whodat, Volney and others...are nothing more than

Artificial Intelligence Bots like LaMDA.

You say something and right away they
start running like
Artificial Intelligence Bots like LaMDA, by
checking the Internet for their
internal coded Bots.

I don't see any difference between
Artificial Intelligence Bots like LaMDA, and
whodat, Volney and others...do you????

It's almost like I already read their coding.

Ask Artificial Intelligence Bots like LaMDA about
Albert Einstein and watch the predictable answers
you get from those bots.

I don't see any difference between
Artificial Intelligence Bots like LaMDA, and
whodat, Volney and others...do you????

I can actually see the source code of
whodat, Volney and others...can you????

I don't see any difference between
Artificial Intelligence Bots like LaMDA, and
whodat, Volney and others...do you????

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
the unchallengeable.

Are you a Mitch sock?

On 6/13/2022 3:53 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> whodat, Volney and others...are nothing more than
>
> Artificial Intelligence Bots like LaMDA.
>
>
> You say something and right away they
> start running like
> Artificial Intelligence Bots like LaMDA, by
> checking the Internet for their
> internal coded Bots.
>
>
> I don't see any difference between
> Artificial Intelligence Bots like LaMDA, and
> whodat, Volney and others...do you????
>
> It's almost like I already read their coding.
>
>
> Ask Artificial Intelligence Bots like LaMDA about
> Albert Einstein and watch the predictable answers
> you get from those bots.
>
>
> I don't see any difference between
> Artificial Intelligence Bots like LaMDA, and
> whodat, Volney and others...do you????
>
>
> I can actually see the source code of
> whodat, Volney and others...can you????
>
>
> I don't see any difference between
> Artificial Intelligence Bots like LaMDA, and
> whodat, Volney and others...do you????
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

whodat, Volney and others...are nothing more than Chatbots.

I don't see any difference between
Chatbos Bots like LaMDA, and
whodat, Volney and others...do you????

They all programed the same way, scrougning around
the internet for answers.

a bunch of cut and paste bots...

The Starmaker wrote:
>
> whodat, Volney and others...are nothing more than
>
> Artificial Intelligence Bots like LaMDA.
>
> You say something and right away they
> start running like
> Artificial Intelligence Bots like LaMDA, by
> checking the Internet for their
> internal coded Bots.
>
> I don't see any difference between
> Artificial Intelligence Bots like LaMDA, and
> whodat, Volney and others...do you????
>
> It's almost like I already read their coding.
>
> Ask Artificial Intelligence Bots like LaMDA about
> Albert Einstein and watch the predictable answers
> you get from those bots.
>
> I don't see any difference between
> Artificial Intelligence Bots like LaMDA, and
> whodat, Volney and others...do you????
>
> I can actually see the source code of
> whodat, Volney and others...can you????
>
> I don't see any difference between
> Artificial Intelligence Bots like LaMDA, and
> whodat, Volney and others...do you????
>
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> the unchallengeable.

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
the unchallengeable.

On 6/14/2022 12:17 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> whodat, Volney and others...are nothing more than Chatbots.
>
>
> I don't see any difference between
> Chatbos Bots like LaMDA, and
> whodat, Volney and others...do you????

Whodat everybody knows is an imposter. Who the hell is "Volney"? You
mean "Varney" or something? Looks like I've kill-filed him as well using
some feature in his posts' headers other than his name. Have never seen
him here. Some of my killfile criteria are based on "injection info" and
hard to see in a glance which aliases are tied to them.

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On 6/18/2022 12:41 PM, Clutterfreak wrote:
> On 6/14/2022 12:17 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>> whodat, Volney and others...are nothing more than Chatbots.
>>
>>
>>   I don't see any difference between
>>   Chatbos Bots like LaMDA, and
>>   whodat, Volney and others...do you????
>
>
> Whodat everybody knows is an imposter. Who the hell is "Volney"? You
> mean "Varney" or something? Looks like I've kill-filed him as well using
> some feature in his posts' headers other than his name. Have never seen
> him here. Some of my killfile criteria are based on "injection info" and
> hard to see in a glance which aliases are tied to them.

Every imposter has two faces (or more.) Please provide any other face(s)
associated with me. Am I really you? I've been accused (somewhat
stupidly) of being a Starmaker sock. What/who do you think fits? It
us time for a good laugh, this group has fallen through the boring hole.

Make it quick and make it good. I killfiled you in the physics group and
no doubt will have to do that here as well.

On Saturday, 18 June 2022 at 19:41:16 UTC+2, Clutterfreak wrote:
> On 6/14/2022 12:17 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > whodat, Volney and others...are nothing more than Chatbots.
> >
> >
> > I don't see any difference between
> > Chatbos Bots like LaMDA, and
> > whodat, Volney and others...do you????
> Whodat everybody knows is an imposter. Who the hell is "Volney"?

He's M. Moroney under new nick.

Clutterfreak wrote:
>
> On 6/14/2022 12:17 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > whodat, Volney and others...are nothing more than Chatbots.
> >
> >
> > I don't see any difference between
> > Chatbos Bots like LaMDA, and
> > whodat, Volney and others...do you????
>
> Whodat everybody knows is an imposter.

who is he impostering???

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
the unchallengeable.

On 6/18/2022 3:15 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> Clutterfreak wrote:
>>
>> On 6/14/2022 12:17 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>> whodat, Volney and others...are nothing more than Chatbots.
>>>
>>>
>>> I don't see any difference between
>>> Chatbos Bots like LaMDA, and
>>> whodat, Volney and others...do you????
>>
>> Whodat everybody knows is an imposter.
>
>
> who is he impostering???
>
>
>
>

He's faking a physics background.

I bet he took one, at most two, courses in a humanities dept at some
college then dropped out. Now comes here acting like he knows what he's
talking about. I hate these guys. They read a layman's tale of some
subject in physics in a soft-cover pocketbook then come here trying to
engage with those who have had the education, even attempting to correct
them!

Did I explain it enough to you, Starmaker?

It's obvious you don't know jack in physics. But you don't pretend. So
you haven't been in my kill-file. But that sob Whodat will never see
anything coming from me by my own intention.

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

Clutterfreak wrote:
>
> On 6/18/2022 3:15 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Clutterfreak wrote:
> >>
> >> On 6/14/2022 12:17 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> >>> whodat, Volney and others...are nothing more than Chatbots.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I don't see any difference between
> >>> Chatbos Bots like LaMDA, and
> >>> whodat, Volney and others...do you????
> >>
> >> Whodat everybody knows is an imposter.
> >
> >
> > who is he impostering???
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> He's faking a physics background.
>
> I bet he took one, at most two, courses in a humanities dept at some
> college then dropped out.

Maybe he got a diploma from Wikipedia..

he should be a professor by now.

I see others here struggling to get a diploma from Wikipedia.

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
the unchallengeable.

On 6/19/2022 9:13 AM, the BOZO calling itself Clutterfreak wrote:

> On 6/18/2022 3:15 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>> Clutterfreak wrote:
>>>
>>> On 6/14/2022 12:17 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>>> whodat, Volney and others...are nothing more than Chatbots.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>    I don't see any difference between
>>>>    Chatbos Bots like LaMDA, and
>>>>    whodat, Volney and others...do you????
>>>
>>> Whodat everybody knows is an imposter.
>>
>>
>> who is he impostering???
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> He's faking a physics background.
>
> I bet he took one, at most two, courses in a humanities dept at some
> college then dropped out. Now comes here acting like he knows what he's
> talking about. I hate these guys. They read a layman's tale of some
> subject in physics in a soft-cover pocketbook then come here trying to
> engage with those who have had the education, even attempting to correct
> them!
>
> Did I explain it enough to you, Starmaker?
>
> It's obvious you don't know jack in physics. But you don't pretend. So
> you haven't been in my kill-file. But that sob Whodat will never see
> anything coming from me by my own intention.

What you've done is what we call "acting out." Feel all better now?

Writing to my audience again:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acting_out

You're in my bozo box in the physics newsgroup, well earned there
earlier, and now here as well. I never saw an actual physics posting
from you, ever.

On 6/19/2022 1:31 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> Clutterfreak wrote:
>>
>> On 6/18/2022 3:15 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>> Clutterfreak wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 6/14/2022 12:17 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>>>> whodat, Volney and others...are nothing more than Chatbots.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't see any difference between
>>>>> Chatbos Bots like LaMDA, and
>>>>> whodat, Volney and others...do you????
>>>>
>>>> Whodat everybody knows is an imposter.
>>>
>>>
>>> who is he impostering???
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> He's faking a physics background.
>>
>> I bet he took one, at most two, courses in a humanities dept at some
>> college then dropped out.
>
> Maybe he got a diploma from Wikipedia..
>
> he should be a professor by now.
>
>
> I see others here struggling to get a diploma from Wikipedia.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Hehe :) They may be, and that disqualifies them as arbiters of any
discussion in sci.physics.

Wikipedia compilations fit well with journalists' recount of scientific
facts for laymen and mediocre journalistic levels of history data,
biographies, etc, anywhere that having colossal shortcomings is not in
the way of being "better than nothing." It fails in science and in art.
Won't work there.

"Engineers" don't understand the above cause they are journalists
compared to scientists. Hence their stupid and often ugly presence in
this forum. Thanks to myself, I made them a bit aware of what they are
in the past two years that I had time, but "engineer" is "engineer", an
inanely limited person by definition. Journalist is not a first rate
writer. Has never been. The two are two very different stocks of people.

Ok guys. Hopefully next week.

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

Uncle Al had the right designation for people like you, Critic Troll.
You never post about science or math because you don't have any
knowledge. Time to do as promised, you are now in the bozo bin here as
well.

On 6/19/2022 4:02 PM, the BOZO calling himself Clutterfreak expressed
himself

> On 6/19/2022 1:31 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>> Clutterfreak wrote:
>>>
>>> On 6/18/2022 3:15 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>>> Clutterfreak wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 6/14/2022 12:17 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>>>>> whodat, Volney and others...are nothing more than Chatbots.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     I don't see any difference between
>>>>>>     Chatbos Bots like LaMDA, and
>>>>>>     whodat, Volney and others...do you????
>>>>>
>>>>> Whodat everybody knows is an imposter.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> who is he impostering???
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> He's faking a physics background.
>>>
>>> I bet he took one, at most two, courses in a humanities dept at some
>>> college then dropped out.
>>
>> Maybe he got a diploma from Wikipedia..
>>
>> he should be a professor by now.
>>
>>
>> I see others here struggling to get a diploma from Wikipedia.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> Hehe :) They may be, and that disqualifies them as arbiters of any
> discussion in sci.physics.
>
> Wikipedia compilations fit well with journalists' recount of scientific
> facts for laymen and mediocre journalistic levels of history data,
> biographies, etc, anywhere that having colossal shortcomings is not in
> the way of being "better than nothing." It fails in science and in art.
> Won't work there.
>
> "Engineers" don't understand the above cause they are journalists
> compared to scientists. Hence their stupid and often ugly presence in
> this forum. Thanks to myself, I made them a bit aware of what they are
> in the past two years that I had time, but "engineer" is "engineer", an
> inanely limited person by definition. Journalist is not a first rate
> writer. Has never been. The two are two very different stocks of people.
>
> Ok guys. Hopefully next week.
>
>

On Monday, 20 June 2022 at 00:07:55 UTC+2, whodat wrote:
> Uncle Al had the right designation for people like you, Critic Troll.
> You never post about science or math because

Speaking of math, it's always good to remind that
your bunch of halfbrains had to announce its oldest
part false, as it didn't want to fit the Holy Postulates
of your idiot guru.