China's Xi thinks that Putin will aim all his 5977 missiles at the USA, none at China, when Putin pushes the nuclear buttons because Ukraine invasion is a failure for him. Is that what your analysis says Kibo Parry Moron?

> Kibo says China's Xi does not believe China will be bombed if Putin pushes the nuclear button
> On Friday, May 26, 1989 at 10:35:51 AM UTC-5, James 'Kibo' Parry wrote:
> > james "kibo" parry | Some days you just can't get rid of a bomb.

Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
Mar 2, 2022, 1:45:07 AM (7 days ago)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
I need some kind of numbers data on number missiles present in the world today.

--- quoting BBC ---
Experts estimate around 1,500 Russian warheads are currently "deployed", meaning sited at missile and bomber bases or on submarines at sea.

How does this compare with other countries?
Nine countries have nuclear weapons: China, France, India, Israel, North Korea, Pakistan, Russia, the US and the UK.

Russia 5,977

NATO 5,943, US 5,428, France 290, UK 225

China 350

Pakistan 165

India 160

Israel 90

North Korea 20

Source-- Federation of American Scientists
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
Mar 2, 2022, 4:30:04 PM (7 days ago)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
The 2006 Litvinenko poisoning killing by Putin's Russia, is a moment in history that is a watershed moment, a moment in which Democracy-rule of law nations had to step in and address with full force.

The Good Guy Countries of the world had to address the 2006 killing of Litvinenko with the cascade of sanctions that the world is now imposing on Russia.

If those sanctions had been imposed on Putin's Russia in 2006, there would now not be a Ukraine invasion by Russia. For those sanctions would have caused the Russian people to kill Putin.

Sanctions of economics are powerful. I myself did not believe they were powerful until just recently. Sanctions are powerful because it is economics that USA is powerful, and China is powerful because of economics, and Russia is powerful because of economics. And so you take away economics, and the people of that country look to kill its leader.

The thing about sanctions is they are slow. Too slow for some, but that is the way it goes with deposing of rogue leaders of powerful states.

So if in 2006, the response to Putin killing people around the world such as Litvinenko, if the response had been the sanctions now imposed on Russia, if imposed by 2006, there would never have been this Ukraine invasion.

The West is too much "asleep at the helm".

Message has been deleted
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
Mar 2, 2022, 8:49:13 PM (6 days ago)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
Could economic sanctions have prevented Hitler starting WW2?

I believe so, for economic sanctions are the counterweight to a society polluted by brainwashing propaganda.

Economic sanctions are slow, but once they sink in, they are overpowering on a society and the society then looks to decapitate its "gone astray into insanity leaders".

Especially the sanctions on businesses with livelihoods and the sanctions of no planes to other countries. The visible reminder-- you have an insane leader that you need to get rid of.

If sanctions had been imposed on Hitler in Munich Beer Putsch and then especially Kristalnacht, that Hitler would have been deposed of and WW2 never happened.

Of course, the world needs the Science of Psychology always surveying the leaders of all countries for "crazy insane ones". And the moment we spot an insane leader, like Putin killing Litvinenko, that the world takes action on the insane leader and starts to economically sanction so the citizens of that country realize they have an insane leader and need to get rid of him as fast as possible.

If this had been done to Putin in 2006 there now would not be a Ukraine invasion.

AP
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
6:56 PM (now)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
In 2016 there were 512 cities on Earth with a population over 1 million.

China has 102 cities over 1 million
India has 46
Brazil has 17
Russia has 15
Japan has 12
Indonesia has 11
Pakistan has 10
USA has 10

How many cities with a population over 1/2 million on Earth?
There are 1,063 cities with inhabitants of 500,000 or more.

How many cities with a population of 100,000 or more?
Answer is 4037 in 2016.

So, from the Russia missile count and the NATO missile count added together is 12,000 nuclear tipped warhead missiles, meaning that every city on Earth that is 100,000 or more inhabitants can expect 2 missile strikes of nuclear armed missiles.

Now, is one missile strike on a city of millions of population, is one missile alone enough to reduce that city of all its population? Is 2?

AP

torsdag 10 mars 2022 kl. 02:08:51 UTC+1 skrev Archimedes Plutonium:
> China's Xi thinks that Putin will aim all his 5977 missiles at the USA, none at China, when Putin pushes the nuclear buttons because Ukraine invasion is a failure for him. Is that what your analysis says Kibo Parry Moron?
>
> > Kibo says China's Xi does not believe China will be bombed if Putin pushes the nuclear button
> > On Friday, May 26, 1989 at 10:35:51 AM UTC-5, James 'Kibo' Parry wrote:
> > > james "kibo" parry | Some days you just can't get rid of a bomb.
>
> Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
> Mar 2, 2022, 1:45:07 AM (7 days ago)
> 
> 
> 
> to Plutonium Atom Universe
> I need some kind of numbers data on number missiles present in the world today.
>
> --- quoting BBC ---
> Experts estimate around 1,500 Russian warheads are currently "deployed", meaning sited at missile and bomber bases or on submarines at sea.
>
> How does this compare with other countries?
> Nine countries have nuclear weapons: China, France, India, Israel, North Korea, Pakistan, Russia, the US and the UK.
>
>
> Russia 5,977
>
> NATO 5,943, US 5,428, France 290, UK 225
>
> China 350
>
> Pakistan 165
>
> India 160
>
> Israel 90
>
> North Korea 20
>
> Source-- Federation of American Scientists
> Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
> Mar 2, 2022, 4:30:04 PM (7 days ago)
> 
> 
> 
> to Plutonium Atom Universe
> The 2006 Litvinenko poisoning killing by Putin's Russia, is a moment in history that is a watershed moment, a moment in which Democracy-rule of law nations had to step in and address with full force.
>
> The Good Guy Countries of the world had to address the 2006 killing of Litvinenko with the cascade of sanctions that the world is now imposing on Russia.
>
> If those sanctions had been imposed on Putin's Russia in 2006, there would now not be a Ukraine invasion by Russia. For those sanctions would have caused the Russian people to kill Putin.
>
> Sanctions of economics are powerful. I myself did not believe they were powerful until just recently. Sanctions are powerful because it is economics that USA is powerful, and China is powerful because of economics, and Russia is powerful because of economics. And so you take away economics, and the people of that country look to kill its leader.
>
> The thing about sanctions is they are slow. Too slow for some, but that is the way it goes with deposing of rogue leaders of powerful states.
>
> So if in 2006, the response to Putin killing people around the world such as Litvinenko, if the response had been the sanctions now imposed on Russia, if imposed by 2006, there would never have been this Ukraine invasion.
>
> The West is too much "asleep at the helm".
> 
> Message has been deleted
> Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
> Mar 2, 2022, 8:49:13 PM (6 days ago)
> 
> 
> 
> to Plutonium Atom Universe
> Could economic sanctions have prevented Hitler starting WW2?
>
> I believe so, for economic sanctions are the counterweight to a society polluted by brainwashing propaganda.
>
> Economic sanctions are slow, but once they sink in, they are overpowering on a society and the society then looks to decapitate its "gone astray into insanity leaders".
>
> Especially the sanctions on businesses with livelihoods and the sanctions of no planes to other countries. The visible reminder-- you have an insane leader that you need to get rid of.
>
> If sanctions had been imposed on Hitler in Munich Beer Putsch and then especially Kristalnacht, that Hitler would have been deposed of and WW2 never happened.
>
> Of course, the world needs the Science of Psychology always surveying the leaders of all countries for "crazy insane ones". And the moment we spot an insane leader, like Putin killing Litvinenko, that the world takes action on the insane leader and starts to economically sanction so the citizens of that country realize they have an insane leader and need to get rid of him as fast as possible.
>
> If this had been done to Putin in 2006 there now would not be a Ukraine invasion.
>
> AP
> Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
> 6:56 PM (now)
> 
> 
> 
> to Plutonium Atom Universe
> In 2016 there were 512 cities on Earth with a population over 1 million.
>
> China has 102 cities over 1 million
> India has 46
> Brazil has 17
> Russia has 15
> Japan has 12
> Indonesia has 11
> Pakistan has 10
> USA has 10
>
> How many cities with a population over 1/2 million on Earth?
> There are 1,063 cities with inhabitants of 500,000 or more.
>
> How many cities with a population of 100,000 or more?
> Answer is 4037 in 2016.
>
> So, from the Russia missile count and the NATO missile count added together is 12,000 nuclear tipped warhead missiles, meaning that every city on Earth that is 100,000 or more inhabitants can expect 2 missile strikes of nuclear armed missiles.
>
> Now, is one missile strike on a city of millions of population, is one missile alone enough to reduce that city of all its population? Is 2?
>
> AP
You are a grade A crank

Zelos Malum says he like to suck on a Putin missile warhead than on Kibo's dick in April.
On Wednesday, March 9, 2022 at 10:58:33 PM UTC-6, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> You are a grade A crank

Kibo says China's Xi thinks that Putin will aim all his 5977 missiles at the USA, none at China, when Putin pushes the nuclear buttons because Ukraine invasion is a failure for him.

> Kibo says China's Xi does not believe China will be bombed if Putin pushes the nuclear button
> On Friday, May 26, 1989 at 10:35:51 AM UTC-5, James 'Kibo' Parry wrote:
> > james "kibo" parry | Some days you just can't get rid of a bomb.

I need some kind of numbers data on number missiles present in the world today.

--- quoting BBC ---
Experts estimate around 1,500 Russian warheads are currently "deployed", meaning sited at missile and bomber bases or on submarines at sea.

How does this compare with other countries?
Nine countries have nuclear weapons: China, France, India, Israel, North Korea, Pakistan, Russia, the US and the UK.

Russia 5,977

NATO 5,943, US 5,428, France 290, UK 225

China 350

Pakistan 165

India 160

Israel 90

North Korea 20

Source-- Federation of American Scientists
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
Mar 2, 2022, 4:30:04 PM (7 days ago)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
The 2006 Litvinenko poisoning killing by Putin's Russia, is a moment in history that is a watershed moment, a moment in which Democracy-rule of law nations had to step in and address with full force.

The Good Guy Countries of the world had to address the 2006 killing of Litvinenko with the cascade of sanctions that the world is now imposing on Russia.

If those sanctions had been imposed on Putin's Russia in 2006, there would now not be a Ukraine invasion by Russia. For those sanctions would have caused the Russian people to kill Putin.

Sanctions of economics are powerful. I myself did not believe they were powerful until just recently. Sanctions are powerful because it is economics that USA is powerful, and China is powerful because of economics, and Russia is powerful because of economics. And so you take away economics, and the people of that country look to kill its leader.

The thing about sanctions is they are slow. Too slow for some, but that is the way it goes with deposing of rogue leaders of powerful states.

So if in 2006, the response to Putin killing people around the world such as Litvinenko, if the response had been the sanctions now imposed on Russia, if imposed by 2006, there would never have been this Ukraine invasion.

The West is too much "asleep at the helm".

Message has been deleted
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
Mar 2, 2022, 8:49:13 PM (6 days ago)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
Could economic sanctions have prevented Hitler starting WW2?

I believe so, for economic sanctions are the counterweight to a society polluted by brainwashing propaganda.

Economic sanctions are slow, but once they sink in, they are overpowering on a society and the society then looks to decapitate its "gone astray into insanity leaders".

Especially the sanctions on businesses with livelihoods and the sanctions of no planes to other countries. The visible reminder-- you have an insane leader that you need to get rid of.

If sanctions had been imposed on Hitler in Munich Beer Putsch and then especially Kristalnacht, that Hitler would have been deposed of and WW2 never happened.

Of course, the world needs the Science of Psychology always surveying the leaders of all countries for "crazy insane ones". And the moment we spot an insane leader, like Putin killing Litvinenko, that the world takes action on the insane leader and starts to economically sanction so the citizens of that country realize they have an insane leader and need to get rid of him as fast as possible.

If this had been done to Putin in 2006 there now would not be a Ukraine invasion.

AP
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
6:56 PM (now)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
In 2016 there were 512 cities on Earth with a population over 1 million.

China has 102 cities over 1 million
India has 46
Brazil has 17
Russia has 15
Japan has 12
Indonesia has 11
Pakistan has 10
USA has 10

How many cities with a population over 1/2 million on Earth?
There are 1,063 cities with inhabitants of 500,000 or more.

How many cities with a population of 100,000 or more?
Answer is 4037 in 2016.

So, from the Russia missile count and the NATO missile count added together is 12,000 nuclear tipped warhead missiles, meaning that every city on Earth that is 100,000 or more inhabitants can expect 2 missile strikes of nuclear armed missiles.

Now, is one missile strike on a city of millions of population, is one missile alone enough to reduce that city of all its population? Is 2?

AP