On Monday, February 21, 2022 at 11:51:52 AM UTC+11, John Doe wrote:
> I wonder if Bill thinks trolling USENET will help his cause.

It's not a delusion that I share with John Doe. Since John Doe is the troll here - though he seems think that what he does isn't trolling - he has got the concept backwards.

> Maybe the cannibal leftist loves losing.

There aren't any cannibal leftists. Even the most doctrinaire leftist knows that eating people is wrong.

John Doe is far enough to the right that he seems to think that 95% of the population is left-wing. About 95% of the population is saner than he is, so they don't share his right-wing delusions, but that doesn't make them all that left-wing.

John Doe is a doctrinaire rightist, and he doesn't know much, which leads him to make remarkably absurd claims. He's probably clinically insane - whence the enthusiasm for cannibalism - but it isn't something one can make a reliable judgement about based only on text-only messages.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

On Saturday, February 19, 2022 at 6:02:56 PM UTC-8, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
> On Sunday, February 20, 2022 at 12:35:32 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
> > On Saturday, February 19, 2022 at 5:26:13 PM UTC-8, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
> > > On Sunday, February 20, 2022 at 12:04:18 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
> > > > On Saturday, February 19, 2022 at 1:35:49 PM UTC-8, Flyguy wrote:
> > > > > On Saturday, February 19, 2022 at 1:25:29 PM UTC-8, whit3rd wrote:
> > > > > > On Saturday, February 19, 2022 at 11:41:47 AM UTC-8, Flyguy wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Translation of SNIPPERMAN's bullshit: "We tried for FOUR YEARS to find something on Trump and FAILED, and...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Huh? Two impeachments in four years is certainly 'something'.
> > > > > > He got his party voted out of power, that's the most important accomplishment of his political career.
> > > > >
> > > > > Correction: two FAILED impeachments, dude. Both were strictly political with NO EVIDENCE!
> > > >
> > > > Also, WHAT do you think is going to happen at the mid-terms? Lyin' Biden has presided over the most FAILED presidency in my lifetime. Presently, some THIRTY Dims have announced they are retiring rather than go down on Lyin' Biden's sinking ship.
> > >
> > > Flyguy seems to think that Trump's presidency was a success. He also thinks he knows what is going to happen at the mid-term election.
> > >
> > > He's a master of wishful thinking.
> >
> > Wanna bet, SNIPPERMAN? The Dims are setting the stage for a HISTORIC DEFEAT come November. The retirements are FACT, fool.
> Politicians retire all the time.
>
> https://www.npr.org/2021/12/09/1061182786/house-retirement-tracker-2022-congress-republicans-democrats
>
> Fourteen Republicans are also retiring. Particular Democrats may not like their chances in their particular electorate, but that doesn't say anything about which party is going to do well in the midterm elections.

Translation: "No - you are RIGHT and I wouldn't bet on the Dims on a DARE!"
>
> --
> Bill Sloman, Sydney

Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in news:4c4d58f7-
6691-4842-8131-337caf6b9962n@googlegroups.com:

> Right. YouTube has a really sophisticated audience.
>

Not about his stupid example, but YouTube can be argued to have
signifigantly more sophisticated users than ANY of the phone idiot
social media apps.

YouTube contains the entire swath of opinions.

So we get PBS a CSPAN and the history channel, and numerous science
based posters putting up content.

He cherry picks as stupid TrumpTards always do.

Turning one's back on all of the other social media outlets out
there, YouTube is by far the best, because it is not linear like
phone apps which throw crap in your face all the time. One can
choose the videos one wants to examine. And numerous news clips form
various sources are there, so one does not have to visit a site one
has no desire to visit.

History
Music
Medicine
Cosmology
all the good stuff.

Also includes flat Earter idiots, and Trump idiots as well, but I
do not view their content.

On Monday, February 21, 2022 at 3:05:36 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
> On Saturday, February 19, 2022 at 6:02:56 PM UTC-8, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
> > On Sunday, February 20, 2022 at 12:35:32 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
> > > On Saturday, February 19, 2022 at 5:26:13 PM UTC-8, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
> > > > On Sunday, February 20, 2022 at 12:04:18 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
> > > > > On Saturday, February 19, 2022 at 1:35:49 PM UTC-8, Flyguy wrote:
> > > > > > On Saturday, February 19, 2022 at 1:25:29 PM UTC-8, whit3rd wrote:
> > > > > > > On Saturday, February 19, 2022 at 11:41:47 AM UTC-8, Flyguy wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Translation of Sloman's bullshit: "We tried for FOUR YEARS to find something on Trump and FAILED, and...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Huh? Two impeachments in four years is certainly 'something'.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > He got his party voted out of power, that's the most important accomplishment of his political career.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Correction: two FAILED impeachments, dude. Both were strictly political with NO EVIDENCE!

None that Flyguy or the Congressional Republican Party were prepared to look at. They do deserve to have their noses rubbed in the evidence, but while you can take a horse's arse to evidence, you can't make him think.

> > > > > Also, WHAT do you think is going to happen at the mid-terms? Joe Biden has presided over the most FAILED presidency in my lifetime. Presently, some THIRTY Dims have announced they are retiring rather than go down on Joe Biden's sinking ship.
> > > >
> > > > Flyguy seems to think that Trump's presidency was a success. He also thinks he knows what is going to happen at the mid-term election.
> > > >
> > > > He's a master of wishful thinking.
> > >
> > > Wanna bet Sloman? The Demcrats are setting the stage for a HISTORIC DEFEAT come November. The retirements are FACT, fool.

But Flyguy is the kind of fool that thinks that a few retirements is a reliable predictor of the outcome of an up-coming election.

> > Politicians retire all the time.
> >
> > https://www.npr.org/2021/12/09/1061182786/house-retirement-tracker-2022-congress-republicans-democrats
> >
> > Fourteen Republicans are also retiring (and a few more got "retired" by the 2020 elections). Particular Democrats may not like their chances in their particular electorate, but that doesn't say anything about which party is going to do well in the midterm elections.
>
> Translation: "No - you are RIGHT and I wouldn't bet on the Democrats on a DARE!"

It's not so much a "translation" as a direct contradiction. Flyguy is too dim to realise that there's a difference.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

John Doe <always.look@message.header> wrote in
news:suvkq4$i1e$4@dont-email.me:

> DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:
>
>> YouTube contains the entire swath of opinions.
>
> Yes it does. Like lots more girls.
>
>> He cherry picks as stupid TrumpTards always do.
>
> Huh? Nothing to do with what I posted, but TDS infected Always
> Wrong needed a Trump jabbing fix.
>

Idiot. You made a comment about the commentors on a CNN report about
it. It most certainly was and is very Trump centric. Nice try though,
putz.

On Monday, February 21, 2022 at 5:40:29 AM UTC-8, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
> On Monday, February 21, 2022 at 8:08:31 PM UTC+11, John Doe wrote:
> > DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
> >
> > > YouTube contains the entire swath of opinions.
> > Yes it does. Like lots more girls.
> > > He cherry picks as stupid TrumpTards always do.
> >
> > Huh? Nothing to do with what I posted, but TDS infected Always Wrong needed a Trump jabbing fix.
> There's quite a lot wrong with everything that John Doe posts, and his mindless enthusiasms for Donald Trump is just one of his many problems.
> It is worth highlighting - it does put him in the same box as a number of our other resident idiots.

Your meaningless "right" wing insult is getting old. Everyone not agreeing with you is "right" wing. May be you are in the "wrong" wing.

On 2022/02/21 4:59 p.m., Anthony William Sloman wrote:
> On Tuesday, February 22, 2022 at 5:38:43 AM UTC+11, StupidAs StupidGet wrote:
>> On Monday, February 21, 2022 at 5:40:29 AM UTC-8, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
>>> On Monday, February 21, 2022 at 8:08:31 PM UTC+11, John Doe wrote:
>>>> DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> YouTube contains the entire swath of opinions.
>>>> Yes it does. Like lots more girls.
>>>>> He cherry picks as stupid TrumpTards always do.
>>>>
>>>> Huh? Nothing to do with what I posted, but TDS infected Always Wrong needed a Trump jabbing fix.
>>>
>>> There's quite a lot wrong with everything that John Doe posts, and his mindless enthusiasms for Donald Trump is just one of his many problems.
>>> It is worth highlighting - it does put him in the same box as a number of our other resident idiots.
>>
>> Your meaningless "right" wing insult is getting old. Everyone not agreeing with you is "right" wing. May be you are in the "wrong" wing.
>
> Don't be silly. Calling somebody right wing isn't necessarily an insult, and it says something quite specific about their political opinions, so it is anything but meaningless. I'm not in any particular "wing". I may look left wing to our more rabid enthusiasts for extreme right-wing political opinions, but there are equally rabid left-wingers around to whom I look timidly middle of the road. They don't post here, but they do exist.
>

And, if one is using the bird comparison - right wing AND left wing are
essential to level flight. They balance off each other...either wing, by
itself, plummets to their doom.

Conservatives need liberals, and liberals need conservatives, so life
can reach a balance of wants, needs, and what is possible.

John ;-#)#

John Robertson <spam@flippers.com> wrote in
news:v8SdnVWkw65x3on_nZ2dnUU7-dnNnZ2d@giganews.com:

>
> On 2022/02/21 4:59 p.m., Anthony William Sloman wrote:
>> On Tuesday, February 22, 2022 at 5:38:43 AM UTC+11, StupidAs
>> StupidGet wrote:
>>> On Monday, February 21, 2022 at 5:40:29 AM UTC-8,
>>> bill....@ieee.org wrote:
>>>> On Monday, February 21, 2022 at 8:08:31 PM UTC+11, John Doe
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> YouTube contains the entire swath of opinions.
>>>>> Yes it does. Like lots more girls.
>>>>>> He cherry picks as stupid TrumpTards always do.
>>>>>
>>>>> Huh? Nothing to do with what I posted, but TDS infected Always
>>>>> Wrong needed a Trump jabbing fix.
>>>>
>>>> There's quite a lot wrong with everything that John Doe posts,
>>>> and his mindless enthusiasms for Donald Trump is just one of
>>>> his many problems. It is worth highlighting - it does put him
>>>> in the same box as a number of our other resident idiots.
>>>
>>> Your meaningless "right" wing insult is getting old. Everyone
>>> not agreeing with you is "right" wing. May be you are in the
>>> "wrong" wing.
>>
>> Don't be silly. Calling somebody right wing isn't necessarily an
>> insult, and it says something quite specific about their
>> political opinions, so it is anything but meaningless. I'm not in
>> any particular "wing". I may look left wing to our more rabid
>> enthusiasts for extreme right-wing political opinions, but there
>> are equally rabid left-wingers around to whom I look timidly
>> middle of the road. They don't post here, but they do exist.
>>
>
> And, if one is using the bird comparison - right wing AND left
> wing are essential to level flight. They balance off each
> other...either wing, by itself, plummets to their doom.
>
> Conservatives need liberals, and liberals need conservatives, so
> life can reach a balance of wants, needs, and what is possible.
>
> John ;-#)#
>
+1 Oh, and plus one:

Well, those wings need a body with muscles to attach to and be
driven by.

We need a third party. The keel of the ship, as it were.

John Doe <always.look@message.header> wrote in
news:sv3kb9$fhd$3@dont-email.me:

> John Robertson wrote:
>
>> And, if one is using the bird comparison - right wing AND left
>> wing are essential to level flight. They balance off each
>> other...either wing, by itself, plummets to their doom.
>
> That's amusing. Perhaps it is in those terms' etymology.
>
>> Conservatives need liberals, and liberals need conservatives, so
>> life can reach a balance of wants, needs, and what is possible.
>
> Unless one is broken, then the bird crashes.
>
> Yes, we certainly do need at least two viable political parties.
>

I guess that leaves your whore mother out. She isn't viable and failed
to flush her worst mistake... you.

On 23.02.22 3:09, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
> On Wednesday, February 23, 2022 at 8:25:09 AM UTC+11, John Doe wrote:
>> John Robertson wrote:
>>
>>> And, if one is using the bird comparison - right wing AND left wing are
>>> essential to level flight. They balance off each other...either wing, by
>>> itself, plummets to their doom.
>> That's amusing. Perhaps it is in those terms' etymology.
>>> Conservatives need liberals, and liberals need conservatives, so life
>>> can reach a balance of wants, needs, and what is possible.
>> Unless one is broken, then the bird crashes.
>>
>> Yes, we certainly do need at least two viable political parties.
>
> The degeneration of the US Republican Party into the Trump Admiration Society has had a fatal impact on it's long term viability. Trump isn't going to live forever.
>
But the number of idiots is refreshed continuously.