In explaining the relativistic Doppler effect for light, at 6:09 in this video

https://youtu.be/MBuLTzj3CWA?t=369

Brian Greene derives the formula

𝛎_obs = 1/Δt' = γ(c-v)/λ

where 𝛎_obs is the frequency measured by the moving observer, γ is the Lorentz factor, c is the speed of the light relative to the stationary source, v is the speed at which the observer moves away from the source, and λ is the wavelength.

Accordingly, the speed of the light waves relative to the moving observer is

c' = λ(𝛎_obs) = γ(c-v),

in violation of Einstein's relativity.

See more here: https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

Pentcho Valev

The Albert Einstein Institute also disproves Einstein's relativity (unwittingly, of course):

Albert Einstein Institute: "Here is an animation of the receiver moving towards the source:

https://www.einstein-online.info/wp-content/uploads/SRT_Dopplereffekt_Pulse_4_%C2%A9_Daniela_Leitner_Markus_Poessel_Einstein-Online.gif

By observing the two indicator lights, you can see for yourself that, once more, there is a blue-shift - the pulse frequency measured at the receiver is somewhat higher than the frequency with which the pulses are sent out. This time, THE DISTANCES BETWEEN SUBSEQUENT PULSES ARE NOT AFFECTED, BUT STILL THERE IS A FREQUENCY SHIFT: As the receiver moves towards each pulse, the time until pulse and receiver meet up is shortened. In this particular animation, which has the receiver moving towards the source at one third the speed of the pulses themselves, four pulses are received in the time it takes the source to emit three pulses." http://www.einstein-online.info/spotlights/doppler.html

The proposition in capitals, combined with the formula

(frequency at receiver) = (speed of light relative to receiver)/(distance between subsequent pulses)

proves variable speed of light and disproves Einstein's relativity.

More here: https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

Pentcho Valev

"The velocity that this observer actually sees that wave travelling is equal to the velocity of the wave plus the velocity of the observer...The wavelength hasn't changed." https://youtu.be/UHpPsnJNKrk?t=91

Einsteinians, this is true for sound waves and wrong for light? The motion of the observer does not change the wavelength of sound but gloriously changes the wavelength of light? Only intense and universal crimestop can save Einstein's relativity:

George Orwell: "Crimestop means the faculty of stopping short, as though by instinct, at the threshold of any dangerous thought. It includes the power of not grasping analogies, of failing to perceive logical errors, of misunderstanding the simplest arguments if they are inimical to Ingsoc, and of being bored or repelled by any train of thought which is capable of leading in a heretical direction. Crimestop, in short, means protective stupidity."

See more: https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

Pentcho Valev