On 6/30/2022 3:20 PM, Toy Funaki wrote:
> mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> if galaxies are moving away from each other they have no absolute rest
>> and that's forever...

What if space is growing/increasing between galaxies and the galaxies
are not moving apart?

[...]

On Thursday, June 30, 2022 at 8:53:03 PM UTC-3, whodat wrote:
> On 6/30/2022 3:20 PM, Toy Funaki wrote:
> > mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> >> if galaxies are moving away from each other they have no absolute rest
> >> and that's forever...
>
> What if space is growing/increasing between galaxies and the galaxies
> are not moving apart?
>
> [...]

Space has no substance or physical properties. It's vacuum!

When the CRETIN fucked the concept of spatial representation invented by René Descartes (Cartesian coordinates system),
brainwashing generations of lesser minds making them believe that gravity bend and twist that genial CONCEPTION, he also
fucked with your mind, obviously.

Space is absolute vacuum and, as such, can't modify the Cartesian representation, because HAS NOT A SINGLE PHYSICAL PROPERTY!

Get over it and will stop having wet dreams, relativist.

On Friday, 1 July 2022 at 01:53:03 UTC+2, whodat wrote:
> On 6/30/2022 3:20 PM, Toy Funaki wrote:
> > mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> >> if galaxies are moving away from each other they have no absolute rest
> >> and that's forever...
>
> What if space is growing/increasing between galaxies and the galaxies
> are not moving apart?

What if? An idiot is mumbling, that's all.

On 6/30/2022 7:06 PM, Richard Hertz wrote:
> On Thursday, June 30, 2022 at 8:53:03 PM UTC-3, whodat wrote:
>> On 6/30/2022 3:20 PM, Toy Funaki wrote:
>>> mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>>> if galaxies are moving away from each other they have no absolute rest
>>>> and that's forever...
>>
>> What if space is growing/increasing between galaxies and the galaxies
>> are not moving apart?
>>
>> [...]
>
> Space has no substance or physical properties. It's vacuum!
>
> When the CRETIN fucked the concept of spatial representation invented by René Descartes (Cartesian coordinates system),
> brainwashing generations of lesser minds making them believe that gravity bend and twist that genial CONCEPTION, he also
> fucked with your mind, obviously.
>
> Space is absolute vacuum and, as such, can't modify the Cartesian representation, because HAS NOT A SINGLE PHYSICAL PROPERTY!
>
> Get over it and will stop having wet dreams, relativist.

If what you believe about "space" is completely true, why can't it grow
as I suggested above. What determines whether there is, per your ideas,
more or less nothing between galaxies?

On Friday, 1 July 2022 at 14:56:01 UTC+2, whodat wrote:
> On 6/30/2022 7:06 PM, Richard Hertz wrote:
> > On Thursday, June 30, 2022 at 8:53:03 PM UTC-3, whodat wrote:
> >> On 6/30/2022 3:20 PM, Toy Funaki wrote:
> >>> mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> if galaxies are moving away from each other they have no absolute rest
> >>>> and that's forever...
> >>
> >> What if space is growing/increasing between galaxies and the galaxies
> >> are not moving apart?
> >>
> >> [...]
> >
> > Space has no substance or physical properties. It's vacuum!
> >
> > When the CRETIN fucked the concept of spatial representation invented by René Descartes (Cartesian coordinates system),
> > brainwashing generations of lesser minds making them believe that gravity bend and twist that genial CONCEPTION, he also
> > fucked with your mind, obviously.
> >
> > Space is absolute vacuum and, as such, can't modify the Cartesian representation, because HAS NOT A SINGLE PHYSICAL PROPERTY!
> >
> > Get over it and will stop having wet dreams, relativist.
> If what you believe about "space" is completely true, why can't it grow
> as I suggested above. What determines whether there is, per your ideas,
> more or less nothing between galaxies?

It's the definition of movement, speed, velocity and
so, poor halfbrain. If the distance is growing - there
is movement.
Of course, modern physicists are far too dumb to
keep the consistency with their definitions; nothing
surprising that you're not exceptional.

On Thursday, June 30, 2022 at 8:06:09 PM UTC-4, Richard Hertz wrote:
> On Thursday, June 30, 2022 at 8:53:03 PM UTC-3, whodat wrote:
> > On 6/30/2022 3:20 PM, Toy Funaki wrote:
> > > mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> > >
> > >> if galaxies are moving away from each other they have no absolute rest
> > >> and that's forever...
> >
> > What if space is growing/increasing between galaxies and the galaxies
> > are not moving apart?
> >
> > [...]
> Space has no substance or physical properties. It's vacuum!
>
> When the CRETIN fucked the concept of spatial representation invented by René Descartes (Cartesian coordinates system),
> brainwashing generations of lesser minds making them believe that gravity bend and twist that genial CONCEPTION, he also
> fucked with your mind, obviously.
>
> Space is absolute vacuum and, as such, can't modify the Cartesian representation, because HAS NOT A SINGLE PHYSICAL PROPERTY!

I disagree. Space transits light obeying the inverse square law........that's a property of space.
>
> Get over it and will stop having wet dreams, relativist.

On 7/1/2022 8:38 AM, Ken Seto wrote:
> On Thursday, June 30, 2022 at 8:06:09 PM UTC-4, Richard Hertz wrote:
>> On Thursday, June 30, 2022 at 8:53:03 PM UTC-3, whodat wrote:
>>> On 6/30/2022 3:20 PM, Toy Funaki wrote:
>>>> mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> if galaxies are moving away from each other they have no absolute rest
>>>>> and that's forever...
>>>
>>> What if space is growing/increasing between galaxies and the galaxies
>>> are not moving apart?
>>>
>>> [...]
>> Space has no substance or physical properties. It's vacuum!
>>
>> When the CRETIN fucked the concept of spatial representation invented by René Descartes (Cartesian coordinates system),
>> brainwashing generations of lesser minds making them believe that gravity bend and twist that genial CONCEPTION, he also
>> fucked with your mind, obviously.
>>
>> Space is absolute vacuum and, as such, can't modify the Cartesian representation, because HAS NOT A SINGLE PHYSICAL PROPERTY!
>
> I disagree. Space transits light obeying the inverse square law........that's a property of space.

And since there is distance between galaxies filled with space, that
distance is a property of space, not of the galaxies.

>> Get over it and will stop having wet dreams, relativist.

I did actually have one wet dream in my life, as a teenager. The girl's
name was Elaine. Are you hung up about wet dreams?

On 7/1/2022 7:55 AM, whodat wrote:
> On 6/30/2022 7:06 PM, Richard Hertz wrote:
>> On Thursday, June 30, 2022 at 8:53:03 PM UTC-3, whodat wrote:
>>> On 6/30/2022 3:20 PM, Toy Funaki wrote:
>>>> mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> if galaxies are moving away from each other they have no absolute rest
>>>>> and that's forever...
>>>
>>> What if space is growing/increasing between galaxies and the galaxies
>>> are not moving apart?
>>>
>>> [...]
>>
>> Space has no substance or physical properties. It's vacuum!
>>
>> When the CRETIN fucked the concept of spatial representation invented
>> by René Descartes (Cartesian coordinates system),
>> brainwashing generations of lesser minds making them believe that
>> gravity bend and twist that genial CONCEPTION, he also
>> fucked with your mind, obviously.
>>
>> Space is absolute vacuum and, as such, can't modify the Cartesian
>> representation, because HAS NOT A SINGLE PHYSICAL PROPERTY!
>>
>> Get over it and will stop having wet dreams, relativist.
>
> If what you believe about "space" is completely true, why can't it grow
> as I suggested above.  What determines whether there is, per your ideas,
> more or less nothing between galaxies?

I see you're done with your thesis and apparently have no supporting
thoughts or experimental data supporting it. That's not a science
discussion then. So why bring it up here at all? Too bad.

On Thursday, June 30, 2022 at 4:53:03 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote:
> On 6/30/2022 3:20 PM, Toy Funaki wrote:
> > mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> >> if galaxies are moving away from each other they have no absolute rest
> >> and that's forever...
>
> What if space is growing/increasing between galaxies and the galaxies
> are not moving apart?
>
> [...]

That does not disprove perpetual motion by the No absolute rest principle.

Mitchell Raemsch

On Thursday, June 30, 2022 at 5:06:09 PM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote:

> Get over it and will stop having wet dreams, relativist.

What if I enjoy my wet dreams?