From Google, "Definitions fro Oxford Languages"

 How long before Googles deletes these definitions?

 Female
 Noun
an adult female human being.

 Woman
adjective
of or denoting the sex that can bear offspring or produce eggs,
distinguished biologically by the production of gametes (ova)
which can be fertilized by male gametes.

                           Mikek

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On 3/25/2022 9:07 AM, amdx wrote:
> From Google, "Definitions fro Oxford Languages"
>
>  How long before Googles deletes these definitions?
>
>  Female
>  Noun

Something that run away when she see you coming

On 3/25/2022 11:22 AM, John Doe wrote:
> bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
>
>> amdx wrote:
>
>>> From Google, "Definitions fro Oxford Languages"
>>>
>>> How long before Googles deletes these definitions?
>>>
>>> Female
>>> Noun
>>
>> Something that run away when she see you coming
>
> Because he's wielding that nasty SCIENCE thing!
>
> We will see. Let's see if women in fact don't do anything about transgender
> bullies beating up on girls in sports. That is a huge question.

Definitely an issue that really connects with the real-world problems of
the regular American. Lol

> Have you heard the one about Blackfeet Indians mutilating their unfaithful
> wives? He cuts off her nose. They still do!

Yeah men have abused women all the time throughout history I'm not
surprised. John & Yoko wrote a song about it was called "Woman Is the
Nigger of the World":

<https://youtu.be/iYjEz441I4M>

On 3/25/2022 9:04 AM, bitrex wrote:
> On 3/25/2022 9:07 AM, amdx wrote:
>>  From Google, "Definitions fro Oxford Languages"
>>
>>   How long before Googles deletes these definitions?
>>
>>   Female
>>   Noun
>
> Something that run away when she see you coming
>
That would be,
Something that run away when she sees you coming.

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On 2022-03-25, John Doe <always.look@message.header> wrote:
> Anybody know how to change Xnews character set so it doesn't make an abortion
> out of this poster's posts?
>

So you can weaoponise another newesreader feature to inconvenience
respondents? I can't see any reason offer assistance, or even try
to reduce the syllable count in this response.

--
Jasen.
Go ahead, throw another tantrum, Edward will love that.

On 2022-03-25 21:31, Jasen Betts wrote:
> On 2022-03-25, John Doe <always.look@message.header> wrote:
>> Anybody know how to change Xnews character set so it doesn't make an abortion
>> out of this poster's posts?
>>
>
> So you can weaoponise another newesreader feature to inconvenience
> respondents? I can't see any reason offer assistance, or even try
> to reduce the syllable count in this response.
>

I *do* wish people would stop arguing with this entity. If it
weren't for those, I wouldn't get to see its inanities at all.

Jeroen Belleman

amdx wrote:
> From Google, "Definitions fro Oxford Languages"
>
> How long before Googles deletes these definitions?
>
> Female
> Noun
> an adult female human being.
>
> Woman
> adjective
> of or denoting the sex that can bear offspring or produce eggs,
> distinguished biologically by the production of gametes (ova)
> which can be fertilized by male gametes.
>
> Mikek

Biden explicitely stated that he would nominate a "black woman" but the
woman in question doesn't know what he meant because she's not a
biologist even though sex isn't determined by biology. I don't
understand why you have trouble understanding that.

--
Defund the Thought Police

bitrex wrote:
> On 3/25/2022 11:22 AM, John Doe wrote:
>>
>> We will see. Let's see if women in fact don't do anything about
>> transgender bullies beating up on girls in sports. That is a huge
>> question.
>
> Definitely an issue that really connects with the real-world problems
> of the regular American. Lol

That's interesting, if you mean that it isn't important because it
doesn't involve most people. Slavery and Jim Crow didn't involve most
people.

--
Defund the Thought Police

The John Doe troll stated the following in message-id
<sdhn7c$pkp$4@dont-email.me>:

> The troll doesn't even know how to format a USENET post...

And the John Doe troll stated the following in message-id
<sg3kr7$qt5$1@dont-email.me>:

> The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from
> breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is
> CLUELESS...

NOBODY likes the John Doe troll's contentless spam.

And yet, the clueless John Doe troll has continued to post incorrectly
formatted USENET articles that are devoid of content (latest example on
Fri, 25 Mar 2022 21:12:16 -0000 (UTC) in message-id
<t1lb7g$h30$2@dont-email.me>).

This posting is a public service announcement for any google groups
readers who happen by to point out that the John Doe troll does not even
follow the rules it uses to troll other posters.

6UfLK87VDLW8

The John Doe troll stated the following in message-id
<sdhn7c$pkp$4@dont-email.me>:

> The troll doesn't even know how to format a USENET post...

And the John Doe troll stated the following in message-id
<sg3kr7$qt5$1@dont-email.me>:

> The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from
> breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is
> CLUELESS...

And yet, the clueless John Doe troll has itself posted yet another
incorrectly formatted USENET posting on Fri, 25 Mar 2022 21:30:01 -0000
(UTC) in message-id <t1lc8p$pp1$2@dont-email.me>.

1FG7phBo2mp0

On Friday, March 25, 2022 at 9:07:19 AM UTC-4, amdx wrote:
> From Google, "Definitions fro Oxford Languages"
>
> How long before Googles deletes these definitions?
>
> Female
> Noun
> an adult female human being.
>
> Woman
> adjective
> of or denoting the sex that can bear offspring or produce eggs,
> distinguished biologically by the production of gametes (ova)
> which can be fertilized by male gametes.

I suppose you think this definition is clear? You do understand it requires you to define "male" first, right? If you define "male" or "man" similarly, you end up saying it produces "gametes" which fertilize the female gametes.

Seems rather circuitous.

--

Rick C.

- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209

On Friday, March 25, 2022 at 5:24:30 PM UTC-4, Tom Del Rosso wrote:
> amdx wrote:
> > From Google, "Definitions fro Oxford Languages"
> >
> > How long before Googles deletes these definitions?
> >
> > Female
> > Noun
> > an adult female human being.
> >
> > Woman
> > adjective
> > of or denoting the sex that can bear offspring or produce eggs,
> > distinguished biologically by the production of gametes (ova)
> > which can be fertilized by male gametes.
> >
> > Mikek
> Biden explicitely stated that he would nominate a "black woman" but the
> woman in question doesn't know what he meant because she's not a
> biologist even though sex isn't determined by biology. I don't
> understand why you have trouble understanding that.

Anyone in doubt of their own gender, can simply check their driver's license.

--

Rick C.

+ Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
+ Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209

On Friday, March 25, 2022 at 5:28:42 PM UTC-4, Tom Del Rosso wrote:
> bitrex wrote:
> > On 3/25/2022 11:22 AM, John Doe wrote:
> >>
> >> We will see. Let's see if women in fact don't do anything about
> >> transgender bullies beating up on girls in sports. That is a huge
> >> question.
> >
> > Definitely an issue that really connects with the real-world problems
> > of the regular American. Lol
> That's interesting, if you mean that it isn't important because it
> doesn't involve most people. Slavery and Jim Crow didn't involve most
> people.

I like the way you ask him a question, then answer it for him. Excellent technique.

--

Rick C.

-- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
-- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209

On 3/25/2022 4:21 PM, John Doe wrote:
> bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
>
>> John Doe wrote:
>>> bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
>>>> amdx wrote:
>>>
>>>>> From Google, "Definitions fro Oxford Languages"
>>>>>
>>>>> How long before Googles deletes these definitions?
>>>>>
>>>>> Female Noun
>>>>
>>>> Something that run away when she see you coming
>>>
>>> Because he's wielding that nasty SCIENCE thing!
>>>
>>> We will see. Let's see if women in fact don't do anything about
>>> transgender bullies beating up on girls in sports. That is a huge
>>> question.
>>
>> Definitely an issue that really connects with the real-world problems of
>> the regular American. Lol
>
> It has a lot of meaning to low income black females who (used to) depend
> on sports for scholarships, income, and notoriety.

Only a tiny fraction of the population makes any money at all off
playing sports, and only a tiny fraction of that ever make decent money.
University sports are a fuckin' racket as anyone could tell you. and
even Debi Thomas who won bronze at the Calgary Olympics in '88 was
almost homeless as of 2015, even competing and winning at the top levels
is no guarantee of anything.

Despite being the first black FEMALE to ever win a medal at the Winter
Games for the good ol' USA, she lost to that German so her coach dropped
her and nobody gave a shit about her anymore:

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debi_Thomas#Personal_life>

What a racket

>>> Have you heard the one about Blackfeet Indians mutilating their
>>> unfaithful wives? He cuts off her nose. They still do!
>>
>> Yeah men have abused women all the time throughout history
>
> Bullshit. Men have loved and cared for women throughout human history.

JD's operating with some definition of "men" that excludes male
Blackfeet Indians apparently but that wouldn't surprise me, either. Or
maybe he figures men beat their wives because they love them too much lol

On 3/25/2022 6:09 PM, Rickster wrote:
> On Friday, March 25, 2022 at 5:28:42 PM UTC-4, Tom Del Rosso wrote:
>> bitrex wrote:
>>> On 3/25/2022 11:22 AM, John Doe wrote:
>>>>
>>>> We will see. Let's see if women in fact don't do anything about
>>>> transgender bullies beating up on girls in sports. That is a huge
>>>> question.
>>>
>>> Definitely an issue that really connects with the real-world problems
>>> of the regular American. Lol
>> That's interesting, if you mean that it isn't important because it
>> doesn't involve most people. Slavery and Jim Crow didn't involve most
>> people.
>
> I like the way you ask him a question, then answer it for him. Excellent technique.
>

I like that it does save time and it was a dumb analogy, anyway.

On 3/25/2022 6:23 PM, bitrex wrote:
> On 3/25/2022 6:09 PM, Rickster wrote:
>> On Friday, March 25, 2022 at 5:28:42 PM UTC-4, Tom Del Rosso wrote:
>>> bitrex wrote:
>>>> On 3/25/2022 11:22 AM, John Doe wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> We will see. Let's see if women in fact don't do anything about
>>>>> transgender bullies beating up on girls in sports. That is a huge
>>>>> question.
>>>>
>>>> Definitely an issue that really connects with the real-world problems
>>>> of the regular American. Lol
>>> That's interesting, if you mean that it isn't important because it
>>> doesn't involve most people. Slavery and Jim Crow didn't involve most
>>> people.
>>
>> I like the way you ask him a question, then answer it for him.
>> Excellent technique.
>>
>
> I like that it does save time and it was a dumb analogy, anyway.

Every time Tucker Carlson gets a time out on Twitter it's BASICALLY the
same as the Holocaust

On 3/25/2022 6:07 PM, Rickster wrote:
> On Friday, March 25, 2022 at 9:07:19 AM UTC-4, amdx wrote:
>> From Google, "Definitions fro Oxford Languages"
>>
>> How long before Googles deletes these definitions?
>>
>> Female
>> Noun
>> an adult female human being.
>>
>> Woman
>> adjective
>> of or denoting the sex that can bear offspring or produce eggs,
>> distinguished biologically by the production of gametes (ova)
>> which can be fertilized by male gametes.
>
> I suppose you think this definition is clear? You do understand it requires you to define "male" first, right? If you define "male" or "man" similarly, you end up saying it produces "gametes" which fertilize the female gametes.
>
> Seems rather circuitous.
>

Every word in this dictionary is defined in terms of other words in the
dictionary!

What the fuck is this. Must be some kind of conspiracy.

On 3/25/2022 3:58 PM, amdx wrote:
> On 3/25/2022 9:04 AM, bitrex wrote:
>> On 3/25/2022 9:07 AM, amdx wrote:
>>>  From Google, "Definitions fro Oxford Languages"
>>>
>>>   How long before Googles deletes these definitions?
>>>
>>>   Female
>>>   Noun
>>
>> Something that run away when she see you coming
>>
> That would be,
> Something that run away when she sees you coming.
>

Great. He finds a dictionary and now he self-identifies as my grammar
teacher.

bitrex wrote:
===========
> > >> From Google, "Definitions fro Oxford Languages"
> >
> > Seems rather circuitous.
> >
> Every word in this dictionary is defined in terms of other words in the
> dictionary!
>

** Writers of dictionaries assume readers are speakers of the language concerned.
( except for language crossover versions)

The definitions are derived from researching publications in the language including newspapers and magazines.
Over time, definitions may change while most words have a variety of meanings depending on context.
The reader has to sort that out.

Their useful purpose is to offer readers pithy definitions, at a point in time, with the commonly accepted spellings.
Dictionaries do NOT define the language nor include many special or technical terms.
Also, while English is spoken in many countries, corresponding dictionaries differ quite a bit in definitions and spellings.

> What the fuck is this. Must be some kind of conspiracy.

** Only looks that way to the terminally paranoid.

....... Phil

On 3/25/2022 7:14 PM, Phil Allison wrote:
> bitrex wrote:
> ===========
>>>>> From Google, "Definitions fro Oxford Languages"
>>>
>>> Seems rather circuitous.
>>>
>> Every word in this dictionary is defined in terms of other words in the
>> dictionary!
>>
>
> ** Writers of dictionaries assume readers are speakers of the language concerned.
> ( except for language crossover versions)
>
> The definitions are derived from researching publications in the language including newspapers and magazines.
> Over time, definitions may change while most words have a variety of meanings depending on context.
> The reader has to sort that out.
>
> Their useful purpose is to offer readers pithy definitions, at a point in time, with the commonly accepted spellings.
> Dictionaries do NOT define the language nor include many special or technical terms.
> Also, while English is spoken in many countries, corresponding dictionaries differ quite a bit in definitions and spellings.

Yes, there's no "one True English" or any other language. The English of
yesterday is different than the English of today which is different than
the English of tomorrow & it's always been that way.

Would be easier to understand my acquaintance from Scotland if it wasn't
that way, I'm sure my 5x great grandfather could just fine, in text it's
okay, but 300 years and 3 beers in him later at the "pub" I can grasp
maybe 50% of what he says on the first try. Eh?

>> What the fuck is this. Must be some kind of conspiracy.
>
> ** Only looks that way to the terminally paranoid.

I called a liquor store a "packie" and he thought I was being a bigot,
doesn't have any connotation that way in New England it's short for
"package store" but pronounced the same as "Paki"

> ...... Phil
>

bitrex wrote:
===========
>
> >
> > ** Writers of dictionaries assume readers are speakers of the language concerned.
> > ( except for language crossover versions)
> >
> > The definitions are derived from researching publications in the language including newspapers and magazines.
> > Over time, definitions may change while most words have a variety of meanings depending on context.
> > The reader has to sort that out.
> >
> > Their useful purpose is to offer readers pithy definitions, at a point in time, with the commonly accepted spellings.
> > Dictionaries do NOT define the language nor include many special or technical terms.
> > Also, while English is spoken in many countries, corresponding dictionaries differ quite a bit in definitions and spellings.
>>
> I called a liquor store a "packie" and he thought I was being a bigot,
> doesn't have any connotation that way in New England it's short for
> "package store" but pronounced the same as "Paki"
>

** There is an Australian dictionary - " The Macquarie Dictionary" .
My edition has over 2000 large pages.
One entry is for " turd strangler ".

Guess what it means ?

...... Phil

On 3/25/2022 8:41 PM, Phil Allison wrote:
> bitrex wrote:
> ===========
>>
>>>
>>> ** Writers of dictionaries assume readers are speakers of the language concerned.
>>> ( except for language crossover versions)
>>>
>>> The definitions are derived from researching publications in the language including newspapers and magazines.
>>> Over time, definitions may change while most words have a variety of meanings depending on context.
>>> The reader has to sort that out.
>>>
>>> Their useful purpose is to offer readers pithy definitions, at a point in time, with the commonly accepted spellings.
>>> Dictionaries do NOT define the language nor include many special or technical terms.
>>> Also, while English is spoken in many countries, corresponding dictionaries differ quite a bit in definitions and spellings.
>>>
>> I called a liquor store a "packie" and he thought I was being a bigot,
>> doesn't have any connotation that way in New England it's short for
>> "package store" but pronounced the same as "Paki"
>>
>
> ** There is an Australian dictionary - " The Macquarie Dictionary" .
> My edition has over 2000 large pages.
> One entry is for " turd strangler ".
>
> Guess what it means ?
>
>
> ..... Phil

Ahh, is it the opposite of something that's a "piece o' piss"?

On Saturday, March 26, 2022 at 11:44:53 AM UTC+11, bitrex wrote:
> On 3/25/2022 8:41 PM, Phil Allison wrote:
> > bitrex wrote:
> > ===========
> >>
> >>>
> >>> ** Writers of dictionaries assume readers are speakers of the language concerned.
> >>> ( except for language crossover versions)
> >>>
> >>> The definitions are derived from researching publications in the language including newspapers and magazines.
> >>> Over time, definitions may change while most words have a variety of meanings depending on context.
> >>> The reader has to sort that out.
> >>>
> >>> Their useful purpose is to offer readers pithy definitions, at a point in time, with the commonly accepted spellings.
> >>> Dictionaries do NOT define the language nor include many special or technical terms.
> >>> Also, while English is spoken in many countries, corresponding dictionaries differ quite a bit in definitions and spellings.
> >>>
> >> I called a liquor store a "packie" and he thought I was being a bigot,
> >> doesn't have any connotation that way in New England it's short for
> >> "package store" but pronounced the same as "Paki"
> >>
> >
> > ** There is an Australian dictionary - " The Macquarie Dictionary" .
> > My edition has over 2000 large pages.
> > One entry is for " turd strangler ".
> >
> > Guess what it means ?
> >
> >
>>
> Ahh, is it the opposite of something that's a "piece o' piss"?

** No, it's Aussie slang for a plumber.

....... Phil

On 3/25/2022 8:57 PM, Phil Allison wrote:
> On Saturday, March 26, 2022 at 11:44:53 AM UTC+11, bitrex wrote:
>> On 3/25/2022 8:41 PM, Phil Allison wrote:
>>> bitrex wrote:
>>> ===========
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ** Writers of dictionaries assume readers are speakers of the language concerned.
>>>>> ( except for language crossover versions)
>>>>>
>>>>> The definitions are derived from researching publications in the language including newspapers and magazines.
>>>>> Over time, definitions may change while most words have a variety of meanings depending on context.
>>>>> The reader has to sort that out.
>>>>>
>>>>> Their useful purpose is to offer readers pithy definitions, at a point in time, with the commonly accepted spellings.
>>>>> Dictionaries do NOT define the language nor include many special or technical terms.
>>>>> Also, while English is spoken in many countries, corresponding dictionaries differ quite a bit in definitions and spellings.
>>>>>
>>>> I called a liquor store a "packie" and he thought I was being a bigot,
>>>> doesn't have any connotation that way in New England it's short for
>>>> "package store" but pronounced the same as "Paki"
>>>>
>>>
>>> ** There is an Australian dictionary - " The Macquarie Dictionary" .
>>> My edition has over 2000 large pages.
>>> One entry is for " turd strangler ".
>>>
>>> Guess what it means ?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Ahh, is it the opposite of something that's a "piece o' piss"?
>
>
> ** No, it's Aussie slang for a plumber.
>
>
> ...... Phil
>

That make sense.

I thought it was like if your favorite team does really badly in a game
you say "That was a real turd strangler"

On 3/25/2022 5:49 PM, bitrex wrote:
> On 3/25/2022 3:58 PM, amdx wrote:
>> On 3/25/2022 9:04 AM, bitrex wrote:
>>> On 3/25/2022 9:07 AM, amdx wrote:
>>>>  From Google, "Definitions fro Oxford Languages"
>>>>
>>>>   How long before Googles deletes these definitions?
>>>>
>>>>   Female
>>>>   Noun
>>>
>>> Something that run away when she see you coming
>>>
>> That would be,
>> Something that run away when she sees you coming.
>>
>
> Great. He finds a dictionary and now he self-identifies as my grammar
> teacher.
Well, I did get it half corrected! :-)

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus