It's time to zoom out a bit on censorship I think.

Mass shootings... Hmmm... video games... Hmmm...
Any conversation or analysis on this connection?
Nah.

Other genres nearby: Zombie Movies! Horror of course;
Good gravy gun slingers and bigger and better guns;
So freedom of expression is guaranteed in these departments while people of a serious nature who care to challenge the standing systems belief broadcasting network; whose controllers choose to remain hidden; all the while the masses are held down by a system of financial pressure and social programming. If we were to use a good dog slash bad dog metric would we find agreement accross the population? Globally? You should see the satellite dishes up in the hills of Guatemala. You should hear the selection on shortwave radio. I have a strong feeling as to who runs the show, but their choice to remain hidden and to make use of levels of indirection and insurrection leave me twiddling my thumbs.

That an exclusive belief system could be behind the levels of corruption and poor quality discussion that we face now I find entirely believable. As to where their nests are: such an exclusive bunch and we attack the one percent? What happens if we do some calculus here and interpose the 0.01 percent and as well let's go the other way and consider the ten percent...
something we can really sink our teeth into...

Hah. The bait that isn't fake... No, substantiating the hidden system is not going to happen here. Roughly though, and on this forum in particular, the ability to back-cast and agglomerate the truth does seem feasible. I guess I'd better cross post this to philosophy as well though. Does the mathematical mind give a damn about the corruption in the world about them? Is it obvious or is it hidden? That those who hold most highly to truth would care to overlook the signals of a system breaded in corruption; here I have your feet to the fire so to speak. Cold feet? Cold war? Um, I'm thinking the other side has some really good stuff we are definitely missing out on over here.

On Wednesday, February 9, 2022 at 6:49:49 PM UTC-5, Timothy Golden wrote:
> It's time to zoom out a bit on censorship I think.
>
> Mass shootings... Hmmm... video games... Hmmm...
> Any conversation or analysis on this connection?
> Nah.
>
> Other genres nearby: Zombie Movies! Horror of course;
> Good gravy gun slingers and bigger and better guns;
> So freedom of expression is guaranteed in these departments while people of a serious nature who care to challenge the standing systems belief broadcasting network; whose controllers choose to remain hidden; all the while the masses are held down by a system of financial pressure and social programming. If we were to use a good dog slash bad dog metric would we find agreement accross the population? Globally? You should see the satellite dishes up in the hills of Guatemala. You should hear the selection on shortwave radio. I have a strong feeling as to who runs the show, but their choice to remain hidden and to make use of levels of indirection and insurrection leave me twiddling my thumbs.
>
> That an exclusive belief system could be behind the levels of corruption and poor quality discussion that we face now I find entirely believable. As to where their nests are: such an exclusive bunch and we attack the one percent? What happens if we do some calculus here and interpose the 0.01 percent and as well let's go the other way and consider the ten percent...
> something we can really sink our teeth into...
>
> Hah. The bait that isn't fake... No, substantiating the hidden system is not going to happen here. Roughly though, and on this forum in particular, the ability to back-cast and agglomerate the truth does seem feasible. I guess I'd better cross post this to philosophy as well though. Does the mathematical mind give a damn about the corruption in the world about them? Is it obvious or is it hidden? That those who hold most highly to truth would care to overlook the signals of a system breaded in corruption; here I have your feet to the fire so to speak. Cold feet? Cold war? Um, I'm thinking the other side has some really good stuff we are definitely missing out on over here.

Strangest of all is as we live in the myth that were it false it would go detected.
I myself have uncovered false assumptions yet as I witness my interactions with others and their own abilities to see the argument or even reason with anything other than sheer mimicry... No; this is not quite true. Especially here on USENET we see the one sliver of the population that might be so open minded to discuss openings in mathematics yet we all go our own ways.

In this environment when mimicry wins then reason fails. Falsification versus failure; mimicry as success; Is this morlity in a nutshell? An empty space? Again, no. Squeak We Must!

On 2/9/2022 3:49 PM, Timothy Golden wrote:
> It's time to zoom out a bit on censorship I think.
>
> Mass shootings... Hmmm... video games... Hmmm...
> Any conversation or analysis on this connection?
> Nah.

Worng newsgruop idiot

On 2/9/2022 5:49 PM, Timothy Golden wrote:
> It's time to zoom out a bit on censorship I think.
>
> Mass shootings... Hmmm... video games... Hmmm...
> Any conversation or analysis on this connection?
> Nah.
>
> Other genres nearby: Zombie Movies! Horror of course;
> Good gravy gun slingers and bigger and better guns;
> So freedom of expression is guaranteed in these departments while people of a serious nature who care to challenge the standing systems belief broadcasting network; whose controllers choose to remain hidden; all the while the masses are held down by a system of financial pressure and social programming. If we were to use a good dog slash bad dog metric would we find agreement accross the population? Globally? You should see the satellite dishes up in the hills of Guatemala. You should hear the selection on shortwave radio. I have a strong feeling as to who runs the show, but their choice to remain hidden and to make use of levels of indirection and insurrection leave me twiddling my thumbs.
>
> That an exclusive belief system could be behind the levels of corruption and poor quality discussion that we face now I find entirely believable. As to where their nests are: such an exclusive bunch and we attack the one percent? What happens if we do some calculus here and interpose the 0.01 percent and as well let's go the other way and consider the ten percent...
> something we can really sink our teeth into...
>
> Hah. The bait that isn't fake... No, substantiating the hidden system is not going to happen here. Roughly though, and on this forum in particular, the ability to back-cast and agglomerate the truth does seem feasible. I guess I'd better cross post this to philosophy as well though. Does the mathematical mind give a damn about the corruption in the world about them? Is it obvious or is it hidden? That those who hold most highly to truth would care to overlook the signals of a system breaded in corruption; here I have your feet to the fire so to speak. Cold feet? Cold war? Um, I'm thinking the other side has some really good stuff we are definitely missing out on over here.

how many times did your bot change subjects above?

On Monday, February 14, 2022 at 11:39:10 AM UTC-5, sergio wrote:
> On 2/9/2022 5:49 PM, Timothy Golden wrote:
> > It's time to zoom out a bit on censorship I think.
> >
> > Mass shootings... Hmmm... video games... Hmmm...
> > Any conversation or analysis on this connection?
> > Nah.
> >
> > Other genres nearby: Zombie Movies! Horror of course;
> > Good gravy gun slingers and bigger and better guns;
> > So freedom of expression is guaranteed in these departments while people of a serious nature who care to challenge the standing systems belief broadcasting network; whose controllers choose to remain hidden; all the while the masses are held down by a system of financial pressure and social programming. If we were to use a good dog slash bad dog metric would we find agreement accross the population? Globally? You should see the satellite dishes up in the hills of Guatemala. You should hear the selection on shortwave radio. I have a strong feeling as to who runs the show, but their choice to remain hidden and to make use of levels of indirection and insurrection leave me twiddling my thumbs.
> >
> > That an exclusive belief system could be behind the levels of corruption and poor quality discussion that we face now I find entirely believable. As to where their nests are: such an exclusive bunch and we attack the one percent? What happens if we do some calculus here and interpose the 0.01 percent and as well let's go the other way and consider the ten percent...
> > something we can really sink our teeth into...
> >
> > Hah. The bait that isn't fake... No, substantiating the hidden system is not going to happen here. Roughly though, and on this forum in particular, the ability to back-cast and agglomerate the truth does seem feasible. I guess I'd better cross post this to philosophy as well though. Does the mathematical mind give a damn about the corruption in the world about them? Is it obvious or is it hidden? That those who hold most highly to truth would care to overlook the signals of a system breaded in corruption; here I have your feet to the fire so to speak. Cold feet? Cold war? Um, I'm thinking the other side has some really good stuff we are definitely missing out on over here.
> how many times did your bot change subjects above?

As one of the greatest mimics here I'll take your comment affirmatively.
Your own inability to process the thoughts as I've laid them out and offer your own analysis is indicative that the connections as I've laid them out could hold.

Cold feet?
Cold war?
Nah.

On Monday, February 14, 2022 at 9:55:13 AM UTC-5, Timothy Golden wrote:
> On Wednesday, February 9, 2022 at 6:49:49 PM UTC-5, Timothy Golden wrote:
> Strangest of all is as we live in the myth that were it false it would go detected.
> I myself have uncovered false assumptions yet as I witness my interactions with others and their own abilities to see the argument or even reason with anything other than sheer mimicry... No; this is not quite true. Especially here on USENET we see the one sliver of the population that might be so open minded to discuss openings in mathematics yet we all go our own ways.
>
> In this environment when mimicry wins then reason fails. Falsification versus failure; mimicry as success; Is this morlity in a nutshell? An empty space? Again, no. Squeak We Must!

Detection: should it be said that humans detect three dimensions?
Tell me then what three?
And how about time?
Does the mathematician give a damn?

Oh Yes They Do

On Tuesday, February 15, 2022 at 10:47:44 AM UTC-5, Timothy Golden wrote:
> On Monday, February 14, 2022 at 9:55:13 AM UTC-5, Timothy Golden wrote:
> > On Wednesday, February 9, 2022 at 6:49:49 PM UTC-5, Timothy Golden wrote:
> > Strangest of all is as we live in the myth that were it false it would go detected.
> > I myself have uncovered false assumptions yet as I witness my interactions with others and their own abilities to see the argument or even reason with anything other than sheer mimicry... No; this is not quite true. Especially here on USENET we see the one sliver of the population that might be so open minded to discuss openings in mathematics yet we all go our own ways.
> >
> > In this environment when mimicry wins then reason fails. Falsification versus failure; mimicry as success; Is this morlity in a nutshell? An empty space? Again, no. Squeak We Must!
> Detection: should it be said that humans detect three dimensions?
> Tell me then what three?

And of course here the notion of undetectable dimension should be filled out.
If there were say perfect balance or cancellation in some 'aspects' then we would have what is known as coherence or in phase existence. This is an extremely challenging notion to deal with particularly if it is unobservable. By definition here in this paragraph this is the case. Clearly this definition would have to be broken. Experimental evidence would have to be achieved. How does one take an out of phase position? This, as an observer, is the means by which we observe our three dimensional existence. Or at least a mapping this way should be produced if this theory were to muster. The introduction of time will have to be engaged a well, for a straight-edge or a rod is not forever straight.

> And how about time?
> Does the mathematician give a damn?
>
> Oh Yes They Do