceDean Totolos
||| | | |  `* Re: Stationary Points in SpaceEd Lake
||| | | |   +* Re: Stationary Points in SpaceMichael Moroney
||| | | |   |+- Re: Stationary Points in SpaceMaciej Wozniak
||| | | |   |`* Re: Stationary Points in SpaceEd Lake
||| | | |   | +* Re: Stationary Points in SpaceMikko
||| | | |   | |`* Re: Stationary Points in SpaceEd Lake
||| | | |   | | `* Re: Stationary Points in SpaceMikko
||| | | |   | |  `- Re: Stationary Points in SpaceEd Lake
||| | | |   | `- Re: Stationary Points in SpaceMichael Moroney
||| | | |   `* Re: Stationary Points in SpaceUfonaut
||| | | |    `* Re: Stationary Points in SpaceEd Lake
||| | | |     `- Re: Stationary Points in SpaceUfonaut
||| | | `- Re: Stationary Points in SpaceStan Fultoni
||| | +* Re: Stationary Points in SpacePaparios
||| | |`* Re: Stationary Points in SpaceEd Lake
||| | | +* Re: Stationary Points in SpaceOdd Bodkin
||| | | |`- Re: Stationary Points in SpaceOdd Bodkin
||| | | `* Re: Stationary Points in SpacePaparios
||| | |  +* Re: Stationary Points in SpaceMaciej Wozniak
||| | |  |`* Re: Stationary Points in SpaceMichael Moroney
||| | |  | `- Re: Stationary Points in SpaceMaciej Wozniak
||| | |  `* Re: Stationary Points in SpaceEd Lake
||| | +* Re: Stationary Points in Spacewhodat
||| | `* Re: Stationary Points in SpaceMichael Moroney
||| +* Re: Stationary Points in SpaceMikko
||| `- Re: Stationary Points in SpaceOdd Bodkin
||+* Re: Stationary Points in SpaceMichael Moroney
||`- Re: Stationary Points in SpaceOdd Bodkin
|`* Re: Stationary Points in SpaceRichD
+* Re: Stationary Points in Spacewhodat
+* Re: Stationary Points in SpaceOdd Bodkin
+- Re: Stationary Points in SpaceTom Roberts
`* Re: Stationary Points in SpaceThe Starmaker

Pages:12345678
Re: Stationary Points in Space

<t4gn2c$103s$1@gioia.aioe.org>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=89414&group=sci.physics.relativity#89414

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!Of0kprfJVVw2aVQefhvR6Q.user.46.165.242.75.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: bodkin...@gmail.com (Odd Bodkin)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Stationary Points in Space
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 12:52:28 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <t4gn2c$103s$1@gioia.aioe.org>
References: <626B1EB4.C6@ix.netcom.com>
<t4fc7o$dg3$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<626B41CF.7F6D@ix.netcom.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="32892"; posting-host="Of0kprfJVVw2aVQefhvR6Q.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org";
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPad)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:PL0MF5eqhSTQyb7izLIoQQSbXAQ=
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
 by: Odd Bodkin - Fri, 29 Apr 2022 12:52 UTC

The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> Odd Bodkin wrote:
>>
>> The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>> Odd Bodkin wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>> Odd Bodkin wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> Odd Bodkin wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, April 27, 2022 at 12:48:19 PM UTC-5, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Ed Lake wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, April 27, 2022 at 11:45:23 AM UTC-5, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Ed Lake wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> You may be right, which shows the sorry state of college physics textbooks.
>>>>>>>>>>>> No, that’s not the right conclusion. If
>>>>>>>>>>>> you find that every textbook
>>>>>>>>>>>> disagrees with something you think is true, then it is a mistake to believe
>>>>>>>>>>>> that you are right and every single textbook is wrong. What is a much
>>>>>>>>>>>> better strategy is to conclude that it is YOU that is not understanding
>>>>>>>>>>>> something correctly.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> There are plenty of textbooks that agree with me. I have a collection of
>>>>>>>>>>> well over 100 college physics textbooks.
>>>>>>>>>> A hundred TEXTBOOKS? I’d like a listing
>>>>>>>>>> of the first 30 please.
>>>>>>>>>> Note that Brian Greene’s The Fabric of
>>>>>>>>>> the Cosmos is not a textbook.
>>>>>>>>>> Hawking’s A Brief History of Time is not a textbook.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Here are about 70 that I have categorized as "textbooks." I could have
>>>>>>>>> dozens more that I just categorized as "books":
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> OK, so let’s have a small moment of
>>>>>>>> truth-telling here, Ed. You have
>>>>>>>> provided a listing of 70 books, but you fell short of claiming that these
>>>>>>>> are actually in your possession.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It turns out that I have 152 books in .pdf format, 11 books in .epub
>>>>>>> format (which my computer can read to me, if I want), and 2 books in
>>>>>>> .mobi format which I can theoretically read on my Kindle. I also see
>>>>>>> that only 31 of the 152 books in .pdf format are non-searchable (I'll
>>>>>>> explain later why that is important).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have a few hundred trade books in ebook formats as well. But not
>>>>>> introductory college textbooks. There’s a reason why that is so.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I only posted what Ed Lake wrote:
>>>>
>>>> That I don’t doubt. I’m sure he has lots of ebooks. Just not the textbooks
>>>> he listed.
>>>
>>> I'm a little confused about what you wrote: "...sure he has lots of
>>> ebooks. Just not the textbooks he listed."
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Can you name a (one) title of an ebook he listed
>>
>> What ebooks did he list?
>
>
> It turns out that I have 152 books in .pdf format, 11 books in .epub
> format (which my computer can read to me, if I want), and 2 books in
> .mobi format which I can theoretically read on my Kindle. I also see
> that only 31 of the 152 books in .pdf format are non-searchable (I'll
> explain later why that is important).
>
> I also have 238 articles in pdf format, which does not include 191
> articles in .pdf format that I downloaded from arXiv.org over the years
> (total: 429). Only 22 of the 429 articles in .pdf format are
> non-searchable.
>
> Another one of the things you can do when you have a spreadsheet list is
> select out a portion of the list for conversion into html format, which
> is the format for this web page. I can then display the first 50 books
> on the list. Like so:

Yup. A number of these books are trade books (e.g. Baggott) that are not
textbooks but popularizations. A number of them are self-published
giveaways (e.g. Kitcher). And a number of them are pirated illegally (e.g.
Serway).

>
> Title
> Author(s)
> 100 Years of Relativity: Space-Time Structure: Einstein and Beyond
> Abhay Ashtekar (Editor)
> A Beginner's Guide to Reality Jim Baggott
> A First Course in General Relativity Bernard F. Schultz
> A Pocket Popper Karl Popper
> A Sophisticate's Primer of Relativity P. W. Bridgman
> Absurdities in Modern Physics Paul Marmet
> All Life is Problem Solving Karl Popper
> An introduction to Mechanics Daniel Kleppner and Robert Kolenkow
> Aspects of Scientific Explanation and other Essays in the Philosophy of
> Science Carl G. Hempel
> Bankrupting Physics: How Today's Top Scientists are Gambling Away Their
> Credibility Alexander Unzicker and Sheilla Jones
> Begegnungen mit Einstein, von Laue und Planck Ilse Rosenthal-Schneider
> Beyond Kuhn: Scientific Explanation, Theory Structure,
> Incommensurability and Physical Necessity Edwin H.-C. Hung
> Boyle on Fire: The Mechanical Revolution in Scientific Explanation
> William R. Eaton
> Causal Physics Chandrasekhar Roychoudhuri
> Causality and Scientific Explanation William A. Wallace
> College Physics (Eighth Edition) Raymond A. Serway & Chris Vuille
> College Physics (Ninth Edition) Raymond A. Serway & Chris Vuille
> College Physics (Seventh Edition?) Raymond A. Serway, Jerry S. Faughn &
> Chris Vuille
> Computational and Geometrical Aspects of on-the-fly Ambiguity
> Resolution Hasanuddin Zainal Abidin
> Cosmogenesis: The Growth of Order in the Universe
> David Layzer
> Cosmological Special Relativity: The Large-Scale Structure of Space,
> Time and Velocity Moshe Carmeli
> Einstein in 90 Minutes John & Mary Gribbin
> Einstein versus Classical Mechanics Paul Marmet
> Einstein's Lost Key: How we overlooked the best idea of the 20th
> century Alexander Unzicker
> Einstein's Miraculous Year: Five Papers That Changed the Face of
> Physics Edited by John Stachel
> Einstein's Space-Time: An Introduction to Special and General
> Relativity Rafael Ferraro
> Endophysics, Time, Quantum and the Subjective Edited by Rosolino
> Buccheri et al.
> Essential Relativity: Special, General and Cosmological (2nd ed)
> Wolfgang Rindler
> Everywhere and Everywhen: Adventures in Physics and Philosophy Nick
> Huggett
> Experiments in Modern Physics
> Explanatory Unification and the Causal Structure of the World Philip
> Kitcher
> Farewell to Reality: How Modern Physics has Betrayed the Search for
> Scientific Truth Jim Baggott
> Fashion, Faith and Fantasy in the New Physics of the Universe Roger
> Penrose
> For the Love of Physics Walter Lewin
> Foundations of Astronomy (Eleventh Edition) Michael A. Seeds, Dana E.
> Backman
> Foundations of Space-Time Theories Edited by John Earman, et al.
> Foundations of Space-Time Theories: Relativistic Physics and Philosophy
> of Science
> Four Decades of Scientific Explanation Wesley C. Salmon
> From Special Relativity to Feynman Diagrams Riccardo D’Auria and Mario
> Trigiante
> Fundamentals of College Physics Peter J. Nolan
> Fundamentals of Modern Physics Peter J. Nolan
> Fundamentals of Modern Physics Robert Martin Eisberg
> Fundamentals of Physics (Eighth Edition) Jearl Walker
> Fundamentals of Physics (Ninth Edition) Jearl Walker
> Fundamentals of Physics (Tenth Edition) Jearl Walker
> Galileo in 90 Minutes John & Mary Gribbin
> General Relativity Benjamin Crowell
> General Relativity and Relativistic Astrophysics Norbert Straumann
> Global Positioning Systems Directorate Systems Engineering &
> Integration
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


Click here to read the complete article
Re: Stationary Points in Space

<bd6525fa-d7f2-4ca4-8d84-c8082a50fef5n@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=89430&group=sci.physics.relativity#89430

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:202d:b0:458:1168:1d87 with SMTP id 13-20020a056214202d00b0045811681d87mr142178qvf.46.1651252012034;
Fri, 29 Apr 2022 10:06:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:c85:b0:441:2b1c:dd46 with SMTP id
r5-20020a0562140c8500b004412b1cdd46mr28143206qvr.41.1651252011779; Fri, 29
Apr 2022 10:06:51 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 10:06:51 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <t4gn2c$103s$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2800:150:125:1082:e9f1:8ca8:828c:5fda;
posting-account=KA67VQoAAAABNtRUVf2Wh-jHtkEfmXxT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2800:150:125:1082:e9f1:8ca8:828c:5fda
References: <626B1EB4.C6@ix.netcom.com> <t4fc7o$dg3$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<626B41CF.7F6D@ix.netcom.com> <t4gn2c$103s$1@gioia.aioe.org>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <bd6525fa-d7f2-4ca4-8d84-c8082a50fef5n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Stationary Points in Space
From: mri...@ing.puc.cl (Paparios)
Injection-Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 17:06:52 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lines: 20
 by: Paparios - Fri, 29 Apr 2022 17:06 UTC

El viernes, 29 de abril de 2022 a las 8:52:32 UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com escribió:
> The Starmaker <star...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

> Yup. A number of these books are trade books (e.g. Baggott) that are not
> textbooks but popularizations. A number of them are self-published
> giveaways (e.g. Kitcher). And a number of them are pirated illegally (e.g..
> Serway).

There are a few legal sites to look for books and articles. One of them is archive.org, which has books for download or borrowing. Using the search word "relativity" there are 26,548 books and articles listed (for instance see https://ia903103.us.archive.org/13/items/arxiv-1601.04996/1601.04996.pdf for Lectures on General Theory of Relativity from Emil T. Akhmedov).

Of course, there are some russian sites that have everything, like the book Gravitation in http://xdel.ru/downloads/lgbooks/Misner%20C.W.%2C%20Thorne%20K.S.%2C%20Wheeler%20J.A.%20Gravitation%20%28Freeman%2C%201973%29%28K%29%28T%29%281304s%29_PGr_.pdf

Re: Stationary Points in Space

<626CB92E.1B53@ix.netcom.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=89467&group=sci.physics.relativity#89467

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!/cd6lVY8Z/mQ7QUEKAKGKw.user.46.165.242.75.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: starma...@ix.netcom.com (The Starmaker)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Stationary Points in Space
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 21:21:02 -0700
Organization: The Starmaker Organization
Message-ID: <626CB92E.1B53@ix.netcom.com>
References: <626B1EB4.C6@ix.netcom.com> <t4fc7o$dg3$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<626B41CF.7F6D@ix.netcom.com> <t4gn2c$103s$1@gioia.aioe.org> <bd6525fa-d7f2-4ca4-8d84-c8082a50fef5n@googlegroups.com>
Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="4304"; posting-host="/cd6lVY8Z/mQ7QUEKAKGKw.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org";
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 220429-4, 04/29/2022), Outbound message
 by: The Starmaker - Sat, 30 Apr 2022 04:21 UTC

Paparios wrote:
>
> El viernes, 29 de abril de 2022 a las 8:52:32 UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com escribió:
> > The Starmaker <star...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>
> > Yup. A number of these books are trade books (e.g. Baggott) that are not
> > textbooks but popularizations. A number of them are self-published
> > giveaways (e.g. Kitcher). And a number of them are pirated illegally (e.g.
> > Serway).
>
> There are a few legal sites to look for books and articles. One of them is archive.org, which has books for download or borrowing. Using the search word "relativity" there are 26,548 books and articles listed (for instance see
>
> Of course, there are some russian sites that have everything, like the book Gravitation in http://xdel.ru/downloads/lgbooks/Misner%20C.W.%2C%20Thorne%20K.S.%2C

Here is one of many sites

https://www.pdfdrive.com/search?q=instructor%27s+solution+manual&pagecount=&pubyear=&searchin=&em=

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
the unchallengeable.

Re: Stationary Points in Space

<gOadndLB_PUS5vD_nZ2dnUU7_8zNnZ2d@giganews.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=89496&group=sci.physics.relativity#89496

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2022 13:10:23 -0500
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2022 13:10:23 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0)
Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.8.1
Subject: Re: Stationary Points in Space
Content-Language: en-US
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <3faa5f61-b246-43ef-b007-50bc2fde89abn@googlegroups.com>
<7bb23deb-ed69-4097-a4ed-4f2874833186n@googlegroups.com>
<6aed40da-f50a-44e9-8877-c4f3f38a10b5n@googlegroups.com>
<518f40a2-4aec-4997-9994-7ced2ca594d2n@googlegroups.com>
<d26a7f2f-e852-4c27-a079-1cbf71a6f94bn@googlegroups.com>
<t45k6l$vct$1@dont-email.me>
<01557d6b-f05b-4e25-b4a0-813de82fe18dn@googlegroups.com>
<t48f1n$t6q$1@dont-email.me>
<bedd7694-e29d-48f8-9309-3f233aa31f02n@googlegroups.com>
<t498p3$jjk$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<6abf6960-ca5e-43ae-9b73-26e43d5304ean@googlegroups.com>
From: tjrobert...@sbcglobal.net (Tom Roberts)
In-Reply-To: <6abf6960-ca5e-43ae-9b73-26e43d5304ean@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <gOadndLB_PUS5vD_nZ2dnUU7_8zNnZ2d@giganews.com>
Lines: 78
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-b6m0mR0n1/KspnhHumqmWrX468D1i5JAtwanVSF/otuwKVYpdxoC6TSp5jsWX8CsiLvoZAhVjAW1pbo!peqbeXO2GR43pQGfCChQ/hjge3sRzONEdryn6d+uKtXNt+ItlwJwG+Xo8BdyKujjSihmWtl82Q==
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 4874
 by: Tom Roberts - Sat, 30 Apr 2022 18:10 UTC

On 4/26/22 3:04 PM, Ed Lake wrote:
> Years ago it was determined that everything in our visible universe
> is moving away from the point of the Big Bang.

You OBVIOUSLY do not know anything about the big bang. This is
COMPLETELY WRONG, as there is no "point of the big bang".

> I just looked through the top 3 physics textbooks. NONE contains a
> description of a photon.

Because you're looking at a list of ELEMENTARY physics textbooks.
Photons are an aspect of QED, which is an advanced topic that students
don't learn about until graduate school. (There's no point in giving you
a list of such textbooks, as you don't understand the elementary books
you claim to have "read".)

> Virtually every source describes a photon as consisting of
> oscillating electric and magnetic fields.

They are all wrong. I cannot help it if idiots and know-nothings
outnumber experts, so Google prioritizes their nonsense over correct
information. And I cannot help it that you are so stupid you don't
recognize your own incompetence in distinguishing lies and
misinformation from correct descriptions.

> We know that light travels in straight lines, so we can trace a
> photon back to its point of origin.

Yes. (Well, light travels along null geodesics, which in the curved
spacetime of the world we inhabit cannot really be called "straight lines".)

> It is a stationary point in space where some ATOM was located when it
> emitted the photon.

Assertions like this are not facts. Rather, the photon was emitted at a
particular point in spacetime; "stationary" simply does not apply to
such points, as they have zero temporal duration.

> I've read Einstein's 1905 paper dozens of times.

No, your eyes may have traversed the text, but you CLEARLY have never
read it with anything approaching understanding.

> Every photon that is emitted is emitted from a stationary point in
> space.

Assertions are not facts. In fact, in our current best models of the
world, photons are emitted from a point in spacetime, to which
"stationary" simply does not apply.

> the first postulate says nothing about any preferred frame.

SURE IT DOES! It's just that you don't understand any of this.
Einstein's first postulate directly states that there is no
such thing as a "preferred frame" (in the sense that such a frame
appears explicitly in the laws of physics).

Every time you claim something is "stationary", you are implicitly
invoking such a preferred frame, that the first postulate says does not
exist.

> How do we know the point of emission is stationary?

"We" don't -- it is only YOU who fantasizes this, because you don't know
the meanings of the words you use, or the concepts of physics that are
involved.

> The Big Bang put everything in motion relative to the stationary
> point of the Big Bang

You just keep demonstrating that you know NOTHING AT ALL about the big
bang -- there is no "stationary point of the big bang", because those
concepts are incommensurate.

You REALLY need to learn how to read, and how to understand what you
have read.

Tom Roberts

Re: Stationary Points in Space

<pan$f14a6$f95bbb88$30947de7$ced81b49@gcftghsf.tk>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=89500&group=sci.physics.relativity#89500

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!tKeDShd/hwLggvz1at/JTQ.user.46.165.242.75.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: owf...@gcftghsf.tk (Colin Ohba)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Stationary Points in Space
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2022 18:28:57 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <pan$f14a6$f95bbb88$30947de7$ced81b49@gcftghsf.tk>
References: <3faa5f61-b246-43ef-b007-50bc2fde89abn@googlegroups.com>
<7bb23deb-ed69-4097-a4ed-4f2874833186n@googlegroups.com>
<6aed40da-f50a-44e9-8877-c4f3f38a10b5n@googlegroups.com>
<518f40a2-4aec-4997-9994-7ced2ca594d2n@googlegroups.com>
<d26a7f2f-e852-4c27-a079-1cbf71a6f94bn@googlegroups.com>
<t45k6l$vct$1@dont-email.me>
<01557d6b-f05b-4e25-b4a0-813de82fe18dn@googlegroups.com>
<t48f1n$t6q$1@dont-email.me>
<bedd7694-e29d-48f8-9309-3f233aa31f02n@googlegroups.com>
<t498p3$jjk$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<6abf6960-ca5e-43ae-9b73-26e43d5304ean@googlegroups.com>
<gOadndLB_PUS5vD_nZ2dnUU7_8zNnZ2d@giganews.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="2319"; posting-host="tKeDShd/hwLggvz1at/JTQ.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org";
User-Agent: Nemo/0.999a
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
 by: Colin Ohba - Sat, 30 Apr 2022 18:28 UTC

Tom Roberts wrote:

>> We know that light travels in straight lines, so we can trace a photon
>> back to its point of origin.
>
> Yes. (Well, light travels along null geodesics, which in the curved
> spacetime of the world we inhabit cannot really be called "straight
> lines".)

not true, it travels spherically. Even lasers travels in steradians, hence
still spherically, and gets "lesser", or rather spread spherically. I
wonder how it relates to photons.

Re: Stationary Points in Space

<626D8A28.798B@ix.netcom.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=89505&group=sci.physics.relativity#89505

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!/cd6lVY8Z/mQ7QUEKAKGKw.user.46.165.242.75.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: starma...@ix.netcom.com (The Starmaker)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Stationary Points in Space
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2022 12:12:40 -0700
Organization: The Starmaker Organization
Message-ID: <626D8A28.798B@ix.netcom.com>
References: <626B1EB4.C6@ix.netcom.com> <t4fc7o$dg3$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<626B41CF.7F6D@ix.netcom.com> <t4gn2c$103s$1@gioia.aioe.org> <bd6525fa-d7f2-4ca4-8d84-c8082a50fef5n@googlegroups.com> <626CB92E.1B53@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="61216"; posting-host="/cd6lVY8Z/mQ7QUEKAKGKw.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org";
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 220430-14, 04/30/2022), Outbound message
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
 by: The Starmaker - Sat, 30 Apr 2022 19:12 UTC

The Starmaker wrote:
>
> Paparios wrote:
> >
> > El viernes, 29 de abril de 2022 a las 8:52:32 UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com escribió:
> > > The Starmaker <star...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Yup. A number of these books are trade books (e.g. Baggott) that are not
> > > textbooks but popularizations. A number of them are self-published
> > > giveaways (e.g. Kitcher). And a number of them are pirated illegally (e.g.
> > > Serway).
> >
> > There are a few legal sites to look for books and articles. One of them is archive.org, which has books for download or borrowing. Using the search word "relativity" there are 26,548 books and articles listed (for instance see
> >
> > Of course, there are some russian sites that have everything, like the book Gravitation in http://xdel.ru/downloads/lgbooks/Misner%20C.W.%2C%20Thorne%20K.S.%
>
> Here is one of many sites
>
> https://www.pdfdrive.com/search?q=instructor%27s+solution+manual&pagecount=&pubyear=&searchin=&em=

Now, if you notice search results for : instructor's solution manual
https://www.pdfdrive.com/search?q=instructor%27s+solution+manual&pagecount=&pubyear=&searchin=&em=

is like it is needed like there is no tomorrow!

and if you just searc: solution manual

https://www.pdfdrive.com/search?q=+solution+manual&pagecount=&pubyear=&searchin=&em=

results jump up dramatically! 4,066 results to 69,523 results found .

Of Course the field Physics is always number one.

like it is needed like there is no tomorrow!

the funny part is the very last book in the results...

Does Student Access to Solution Manual Pose a Challenge?

What a stupid title! Everyone is looking for Solutions to problems in
the world...

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
the unchallengeable.

Re: Stationary Points in Space

<626DA924.6AE1@ix.netcom.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=89517&group=sci.physics.relativity#89517

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!/cd6lVY8Z/mQ7QUEKAKGKw.user.46.165.242.75.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: starma...@ix.netcom.com (The Starmaker)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Stationary Points in Space
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2022 14:24:52 -0700
Organization: The Starmaker Organization
Message-ID: <626DA924.6AE1@ix.netcom.com>
References: <3faa5f61-b246-43ef-b007-50bc2fde89abn@googlegroups.com>
<7bb23deb-ed69-4097-a4ed-4f2874833186n@googlegroups.com>
<6aed40da-f50a-44e9-8877-c4f3f38a10b5n@googlegroups.com>
<518f40a2-4aec-4997-9994-7ced2ca594d2n@googlegroups.com>
<d26a7f2f-e852-4c27-a079-1cbf71a6f94bn@googlegroups.com>
<t45k6l$vct$1@dont-email.me>
<01557d6b-f05b-4e25-b4a0-813de82fe18dn@googlegroups.com>
<t48f1n$t6q$1@dont-email.me>
<bedd7694-e29d-48f8-9309-3f233aa31f02n@googlegroups.com>
<t498p3$jjk$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<6abf6960-ca5e-43ae-9b73-26e43d5304ean@googlegroups.com>
<gOadndLB_PUS5vD_nZ2dnUU7_8zNnZ2d@giganews.com> <pan$f14a6$f95bbb88$30947de7$ced81b49@gcftghsf.tk>
Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="30747"; posting-host="/cd6lVY8Z/mQ7QUEKAKGKw.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org";
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 220430-14, 04/30/2022), Outbound message
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
 by: The Starmaker - Sat, 30 Apr 2022 21:24 UTC

Colin Ohba wrote:
>
> Tom Roberts wrote:
>
> >> We know that light travels in straight lines, so we can trace a photon
> >> back to its point of origin.
> >
> > Yes. (Well, light travels along null geodesics, which in the curved
> > spacetime of the world we inhabit cannot really be called "straight
> > lines".)
>
> not true, it travels spherically. Even lasers travels in steradians, hence
> still spherically, and gets "lesser", or rather spread spherically. I
> wonder how it relates to photons.

Stars, the origin of stars...whence they came from...the Stationary Points in Space,

had no curvature in space then.

The Big Dipper which existed at the big bang contains

4 stars at points perpendicular to each other. The other handle of the big dipper simply lost is way.

Each star then existed at a Stationary Point in Space, like billions of big dippers without the handles.

things were in order then..

The Starmaker

btw, the earth is the center of the universe.

It is the focal point of the universe.

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
the unchallengeable.

Re: Stationary Points in Space

<pan$5c943$4ae8b7bb$27b5cdbe$8a84b0bc@gcftghsf.tk>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=89518&group=sci.physics.relativity#89518

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!tKeDShd/hwLggvz1at/JTQ.user.46.165.242.75.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: owf...@gcftghsf.tk (Colin Ohba)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Stationary Points in Space
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2022 21:30:07 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <pan$5c943$4ae8b7bb$27b5cdbe$8a84b0bc@gcftghsf.tk>
References: <3faa5f61-b246-43ef-b007-50bc2fde89abn@googlegroups.com>
<7bb23deb-ed69-4097-a4ed-4f2874833186n@googlegroups.com>
<6aed40da-f50a-44e9-8877-c4f3f38a10b5n@googlegroups.com>
<518f40a2-4aec-4997-9994-7ced2ca594d2n@googlegroups.com>
<d26a7f2f-e852-4c27-a079-1cbf71a6f94bn@googlegroups.com>
<t45k6l$vct$1@dont-email.me>
<01557d6b-f05b-4e25-b4a0-813de82fe18dn@googlegroups.com>
<t48f1n$t6q$1@dont-email.me>
<bedd7694-e29d-48f8-9309-3f233aa31f02n@googlegroups.com>
<t498p3$jjk$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<6abf6960-ca5e-43ae-9b73-26e43d5304ean@googlegroups.com>
<gOadndLB_PUS5vD_nZ2dnUU7_8zNnZ2d@giganews.com>
<pan$f14a6$f95bbb88$30947de7$ced81b49@gcftghsf.tk>
<626DA924.6AE1@ix.netcom.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="3268"; posting-host="tKeDShd/hwLggvz1at/JTQ.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org";
User-Agent: Nemo/0.999a
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
 by: Colin Ohba - Sat, 30 Apr 2022 21:30 UTC

The Starmaker wrote:

>> not true, it travels spherically. Even lasers travels in steradians,
>> hence still spherically, and gets "lesser", or rather spread
>> spherically. I wonder how it relates to photons.
>
> Stars, the origin of stars...whence they came from...the Stationary
> Points in Space, had no curvature in space then.

new to me. However, as EM you 2D integrate the amplitude over surface,
which becomes weaker further away from the sources. However as photons,
the probability amplitude *has_to* flattens and fall, further away from
the source. I can't really interpret the later regarding the macro_scale.

Re: Stationary Points in Space

<626DAC86.39EC@ix.netcom.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=89519&group=sci.physics.relativity#89519

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!/cd6lVY8Z/mQ7QUEKAKGKw.user.46.165.242.75.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: starma...@ix.netcom.com (The Starmaker)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Stationary Points in Space
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2022 14:39:18 -0700
Organization: The Starmaker Organization
Message-ID: <626DAC86.39EC@ix.netcom.com>
References: <626B1EB4.C6@ix.netcom.com> <t4fc7o$dg3$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<626B41CF.7F6D@ix.netcom.com> <t4gn2c$103s$1@gioia.aioe.org> <bd6525fa-d7f2-4ca4-8d84-c8082a50fef5n@googlegroups.com> <626CB92E.1B53@ix.netcom.com> <626D8A28.798B@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="40668"; posting-host="/cd6lVY8Z/mQ7QUEKAKGKw.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org";
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 220430-14, 04/30/2022), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
 by: The Starmaker - Sat, 30 Apr 2022 21:39 UTC

The Starmaker wrote:
>
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > Paparios wrote:
> > >
> > > El viernes, 29 de abril de 2022 a las 8:52:32 UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com escribió:
> > > > The Starmaker <star...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Yup. A number of these books are trade books (e.g. Baggott) that are not
> > > > textbooks but popularizations. A number of them are self-published
> > > > giveaways (e.g. Kitcher). And a number of them are pirated illegally (e.g.
> > > > Serway).
> > >
> > > There are a few legal sites to look for books and articles. One of them is archive.org, which has books for download or borrowing. Using the search word "relativity" there are 26,548 books and articles listed (for instance see
> > >
> > > Of course, there are some russian sites that have everything, like the book Gravitation in http://xdel.ru/downloads/lgbooks/Misner%20C.W.%2C%20Thorne%20K.S
> >
> > Here is one of many sites
> >
> > https://www.pdfdrive.com/search?q=instructor%27s+solution+manual&pagecount=&pubyear=&searchin=&em=
>
> Now, if you notice search results for : instructor's solution manual
> https://www.pdfdrive.com/search?q=instructor%27s+solution+manual&pagecount=&pubyear=&searchin=&em=
>
> is like it is needed like there is no tomorrow!
>
> and if you just searc: solution manual
>
> https://www.pdfdrive.com/search?q=+solution+manual&pagecount=&pubyear=&searchin=&em=
>
> results jump up dramatically! 4,066 results to 69,523 results found .
>
> Of Course the field Physics is always number one.
>
> like it is needed like there is no tomorrow!
>
> the funny part is the very last book in the results...
>
> Does Student Access to Solution Manual Pose a Challenge?
>
> What a stupid title! Everyone is looking for Solutions to problems in
> the world...
>

How do you get into the best colleges? Use the Solution, ...the backdoor. (you can even have a person take the test for you) solution, solutions, solutions.

If there is no food in the refridgerator, get take out!

solution, solutions, solutions.

Albert Einstein just wants to know what is on God's mind...the rest are just details.

In otherwords, he doesn't want to read the physic book, he wants the answers...the instructor's solution manual.

otherwise he'll just die and never know.

The reason why The Physics Manual solution is number one in results is because...it's TOO FUCKING HARD!!!!

[WHISPER] {i heard that God is STILL working on it...}

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
the unchallengeable.

Re: Stationary Points in Space

<626DC1B7.3E79@ix.netcom.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=89522&group=sci.physics.relativity#89522

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!/cd6lVY8Z/mQ7QUEKAKGKw.user.46.165.242.75.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: starma...@ix.netcom.com (The Starmaker)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Stationary Points in Space
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2022 16:09:43 -0700
Organization: The Starmaker Organization
Message-ID: <626DC1B7.3E79@ix.netcom.com>
References: <3faa5f61-b246-43ef-b007-50bc2fde89abn@googlegroups.com>
<7bb23deb-ed69-4097-a4ed-4f2874833186n@googlegroups.com>
<6aed40da-f50a-44e9-8877-c4f3f38a10b5n@googlegroups.com>
<518f40a2-4aec-4997-9994-7ced2ca594d2n@googlegroups.com>
<d26a7f2f-e852-4c27-a079-1cbf71a6f94bn@googlegroups.com>
<t45k6l$vct$1@dont-email.me>
<01557d6b-f05b-4e25-b4a0-813de82fe18dn@googlegroups.com>
<t48f1n$t6q$1@dont-email.me>
<bedd7694-e29d-48f8-9309-3f233aa31f02n@googlegroups.com>
<t498p3$jjk$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<6abf6960-ca5e-43ae-9b73-26e43d5304ean@googlegroups.com>
<gOadndLB_PUS5vD_nZ2dnUU7_8zNnZ2d@giganews.com>
<pan$f14a6$f95bbb88$30947de7$ced81b49@gcftghsf.tk>
<626DA924.6AE1@ix.netcom.com> <pan$5c943$4ae8b7bb$27b5cdbe$8a84b0bc@gcftghsf.tk>
Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="32126"; posting-host="/cd6lVY8Z/mQ7QUEKAKGKw.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org";
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 220430-14, 04/30/2022), Outbound message
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
 by: The Starmaker - Sat, 30 Apr 2022 23:09 UTC

Colin Ohba wrote:
>
> The Starmaker wrote:
>
> >> not true, it travels spherically. Even lasers travels in steradians,
> >> hence still spherically, and gets "lesser", or rather spread
> >> spherically. I wonder how it relates to photons.
> >
> > Stars, the origin of stars...whence they came from...the Stationary
> > Points in Space, had no curvature in space then.
>
> new to me. However, as EM you 2D integrate the amplitude over surface,
> which becomes weaker further away from the sources. However as photons,
> the probability amplitude *has_to* flattens and fall, further away from
> the source. I can't really interpret the later regarding the macro_scale.

it's new to you because I'm refering to...Before the big bang, whence
they came from, not After the big bang.

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
the unchallengeable.

Re: Stationary Points in Space

<626EDC5E.694B@ix.netcom.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=89552&group=sci.physics.relativity#89552

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity sci.physics
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!45.76.7.193.MISMATCH!3.us.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 01 May 2022 14:15:35 -0500
Message-ID: <626EDC5E.694B@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Sun, 01 May 2022 12:15:42 -0700
From: starma...@ix.netcom.com (The Starmaker)
Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com
Organization: The Starmaker Organization
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics
Subject: Re: Stationary Points in Space
References: <3faa5f61-b246-43ef-b007-50bc2fde89abn@googlegroups.com>
<7bb23deb-ed69-4097-a4ed-4f2874833186n@googlegroups.com>
<6aed40da-f50a-44e9-8877-c4f3f38a10b5n@googlegroups.com>
<518f40a2-4aec-4997-9994-7ced2ca594d2n@googlegroups.com>
<d26a7f2f-e852-4c27-a079-1cbf71a6f94bn@googlegroups.com>
<t45k6l$vct$1@dont-email.me>
<01557d6b-f05b-4e25-b4a0-813de82fe18dn@googlegroups.com>
<t48f1n$t6q$1@dont-email.me>
<bedd7694-e29d-48f8-9309-3f233aa31f02n@googlegroups.com>
<t498p3$jjk$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<6abf6960-ca5e-43ae-9b73-26e43d5304ean@googlegroups.com>
<gOadndLB_PUS5vD_nZ2dnUU7_8zNnZ2d@giganews.com> <pan$f14a6$f95bbb88$30947de7$ced81b49@gcftghsf.tk> <626DA924.6AE1@ix.netcom.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 220501-4, 05/01/2022), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Lines: 44
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 108.219.229.47
X-Trace: sv3-t3oacW2nXHhdCCiMSGMnd9CXOmhdm/CbuzMHvQGp5PvDPtsCd7dYK1nmO7gtd+JSLLgcbr1tMgxs4dU!yuDOqnANRPcIvmOwCbWdok+nyu8RQ4jo6HCNuB/77U3Cafecwa/Sw9wwe6BJr1r+Ued5UCEBMkYi!FWn+JD9wmus=
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2708
 by: The Starmaker - Sun, 1 May 2022 19:15 UTC

The Starmaker wrote:

>
> btw, the earth is the center of the universe.
>
> It is the focal point of the universe.

I understand it is a little differcult for yous to understand and see
the center of the universe...

Look at a woman..
Where is her Center? ..the focal point,
also known at the...entertainment center?

Where life comes from?

The center of a woman.

The only thing you focus on...

Now, where is the center of the universe?

Where is the focus of the universe?

It would have to be where chemical operations and activity are taking
place.

Where life is.

Now, where is the center of the universe?

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
the unchallengeable.

Re: Stationary Points in Space

<t4moeo$1mlo1$1@solani.org>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=89553&group=sci.physics.relativity#89553

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity sci.physics
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!reader5.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: clutterf...@gmail.com (Clutterfreak)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics
Subject: Re: Stationary Points in Space
Date: Sun, 1 May 2022 14:52:59 -0500
Message-ID: <t4moeo$1mlo1$1@solani.org>
References: <3faa5f61-b246-43ef-b007-50bc2fde89abn@googlegroups.com>
<7bb23deb-ed69-4097-a4ed-4f2874833186n@googlegroups.com>
<6aed40da-f50a-44e9-8877-c4f3f38a10b5n@googlegroups.com>
<518f40a2-4aec-4997-9994-7ced2ca594d2n@googlegroups.com>
<d26a7f2f-e852-4c27-a079-1cbf71a6f94bn@googlegroups.com>
<t45k6l$vct$1@dont-email.me>
<01557d6b-f05b-4e25-b4a0-813de82fe18dn@googlegroups.com>
<t48f1n$t6q$1@dont-email.me>
<bedd7694-e29d-48f8-9309-3f233aa31f02n@googlegroups.com>
<t498p3$jjk$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<6abf6960-ca5e-43ae-9b73-26e43d5304ean@googlegroups.com>
<gOadndLB_PUS5vD_nZ2dnUU7_8zNnZ2d@giganews.com>
<pan$f14a6$f95bbb88$30947de7$ced81b49@gcftghsf.tk>
<626DA924.6AE1@ix.netcom.com> <626EDC5E.694B@ix.netcom.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 1 May 2022 19:52:57 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: solani.org;
logging-data="1791745"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@news.solani.org"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/91.8.1
Cancel-Lock: sha1:UVaVkBMltlT+n67vzBk2hC75va8=
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 220501-4, 5/1/2022), Outbound message
In-Reply-To: <626EDC5E.694B@ix.netcom.com>
Content-Language: en-US
X-User-ID: eJwNyskNACEMBLCWkmUOKAcS0X8Jy9OSOZQqQxR4eVGk0eeh6PC+Pm9EZzlyrznObPQ36QQZUCy48u2tln449RR6
 by: Clutterfreak - Sun, 1 May 2022 19:52 UTC

On 5/1/2022 2:15 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> Now, where is the center of the universe?

What does the 1940s comic books say about it?

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

Pages:12345678
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.7
clearnet tor