Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

Computer programmers never die, they just get lost in the processing.


tech / sci.physics.relativity / Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'

SubjectAuthor
* New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Thomas Heger
+* Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Thomas Heger
|`- Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Darrel Angus
+* Crank Thomas Heger perseveresDono.
|`* Re: Crank Dontknow perversesThomas Heger
| +- Re: Crank Dontknow perversesDarrel Angus
| `* Re: Crank Dontknow perversesDono.
|  `- Re: Crank Dontknow perversesRichard Hachel
+- Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Odd Bodkin
+* Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Odd Bodkin
|`* Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Thomas Heger
| +* Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Michael Moroney
| |+* Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Thomas Heger
| ||+- Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Odd Bodkin
| ||+* Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Michael Moroney
| |||`* Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Thomas Heger
| ||| +- Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Odd Bodkin
| ||| `* Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Michael Moroney
| |||  `* Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Thomas Heger
| |||   `* Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Michael Moroney
| |||    `- Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Maciej Wozniak
| ||`* Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Mikko
| || +* Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
| || |`* Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Thomas Heger
| || | +* Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Python
| || | |+- Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Maciej Wozniak
| || | |`- Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Thomas Heger
| || | +* Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Odd Bodkin
| || | |`* Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Thomas Heger
| || | | +- Cretin Thomas Heger perseveresDono.
| || | | `* Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Odd Bodkin
| || | |  `* Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Thomas Heger
| || | |   `* Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Odd Bodkin
| || | |    `* Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Thomas Heger
| || | |     +- Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Odd Bodkin
| || | |     `* Crank Thomas Heger admits he's a foolDono.
| || | |      `- Re: Crank Do'no admits he's a foolThomas Heger
| || | `* Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Mikko
| || |  `* Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Thomas Heger
| || |   `* Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Mikko
| || |    +* Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Thomas Heger
| || |    |`* Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Odd Bodkin
| || |    | `* Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Thomas Heger
| || |    |  +* Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Odd Bodkin
| || |    |  |`* Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Thomas Heger
| || |    |  | `* Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Odd Bodkin
| || |    |  |  `* Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Thomas Heger
| || |    |  |   `* Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Odd Bodkin
| || |    |  |    `* Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Thomas Heger
| || |    |  |     +* Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Odd Bodkin
| || |    |  |     |`- Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Maciej Wozniak
| || |    |  |     `* Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Michael Moroney
| || |    |  |      +- Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Odd Bodkin
| || |    |  |      `* Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Thomas Heger
| || |    |  |       +* Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Michael Moroney
| || |    |  |       |+- Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Maciej Wozniak
| || |    |  |       |+- Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'J. J. Lodder
| || |    |  |       |`* Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Thomas Heger
| || |    |  |       | +* Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'J. J. Lodder
| || |    |  |       | |`* Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Thomas Heger
| || |    |  |       | | +* Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Paparios
| || |    |  |       | | |`* Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Thomas Heger
| || |    |  |       | | | +* Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Paparios
| || |    |  |       | | | |+- Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'J. J. Lodder
| || |    |  |       | | | |`* Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Thomas Heger
| || |    |  |       | | | | +* Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'J. J. Lodder
| || |    |  |       | | | | |`* Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Thomas Heger
| || |    |  |       | | | | | `* Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'J. J. Lodder
| || |    |  |       | | | | |  `* Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Michael Moroney
| || |    |  |       | | | | |   +* Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Paparios
| || |    |  |       | | | | |   |`* Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'J. J. Lodder
| || |    |  |       | | | | |   | `* Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Thomas Heger
| || |    |  |       | | | | |   |  +* Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Paul B. Andersen
| || |    |  |       | | | | |   |  |+- Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'J. J. Lodder
| || |    |  |       | | | | |   |  |+* Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Thomas Heger
| || |    |  |       | | | | |   |  ||+- Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Paul B. Andersen
| || |    |  |       | | | | |   |  ||+* Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Odd Bodkin
| || |    |  |       | | | | |   |  |||`* Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Thomas Heger
| || |    |  |       | | | | |   |  ||| +* Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Odd Bodkin
| || |    |  |       | | | | |   |  ||| |`* Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Thomas Heger
| || |    |  |       | | | | |   |  ||| | `* Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Odd Bodkin
| || |    |  |       | | | | |   |  ||| |  `* Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Thomas Heger
| || |    |  |       | | | | |   |  ||| |   `* Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Odd Bodkin
| || |    |  |       | | | | |   |  ||| |    `* Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Thomas Heger
| || |    |  |       | | | | |   |  ||| |     `* Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Odd Bodkin
| || |    |  |       | | | | |   |  ||| |      `* Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Thomas Heger
| || |    |  |       | | | | |   |  ||| |       `* Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Odd Bodkin
| || |    |  |       | | | | |   |  ||| |        `- Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Maciej Wozniak
| || |    |  |       | | | | |   |  ||| `- Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Paul B. Andersen
| || |    |  |       | | | | |   |  ||`* Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'J. J. Lodder
| || |    |  |       | | | | |   |  || `- Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Thomas Heger
| || |    |  |       | | | | |   |  |`* Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Prokaryotic Capase Homolog
| || |    |  |       | | | | |   |  | `* Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Thomas Heger
| || |    |  |       | | | | |   |  |  `* Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Paul B. Andersen
| || |    |  |       | | | | |   |  |   `* Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Thomas Heger
| || |    |  |       | | | | |   |  |    `* Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Paul B. Andersen
| || |    |  |       | | | | |   |  |     `* Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Thomas Heger
| || |    |  |       | | | | |   |  |      `* Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Paul B. Andersen
| || |    |  |       | | | | |   |  |       `* Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Thomas Heger
| || |    |  |       | | | | |   |  |        +- Nazi piece of shit Thomas Heger exposedDono.
| || |    |  |       | | | | |   |  |        `* Re: Nazi piece of shit Thomas Heger exposedThe Starmaker
| || |    |  |       | | | | |   |  +* Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'J. J. Lodder
| || |    |  |       | | | | |   |  `- Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Odd Bodkin
| || |    |  |       | | | | |   +- Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'J. J. Lodder
| || |    |  |       | | | | |   `* Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'JanPB
| || |    |  |       | | | | +- Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Python
| || |    |  |       | | | | +- Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Odd Bodkin
| || |    |  |       | | | | +- Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Michael Moroney
| || |    |  |       | | | | `- Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Maciej Wozniak
| || |    |  |       | | | `* Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Odd Bodkin
| || |    |  |       | | +- Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Dono.
| || |    |  |       | | +* Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Michael Moroney
| || |    |  |       | | `* Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'J. J. Lodder
| || |    |  |       | `* Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Michael Moroney
| || |    |  |       `- Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Odd Bodkin
| || |    |  `* Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Paparios
| || |    `* Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'JanPB
| || `- Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
| |`- Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Dono.
| +* Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Paul B. Andersen
| `- Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Odd Bodkin
+* Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'JanPB
`- Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'Mikko

Pages:123456789101112131415161718
Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'

<ja860sFk6U1@mid.individual.net>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=85947&group=sci.physics.relativity#85947

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!news.uzoreto.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: ttt_...@web.de (Thomas Heger)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2022 10:51:27 +0100
Lines: 35
Message-ID: <ja860sFk6U1@mid.individual.net>
References: <j6qfgnF506aU1@mid.individual.net> <jylWJ.77501$5u1.52269@fx13.ams4> <j906lqFgnk5U1@mid.individual.net> <1d7XJ.338097$8b1.172022@fx01.ams4> <j95o9mFii72U1@mid.individual.net> <j98atkF33riU1@mid.individual.net> <fDLXJ.247162$dS2.161815@fx11.ams4> <j9as1nFhvhhU1@mid.individual.net> <H9ZXJ.338935$2c1.141016@fx04.ams4> <j9dhovF39soU1@mid.individual.net> <I4iYJ.229489$833.30821@fx14.ams4> <j9f06lF4bguU1@mid.individual.net> <E8HYJ.174093$NCX1.145967@fx08.ams4> <j9ijcvFpfpjU1@mid.individual.net> <kxkZJ.431844$dS2.412920@fx11.ams4> <j9mssvFkgj5U1@mid.individual.net> <h9NZJ.332161$Sxe.325333@fx09.ams4> <j9qpdfFch4rU1@mid.individual.net> <1OYZJ.865289$2c1.108141@fx04.ams4> <j9s5ccFksgqU1@mid.individual.net> <Fnr_J.1511502$391.749939@fx05.ams4> <ja05jpFdphmU1@mid.individual.net> <RuC_J.896375$2c1.378872@fx04.ams4> <ja2mdeFsm0oU1@mid.individual.net> <CP__J.918529$2c1.595138@fx04.ams4> <ja5943FdgahU1@mid.individual.net> <98k%J.1563356$391.91006@fx05.ams4>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net 75PmrBkm2iIGCbWW4NJCnQV25YOiciczi8ZMrYO0qFWtX4k1Hi
Cancel-Lock: sha1:8KXat4LaFecfqQTIVgye+ejhmGA=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
In-Reply-To: <98k%J.1563356$391.91006@fx05.ams4>
 by: Thomas Heger - Sat, 26 Mar 2022 09:51 UTC

Am 25.03.2022 um 15:15 schrieb Paul B. Andersen:
>
>
> Den 25.03.2022 08:25, skrev Thomas Heger:
>>
>> I'm an engineer
>
> I don't believe you.
>
> No engineer can be so completely ignorant of elementary
> Newtonian mechanics, electrotechnics and maths as you are.
>
I'm not unaware of any of those topics. But there are different branches
in engineering and elctrotechnics was only a little side-topic for me.

I'm a hobbyist in electronics and can do a lot of stuff in this realm.
But to understand the meaning of Maxwell's equations was (unfortunately)
a relatively recent achievement for me.

I was actually quite good in math in school (one of the best in our
school) and won a little price.

But school is long ago and everything got a little 'rusty'.

In university I learned math, too, of course. But that was all quite a
lot in too little time, hence I forgot most.

Another influence was actually chemistry, which I was also interested in
school and a very good student. I had actually my own little laboratory
in the basement. In chemistry I have learned a lot about atoms, orbitals
and things like Schroedingers equation (at the age of 16).

TH

Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'

<7c98697c-8a13-47d5-9a9a-83941d89edcbn@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=85992&group=sci.physics.relativity#85992

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5889:0:b0:2e1:afa2:65a9 with SMTP id t9-20020ac85889000000b002e1afa265a9mr14595307qta.268.1648323011577;
Sat, 26 Mar 2022 12:30:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a37:48f:0:b0:67b:2755:310e with SMTP id
137-20020a37048f000000b0067b2755310emr11121137qke.470.1648323011353; Sat, 26
Mar 2022 12:30:11 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2022 12:30:11 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <98k%J.1563356$391.91006@fx05.ams4>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=205.154.192.197; posting-account=x2WXVAkAAACheXC-5ndnEdz_vL9CA75q
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.154.192.197
References: <j6qfgnF506aU1@mid.individual.net> <t08go6$1o8u$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<j8tlr9F1sotU1@mid.individual.net> <jylWJ.77501$5u1.52269@fx13.ams4>
<j906lqFgnk5U1@mid.individual.net> <1d7XJ.338097$8b1.172022@fx01.ams4>
<j95o9mFii72U1@mid.individual.net> <j98atkF33riU1@mid.individual.net>
<fDLXJ.247162$dS2.161815@fx11.ams4> <j9as1nFhvhhU1@mid.individual.net>
<H9ZXJ.338935$2c1.141016@fx04.ams4> <j9dhovF39soU1@mid.individual.net>
<I4iYJ.229489$833.30821@fx14.ams4> <j9f06lF4bguU1@mid.individual.net>
<E8HYJ.174093$NCX1.145967@fx08.ams4> <j9ijcvFpfpjU1@mid.individual.net>
<kxkZJ.431844$dS2.412920@fx11.ams4> <j9mssvFkgj5U1@mid.individual.net>
<h9NZJ.332161$Sxe.325333@fx09.ams4> <j9qpdfFch4rU1@mid.individual.net>
<1OYZJ.865289$2c1.108141@fx04.ams4> <j9s5ccFksgqU1@mid.individual.net>
<Fnr_J.1511502$391.749939@fx05.ams4> <ja05jpFdphmU1@mid.individual.net>
<RuC_J.896375$2c1.378872@fx04.ams4> <ja2mdeFsm0oU1@mid.individual.net>
<CP__J.918529$2c1.595138@fx04.ams4> <ja5943FdgahU1@mid.individual.net> <98k%J.1563356$391.91006@fx05.ams4>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <7c98697c-8a13-47d5-9a9a-83941d89edcbn@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'
From: r_delane...@yahoo.com (RichD)
Injection-Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2022 19:30:11 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 11
 by: RichD - Sat, 26 Mar 2022 19:30 UTC

On March 25, Paul B. Andersen wrote:
> No engineer can be so completely ignorant of elementary
> Newtonian mechanics, electrotechnics and maths as you are.

Ingenuity is possible sans math and book learning -

https://youtu.be/HZJAzkLyWG4

--
Rich

Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'

<t1nqc8$nhk$1@gioia.aioe.org>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=85994&group=sci.physics.relativity#85994

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!Uh3cGLv3BUP05xA/L7flqA.user.46.165.242.75.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: moro...@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2022 15:43:08 -0400
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <t1nqc8$nhk$1@gioia.aioe.org>
References: <j6qfgnF506aU1@mid.individual.net> <svq1vd$727$1@dont-email.me>
<j8du62F1bq9U1@mid.individual.net> <svti5l$47e$1@dont-email.me>
<j8hr7dFoasjU1@mid.individual.net> <t02167$pgn$1@dont-email.me>
<j8kjccF9sgdU1@mid.individual.net> <t053dk$f7l$1@dont-email.me>
<j8mufeFnlbbU1@mid.individual.net> <t05n0c$gnf$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<j8oc07F19itU1@mid.individual.net> <t073dd$1tq4$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<j8pr6cFa5n3U1@mid.individual.net> <t08go6$1o8u$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<j8tlr9F1sotU1@mid.individual.net> <jylWJ.77501$5u1.52269@fx13.ams4>
<j906lqFgnk5U1@mid.individual.net> <1d7XJ.338097$8b1.172022@fx01.ams4>
<j95o9mFii72U1@mid.individual.net> <8umXJ.159024$833.56678@fx14.ams4>
<j98i2hF4e9lU1@mid.individual.net> <t0nqe8$a7l$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<j9asrfFi43fU1@mid.individual.net> <t0qlb2$1999$2@gioia.aioe.org>
<j9telvFs7hqU1@mid.individual.net> <t1df7p$12dg$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<ja04ghFdj3cU1@mid.individual.net> <t1jgj1$h34$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<ja58ifFdcdbU1@mid.individual.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="24116"; posting-host="Uh3cGLv3BUP05xA/L7flqA.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org";
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/91.6.1
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
Content-Language: en-US
 by: Michael Moroney - Sat, 26 Mar 2022 19:43 UTC

On 3/25/2022 3:16 AM, Thomas Heger wrote:
> Am 25.03.2022 um 05:31 schrieb Michael Moroney:
>> On 3/23/2022 4:36 AM, Thomas Heger wrote:
>>> Am 22.03.2022 um 22:31 schrieb Michael Moroney:
>>>> On 3/22/2022 4:11 AM, Thomas Heger wrote:
>>>>> Am 15.03.2022 um 19:19 schrieb Michael Moroney:
>>>>>> On 3/15/2022 3:17 AM, Thomas Heger wrote:
>>>>>>> Am 14.03.2022 um 17:27 schrieb Michael Moroney:
>>>>>>>> Not a problem.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 1) The electron could be flying along in a straight line when at
>>>>>>>> t=0,
>>>>>>>> the (electro)magnetic field is switched on.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ??????
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That IS a VERY serious problem, because VERY large magnets (like
>>>>>>> in a
>>>>>>> synchroton), can take quite a while to build up a static magnetic
>>>>>>> field.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> And what does this have to do with the price of tea in China?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> It has something to do with your comment, that the magnet could be
>>>>> switched on, once the electron enters at t=0.
>>>>>
>>>>> I wanted to mention, that this is not possible, because a sharp
>>>>> steplike increase of the magnetic field strength in a magnet is
>>>>> impossible.
>>>>
>>>> And...?
>>>>
>>>> There are no electromagnets with a perfect step function response.
>>>
>>> But YOU wanted to switch the magnet one in that moment, when the
>>> electron passes by.
>>
>> No, YOU were whining that the electron wasn't going in a straight line
>> before it was measured. Despite the irrelevance of that, you kept
>> whining about it, so I offered that as a solution.  Instead, you found
>> *another* thing to whine about.
>
>
> I wrote my annotations from the perspective of a hypothetical professor,
> who treated the text in question as the homework of a student.

A *real* professor, on the other hand, wouldn't bother questioning
things that may be difficult or impossible to actually do with a problem
like that. As is evident in so many mechanics problems assuming
frictionless surfaces or air resistance.

> Now my aim was, to find every single error, whether important or not,
> even if it is a very small error.

A real professor doesn't consider such simplifications as an error.

> I also gave him the advise, to try something else than theoretical physics.

Your retarded hypothetical "professor" really is dumb.

Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'

<jablt6FkjkvU1@mid.individual.net>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=86037&group=sci.physics.relativity#86037

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!news.szaf.org!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: ttt_...@web.de (Thomas Heger)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2022 19:40:59 +0200
Lines: 66
Message-ID: <jablt6FkjkvU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <j6qfgnF506aU1@mid.individual.net> <j8du62F1bq9U1@mid.individual.net> <svti5l$47e$1@dont-email.me> <j8hr7dFoasjU1@mid.individual.net> <t02167$pgn$1@dont-email.me> <j8kjccF9sgdU1@mid.individual.net> <t053dk$f7l$1@dont-email.me> <j8mufeFnlbbU1@mid.individual.net> <t05n0c$gnf$1@gioia.aioe.org> <j8oc07F19itU1@mid.individual.net> <t073dd$1tq4$1@gioia.aioe.org> <j8pr6cFa5n3U1@mid.individual.net> <t08go6$1o8u$1@gioia.aioe.org> <j8tlr9F1sotU1@mid.individual.net> <jylWJ.77501$5u1.52269@fx13.ams4> <j906lqFgnk5U1@mid.individual.net> <1d7XJ.338097$8b1.172022@fx01.ams4> <j95o9mFii72U1@mid.individual.net> <8umXJ.159024$833.56678@fx14.ams4> <j98i2hF4e9lU1@mid.individual.net> <t0nqe8$a7l$1@gioia.aioe.org> <j9asrfFi43fU1@mid.individual.net> <t0qlb2$1999$2@gioia.aioe.org> <j9telvFs7hqU1@mid.individual.net> <t1df7p$12dg$1@gioia.aioe.org> <ja04ghFdj3cU1@mid.individual.net> <t1jgj1$h34$1@gioia.aioe.org> <ja58ifFdcdbU1@mid.individual.net> <t1nqc8$nhk$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net dReGjHvOQNz405WvhS2VGAsCdbZHiL2xwbGX9qG1KMctk/gVrN
Cancel-Lock: sha1:WcohowZMcUyHeEEgq1hTIJsP8sg=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
In-Reply-To: <t1nqc8$nhk$1@gioia.aioe.org>
 by: Thomas Heger - Sun, 27 Mar 2022 17:40 UTC

Am 26.03.2022 um 20:43 schrieb Michael Moroney:
> On 3/25/2022 3:16 AM, Thomas Heger wrote:
>> Am 25.03.2022 um 05:31 schrieb Michael Moroney:
>>> On 3/23/2022 4:36 AM, Thomas Heger wrote:
>>>> Am 22.03.2022 um 22:31 schrieb Michael Moroney:
>>>>> On 3/22/2022 4:11 AM, Thomas Heger wrote:
>>>>>> Am 15.03.2022 um 19:19 schrieb Michael Moroney:
>>>>>>> On 3/15/2022 3:17 AM, Thomas Heger wrote:
>>>>>>>> Am 14.03.2022 um 17:27 schrieb Michael Moroney:
>>>>>>>>> Not a problem.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 1) The electron could be flying along in a straight line when at
>>>>>>>>> t=0,
>>>>>>>>> the (electro)magnetic field is switched on.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ??????
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That IS a VERY serious problem, because VERY large magnets (like
>>>>>>>> in a
>>>>>>>> synchroton), can take quite a while to build up a static magnetic
>>>>>>>> field.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And what does this have to do with the price of tea in China?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It has something to do with your comment, that the magnet could be
>>>>>> switched on, once the electron enters at t=0.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I wanted to mention, that this is not possible, because a sharp
>>>>>> steplike increase of the magnetic field strength in a magnet is
>>>>>> impossible.
>>>>>
>>>>> And...?
>>>>>
>>>>> There are no electromagnets with a perfect step function response.
>>>>
>>>> But YOU wanted to switch the magnet one in that moment, when the
>>>> electron passes by.
>>>
>>> No, YOU were whining that the electron wasn't going in a straight line
>>> before it was measured. Despite the irrelevance of that, you kept
>>> whining about it, so I offered that as a solution. Instead, you found
>>> *another* thing to whine about.
>>
>>
>> I wrote my annotations from the perspective of a hypothetical
>> professor, who treated the text in question as the homework of a student.
>
> A *real* professor, on the other hand, wouldn't bother questioning
> things that may be difficult or impossible to actually do with a problem
> like that. As is evident in so many mechanics problems assuming
> frictionless surfaces or air resistance.

Sure, but still you missed the point, because it was not my aim to
immitate a real professor.

I pretended to be a professor, what is more like in a role play.

It is actually like this: if you would dress like superman, you
certainly won't try to fly.

....

TH

Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'

<h1e0K.821001$5u1.78079@fx13.ams4>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=86082&group=sci.physics.relativity#86082

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!news.uzoreto.com!news-out.netnews.com!news.alt.net!fdc2.netnews.com!peer02.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer02.ams4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx13.ams4.POSTED!not-for-mail
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/91.7.0
Subject: Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'
Content-Language: en-GB
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <j6qfgnF506aU1@mid.individual.net> <svti5l$47e$1@dont-email.me>
<j8hr7dFoasjU1@mid.individual.net> <t02167$pgn$1@dont-email.me>
<j8kjccF9sgdU1@mid.individual.net> <t053dk$f7l$1@dont-email.me>
<j8mufeFnlbbU1@mid.individual.net> <t05n0c$gnf$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<j8oc07F19itU1@mid.individual.net> <t073dd$1tq4$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<j8pr6cFa5n3U1@mid.individual.net> <t08go6$1o8u$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<j8tlr9F1sotU1@mid.individual.net> <jylWJ.77501$5u1.52269@fx13.ams4>
<j906lqFgnk5U1@mid.individual.net> <1d7XJ.338097$8b1.172022@fx01.ams4>
<j95o9mFii72U1@mid.individual.net> <8umXJ.159024$833.56678@fx14.ams4>
<j98i2hF4e9lU1@mid.individual.net> <t0nqe8$a7l$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<j9asrfFi43fU1@mid.individual.net> <t0qlb2$1999$2@gioia.aioe.org>
<j9telvFs7hqU1@mid.individual.net> <t1df7p$12dg$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<ja04ghFdj3cU1@mid.individual.net> <t1jgj1$h34$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<ja58ifFdcdbU1@mid.individual.net> <t1nqc8$nhk$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<jablt6FkjkvU1@mid.individual.net>
From: paul.b.a...@paulba.no (Paul B. Andersen)
In-Reply-To: <jablt6FkjkvU1@mid.individual.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <h1e0K.821001$5u1.78079@fx13.ams4>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@eweka.nl
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2022 08:07:41 UTC
Organization: Eweka Internet Services
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2022 10:07:41 +0200
X-Received-Bytes: 2130
 by: Paul B. Andersen - Mon, 28 Mar 2022 08:07 UTC

Den 27.03.2022 19:40, skrev Thomas Heger:

>
> I pretended to be a professor, what is more like in a role play.
>
> It is actually like this: if you would dress like superman, you
> certainly won't try to fly.
>
So you know how stupid your 'role play' is, but still do it?

--
Paul

https://paulba.no/

Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'

<t1rvjk$ana$1@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=86083&group=sci.physics.relativity#86083

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: mikko.le...@iki.fi (Mikko)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2022 12:36:52 +0300
Organization: -
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <t1rvjk$ana$1@dont-email.me>
References: <j6qfgnF506aU1@mid.individual.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="67f2c6d00a243583c8401aa16eef809b";
logging-data="10986"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/y0HlICQo3blJKMYuoq8HZ"
User-Agent: Unison/2.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:8bDl8SmSyVALkteTAhTcOrVgkKc=
 by: Mikko - Mon, 28 Mar 2022 09:36 UTC

On 2022-02-12 19:18:55 +0000, Thomas Heger said:

> after spending a lot of time on the subject and after rewriting most of
> my comments (at least a little), I would call my latest version now
> 'final'.
>
> The text 'On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies' as a pdf with my
> comments can be found here
>
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1IiF0r7Rl4eLEMLOyRorKke6iDwFpWvxl/view?usp=sharing
>

All your comments show something about you. Perhaps you should reconsider
how much of you you want to show in a public place.

Mikko

Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'

<t1sc27$17fo$2@gioia.aioe.org>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=86091&group=sci.physics.relativity#86091

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!Of0kprfJVVw2aVQefhvR6Q.user.46.165.242.75.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: bodkin...@gmail.com (Odd Bodkin)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2022 13:09:27 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <t1sc27$17fo$2@gioia.aioe.org>
References: <j8hr7dFoasjU1@mid.individual.net>
<t02167$pgn$1@dont-email.me>
<j8kjccF9sgdU1@mid.individual.net>
<t053dk$f7l$1@dont-email.me>
<j8mufeFnlbbU1@mid.individual.net>
<t05n0c$gnf$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<j8oc07F19itU1@mid.individual.net>
<t073dd$1tq4$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<j8pr6cFa5n3U1@mid.individual.net>
<t08go6$1o8u$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<j8tlr9F1sotU1@mid.individual.net>
<jylWJ.77501$5u1.52269@fx13.ams4>
<j906lqFgnk5U1@mid.individual.net>
<1d7XJ.338097$8b1.172022@fx01.ams4>
<j95o9mFii72U1@mid.individual.net>
<8umXJ.159024$833.56678@fx14.ams4>
<j98i2hF4e9lU1@mid.individual.net>
<t0nqe8$a7l$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<j9asrfFi43fU1@mid.individual.net>
<t0qlb2$1999$2@gioia.aioe.org>
<j9telvFs7hqU1@mid.individual.net>
<t1df7p$12dg$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<ja04ghFdj3cU1@mid.individual.net>
<t1jgj1$h34$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<ja58ifFdcdbU1@mid.individual.net>
<t1nqc8$nhk$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<jablt6FkjkvU1@mid.individual.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="40440"; posting-host="Of0kprfJVVw2aVQefhvR6Q.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org";
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPad)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:iz01Fm9oXZJ0ozUYZkhVkJBOWnc=
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
 by: Odd Bodkin - Mon, 28 Mar 2022 13:09 UTC

Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> wrote:
> Am 26.03.2022 um 20:43 schrieb Michael Moroney:
>> On 3/25/2022 3:16 AM, Thomas Heger wrote:
>>> Am 25.03.2022 um 05:31 schrieb Michael Moroney:
>>>> On 3/23/2022 4:36 AM, Thomas Heger wrote:
>>>>> Am 22.03.2022 um 22:31 schrieb Michael Moroney:
>>>>>> On 3/22/2022 4:11 AM, Thomas Heger wrote:
>>>>>>> Am 15.03.2022 um 19:19 schrieb Michael Moroney:
>>>>>>>> On 3/15/2022 3:17 AM, Thomas Heger wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Am 14.03.2022 um 17:27 schrieb Michael Moroney:
>>>>>>>>>> Not a problem.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 1) The electron could be flying along in a straight line when at
>>>>>>>>>> t=0,
>>>>>>>>>> the (electro)magnetic field is switched on.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ??????
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> That IS a VERY serious problem, because VERY large magnets (like
>>>>>>>>> in a
>>>>>>>>> synchroton), can take quite a while to build up a static magnetic
>>>>>>>>> field.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And what does this have to do with the price of tea in China?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It has something to do with your comment, that the magnet could be
>>>>>>> switched on, once the electron enters at t=0.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I wanted to mention, that this is not possible, because a sharp
>>>>>>> steplike increase of the magnetic field strength in a magnet is
>>>>>>> impossible.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And...?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There are no electromagnets with a perfect step function response.
>>>>>
>>>>> But YOU wanted to switch the magnet one in that moment, when the
>>>>> electron passes by.
>>>>
>>>> No, YOU were whining that the electron wasn't going in a straight line
>>>> before it was measured. Despite the irrelevance of that, you kept
>>>> whining about it, so I offered that as a solution. Instead, you found
>>>> *another* thing to whine about.
>>>
>>>
>>> I wrote my annotations from the perspective of a hypothetical
>>> professor, who treated the text in question as the homework of a student.
>>
>> A *real* professor, on the other hand, wouldn't bother questioning
>> things that may be difficult or impossible to actually do with a problem
>> like that. As is evident in so many mechanics problems assuming
>> frictionless surfaces or air resistance.
>
> Sure, but still you missed the point, because it was not my aim to
> immitate a real professor.
>
> I pretended to be a professor, what is more like in a role play.
>
> It is actually like this: if you would dress like superman, you
> certainly won't try to fly.

And if you dress up like a professor, then you’re certainly not going to
find any real mistakes.

>
> ...
>
>
> TH
>

--
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'

<jfr506Fc3soU1@mid.individual.net>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=91204&group=sci.physics.relativity#91204

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!news.szaf.org!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: ttt_...@web.de (Thomas Heger)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'
Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2022 08:51:55 +0200
Lines: 44
Message-ID: <jfr506Fc3soU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <j8hr7dFoasjU1@mid.individual.net> <t02167$pgn$1@dont-email.me> <j8kjccF9sgdU1@mid.individual.net> <t053dk$f7l$1@dont-email.me> <j8mufeFnlbbU1@mid.individual.net> <t05n0c$gnf$1@gioia.aioe.org> <j8oc07F19itU1@mid.individual.net> <t073dd$1tq4$1@gioia.aioe.org> <j8pr6cFa5n3U1@mid.individual.net> <t08go6$1o8u$1@gioia.aioe.org> <j8tlr9F1sotU1@mid.individual.net> <jylWJ.77501$5u1.52269@fx13.ams4> <j906lqFgnk5U1@mid.individual.net> <1d7XJ.338097$8b1.172022@fx01.ams4> <j95o9mFii72U1@mid.individual.net> <8umXJ.159024$833.56678@fx14.ams4> <j98i2hF4e9lU1@mid.individual.net> <t0nqe8$a7l$1@gioia.aioe.org> <j9asrfFi43fU1@mid.individual.net> <t0qlb2$1999$2@gioia.aioe.org> <j9telvFs7hqU1@mid.individual.net> <t1df7p$12dg$1@gioia.aioe.org> <ja04ghFdj3cU1@mid.individual.net> <t1jgj1$h34$1@gioia.aioe.org> <ja58ifFdcdbU1@mid.individual.net> <t1nqc8$nhk$1@gioia.aioe.org> <jablt6FkjkvU1@mid.individual.net> <t1sc27$17fo$2@gioia.aioe.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net ZUGJnS+0Wvf0MLvp4Lfdvwj/ao75vOc/eCyvM/Q7GJNfXUPhq4
Cancel-Lock: sha1:dZ9TMG2i0vweCtKVkakQlMRSrZc=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
In-Reply-To: <t1sc27$17fo$2@gioia.aioe.org>
 by: Thomas Heger - Thu, 2 Jun 2022 06:51 UTC

Am 28.03.2022 um 15:09 schrieb Odd Bodkin:

>>>> I wrote my annotations from the perspective of a hypothetical
>>>> professor, who treated the text in question as the homework of a student.
>>>
>>> A *real* professor, on the other hand, wouldn't bother questioning
>>> things that may be difficult or impossible to actually do with a problem
>>> like that. As is evident in so many mechanics problems assuming
>>> frictionless surfaces or air resistance.
>>
>> Sure, but still you missed the point, because it was not my aim to
>> immitate a real professor.
>>
>> I pretended to be a professor, what is more like in a role play.
>>
>> It is actually like this: if you would dress like superman, you
>> certainly won't try to fly.
>
> And if you dress up like a professor, then you’re certainly not going to
> find any real mistakes.

Of course I don't 'dress up like a professor', nor do I pretend to be one.

It is a ficticious background, like in a role play.

The role I play is that of a professor, who had to write corrections for
the homework of a student.

But a specific dress is not required.

The errors I find are all real, at least I meant my comments are about
real errors.

The method is actually a tool for self-education and works quite good,
while you apparently do not understand, how that method works.

The number of errors I found was just enormous, what came as a surprise
for me. But that's a different story.

TH

Pages:123456789101112131415161718
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.81
clearnet tor