Can we please get West billionaires to buy fighter jets and donate to the Ukraine cause, please, please buy 10 F16's and donate to Ukraine// SCIENCE COUNCIL RULES EARTH.

What Ukraine needs most of all is fire-power in the air to defend themselves.

I see a F-16 costs $65 million.

Please, can Gates, Musk, Buffett and other billionaires chip in and buy 10 such jets and send them to Ukraine ASAP.

Hopefully get volunteer ace pilots to fly them over Ukraine.

We see in the news of sanctions on Russian oligarches.

Well, why not have West billionaires do the exact opposite-- help humanity in its time of "most need".

And I can say-- the name Gates or Musk or Buffett and other billionaires, in the long term of history, you will not be remembered for how much money you have, but be remembered for your help to humanity in time of its most dire need.

Thanks,

P.S. Thanks to Elon Musk for giving Ukraine satellite communications

Shuut up, fucctaard.

On Friday, March 11, 2022 at 3:21:32 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Can we please get West billionaires to buy fighter jets and donate to the Ukraine cause, please, please buy 10 F16's and donate to Ukraine// SCIENCE COUNCIL RULES EARTH.
>
> What Ukraine needs most of all is fire-power in the air to defend themselves.
>
> I see a F-16 costs $65 million.
>
> Please, can Gates, Musk, Buffett and other billionaires chip in and buy 10 such jets and send them to Ukraine ASAP.
>
> Hopefully get volunteer ace pilots to fly them over Ukraine.
>
> We see in the news of sanctions on Russian oligarches.
>
> Well, why not have West billionaires do the exact opposite-- help humanity in its time of "most need".
>
> And I can say-- the name Gates or Musk or Buffett and other billionaires, in the long term of history, you will not be remembered for how much money you have, but be remembered for your help to humanity in time of its most dire need.
>
> Thanks,
>
> P.S. Thanks to Elon Musk for giving Ukraine satellite communications

#11-1, 3rd published book

AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Ever since Ancient Greek Times it was thought the slant cut into a cone is the ellipse. That was false. For the slant cut in every cone is a Oval, never an Ellipse. This book is a proof that the slant cut is a oval, never the ellipse. A slant cut into the Cylinder is in fact a ellipse, but never in a cone.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PLSDQWC
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 11, 2019
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 1621 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 20 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
•
•

Proofs Ellipse is never a Conic section, always a Cylinder section and a Well Defined Oval definition//Student teaches professor series, book 5 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 26Jan2022. This is AP's 68th published book of science.

Preface: A similar book on single cone cut is a oval, never a ellipse was published in 11Mar2019 as AP's 3rd published book, but Amazon Kindle converted it to pdf file, and since then, I was never able to edit this pdf file, and decided rather than struggle and waste time, decided to leave it frozen as is in pdf format. Any new news or edition of ellipse is never a conic in single cone is now done in this book. The last thing a scientist wants to do is wade and waddle through format, when all a scientist ever wants to do is science itself. So all my new news and thoughts of Conic Sections is carried out in this 68th book of AP. And believe you me, I have plenty of new news.

In November of 2019, I was challenged to make the definition of Oval a well defined definition. I took up that task, and fortunately I waited a long time since, 2016, my discovery that the oval was the slant cut into a cone, not the ellipse. I say fortunately because you need physics in order to make a well defined definition of oval. You need the knowledge of physics, that electricity is perpendicular to magnetism and this perpendicularity is crucial in a well defined definition of oval. When I discovered the ellipse was never a conic in 2016, I probably could not have well defined the oval at that time, because I needed the 3 years intervening to catch up on a lot of physics, but by November 2019, I was ready willing and able. Then in August of 2020, I discovered a third new proof of Ellipse is a cylinder section never a conic section, using solid 3rd dimension geometry of ovoid and ellipsoid.

Cover picture is a cone and a cylinder on a cutting board and that is an appropriate base to place those two figures because sectioning means cutting, and the cuts we want to make into a single cone and a cylinder is a slant cut not a cut parallel to the base of the figures, nor a cut that leaves the figure open ended but a slant cut that leaves the figure a closed loop.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B081TWQ1G6
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ November 21, 2019
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 2021 KB
• Simultaneous device usage ‏ : ‎ Unlimited
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 50 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled

#11-2, 11th published book

World's First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus// Math proof series, book 2 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 15Dec2021. This is AP's 11th published book of science.
Preface:
Actually my title is too modest, for the proof that lies within this book makes it the World's First Valid Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for in my modesty, I just wanted to emphasis that calculus was geometry and needed a geometry proof. Not being modest, there has never been a valid proof of FTC until AP's 2015 proof. This also implies that only a geometry proof of FTC constitutes a valid proof of FTC.

Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math so long as they had a huge mass of mistakes, errors, fakes and con-artist trickery such as the "limit analysis". And very surprising that most math professors cannot tell the difference between a "proving something" and that of "analyzing something". As if an analysis is the same as a proof. We often analyze various things each and every day, but few if none of us consider a analysis as a proof. Yet that is what happened in the science of mathematics where they took an analysis and elevated it to the stature of being a proof, when it was never a proof.

To give a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus requires math be cleaned-up and cleaned-out of most of math's mistakes and errors. So in a sense, a Geometry FTC proof is a exercise in Consistency of all of Mathematics. In order to prove a FTC geometry proof, requires throwing out the error filled mess of Old Math. Can the Reals be the true numbers of mathematics if the Reals cannot deliver a Geometry proof of FTC? Can the functions that are not polynomial functions allow us to give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a Coordinate System in 2D have 4 quadrants and still give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a equation of mathematics with a number that is _not a positive decimal Grid Number_ all alone on the right side of the equation, at all times, allow us to give a Geometry proof of the FTC?

Cover Picture: Is my hand written, one page geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, the world's first geometry proof of FTC, 2013-2015, by AP.

Product details
ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PQTNHMY
Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 14, 2019
Language ‏ : ‎ English
File size ‏ : ‎ 1309 KB
Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
Print length ‏ : ‎ 154 pages
Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #128,729 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#2 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
#134 in Calculus (Books)
#20 in Calculus (Kindle Store)

#11-3, 24th published book

World's First Proof of Kepler Packing Problem KPP // Math proof series, book 3 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

There has been a alleged proof of KPP by Thomas Hales, but his is a fakery because he does not define what infinity actually means, for it means a borderline between finite and infinite numbers. Thus, KPP was never going to be proven until a well-defined infinity borderline was addressed within the proof. And because infinity has a borderline means that in free space with no borderlines to tackle and contend with, the 12 kissing point density that is the hexagonal close packed is the maximum density. But the truth and reality of Kepler Packing is asking for maximum packing out to infinity. That means you have to contend and fight with the packing of identical spheres up against a wall or border. And so, in tackling that wall, we can shift the hexagonal closed pack to another type of packing, a hybrid type of packing in order to get "maximum packing". So no proof ever of KPP is going to happen unless the proof tackles a infinity border wall. In free-space, a far distance away from a wall barrier of infinity border, then, hexagonal closed pack reigns and is the packing in all of free space-- but, the moment the packing gets nearby the walls of infinity border, then, we re-arrange the hexagonal closed pack to fit in more spheres. Not unlike us packing a suitcase and then rearranging to fit in more.

Cover picture: is a container and so the closed packing must be modified once the border is nearly reached to maximize the number of spheres.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07NMV8NQQ
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 20, 2019
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 1241 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 60 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled

#11-4, 28th published book

World's First Valid Proof of 4 Color Mapping Problem// Math proof series, book 4 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Now in the math literature it is alleged that Appel & Haken proved this conjecture that 4 colors are sufficient to color all planar maps such that no two adjacent countries have the same color. Appel & Haken's fake proof was a computer proof and it is fake because their method is Indirect Nonexistence method. Unfortunately in the time of Appel & Haken few in mathematics had a firm grip on true Logic, where they did not even know that Boole's logic is fakery with his 3 OR 2 = 5 with 3 AND 2 = 1, when even the local village idiot knows that 3 AND 2 = 5 with 3 OR 2 = either 3 or 2 depending on which is subtracted. But the grave error in logic of Appel & Haken is their use of a utterly fake method of proof-- indirect nonexistence (see my textbook on Reductio Ad Absurdum). Wiles with his alleged proof of Fermat's Last Theorem is another indirect nonexistence as well as Hales's fake proof of Kepler Packing is indirect nonexistence.
Appel & Haken were in a time period when computers used in mathematics was a novelty, and instead of focusing on whether their proof was sound, everyone was dazzled not with the logic argument but the fact of using computers to generate a proof. And of course big big money was attached to this event and so, math is stuck with a fake proof of 4-Color-Mapping. And so, AP starting in around 1993, eventually gives the World's first valid proof of 4-Color-Mapping. Sorry, no computer fanfare, but just strict logical and sound argument.

Mathin3D placing a red star on donated jet fighters

On Friday, March 11, 2022 at 6:57:45 PM UTC-6, Mathin3D wrote:
>up,
>
>

Yes, generally that is where fighter jets go-- they go up.

And what flag or symbol should these fighter jets have? Should they have a Chinese symbol to fight the Russian jets in Ukraine, Mathin3D. Let me see what the Chinese insignia is? It is another red star. And the Russian insignia is also a red star.

So then if we had jet warplanes all with red stars fighting in Ukraine, we should have them all falling out of the sky.

Mathin3D wrote:

> Shuut up, fucctaard.
>
> On Friday, March 11, 2022 at 3:21:32 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium
> wrote:

It looks like the "war" in ukraina is a *young_global_leader* media fake,
to hide their murder by injections deaths. Those fake bombed buildings
were old training facilities and similar. These criminals are not finished
yet.

A turist in Ukraina
https://www.bitchute.com/video/3JkMfB51cHJ8/

I would not call the destruction and collateral damage happening in Ukraine fake - it is real. The reasons, of course, are the inaccuracy of Russian hardware and the fact that common people are being armed to oppose the Russian military. Ask any Iraq/Afghanistan veteran what they had to do when they were confronted by armed citizenry - that's right, confront them and kill them. It is an action of survival.

What is going on in Ukraine today is a tragedy mainly instigated by its president and the West that wants to have its hands on Ukraine to contain Russia. But the mis-calculation by the West was to trust a bad actor such as Zelinskii. Now Russia is the villain completely isolated from the world. They have no option now, but to oust Zelenskii and all of his associates.

What is most ironic about the situation, is that the Russian government is acting on what it believes are the same ideological forces that prevailed in Germany under Hitler. And, if this is in fact the case, the West is shooting itself in the foot by siding with Ukraine's government. Ultimately, whether they admit it or not, Western Europe owes it present freedom and prosperity in part to Russia and to the United States. They cannot ignore that. in assessing whether the current Ukrainian government is a worthwhile entity.

On Saturday, March 12, 2022 at 5:30:17 PM UTC-5, Vaugn Rhea wrote:
> Mathin3D wrote:
>
> > Shuut up, fucctaard.
> >
> > On Friday, March 11, 2022 at 3:21:32 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium
> > wrote:
> It looks like the "war" in ukraina is a *young_global_leader* media fake,
> to hide their murder by injections deaths. Those fake bombed buildings
> were old training facilities and similar. These criminals are not finished
> yet.
>
> A turist in Ukraina
> https://www.bitchute.com/video/3JkMfB51cHJ8/