Jews are the smartest conmen on the planet. You may believe that Donald Trump holds this dishonour, but in fact it was perfected by my Jewish ancestors thousands of years ago. They understood the benefit of repeating a lie over and over again.

"I'm not disputing that you can represent 1/3 as an infinitely long decimal
string 0.333.....

What I'm disputing is that you can produce an enumeration of the nodes of
your tree which will ever include that string. The fact that you've
got a representation for the real numbers does not imply that you've
got an enumeration of the real numbers. Your representation is
not enumerable." - Mark Chu Carroll

https://scienceblogs.com/goodmath/2010/02/04/so-remember-back-in

On the one hand, Carroll imagines that 0.333... is a *representation* and *enumeration* of some mythical infinite decimal string, but on the other hand tree nodes (which include "enumeration" since each node has a unique identifier) are NEITHER a representation NOR an enumeration. HA, HA, HA.

The Swiss idiot Leonhard Euler claimed that there exists an n such that 0 = 1/(3 x 10^n):

https://www.academia.edu/45001199/Mainstream_mathematics_professors_are_incorrigibly_stupid_creatures_who_cannot_be_corrected

Mainstream cranks smell this shit and smear it all over their faces.

You cannot win when arguing with cranks.

*A crank is one who cannot be convinced in the face of overwhelming evidence*

If you think that there are Jews who don't know the truth, think again! There are many who agree with me! Unfortunately, the majority are vile cowards and won't step forth because of reprisals.

Cantor was the father of ALL mainstream mathematical cranks.

https://youtu.be/hlqTuuhR3-4

On Saturday, 19 February 2022 at 07:52:36 UTC+2, Eram semper recta wrote:
> Jews are the smartest conmen on the planet. You may believe that Donald Trump holds this dishonour, but in fact it was perfected by my Jewish ancestors thousands of years ago. They understood the benefit of repeating a lie over and over again.
>
> "I'm not disputing that you can represent 1/3 as an infinitely long decimal
> string 0.333.....
>
> What I'm disputing is that you can produce an enumeration of the nodes of
> your tree which will ever include that string. The fact that you've
> got a representation for the real numbers does not imply that you've
> got an enumeration of the real numbers. Your representation is
> not enumerable." - Mark Chu Carroll
>
> https://scienceblogs.com/goodmath/2010/02/04/so-remember-back-in
>
> On the one hand, Carroll imagines that 0.333... is a *representation* and *enumeration* of some mythical infinite decimal string, but on the other hand tree nodes (which include "enumeration" since each node has a unique identifier) are NEITHER a representation NOR an enumeration. HA, HA, HA.
>
> The Swiss idiot Leonhard Euler claimed that there exists an n such that 0 = 1/(3 x 10^n):
>
> https://www.academia.edu/45001199/Mainstream_mathematics_professors_are_incorrigibly_stupid_creatures_who_cannot_be_corrected
>
> Mainstream cranks smell this shit and smear it all over their faces.
>
> You cannot win when arguing with cranks.
>
> *A crank is one who cannot be convinced in the face of overwhelming evidence*
>
> If you think that there are Jews who don't know the truth, think again! There are many who agree with me! Unfortunately, the majority are vile cowards and won't step forth because of reprisals.
>
> Cantor was the father of ALL mainstream mathematical cranks.
>
> https://youtu.be/hlqTuuhR3-4

How can any honest academic with a peanut brain claim otherwise? Even so, the baboons cling to these beliefs because the pile of shit mathematics they have formulated rests on these false premises.