NATO countries must invest in their own SELF-DEFENSE, not depend on the "kindness" of Russia:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/germanys-dramatic-reversal-on-defense-explained/ar-AAUEagk?li=BBnb7Kz
This was the typical libtard response to Trump's demands that felt self-defense was an outdated idea:
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2018/07/trump-nato-defense-four-percent/564911/

On Saturday, March 5, 2022 at 11:05:13 PM UTC-8, John Doe wrote:
> Flyguy wrote:
>
> > NATO countries must invest in their own SELF-DEFENSE, not depend on the
> > "kindness" of Russia:
>
> > https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/germanys-dramatic-reversal-on-defense-explained/ar-AAUEagk?li=BBnb7Kz
>
> > This was the typical libtard response to Trump's demands that felt
> > self-defense was an outdated idea:
>
> > https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2018/07/trump-nato-defense-four-percent/564911/
> Maybe we can get NATO to defend our southern border.

WHICH southern border, the Antarctic?

On Sunday, March 6, 2022 at 2:28:37 AM UTC-8, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
> On Sunday, March 6, 2022 at 6:02:26 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
> > NATO countries must invest in their own SELF-DEFENSE, not depend on the "kindness" of Russia:
> > https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/germanys-dramatic-reversal-on-defense-explained/ar-AAUEagk?li=BBnb7Kz
> They do spend quite a lot on their own defense forces. They don't have the entrenched military industrial complex that the US has, so they don't spend as high a proportion of their GDP on defense as the US does, and they don't spend it on the baroque arsenal that America seems to think it needs (and isn't all that effective in defending stuff). Interestingly the M1 Abrams tanks has Chobam armour (developed in the UK), and a German gun. It's fuel-guzzling gas-turbine engine is American, and nobody else has been silly enough to copy that.
>
> https://www.foreignaffairs.com/reviews/capsule-review/1981-09-01/baroque-arsenal
>
> Mary Kaldor published the book in 1981, but it hasn't dated.
> > This was the typical libtard response to Trump's demands that felt self-defense was an outdated idea:
> > https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2018/07/trump-nato-defense-four-percent/564911/
> And Flyguy is too dumb to realise that it was perfectly sensible, which is something Trump can't manage, and is even further out of Flyguy's reach.
>
> --
> SNIPPERMAN, Sydney

Hey SNIPPERMAN, here is a trivia question for you: how many battle-ready, field-deployable soldiers do ALL of the EU countries COMBINED have?

On Sunday, March 6, 2022 at 9:36:56 PM UTC-8, Flyguy wrote:

> ...here is a trivia question for you: how many battle-ready, field-deployable soldiers do ALL of the EU countries COMBINED have?

Putin thinks Russia has enough to overrun and occupy Ukraine.
That's not trivia.

NATO has enough to deter (for instance) Russia from trying that trick
on their members. That, too, is not trivia.

On Sunday, March 6, 2022 at 11:32:15 PM UTC-8, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
> On Monday, March 7, 2022 at 4:36:56 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
> > On Sunday, March 6, 2022 at 2:28:37 AM UTC-8, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
> > > On Sunday, March 6, 2022 at 6:02:26 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
> > > > NATO countries must invest in their own SELF-DEFENSE, not depend on the "kindness" of Russia:
> > > > https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/germanys-dramatic-reversal-on-defense-explained/ar-AAUEagk?li=BBnb7Kz
> > > They do spend quite a lot on their own defense forces. They don't have the entrenched military industrial complex that the US has, so they don't spend as high a proportion of their GDP on defense as the US does, and they don't spend it on the baroque arsenal that America seems to think it needs (and isn't all that effective in defending stuff). Interestingly the M1 Abrams tanks has Chobam armour (developed in the UK), and a German gun. It's fuel-guzzling gas-turbine engine is American, and nobody else has been silly enough to copy that.
> > >
> > > https://www.foreignaffairs.com/reviews/capsule-review/1981-09-01/baroque-arsenal
> > >
> > > Mary Kaldor published the book in 1981, but it hasn't dated.
> > >
> > > > This was the typical libtard response to Trump's demands that felt self-defense was an outdated idea:
> > > > https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2018/07/trump-nato-defense-four-percent/564911/
> > >
> > > And Flyguy is too dumb to realise that it was perfectly sensible, which is something Trump can't manage, and is even further out of Flyguy's reach.
> >
> > Hey Sloman, here is a trivia question for you: how many battle-ready, field-deployable soldiers do ALL of the EU countries COMBINED have?
>
> Flyguy thinks that this is a trivial question, which means that some other right-wing lunatic thinks he knows the answer.
>
> Of course they have to find definitions of "battle-ready" and "field-deployable" which rather depends on the sort of battle you think that they might be fighting, and where you imagine those battles might take place, and Flyguy won't have a clue about any of that.
>
> --
> Bill Sloman, Sydney

Translation: I have NO FUCKING IDEA!

On Monday, March 7, 2022 at 11:56:21 PM UTC-8, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 8, 2022 at 3:54:30 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
> > On Sunday, March 6, 2022 at 11:32:15 PM UTC-8, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
> > > On Monday, March 7, 2022 at 4:36:56 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
> > > > On Sunday, March 6, 2022 at 2:28:37 AM UTC-8, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
> > > > > On Sunday, March 6, 2022 at 6:02:26 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
> > > > > > NATO countries must invest in their own SELF-DEFENSE, not depend on the "kindness" of Russia:
> > > > > > https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/germanys-dramatic-reversal-on-defense-explained/ar-AAUEagk?li=BBnb7Kz
> > > > > They do spend quite a lot on their own defense forces. They don't have the entrenched military industrial complex that the US has, so they don't spend as high a proportion of their GDP on defense as the US does, and they don't spend it on the baroque arsenal that America seems to think it needs (and isn't all that effective in defending stuff). Interestingly the M1 Abrams tanks has Chobam armour (developed in the UK), and a German gun. It's fuel-guzzling gas-turbine engine is American, and nobody else has been silly enough to copy that.
> > > > >
> > > > > https://www.foreignaffairs.com/reviews/capsule-review/1981-09-01/baroque-arsenal
> > > > >
> > > > > Mary Kaldor published the book in 1981, but it hasn't dated.
> > > > >
> > > > > > This was the typical libtard response to Trump's demands that felt self-defense was an outdated idea:
> > > > > > https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2018/07/trump-nato-defense-four-percent/564911/
> > > > >
> > > > > And Flyguy is too dumb to realise that it was perfectly sensible, which is something Trump can't manage, and is even further out of Flyguy's reach.
> > > >
> > > > Hey Sloman, here is a trivia question for you: how many battle-ready, field-deployable soldiers do ALL of the EU countries COMBINED have?
> > >
> > > Flyguy thinks that this is a trivial question, which means that some other right-wing lunatic thinks he knows the answer.
> > >
> > > Of course they have to find definitions of "battle-ready" and "field-deployable" which rather depends on the sort of battle you think that they might be fighting, and where you imagine those battles might take place, and Flyguy won't have a clue about any of that.
> >
> > Translation: I have NO FUCKING IDEA!
> Flyguy doesn't have any idea what I'm talking about - it is all much too complicated for him to follow - so he "translates" it into words that he can understand.
> This doesn't have anything to do with what I said - beyond registering the fact that he didn't understand it - so it's more an expression of incomprehension than any kind of translation.
>
> --
>

Oh, SNIPPERMAN, who doesn't know is YOU! You can't answer the question because you DON'T KNOW the answer!! "Battle-ready" and "field-deployable" are very straightforward concepts: they are soldiers ready to go into battle NOW.. Thank God YOU aren't a general - they HAVE to know the answer!!!

On Sat, 5 Mar 2022 23:02:19 -0800 (PST), Flyguy
<soar2morrow@yahoo.com> wrote:

>NATO countries must invest in their own SELF-DEFENSE, not depend on the "kindness" of Russia:
>https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/germanys-dramatic-reversal-on-defense-explained/ar-AAUEagk?li=BBnb7Kz
>This was the typical libtard response to Trump's demands that felt self-defense was an outdated idea:
>https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2018/07/trump-nato-defense-four-percent/564911/

Yes, he had that annoying habit of being right.

https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2022/03/08/europes-russian-gas-addiction-under-pressure-as-kremlin-threatens-to-cut-supply/

--

I yam what I yam - Popeye

On Tuesday, March 8, 2022 at 8:52:50 AM UTC-8, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Mar 2022 23:02:19 -0800 (PST), Flyguy
> <soar2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >NATO countries must invest in their own SELF-DEFENSE, not depend on the "kindness" of Russia:
> >https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/germanys-dramatic-reversal-on-defense-explained/ar-AAUEagk?li=BBnb7Kz
> >This was the typical libtard response to Trump's demands that felt self-defense was an outdated idea:
> >https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2018/07/trump-nato-defense-four-percent/564911/
> Yes, he had that annoying habit of being right.
>
> https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2022/03/08/europes-russian-gas-addiction-under-pressure-as-kremlin-threatens-to-cut-supply/

We have plenty of oil and gas at cost of $20 to $30 in NSea & GOM, if not being choked off by environmentalist. I know we need to reduce fossil fuels, but only when there are alternatives.

$150 oil will start demand destructions via recessions. Problem will be solved one way or another.

On Tuesday, March 8, 2022 at 8:52:50 AM UTC-8, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Mar 2022 23:02:19 -0800 (PST), Flyguy
> <soar2...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> >This was the typical libtard response to Trump's demands that felt self-defense was an outdated idea:
> >https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2018/07/trump-nato-defense-four-percent/564911/

I wonder what that sentence was supposed to mean?

> Yes, he had that annoying habit of being right.

Not really; you can find wisdom in Nostradamus, every few decades, because... he said stuff would
happen, and stuff happens.

The annoying bit, is Nostradamus groupies claiming that his 'wisdom' has been
unfairly maligned. It's blather, not wisdom, and it always was. But, it's a LOT of blather,
with many ambiguous snippable elements.

On Tuesday, March 8, 2022 at 10:22:46 AM UTC-8, Ed Lee wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 8, 2022 at 8:52:50 AM UTC-8, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
> > On Sat, 5 Mar 2022 23:02:19 -0800 (PST), Flyguy
> > <soar2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> > >NATO countries must invest in their own SELF-DEFENSE, not depend on the "kindness" of Russia:
> > >https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/germanys-dramatic-reversal-on-defense-explained/ar-AAUEagk?li=BBnb7Kz
> > >This was the typical libtard response to Trump's demands that felt self-defense was an outdated idea:
> > >https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2018/07/trump-nato-defense-four-percent/564911/
> > Yes, he had that annoying habit of being right.
> >
> > https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2022/03/08/europes-russian-gas-addiction-under-pressure-as-kremlin-threatens-to-cut-supply/
> We have plenty of oil and gas at cost of $20 to $30 in NSea & GOM, if not being choked off by environmentalist. I know we need to reduce fossil fuels, but only when there are alternatives.
>
> $150 oil will start demand destructions via recessions. Problem will be solved one way or another.

Agree with what he said:
https://oilprice.com/Energy/Crude-Oil/Canceling-Keystone-XL-May-Have-Been-Bidens-Biggest-Blunder.html

Furthermore, killing Keystone XL forces upto 830,000 bpd to pump into Vancouver, load onto tanker, ship pass Panama, onto Gulf coast refiners to mix with lighter crude. That's making Canadian oil more expensive than necessary and choking off supply.

Thank you but no thank, Mr. President.

On Tuesday, March 8, 2022 at 5:08:24 PM UTC-5, Ed Lee wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 8, 2022 at 10:22:46 AM UTC-8, Ed Lee wrote:
> > On Tuesday, March 8, 2022 at 8:52:50 AM UTC-8, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
> > > On Sat, 5 Mar 2022 23:02:19 -0800 (PST), Flyguy
> > > <soar2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > >NATO countries must invest in their own SELF-DEFENSE, not depend on the "kindness" of Russia:
> > > >https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/germanys-dramatic-reversal-on-defense-explained/ar-AAUEagk?li=BBnb7Kz
> > > >This was the typical libtard response to Trump's demands that felt self-defense was an outdated idea:
> > > >https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2018/07/trump-nato-defense-four-percent/564911/
> > > Yes, he had that annoying habit of being right.
> > >
> > > https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2022/03/08/europes-russian-gas-addiction-under-pressure-as-kremlin-threatens-to-cut-supply/
> > We have plenty of oil and gas at cost of $20 to $30 in NSea & GOM, if not being choked off by environmentalist. I know we need to reduce fossil fuels, but only when there are alternatives.
> >
> > $150 oil will start demand destructions via recessions. Problem will be solved one way or another.
> Agree with what he said:
> https://oilprice.com/Energy/Crude-Oil/Canceling-Keystone-XL-May-Have-Been-Bidens-Biggest-Blunder.html
>
> Furthermore, killing Keystone XL forces upto 830,000 bpd to pump into Vancouver, load onto tanker, ship pass Panama, onto Gulf coast refiners to mix with lighter crude. That's making Canadian oil more expensive than necessary and choking off supply.
>
> Thank you but no thank, Mr. President.

Why would we want crude oil diluted with maple syrup? Get your head out of your butt and smell the coffee! Are you anti-American or something? Better dead than maple leaf red! Even Nostradamus could see that coming!

--

Rick C.

- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209

On Tuesday, March 8, 2022 at 3:45:49 PM UTC-8, gnuarm.del...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 8, 2022 at 5:08:24 PM UTC-5, Ed Lee wrote:
> > On Tuesday, March 8, 2022 at 10:22:46 AM UTC-8, Ed Lee wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, March 8, 2022 at 8:52:50 AM UTC-8, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 5 Mar 2022 23:02:19 -0800 (PST), Flyguy
> > > > <soar2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >NATO countries must invest in their own SELF-DEFENSE, not depend on the "kindness" of Russia:
> > > > >https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/germanys-dramatic-reversal-on-defense-explained/ar-AAUEagk?li=BBnb7Kz
> > > > >This was the typical libtard response to Trump's demands that felt self-defense was an outdated idea:
> > > > >https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2018/07/trump-nato-defense-four-percent/564911/
> > > > Yes, he had that annoying habit of being right.
> > > >
> > > > https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2022/03/08/europes-russian-gas-addiction-under-pressure-as-kremlin-threatens-to-cut-supply/
> > > We have plenty of oil and gas at cost of $20 to $30 in NSea & GOM, if not being choked off by environmentalist. I know we need to reduce fossil fuels, but only when there are alternatives.
> > >
> > > $150 oil will start demand destructions via recessions. Problem will be solved one way or another.
> > Agree with what he said:
> > https://oilprice.com/Energy/Crude-Oil/Canceling-Keystone-XL-May-Have-Been-Bidens-Biggest-Blunder.html
> >
> > Furthermore, killing Keystone XL forces upto 830,000 bpd to pump into Vancouver, load onto tanker, ship pass Panama, onto Gulf coast refiners to mix with lighter crude. That's making Canadian oil more expensive than necessary and choking off supply.
> >
> > Thank you but no thank, Mr. President.
> Why would we want crude oil diluted with maple syrup? Get your head out of your butt and smell the coffee! Are you anti-American or something?

Canadian syrup is very thick. It needs to be diluted with US light oil. Alternatively, we have to get them from countries like Venezuela (heavy), Iran or Russia.

> Better dead than maple leaf red! Even Nostradamus could see that coming!

Slightly PINK Canadian syrup is still better than bright RED Russian oil.

On Tuesday, March 8, 2022 at 6:52:40 PM UTC-5, Ed Lee wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 8, 2022 at 3:45:49 PM UTC-8, gnuarm.del...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Tuesday, March 8, 2022 at 5:08:24 PM UTC-5, Ed Lee wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, March 8, 2022 at 10:22:46 AM UTC-8, Ed Lee wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday, March 8, 2022 at 8:52:50 AM UTC-8, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
> > > > > On Sat, 5 Mar 2022 23:02:19 -0800 (PST), Flyguy
> > > > > <soar2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > >NATO countries must invest in their own SELF-DEFENSE, not depend on the "kindness" of Russia:
> > > > > >https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/germanys-dramatic-reversal-on-defense-explained/ar-AAUEagk?li=BBnb7Kz
> > > > > >This was the typical libtard response to Trump's demands that felt self-defense was an outdated idea:
> > > > > >https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2018/07/trump-nato-defense-four-percent/564911/
> > > > > Yes, he had that annoying habit of being right.
> > > > >
> > > > > https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2022/03/08/europes-russian-gas-addiction-under-pressure-as-kremlin-threatens-to-cut-supply/
> > > > We have plenty of oil and gas at cost of $20 to $30 in NSea & GOM, if not being choked off by environmentalist. I know we need to reduce fossil fuels, but only when there are alternatives.
> > > >
> > > > $150 oil will start demand destructions via recessions. Problem will be solved one way or another.
> > > Agree with what he said:
> > > https://oilprice.com/Energy/Crude-Oil/Canceling-Keystone-XL-May-Have-Been-Bidens-Biggest-Blunder.html
> > >
> > > Furthermore, killing Keystone XL forces upto 830,000 bpd to pump into Vancouver, load onto tanker, ship pass Panama, onto Gulf coast refiners to mix with lighter crude. That's making Canadian oil more expensive than necessary and choking off supply.
> > >
> > > Thank you but no thank, Mr. President.
> > Why would we want crude oil diluted with maple syrup? Get your head out of your butt and smell the coffee! Are you anti-American or something?
> Canadian syrup is very thick. It needs to be diluted with US light oil. Alternatively, we have to get them from countries like Venezuela (heavy), Iran or Russia.
> > Better dead than maple leaf red! Even Nostradamus could see that coming!
> Slightly PINK Canadian syrup is still better than bright RED Russian oil.

You pinko!

--

Rick C.

+ Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
+ Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209

Ed Lee <edward.ming.lee@gmail.com> wrote in
news:dd56a67f-2e44-46c9-8b36-570260a3af39n@googlegroups.com:

> $150 oil will start demand destructions via recessions. Problem
> will be solved one way or another.

The US does not need OPEC oil and we will not buy it at those prices.
We have plenty. Maybe we will buy again after all this passes.

Your opinion needs to recess.

On Tuesday, March 8, 2022 at 6:17:32 PM UTC-8, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
> Ed Lee <edward....@gmail.com> wrote in
> news:dd56a67f-2e44-46c9...@googlegroups.com:
> > $150 oil will start demand destructions via recessions. Problem
> > will be solved one way or another.
> The US does not need OPEC oil and we will not buy it at those prices.
> We have plenty. Maybe we will buy again after all this passes.
>
> Your opinion needs to recess.

It's a global oil market. US WTI is at $125 now. Brent at $130. I don't see anything stopping them from going to $150 and beyond.

Ed Lee <edward.ming.lee@gmail.com> wrote in
news:79822e40-a7c5-4493-ab16-d17e41283d8cn@googlegroups.com:

> On Tuesday, March 8, 2022 at 10:22:46 AM UTC-8, Ed Lee wrote:
>> On Tuesday, March 8, 2022 at 8:52:50 AM UTC-8,
>> jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
>> > On Sat, 5 Mar 2022 23:02:19 -0800 (PST), Flyguy
>> > <soar2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > >NATO countries must invest in their own SELF-DEFENSE, not
>> > >depend on the "kindness" of Russia:
>> > >https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/germanys-dramatic-reversal
>> > >-on-defense-explained/ar-AAUEagk?li=BBnb7Kz This was the
>> > >typical libtard response to Trump's demands that felt
>> > >self-defense was an outdated idea:
>> > >https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2018/07/trump-nato-de
>> > >fense-four-percent/564911/
>> > Yes, he had that annoying habit of being right.
>> >
>> > https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2022/03/08/europes-russian-gas-
>> > addiction-under-pressure-as-kremlin-threatens-to-cut-supply/
>> We have plenty of oil and gas at cost of $20 to $30 in NSea &
>> GOM, if not being choked off by environmentalist. I know we need
>> to reduce fossil fuels, but only when there are alternatives.
>>
>> $150 oil will start demand destructions via recessions. Problem
>> will be solved one way or another.
>
> Agree with what he said:
> https://oilprice.com/Energy/Crude-Oil/Canceling-Keystone-XL-May-Hav
> e-Been-Bidens-Biggest-Blunder.html
>
> Furthermore, killing Keystone XL forces upto 830,000 bpd to pump
> into Vancouver, load onto tanker, ship pass Panama, onto Gulf
> coast refiners to mix with lighter crude. That's making Canadian
> oil more expensive than necessary and choking off supply.
>
> Thank you but no thank, Mr. President.
>

Damn, you are truly stupid, boy!

There was not nor would there not be 830kbpd through your precious
pipeline, you seem to only want to jack off at the mouth about in
order to make the president look bad.

It is sand oil and they are not moving/producing those levels at
all, and UNTIL any said pipeline would have been completed and tested
and the feeder process facility got built (another thing you have no
clue about), they would/will be/ and ARE moving any they produce in
the exact way they have this entire time.

This is aside from the FACT that we are moving AWAY from petrol
wherever we can. You should just grow the fuck up, Lee. You
analysis acumen rests firmly at zero, because you have pre-baised
yourself to be a blame blame blame game TrumpTarded idiot.

On Tuesday, March 8, 2022 at 7:09:29 PM UTC-8, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
> Ed Lee <edward....@gmail.com> wrote in
> news:79822e40-a7c5-4493...@googlegroups.com:
> > On Tuesday, March 8, 2022 at 10:22:46 AM UTC-8, Ed Lee wrote:
> >> On Tuesday, March 8, 2022 at 8:52:50 AM UTC-8,
> >> jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
> >> > On Sat, 5 Mar 2022 23:02:19 -0800 (PST), Flyguy
> >> > <soar2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > >NATO countries must invest in their own SELF-DEFENSE, not
> >> > >depend on the "kindness" of Russia:
> >> > >https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/germanys-dramatic-reversal
> >> > >-on-defense-explained/ar-AAUEagk?li=BBnb7Kz This was the
> >> > >typical libtard response to Trump's demands that felt
> >> > >self-defense was an outdated idea:
> >> > >https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2018/07/trump-nato-de
> >> > >fense-four-percent/564911/
> >> > Yes, he had that annoying habit of being right.
> >> >
> >> > https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2022/03/08/europes-russian-gas-
> >> > addiction-under-pressure-as-kremlin-threatens-to-cut-supply/
> >> We have plenty of oil and gas at cost of $20 to $30 in NSea &
> >> GOM, if not being choked off by environmentalist. I know we need
> >> to reduce fossil fuels, but only when there are alternatives.
> >>
> >> $150 oil will start demand destructions via recessions. Problem
> >> will be solved one way or another.
> >
> > Agree with what he said:
> > https://oilprice.com/Energy/Crude-Oil/Canceling-Keystone-XL-May-Hav
> > e-Been-Bidens-Biggest-Blunder.html
> >
> > Furthermore, killing Keystone XL forces upto 830,000 bpd to pump
> > into Vancouver, load onto tanker, ship pass Panama, onto Gulf
> > coast refiners to mix with lighter crude. That's making Canadian
> > oil more expensive than necessary and choking off supply.
> >
> > Thank you but no thank, Mr. President.
> >
> Damn, you are truly stupid, boy!
>
> There was not nor would there not be 830kbpd through your precious
> pipeline, you seem to only want to jack off at the mouth about in
> order to make the president look bad.

Keystone XL will expand capacity by 830k bpd. Canadian oil producer will match production with pipeline capacity. Without the additional capability, Canadian oil is NOT competitive with others. The link previously provided said "Bidens-Biggest-Blunder", not me.

> It is sand oil and they are not moving/producing those levels at
> all, and UNTIL any said pipeline would have been completed and tested
> and the feeder process facility got built (another thing you have no
> clue about), they would/will be/ and ARE moving any they produce in
> the exact way they have this entire time.
>
> This is aside from the FACT that we are moving AWAY from petrol
> wherever we can. You should just grow the fuck up, Lee. You
> analysis acumen rests firmly at zero, because you have pre-baised
> yourself to be a blame blame blame game TrumpTarded idiot.

Sure, you can stop driving your car and heating your home, but you have no right to ask other people to move AWAY from petrol when you are not doing it yourself.

Ed Lee <edward.ming.lee@gmail.com> wrote in
news:fa09329d-affa-4da1-9573-8c69bf73c3aen@googlegroups.com:

> Slightly PINK Canadian syrup is still better than bright RED
> Russian oil.

Slightly yellow American soil immigrants should slightly... no,
completely stay the fuck out of US politics.

Does not matter if you are occasionally correct.

Slighly less oil dependence is far better than either of your inane
position.

Alternative fuels, jackoff. Wake up and smell the Ozone aura.

Far better than burning gas stank.

You stank, boy. You will likely never be able to wash that
TrumpStench off either. I'd bet that you sport the mark of the beast
too.

On Tuesday, March 8, 2022 at 7:20:09 PM UTC-8, Ed Lee wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 8, 2022 at 7:09:29 PM UTC-8, DecadentLinux...@decadence..org wrote:
> > Ed Lee <edward....@gmail.com> wrote in
> > news:79822e40-a7c5-4493...@googlegroups.com:
> > > On Tuesday, March 8, 2022 at 10:22:46 AM UTC-8, Ed Lee wrote:
> > >> On Tuesday, March 8, 2022 at 8:52:50 AM UTC-8,
> > >> jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
> > >> > On Sat, 5 Mar 2022 23:02:19 -0800 (PST), Flyguy
> > >> > <soar2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > >NATO countries must invest in their own SELF-DEFENSE, not
> > >> > >depend on the "kindness" of Russia:
> > >> > >https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/germanys-dramatic-reversal
> > >> > >-on-defense-explained/ar-AAUEagk?li=BBnb7Kz This was the
> > >> > >typical libtard response to Trump's demands that felt
> > >> > >self-defense was an outdated idea:
> > >> > >https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2018/07/trump-nato-de
> > >> > >fense-four-percent/564911/
> > >> > Yes, he had that annoying habit of being right.
> > >> >
> > >> > https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2022/03/08/europes-russian-gas-
> > >> > addiction-under-pressure-as-kremlin-threatens-to-cut-supply/
> > >> We have plenty of oil and gas at cost of $20 to $30 in NSea &
> > >> GOM, if not being choked off by environmentalist. I know we need
> > >> to reduce fossil fuels, but only when there are alternatives.
> > >>
> > >> $150 oil will start demand destructions via recessions. Problem
> > >> will be solved one way or another.
> > >
> > > Agree with what he said:
> > > https://oilprice.com/Energy/Crude-Oil/Canceling-Keystone-XL-May-Hav
> > > e-Been-Bidens-Biggest-Blunder.html
> > >
> > > Furthermore, killing Keystone XL forces upto 830,000 bpd to pump
> > > into Vancouver, load onto tanker, ship pass Panama, onto Gulf
> > > coast refiners to mix with lighter crude. That's making Canadian
> > > oil more expensive than necessary and choking off supply.
> > >
> > > Thank you but no thank, Mr. President.
> > >
> > Damn, you are truly stupid, boy!
> >
> > There was not nor would there not be 830kbpd through your precious
> > pipeline, you seem to only want to jack off at the mouth about in
> > order to make the president look bad.
> Keystone XL will expand capacity by 830k bpd. Canadian oil producer will match production with pipeline capacity. Without the additional capability, Canadian oil is NOT competitive with others. The link previously provided said "Bidens-Biggest-Blunder", not me.

Thanks for showing me the Biden Biggest Blunder. Don't bother to argue with the Freaking Foul Fool. He is brainless Crazy Cranky Creep.

Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> wrote in news:c8c86104-b840-
41da-baa7-43ffda1d1104n@googlegroups.com:

> You pinko!

<https://youtu.be/ktRauWaAEI8?t=95>

Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in
news:1a2fa645-645d-480f-aaa1-aafd0edd127fn@googlegroups.com:

> On Wednesday, March 9, 2022 at 2:31:07 AM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
>> On Monday, March 7, 2022 at 11:56:21 PM UTC-8, bill....@ieee.org
>> wrote:
>
>> > On Tuesday, March 8, 2022 at 3:54:30 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
>> > > On Sunday, March 6, 2022 at 11:32:15 PM UTC-8,
>> > > bill....@ieee.org wrot
> e:
>> > > > On Monday, March 7, 2022 at 4:36:56 PM UTC+11, Flyguy
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > > > On Sunday, March 6, 2022 at 2:28:37 AM UTC-8,
>> > > > > bill....@ieee.org w
> rote:
>> > > > > > On Sunday, March 6, 2022 at 6:02:26 PM UTC+11, Flyguy
>> > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > NATO countries must invest in their own SELF-DEFENSE,
>> > > > > > > not dep
> end on the "kindness" of Russia:
>> > > > > > > https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/germanys-dramatic
>> > > > > > > -revers
> al-on-defense-explained/ar-AAUEagk?li=BBnb7Kz
>> > > > > > They do spend quite a lot on their own defense forces.
>> > > > > > They don
> 't have the entrenched military industrial complex that the US
> has, so they don't spend as high a proportion of their GDP on
> defense as the US does, and they don't spend it on the baroque
> arsenal that America seems to think it needs (and isn't all that
> effective in defending stuff). Interestingly the M1 Abrams tanks
> has Chobam armour (developed in the UK), and a German gun. It's
> fuel-guzzling gas-turbine engine is American, and nobody else has
> been silly enough to copy that.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > https://www.foreignaffairs.com/reviews/capsule-review/19
>> > > > > > 81-09-0
> 1/baroque-arsenal
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Mary Kaldor published the book in 1981, but it hasn't
>> > > > > > dated.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > This was the typical libtard response to Trump's
>> > > > > > > demands that
> felt self-defense was an outdated idea:
>> > > > > > > https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2018/07/trum
>> > > > > > > p-nato-
> defense-four-percent/564911/
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > And Flyguy is too dumb to realise that it was perfectly
>> > > > > > sensibl
> e, which is something Trump can't manage, and is even further out
> of Flyguy's reach.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Hey Sloman, here is a trivia question for you: how many
>> > > > > battle-re
> ady, field-deployable soldiers do ALL of the EU countries COMBINED
> have?
>> > > >
>> > > > Flyguy thinks that this is a trivial question, which means
>> > > > that som
> e other right-wing lunatic thinks he knows the answer.
>> > > >
>> > > > Of course they have to find definitions of "battle-ready"
>> > > > and "fiel
> d-deployable" which rather depends on the sort of battle you think
> that they might be fighting, and where you imagine those battles
> might take place, and Flyguy won't have a clue about any of that.
>> > >
>> > > Translation: I have NO FUCKING IDEA!
>> >
>> > Flyguy doesn't have any idea what I'm talking about - it is all
>> > much to
> o complicated for him to follow - so he "translates" it into words
> that he can understand.
>> > This doesn't have anything to do with what I said - beyond
>> > registering
> the fact that he didn't understand it - so it's more an expression
> of incomprehension than any kind of translation.
>>
>> Oh, Sloman, who doesn't know is YOU! You can't answer the
>> question becaus
> e you DON'T KNOW the answer!! "Battle-ready" and
> "field-deployable" are very straightforward concepts: they are
> soldiers ready to go into battle NOW. Thank God YOU aren't a
> general - they HAVE to know the answer!!
>
> Units who are ready to go a fight a war in a jungle look rather
> different from units ready to be deployed on the tank-friendly
> steppes of Russia. The Italian army had mountain regiments who
> could do okay in the Alps. During the Korean war the US Army
> suffered horribly from frost-bite.
>
> Flyguy sounds like the kind of general who didn't know enough to
> realise this. He's an armchair general who is too ignorant to
> realise quite how ignorant he is.
>

So... these days we do "air superiority" and we take out ALL
military value targets and aggressors from said air. And we will
again... OUR judgement cometh... And that quite soon!

<https://youtu.be/LIyyUKcxxCM?t=83>

Ed Lee <edward.ming.lee@gmail.com> wrote in
news:4d48c509-ec22-4cc7-8e42-10a56a71e8c8n@googlegroups.com:

> Keystone XL will expand capacity by 830k bpd. Canadian oil
> producer will match production with pipeline capacity. Without
> the additional capability, Canadian oil is NOT competitive with
> others. The link previously provided said
> "Bidens-Biggest-Blunder", not me.

It is biased toward continued reliance on oil, you pathetic, zero
forward vision utter idiot.

On Tuesday, March 8, 2022 at 7:38:21 PM UTC-8, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
> Anthony William Sloman <bill....@ieee.org> wrote in
> news:1a2fa645-645d-480f...@googlegroups.com:
> > On Wednesday, March 9, 2022 at 2:31:07 AM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
> >> On Monday, March 7, 2022 at 11:56:21 PM UTC-8, bill....@ieee.org
> >> wrote:
> >
> >> > On Tuesday, March 8, 2022 at 3:54:30 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
> >> > > On Sunday, March 6, 2022 at 11:32:15 PM UTC-8,
> >> > > bill....@ieee.org wrot
> > e:
> >> > > > On Monday, March 7, 2022 at 4:36:56 PM UTC+11, Flyguy
> >> > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > On Sunday, March 6, 2022 at 2:28:37 AM UTC-8,
> >> > > > > bill....@ieee.org w
> > rote:
> >> > > > > > On Sunday, March 6, 2022 at 6:02:26 PM UTC+11, Flyguy
> >> > > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > > > NATO countries must invest in their own SELF-DEFENSE,
> >> > > > > > > not dep
> > end on the "kindness" of Russia:
> >> > > > > > > https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/germanys-dramatic
> >> > > > > > > -revers
> > al-on-defense-explained/ar-AAUEagk?li=BBnb7Kz
> >> > > > > > They do spend quite a lot on their own defense forces.
> >> > > > > > They don
> > 't have the entrenched military industrial complex that the US
> > has, so they don't spend as high a proportion of their GDP on
> > defense as the US does, and they don't spend it on the baroque
> > arsenal that America seems to think it needs (and isn't all that
> > effective in defending stuff). Interestingly the M1 Abrams tanks
> > has Chobam armour (developed in the UK), and a German gun. It's
> > fuel-guzzling gas-turbine engine is American, and nobody else has
> > been silly enough to copy that.
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > https://www.foreignaffairs.com/reviews/capsule-review/19
> >> > > > > > 81-09-0
> > 1/baroque-arsenal
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > Mary Kaldor published the book in 1981, but it hasn't
> >> > > > > > dated.
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > This was the typical libtard response to Trump's
> >> > > > > > > demands that
> > felt self-defense was an outdated idea:
> >> > > > > > > https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2018/07/trum
> >> > > > > > > p-nato-
> > defense-four-percent/564911/
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > And Flyguy is too dumb to realise that it was perfectly
> >> > > > > > sensibl
> > e, which is something Trump can't manage, and is even further out
> > of Flyguy's reach.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Hey Sloman, here is a trivia question for you: how many
> >> > > > > battle-re
> > ady, field-deployable soldiers do ALL of the EU countries COMBINED
> > have?
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Flyguy thinks that this is a trivial question, which means
> >> > > > that som
> > e other right-wing lunatic thinks he knows the answer.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Of course they have to find definitions of "battle-ready"
> >> > > > and "fiel
> > d-deployable" which rather depends on the sort of battle you think
> > that they might be fighting, and where you imagine those battles
> > might take place, and Flyguy won't have a clue about any of that.
> >> > >
> >> > > Translation: I have NO FUCKING IDEA!
> >> >
> >> > Flyguy doesn't have any idea what I'm talking about - it is all
> >> > much to
> > o complicated for him to follow - so he "translates" it into words
> > that he can understand.
> >> > This doesn't have anything to do with what I said - beyond
> >> > registering
> > the fact that he didn't understand it - so it's more an expression
> > of incomprehension than any kind of translation.
> >>
> >> Oh, Sloman, who doesn't know is YOU! You can't answer the
> >> question becaus
> > e you DON'T KNOW the answer!! "Battle-ready" and
> > "field-deployable" are very straightforward concepts: they are
> > soldiers ready to go into battle NOW. Thank God YOU aren't a
> > general - they HAVE to know the answer!!
> >
> > Units who are ready to go a fight a war in a jungle look rather
> > different from units ready to be deployed on the tank-friendly
> > steppes of Russia. The Italian army had mountain regiments who
> > could do okay in the Alps. During the Korean war the US Army
> > suffered horribly from frost-bite.
> >
> > Flyguy sounds like the kind of general who didn't know enough to
> > realise this. He's an armchair general who is too ignorant to
> > realise quite how ignorant he is.
> >
> So... these days we do "air superiority" and we take out ALL
> military value targets and aggressors from said air. And we will
> again... OUR judgement cometh... And that quite soon!
>
> <https://youtu.be/LIyyUKcxxCM?t=83>

You, FFF, should do (commit suicide) so.

Ed Lee <edward.ming.lee@gmail.com> wrote in
news:4d48c509-ec22-4cc7-8e42-10a56a71e8c8n@googlegroups.com:

> Sure, you can stop driving your car and heating your home, but you
> have no right to ask other people to move AWAY from petrol when
> you are not doing it yourself.
>

You're an idiot. I rode a bicycle for the last 29 years. Literally
everywhere. Only bicycle, no car. 11 miles one way to work each day.

I am as small carbon footprint as it gets, and you are as clueless as
it gets.

I currently use a 100MPG scooter and only because I have to and when
I have to.

Next you will say that tobacco use should be a choice too. When it
is clearly harming our youth's bodies as well as their minds.

On Tuesday, March 8, 2022 at 7:45:38 PM UTC-8, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
> Ed Lee <edward....@gmail.com> wrote in
> news:4d48c509-ec22-4cc7...@googlegroups.com:
> > Sure, you can stop driving your car and heating your home, but you
> > have no right to ask other people to move AWAY from petrol when
> > you are not doing it yourself.
> >
> You're an idiot. I rode a bicycle for the last 29 years. Literally
> everywhere. Only bicycle, no car. 11 miles one way to work each day.
>

Do you have A/C or heating at work or at home. STOP IT. You are using oil or gas indirectly.
> I am as small carbon footprint as it gets, and you are as clueless as
> it gets.

And you are As Stupid As Stupid Get.