18m views-- AP's 178th book of science// TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Light Waves and Energy, 4th year College, by Archimedes Plutonium

Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com>
Mar 12, 2022, 4:22:10 PM
to Plutonium Atom Universe
On page 14, Feynman QED writes: "Newton thought that light was made up of particles-- he called them "corpuscles" -- and he was right (but the reasoning that he used to come to that decision was erroneous)."

I was looking for what that reasoning was.

--- quoting a website aaas.org ---

Newton's crucial experiment was to refract light onto a piece of wood, into which had been drilled a small hole. In this way, he was able to obtain a beam of light with a pure color. He was able to show that blue light, for instance, when refracted through a second prism yielded again only blue light.Nov 19, 2012

--- end quote ---

I am not sure the above is Feynman's complaint of reasoning.
I will take a look into Feynman Lectures to see if he elaborates on his complaint of Newton's reasoning for the proof of particle theory of light.
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com>
Mar 12, 2022, 4:50:46 PM (10 hours ago)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
Now I must look up what Newton's proof method for particle theory of light was. And see why Feynman complained about it. Of course, to Feynman, he thinks (falsely though) that the proof that light is particle is his "clicks" in experiments when light shines on sensitive instruments.

To me, that is not proof of particle, as Feynman thinks of a proof. For me, the proof that Light Waves are particles (sometimes, mind you sometimes) is the proof of Gamma Ray --> two particles of positron + antipositron. Two created particles from a Light Wave of Gamma. That to me is Logical proof.

For we have to remember that Feynman believed the 0.5MeV particle was the atom's electron, which in truth, the atom's electron was the Muon at 105MeV.

So, we have the ultimate duality of Quantum Mechanics (which a far better name for this branch of Science would have been Duality Mechanics) for Light Waves in that at 1MeV gamma waves can turn into rest mass two particles of 0.5MeV of positron and antipositron. I dare not call them positron and electron for the 0.5MeV particles are Dirac magnetic monopoles.

So, here is a question that no physicist ever seemed to ask, none after Feynman seems to be cognizant of the reality that you have Gamma waves moving at the speed of light-- with no rest mass --- and then, all of a sudden as the gamma wave hits the nucleus of neutrons in a atom, converts to two particles which do have rest mass.

This is a huge huge mystery for physics of how a Gamma wave has no rest mass, and then it has two particles with rest mass.

So when Feynman talks long long and hard about the mysteries of Uncertainty Principle, he is wrong and wasting his time. For the Uncertainty Principle all evaporates away as "logical confusion" for when you view the Light Wave as a Pencil thin closed loop circuit ellipse, when the light wave is a circuit, not a ray arrow with head and tail, then there is no Uncertainty Principle.

But rather than focus on the mysteries of Double Slit as a waste of time for Waves of circuits trashcan the Uncertainty principle. And yet, the real real mystery is How does a Gamma Wave moving at speed of light, all of a sudden convert to 2 Particles of rest mass in Pair Production.

The key experiment in Quantum Mechanics (should have been called Duality Mechanics) is not the Double Slit experiment but is the Pair Production experiment.

Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com>
Mar 12, 2022, 8:00:47 PM (7 hours ago)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
Alright, I made a half-hearted search in Feynman to see if he expanded on why he opined that Newton failed to prove the particle theory of light. Perhaps it was because in polarization, Newton's blue light refracted is further divided, as Feynman mentions that red light has further splitting from polarization.

Anyway it is not worth the time to find Feynman's objection of Newton in Newton's proof that light is a particle (corpuscle).

So let me punch a hole into Feynman's so called proof that light is a particle. For Feynman's logical reasoning that "clicks" in sensitive machines proves particles. Here, Feynman is saying that waves cannot give clicks. The flaws in Feynman's argument is that the sensitive machine itself maybe translating wave energy into clicks but where the photon is a wave. Another flaw in Feynman's argument is that he makes no allowance for the idea that a "click" only corresponds to specific frequencies in the superpositioned photons entering sensitive instruments. But most damaging of all to Feynman's click argument is that Feyman thought a Light wave was looking like this in ascii art ^v^v^v^ as a open ended arrow with a head and a tail so that as it enters the sensitive machine to measure, there is no click but rather a bouncing up and down from the open ended arrow wave. When in truth, the photon as a light wave is a closed loop of a thin pencil ellipse circuit of ^v^v^v^. So as this photon circuit wave comes in contact at a perpendicular with the sensitive machine it gives off a "click" as a hit of that pencil ellipse wave.

So in reality, Feynman's so called "click proof" is not a proof at all. It would be a proof if Light waves are open ended arrow wave and not closed loops. For it is the closed loop as wave that can give just as much of a "click" as a genuine particle gives a click.

AP likes neither the Newton proof nor the Feynman "click" proof. For neither are thoroughly convincing. Both have shortcomings. But in physics history with Pair Production of 1933 with Blackett noticing the opposing spiral tracks of positron and antipositron in Pair Production, can physics safely say they proved the Light Wave behaves as a particle, two particles.

So this is the deep deep mystery of Quantum Mechanics (better called Duality Mechanics). The mystery of the atom is why existence depends on duality. Like the duality of male and female in biology, or the duality of good and evil in religion.

AP
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com>
3:15 AM (1 hour ago)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
Alright there is a beautiful duality in mathematics, that almost compares with the most exquisite duality in the universe-- physics-- electricity and magnetism. Now some can already guess what this duality is in mathematics for it is quite plain to see if you ever did proofs in geometry and algebra and calculus. The duality I speak of is the duality of algebra to geometry. So often in math, we are faced with a statement to prove and find that even though it looks like no geometry and mostly algebra, that we can find two proofs, a geometrical and a algebraic.

But I complain about Quantum Physics name as quantum or discrete, when the main motor that is driving physics is not its discreteness, no, not the quantum, but the duality feature of physics. This is the major mystery. The mysteries that Feynman complains about. The mysteries that likely the human mind of this present day time can never dive deeper into. At some point of knowledge and understanding, we have to leave it to two concepts-- electricity and magnetism. We cannot go below electricity nor below magnetism and say-- the inner workings of electricity are these, or the inner workings of magnetism are these. At some point in knowledge, wisdom and understanding we cannot go below. Duality is existence and duality is of two items. Those two items are never equal, but always present. And those two items are the cause of all mysteries in science.

But in Feynman's Lectures on Physics or in his QED, he is in error and baffled by mysteries of Double Slit Experiment, of Uncertainty Principle, even of Quantum Entanglement and EPR. But those are error filled mysteries, all stemming from the fact that Feynman and latter physicists, by mistake, thought the Light Wave was a straightline Arrow with a head and tail. No. Light Waves are in fact closed loop circuits. Mind you, very very thin pencil ellipses. Much like the extension electric cord in your house. And these closed loop circuits always have the source of the light in that circuit, unless the source is cut off and then the entire circuit disappears, not matter how far away, the entire circuit vanishes instantly, even if further away than the speed of light takes to reach its circuit extremities. You can easily make the mistake of thinking the extension cord is a straight line arrow.. But no, the extension cord is a Circuit, a Closed Loop.

So if you re-work and re-do all of Old Physics with the idea that the Light Wave and photon are Pencil thin ellipses of closed loop circuit, then you no longer have a Uncertainty Principle. You no longer have the mysteries of Double Slit Experiment. You no longer have mysteries of EPR and Quantum Entanglement. You get rid of all those mysteries and you realize they were mistakes all because you believed a Light Wave was a open ended straightline arrow with heads and a tail.

The Uncertainty Principle is not physics, but rather was a failure idea because you accepted that Light waves were open ended arrows, not circuits.

But Quantum Physics still has many mysteries because Duality was never a mistake. And duality offers us mystery after mystery after mystery.

Alright, I am in extreme luck here, for before starting to write TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, 4th year College, I was tussling and fighting with the theory of how reflection from a mirror gives us a accurate description of "reality in the world". I mean, think of science of the eye and brain if it cannot reflect a accurate description of the objects around us.

And so this terribly difficult problem and question-- how does a mirror reflection of say a chair in a room seen in the mirror, how is that possible?

And I had never read Feynman's QED until now, and lo and behold, this physics of reflection is how Feynman starts his QED. But sadly Feynman can never answer the question of "how does a mirror accurately portray the object"?

So, well, the last chapters of AP's 178th book of science will be the answer to that question. And deeply surprising is that I am going to get that answer from biology DNA molecule. That the reason Light Waves can bounce off a chair and reflected in a mirror into my eye and then brain, and recorded in my brain as a "chair" the exact replica of the chair in the room as reflected by the mirror. How is that possible? And the only way I can see that it is possible is that a Light Wave is a closed loop circuit of pencil thin ellipse and that a Light Wave is perfect DNA. So as the light wave hits a part of the chair in the room, the light waves internal parts are A,T,C,G and those parts are configured from the hitting of the chair and that light wave then hits the mirror and reflected and hits my eye and eventually to my brain where the unravelling of that light waves A,T,C,G becomes translated into "that is a chair".

So now, physics scientists have never done such a explanation. All they did was say a light wave is a arrow, open ended arrow that hits the chair then reflected in the mirror and into the eye and brain and the "information of the light wave is a point-dot-information". That is what Old Physics analyzes the phenomenom of chair reflected in mirror.

Now let us look at biology DNA and see if it is similar to Light Wave DNA of chair in mirror. In biology DNA, the DNA after meiosis and after fertilization and a baby is born, so that the DNA contains all the information to reproduce a new individual. And we can see the similarities that this new person is like a mirror reflection of a chair in a mirror. Better yet, use mitosis reproduction for almost a exact copy. So that in this analogy we can say that we reproduce a chair in a room with a mirror reflection of the chair. And that is only possible, if the Light Wave had some capacity to record Information. Information that is more than just a point-dot contact on the chair and then transmitted to the mirror, finally into our eye and brain. That implies a Light Wave is a very complex machinery and capable of holding as much and more than DNA molecule of biology.

So the first chapters of AP's 178th book is about possible geometry architecture of the Light Wave, and the last chapters has to have the architecture be that of Light Wave equals Perfect DNA of biology.

So I am going to jump to the end of this book and let DNA of biology help me to discover the true geometry of the internal machinery of a Light Wave. So by the time I reach the last chapters, I can say, well, Light Waves if we can peek inside and see the machinery is the same as looking at biology's DNA and its ability to replicate a exact image.

AP, King of Science, especially chemistry-physics

So here, what I am doing is figuring out the Architecture of Light Waves. In 3rd year college we figured out the Architecture of the Atom as being a proton torus with electrons as muons thrusting around inside the proton torus in a Faraday law producing electricity and where this new electricity is storaged in the neutrons which occupy the donut hole of the proton torus and two parallel plates top and bottom of the proton torus. The neutrons form a nucleus, but not as dense as the failed Bohr-Rutherford model where neutrons plus protons as tiny spheres that do nothing and form a denser nucleus than AP's model of the donut hole of torus being the nucleus.

So here we are in 4th year College and we want the Architecture of Light Waves. And I believe the key to finding out this architecture is by Reflection of Light waves from a mirror.

We start with a completely dark room, where no light exists. We are told there is a mirror and lamp and chair in the room. We step inside the complete dark room and can see nothing. All dark, no light. Then we turn on the lamp and can see a mirror which has a chair image in the mirror and has the chair in the room as well as the lamp.

So, the question is. How does light waves store Information so that the light wave hits the chair, bounces off the chair, hits the mirror, reflects off the mirror into our eye and brain. How does light wave collect that information of the chair and reflect it from the mirror and then finally settling into our eye and mind that it is a identical chair in the mirror that it is a actual chair in the room.

Old Physics seems to overlooked this question entirely. And if anyone in Old Physics started to give an explanation, they started with the idea that light waves come pouring out of the lamp as straightline arrows, some hitting the chair and at that point of contact -- have no recording -- of the chair at that point of contact and so the Old Physics breaks down.

In New Physics, what I argue is that the Light Wave is like a DNA molecule of a closed loop circuit, and when that circuit comes in contact over a broad swathe of the chair, that the internal structure of the Light Wave rearranges itself so as this light wave having the picture of that chair swathe it traveled over, reflecting in the mirror, reaching our eye and brain, and finally the coding of the Light Wave of the chair is pictured in our mind.

You see, in Old Physics, their light wave had no Information storage capacity. In New Physics, the light wave has Information capacity and is similar to DNA of biology. So that one can say the Light wave reproduced the image of the chair, and the DNA molecule reproduced a human as the image of its parents.

Old Physics had simple ideas of Light waves such as Snell's law or optics, but Old Physics had no idea that Light Waves need a Information Capacity.

AP

🦇 of Math and 🦨 of Physics Archimedes "Drag Queen of Science"
Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> blathered:

> China's Xi thinks all 5977 Russian nuclear warheads are aimed at USA
and none at Beijing, why McGinn???

You're doing such a great time spamming, Plutonium you spamtard!
It's taking you no time at all to spam this 5977 times!