Fire Alexander Berglund,Jonas Bergstrom,Rikard Bogvad,Samuel Lundqvist, Annemarie Luger, Erik Palmgren
Torbjorn Tambour SO SAYS Jan. Why Jan? Because they are too stupid to see a slant cut in single cone is a OVAL never the Ellipse?

On Wednesday, November 22, 2017 at 9:57:43 PM UTC-6, Jan wrote:
> Who cares?
> --
> Jan

Stockholm University
Math logic
Per Martin-Lof, Erik Palmgren, Tom Britton, Pavel Kurasov
Alexander Berglund, Jonas Bergstrom, Rikard Bogvad
Samuel Lundqvist, Annemarie Luger, Erik Palmgren
Torbjorn Tambour
 
Rector: Astrid Soderbergh Widding

Stockholm Univ physics
Tony Hansson, Markus Hennrich, Tommy Ohlsson, Paul Crutzen,

Swedish physics, et al
Bo Thide, Max Tegmark, Cecilia Jarlskog, Lars Bergstrom, Lars Samuelson
Anders Flodstrom, Hans Ryde, Anders Barany, Gunnar von Heijne
Claes-Goran Granqvist, Joakim Edsjo, Carl Falthammar, Sven Hansson, Arne Kaijser
Pres. Sigbritt Karlsson (KTH)

University Gothenburg
Bernt Wennberg
Aila Sarkka

Univ Stockholm Physics dept

Gunnar Benediktsson, Clas Blomberg, Bo Cartling
Olle Edholm, Goran Grimvall, Goran Lindblad
Hakan Snellman, Jouko Mickelsson, Anders Rosengren
John Rundgren

Need to hear AP your better--MIT, William Bertozzi, Robert Birgeneau, Hale Bradt, Bernard Burke, George Clark , Jeffrey Goldstone, So Says Kibo Parry M. But then Kibo failed Rensselaer with his 938 is 12% short of 945.

On Wednesday, March 16, 2022 at 12:30:05 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> On 3/16/2022 6:09 AM, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > On Wednesday, March 16, 2022 at 4:10:31 AM UTC-5, bwr fml wrote:
> >> On Wednesday, March 16, 2022 at 12:41:46 AM UTC-7, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> >>> On Wednesday, March 16, 2022 at 12:39:41 AM UTC-5, bwr fml wrote:
> >>>> On Tuesday, March 15, 2022 at 10:05:06 PM UTC-7, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> >>>>> On Tuesday, March 15, 2022 at 10:40:10 PM UTC-5, bwr fml wrote:
> >>>>>> On Friday, February 25, 2022 at 6:48:55 PM UTC-8, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> >>>>>>> I may require a Nobel prize for my brunt force demand and determination of researching drones that replace rockets for interplanetary travel.. I may not actually engineer the drone itself, but certainly spur the momentum and feat onwards. For I envision that drones can fly in Space with no atmosphere, none whatsoever, only riding on the Magnetic Fields, Electric Fields, and Solar Wind. Yes, the Solar Wind should enable us to reach Europa, faster than any modern rockets now in use.
> >>>>>> If you hadn't been wasting time telling everyone what to do that would result in starting WWIII
> >>>>>> and you actually did real experiments with real instruments and real measurements and built real things...
> >>>>>> then you might have been able to claim credit for your battery powered flight.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Instead the fine folks at MIT get all the credit for doing that.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> https://www.iflscience.com/technology/scientists-have-created-a-star-treklike-plane-that-flies-using-ion-thrusters-and-no-fuel/
> >>>>> Thanks for that information for they apparently use wires to ionize N2 and this thrusts the aircraft.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Perhaps we need a design that uses both helicopter and ion thruster.. The ion thruster to lift off of Earth in the N2 atmosphere, then the helicopter to blade of battery operated to get to the Solar Wind channels, then switch back to the ion thruster in the Solar Wind.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Maybe both are needed to get us from Earth to Europa and back. And maybe the design could be where we ride the Solar Wind and recharge the ion battery in the Solar Wind from the thruster wires.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Possibly even a third mechanism of Solar Radiation to recharge the batteries as the helicopter on Mars does.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> So 5 power sources (1) lithium battery (2) Earth magnetic field lifting us (3) ion thruster (4) Solar Wind (5) Solar Radiation.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Things looking up on AP's new spacecraft, replacing all the old ugly polluters of rockets.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This would be AP's 9th Nobel Prize: 10) A Physics-II Nobel prize to AP, "For development of the lithium battery operated spacecraft, and thus saving life on Earth by colonizing Europa from the Sun gone Red Giant Phase, for stars shine from Faraday law, not fusion." Here we make a brand new category of Physics Nobel prizes because the old list is 80% in error and unfair to future winners of Nobel physics prizes. Who wants to be on a list of con-artist dumb fakesters of physics. So we split off the old error filled list and start fresh anew with a Physics Nobel prize.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Now can AP coax the researchers at MIT to see if a drone helicopter of lithium battery only, utilizing the North Pole strong upward magnetic field, see if the craft can reach the height of the Space Station. Everyone here on Earth says "no", but AP says "yes" and AP is the King of Science.
> >>>> Google says
> >>>> Lithium AAA battery weighs 7.6 grams
> >>>> and it contains 1.87 watt hours energy
> >>>> 1 watt hour = 3600 joules
> >>>> 1.87 watt hours * 3600 joules/watt hour = 6732 joules
> >>>> International space station is 408 kilometers altitude
> >>>> It takes 9.8 joules to lift one kilogram one meter
> >>>>
> >>>> 7.6 grams/1 kilogram*408 kilometers/1 meter*9.8 joules=30388 joules
> >>>>
> >>>> So it takes 30388 joules to lift a 7.6 gram lithium AAA battery
> >>>> from the earth to the ISS, but a AAA lithium battery only has 6732 joules
> >>>>
> >>>> 30388 joules / 6732 joules = 4.51
> >>>>
> >>>> So it will take about 4.5 times the power in a AAA lithium battery
> >>>> just to lift a AAA battery to the international space station.
> >>>> And that is with 100% perfect efficiency and without the added
> >>>> weight of a beryllium drone or electronics to obtain lift from any
> >>>> magnetic field or anything else needed.
> >>>>
> >>> Your calculations are wrong. Did you check to see what 30388 joules was? No, 1 kW = 1,000 J/s
> >> I think I checked the calculations.
> >> Yes 1 kilowatt is 1000 joules/second.
> >> And a kilowatt second is 1000 joules. What is your point?
> >> And 1.87 watt hours is 6732 joules. That is what I said.
> >>
> >> 9.8 joules will lift 1 kilogram one meter.
> >> But we only need to lift 7.6 grams, not 1000 grams
> >> But we need to lift 408 kilometers, not 1 meter.
> >> So 7.6/1000 * 408000/1 * 9.8 joules = 30388 joules
> >>
> >> If that isn't correct then put your precisely correct math on the table.
> >
> > Sure, fool, 11.2 km/sec klunker rocket blast compared to AP's float and helicopter calmly
> Where is your precisely correct math, Pluto?
> >>
> >> Those calculations are lifting a mass against gravity.
> >
> > But why bother with such calculations of lifting mass, as if you lifted a heavy rocket. Why bother at all. Did you ever take physics? I doubt it.
> "Why bother with calculations?" ?? Because that's a major part of
> physics, StupidPlutonium! If YOU had ever taken physics, you'd know
> that. But I guess not, you are quite ignorant about how physics works.
> >
> > Just run to the Escape velocities.
> >
> Those are velocities. You need to know the amount of energy needed to
> escape from the surface. bwr did that for the lithium AA battery and
> showed it exceeded its storage capacity. Escape velocity is the velocity
> need at the surface to escape _with no further energy added_.
> >
> > Now, it is extremely difficult for a drone built of the lightest weight material beryllium parked at the magnetic north pole to gain the poles Magnetic Field, extremely difficult to get that drone at 11.2 km/sec.
> >
> > But what most physicists do not understand is that we can Escape Earth from "floating" not rocketing.
> Hand waving. You still need to provide energy to work against gravity.
> >
> > Every day Earth loses thousands of particles that float, even bacteria that float. And none of these are going at 11.2 km/sec.
> The escape velocity is simply the speed needed when leaving the surface
> to escape, with no further energy input. Like firing a cannon where the
> cannonball isn't given any additional energy after firing. A cannonball
> moving at escape velocity at the muzzle will escape, one with less
> velocity will fall back to earth.
> > So, my Drone to take off at the North Magnetic Pole is a hybrid between something that Floats and the usual klunker rockets at Cape Canaveral.
> Where does it get its energy if a lithium battery doesn't have enough
> energy to escape? All you do is handwaving about a magnetic field at
> the north magnetic pole.
> >
> > My drone is so lightweight that the Magnetic Field of North Pole will do half the job of getting it to outer space as the helicopter blades on the drone for lift off.
> More handwaving. What drone. Build it and demonstrate it. Explain where
> it gets its energy from.
> >
> > So, what is the escape velocity of a balloon from Earth? It certainly is far less than 11.2 km/sec. For that is in Newton's law that misses the idea of Floating for Escape of Earth.
> Balloons aren't fired from cannons. Balloons cannot escape by
> themselves. Any gas in the balloon is denser than the vacuum of space.
> >
> > This is why I insist we cannot find the answers until someone with a drone goes to the Magnetic North Pole, lithium ion battery, the same helicopter that is now as I speak on planet Mars. Escape velocity of Mars is about half of Earth's 5.03. And this helicopter was built for lightweight like a balloon, not like a klunker rocket or airplane.
> Show the math which shows it has enough energy to escape.
> >
> > So, build a replica of Ingenuity and run up to the Magnetic North Pole and be surprised, that this helicopter goes past ISS and directly into Outer Space.
> Show the physics which cause this "surprise". Handwaving doesn't count
> for anything.
> >
> > Every report of Ingenuity on Mars has been one of "outperform expectations". And if NASA had the courage to let Ingenuity come home back to Earth riding the Solar Wind if possible, I bet we would be successful in even that much.
> Ingenuity, as it is, cannot even fly on earth. The atmosphere is too
> thick and gravity is too strong. This was explained by a NASA tech
> during a news special when Ingenuity first flew, he was flying a
> modified version of Ingenuity and explained the modifications. Slower
> rotation, different blade pitch (and material I think, needed to be
> stronger) and run at a higher power due to stronger earth gravity.
> >
> > So, learn physics first before opening silly mouth. Learn that there is 11.2 Km/sec but there is a better way-- float into outer space. You see Newton's gravity laws are for the rush rush do everything instantly, microwave a rocket launch. But the AP way is float into outer space.
> You need to learn physics first before trying to explain anything to
> your betters.

Spamming 💩👤 Archimedes Plutonium blithered:
>
> My 134th published book
>
> Introduction to TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 1 for ages 5 through 26, math textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> Why do you still keep trying to brainwash little 5 year old kids?

WARNING TO STUDENTS, PARENTS and TEACHERS: Archimedes Plutonium is
offering to teach your children his broken physics and math. BEWARE! He
will corrupt the minds of your children! Mr. Plutonium is not content to
be a failure of math and physics all by himself. He wants everyone else
to fail as well! He teaches bizarre false physics and math, such as
atoms contain the unstable muon, water is H4O and not H2O, the ellipse
isn't a conic section, there are no negative numbers and no complex
numbers, that a sine wave isn't sinusoidal but semicircles, cycloids or
parabolas (depending on his mood), plus many, many other instances of
bad math and physics.

Plutonium has previously tried to corrupt our youth by posting his books
on Usenet. That has failed until now, perhaps in part due to the fact
Usenet is an old, dying medium, which few modern students even know of,
much less use. However, Mr. Plutonium has somehow duped Amazon into
providing his dangerous books for free on Kindle. This has greatly
increased the danger to our students!

One of his dangerous tricks is teach false Boolean logic such as 10 AND
2 = 12. His method at doing this is particularly insidious. He'll post a
false statement that nobody believes, such as 10 OR 2 = 12, say that it
is false (which it is), but then he'll try to replace it with another
similar false statement such as 10 AND 2 = 12, in order to really
confuse future computer scientists. Plutonium is taking advantage of the
fact that AND means different things in Boolean logic and elementary
arithmetic, as AND is an informal synonym for plus/addition. It is
important for future computer scientists to remember that in the bitwise
Boolean logic used by modern computers, 10 OR 2 = 10 and 10 AND 2 = 2.
Of course in pure Boolean logic the only possible values are true and
false (1 or 0), so in pure Boolean logic the statements "10 AND 2" and
"10 OR 2" don't even make sense. Don't let evil Plutonium's bad logic
confuse you!

Plutonium has been targeting children as young as 5. A new attempt to
corrupt the minds of young children is to teach that the alphabet has 12
letters, 6 vowels and 6 consonants. This sounds like a great way to
keep our children from reading!

Nobody knows why Plutonium wishes to corrupt the minds of our youth like
this. Perhaps Plutonium is envious of their potential success, which he
never had because he is a failure at math and science. Plutonium is not
content to be a failure at math and physics all by himself. He wants
everyone to fail as well. Some claim Plutonium is an agent of China, in
order for China to dominate the world economy. Maybe he is a minion of
Kim Jong Un of North Korea. Most likely, however, he is an agent of
Putin and Russia, since Plutonium has previously attempted to summon
Russian robots in 2017 "to create a new, true mathematics" in an attempt
to destroy mathematics.

Additionally, Plutonium has started a Cult of Failure. He is trying to
convince students to worship his evil pagan Plutonium atom god of
Failure. This cult is anti-science and anti-mathematics. Its only goal
is to promote failure in math and science.

There is some evidence this Cult of Failure may be a suicide cult.
Plutonium has advocated that the "good guy" nations join into a
supernation and threaten to "flatten" the (nuclear armed) "bad guy"
nations who misbehave. The idea may to initiate an all-out nuclear
war when "bad guy" nations retaliate. Not simply is Plutonium or his
cult committing suicide but would take Planet Earth with them. As the
war in Ukraine continues, Plutonium keeps asking NATO to attack the
Russians, starting a nuclear WW3, which he feels is unavoidable. More
evidence of Plutonium's Cult of Failure being a suicide cult.

Plutonium is now encouraging resistance fighters fighting the regimes
in Russia and Iran to attack power lines in Tehran and Moscow by
carrying long vertical aluminum poles under them, presumably to short
them out, complete with a diagram. Obviously, this will not end well
for for the resistance fighter. The question is, did he do this because
he is Putin's stooge trying to kill off resistance fighters? Or is this
part of Plutonium's Suicide Cult of Failure, meaning this is merely a
suggestion how to commit suicide while failing to harm the regimes? Or
both?

But the point is, stay away, if he offers to give or sell you one of his
dangerous books. Especially now since they are available for free from
otherwise legitimate Amazon.