Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

There are no data that cannot be plotted on a straight line if the axis are chosen correctly.


tech / sci.physics.relativity / Re: [SR] accelerated frames

SubjectAuthor
* [SR] accelerated framesRichard Hachel
+* Re: [SR] accelerated framesMaciej Wozniak
|`- Re: [SR] accelerated framesRichard Hachel
`- Re: [SR] accelerated framesJ. J. Lodder

1
[SR] accelerated frames

<3Vj-un5BB0IuJxtkvlcY2iCortI@jntp>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=89567&group=sci.physics.relativity#89567

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Path: i2pn2.org!rocksolid2!i2pn.org!paganini.bofh.team!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <3Vj-un5BB0IuJxtkvlcY2iCortI@jntp>
JNTP-Route: news2.nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: [SR] accelerated frames
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
JNTP-HashClient: QoSMz6utXKuOwo6qIVKgw9hbEqY
JNTP-ThreadID: Jb5BZ-sJ5Oo5mTSiN-DDXxkDlps
JNTP-Uri: http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=3Vj-un5BB0IuJxtkvlcY2iCortI@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/0.999a
JNTP-OriginServer: news2.nemoweb.net
Date: Sun, 01 May 22 23:16:34 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/100.0.4896.127 Safari/537.36
Injection-Info: news2.nemoweb.net; posting-host="c3e355931b5908111e85545d30f66607171993b2"; logging-data="2022-05-01T23:16:34Z/6858989"; posting-account="4@news2.nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="newsmaster@news2.nemoweb.net"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From: r.hac...@tiscali.fr (Richard Hachel)
 by: Richard Hachel - Sun, 1 May 2022 23:16 UTC

It's probably very surprising to say, and I know I'm not going to make
myself loved, neither by relativists nor by Newtonians, but I'm thinking
terribly about this: "And if the equation
∫ΔTr=∫ΔTo.sqrt(1-Vo²/c²)
which seems irrefutable to us were all just wrong in accelerated media?"
I say this very seriously.

R.H.

Re: [SR] accelerated frames

<2695a5d6-4083-4f63-9684-eedecaeaf27dn@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=89579&group=sci.physics.relativity#89579

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:648:b0:2f3:642d:c12a with SMTP id a8-20020a05622a064800b002f3642dc12amr9040375qtb.464.1651468866480;
Sun, 01 May 2022 22:21:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:4415:b0:69e:c048:dd87 with SMTP id
v21-20020a05620a441500b0069ec048dd87mr7500561qkp.0.1651468866330; Sun, 01 May
2022 22:21:06 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Date: Sun, 1 May 2022 22:21:06 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <3Vj-un5BB0IuJxtkvlcY2iCortI@jntp>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=89.206.14.16; posting-account=I3DWzAoAAACOmZUdDcZ-C0PqAZGVsbW0
NNTP-Posting-Host: 89.206.14.16
References: <3Vj-un5BB0IuJxtkvlcY2iCortI@jntp>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <2695a5d6-4083-4f63-9684-eedecaeaf27dn@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [SR] accelerated frames
From: maluwozn...@gmail.com (Maciej Wozniak)
Injection-Date: Mon, 02 May 2022 05:21:06 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lines: 11
 by: Maciej Wozniak - Mon, 2 May 2022 05:21 UTC

On Monday, 2 May 2022 at 01:16:37 UTC+2, Richard Hachel wrote:
> It's probably very surprising to say, and I know I'm not going to make
> myself loved, neither by relativists nor by Newtonians, but I'm thinking
> terribly about this: "And if the equation
> ∫ΔTr=∫ΔTo.sqrt(1-Vo²/c²)
> which seems irrefutable to us were all just wrong in accelerated media?"
> I say this very seriously.

While it seems irrefutable, sane people make clocks
measuring t'=t, like always.

Re: [SR] accelerated frames

<_pS_vcvmQhW5qLuQVZcJD11Y19E@jntp>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=89605&group=sci.physics.relativity#89605

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!paganini.bofh.team!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <_pS_vcvmQhW5qLuQVZcJD11Y19E@jntp>
JNTP-Route: news2.nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Re: [SR] accelerated frames
References: <3Vj-un5BB0IuJxtkvlcY2iCortI@jntp> <2695a5d6-4083-4f63-9684-eedecaeaf27dn@googlegroups.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
JNTP-HashClient: Um79CUAov7Tu_ifiYcZba-Xlyzk
JNTP-ThreadID: Jb5BZ-sJ5Oo5mTSiN-DDXxkDlps
JNTP-Uri: http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=_pS_vcvmQhW5qLuQVZcJD11Y19E@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/0.999a
JNTP-OriginServer: news2.nemoweb.net
Date: Mon, 02 May 22 15:22:16 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/100.0.4896.127 Safari/537.36
Injection-Info: news2.nemoweb.net; posting-host="b030aa27988bea438a9fd067d415676c38cb5b34"; logging-data="2022-05-02T15:22:16Z/6860964"; posting-account="4@news2.nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="newsmaster@news2.nemoweb.net"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From: r.hac...@tiscali.fr (Richard Hachel)
 by: Richard Hachel - Mon, 2 May 2022 15:22 UTC

Le 02/05/2022 à 07:21, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
> While it seems irrefutable, sane people make clocks
> measuring t'=t, like always.

According to you, if we send someone to 0.8c in space for 30 years, i.e.
v=240000km/s,
you do not agree that the traveler will not return until he is 18?

R.H.

Re: [SR] accelerated frames

<1prckze.1urqq689y7zcmN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=89619&group=sci.physics.relativity#89619

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: nos...@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: [SR] accelerated frames
Date: Mon, 2 May 2022 22:01:22 +0200
Organization: De Ster
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <1prckze.1urqq689y7zcmN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl>
References: <3Vj-un5BB0IuJxtkvlcY2iCortI@jntp>
Reply-To: jjlax32@xs4all.nl (J. J. Lodder)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="834b8e896ad52fb5c14a21fd1827db6f";
logging-data="31861"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19BM6yQ4q34GKF5T02zIFXrRRFlyQcAxbE="
User-Agent: MacSOUP/2.8.5 (ea919cf118) (Mac OS 10.10.5)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:hNvfq9bNMQnMTixtYhS9h0SbNrA=
 by: J. J. Lodder - Mon, 2 May 2022 20:01 UTC

Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> wrote:

> It's probably very surprising to say, and I know I'm not going to make
> myself loved, neither by relativists nor by Newtonians, but I'm thinking
> terribly about this: "And if the equation
> ∫?Tr=∫?To.sqrt(1-Vo?/c?)
> which seems irrefutable to us were all just wrong in accelerated media?"
> I say this very seriously.

If you would have been serious you would have written it in TeX,
(istead of in ? ? )

Jan

1
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.7
clearnet tor