The creation of momentum with my new invention, the low voltage heavy armature rail gun.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYtyOMbgiZ0

The updating of Newtonian laws of motion... delete "external" from the first law and add "mechanical" to action in the third law

The above link shows links to other videos, where there is plenty of data and maths to be found to support the new physics effect.

Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee
Director
HTN Research Pty Ltd
Melbourne

On Tuesday, March 15, 2022 at 6:55:04 PM UTC-4, banerjee...@gmail.com wrote:
> The creation of momentum with my new invention, the low voltage heavy armature rail gun.
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYtyOMbgiZ0
>
> The updating of Newtonian laws of motion... delete "external" from the first law and add "mechanical" to action in the third law
>
> The above link shows links to other videos, where there is plenty of data and maths to be found to support the new physics effect.
>
> Cheers,
> Arindam Banerjee
> Director
> HTN Research Pty Ltd
> Melbourne

Geeze. Sounds good.

On Tuesday, March 15, 2022 at 6:55:04 PM UTC-4, banerjee...@gmail.com wrote:
> The creation of momentum with my new invention, the low voltage heavy armature rail gun.
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYtyOMbgiZ0
>
> The updating of Newtonian laws of motion... delete "external" from the first law and add "mechanical" to action in the third law
>
> The above link shows links to other videos, where there is plenty of data and maths to be found to support the new physics effect.
>
> Cheers,
> Arindam Banerjee
> Director
> HTN Research Pty Ltd
> Melbourne
Well, at least it didn't take very long.

On Wednesday, 16 March 2022 at 11:04:14 UTC+11, timba...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 15, 2022 at 6:55:04 PM UTC-4, banerjee...@gmail.com wrote:
> > The creation of momentum with my new invention, the low voltage heavy armature rail gun.
> >
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYtyOMbgiZ0
> >
> > The updating of Newtonian laws of motion... delete "external" from the first law and add "mechanical" to action in the third law
> >
> > The above link shows links to other videos, where there is plenty of data and maths to be found to support the new physics effect.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Arindam Banerjee
> > Director
> > HTN Research Pty Ltd
> > Melbourne
> Geeze. Sounds good.

Thanks for the response!
Best thing, it cannot be dismissed as a "conspiracy theory".
It is on video and anyone can repeat the experiment.

fyi the roller weighs nearly 3Kg and the rest about 4.2Kg.
So you can see how the momentum is created - the brass roller moves out much faster than the gun goes back.

I will post other videos to make it all crystal clear.

This follows from my work posted online in 2017 - the links are there in the above link.

On Wednesday, 16 March 2022 at 11:04:58 UTC+11, timba...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 15, 2022 at 6:55:04 PM UTC-4, banerjee...@gmail.com wrote:
> > The creation of momentum with my new invention, the low voltage heavy armature rail gun.
> >
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYtyOMbgiZ0
> >
> > The updating of Newtonian laws of motion... delete "external" from the first law and add "mechanical" to action in the third law
> >
> > The above link shows links to other videos, where there is plenty of data and maths to be found to support the new physics effect.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Arindam Banerjee
> > Director
> > HTN Research Pty Ltd
> > Melbourne
> Well, at least it didn't take very long.

It was on the rails for 0.46 seconds. Will do more work on that, thanks for your response, most encouraging.
Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee

On 3/15/2022 10:12 PM, banerjee...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Wednesday, 16 March 2022 at 11:04:14 UTC+11, timba...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Tuesday, March 15, 2022 at 6:55:04 PM UTC-4, banerjee...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> The creation of momentum with my new invention, the low voltage heavy armature rail gun.
>>>
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYtyOMbgiZ0
>>>
>>> The updating of Newtonian laws of motion... delete "external" from the first law and add "mechanical" to action in the third law
>>>
>>> The above link shows links to other videos, where there is plenty of data and maths to be found to support the new physics effect.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Arindam Banerjee
>>> Director
>>> HTN Research Pty Ltd
>>> Melbourne
>> Geeze. Sounds good.
>
> Thanks for the response!
> Best thing, it cannot be dismissed as a "conspiracy theory".
> It is on video and anyone can repeat the experiment.
>
> fyi the roller weighs nearly 3Kg and the rest about 4.2Kg.
> So you can see how the momentum is created - the brass roller moves out much faster than the gun goes back.
>
> I will post other videos to make it all crystal clear.
>
> This follows from my work posted online in 2017 - the links are there in the above link.

Did you actually get it to go uphill?

Did you carefully measure the speed/acceleration etc. when performing
the experiment?

Did you get a demonstration that is clear and obvious where anyone can
see your effect rather than that pathetic first video where nobody can
see anything?

Remember the "EMDrive" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EmDrive

They thought they had carefully measured the effect, not just watched it.
Then the more carefully they measured this the more odd it became.
Finally it seems that everyone thinks that they have figured it out,
it just isn't what they originally thought that it was.

See if you can find a way to really carefully measure what you have done.
And avoid missing any little details that can detract from the result.
That may be a little difficult with the large impulse forces you seem to have.

Just mounting the whole setup on wheels and seeing that it rolls off
in one direction is almost certainly not enough, because the friction
may be different during different parts of the impulse experiment.
Need to find something much better than that to measure your effect.

Good luck

On Wednesday, 16 March 2022 at 13:44:53 UTC+11, Michael Moroney wrote:
> On 3/15/2022 10:12 PM, banerjee...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 16 March 2022 at 11:04:14 UTC+11, timba...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> On Tuesday, March 15, 2022 at 6:55:04 PM UTC-4, banerjee...@gmail.com wrote:
> >>> The creation of momentum with my new invention, the low voltage heavy armature rail gun.
> >>>
> >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYtyOMbgiZ0
> >>>
> >>> The updating of Newtonian laws of motion... delete "external" from the first law and add "mechanical" to action in the third law
> >>>
> >>> The above link shows links to other videos, where there is plenty of data and maths to be found to support the new physics effect.
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>> Arindam Banerjee
> >>> Director
> >>> HTN Research Pty Ltd
> >>> Melbourne
> >> Geeze. Sounds good.
> >
> > Thanks for the response!
> > Best thing, it cannot be dismissed as a "conspiracy theory".
> > It is on video and anyone can repeat the experiment.
> >
> > fyi the roller weighs nearly 3Kg and the rest about 4.2Kg.
> > So you can see how the momentum is created - the brass roller moves out much faster than the gun goes back.
> >
> > I will post other videos to make it all crystal clear.
> >
> > This follows from my work posted online in 2017 - the links are there in the above link.
> Did you actually get it to go uphill?

The slope of the rails is slanted uphill, yes, following my new triggering system which uses slight gravite for the bullet to rest against the firing pin.
Are you blind?
>
> Did you carefully measure the speed/acceleration etc. when performing
> the experiment?

Anyone can do that from the video. If there is minimum competence.
>
> Did you get a demonstration that is clear and obvious where anyone can
> see your effect rather than that pathetic first video where nobody can
> see anything?

Are you blind as well as stupid?

On 3/15/2022 3:54 PM, banerjee...@gmail.com wrote:
> The creation of momentum with my new invention, the low voltage heavy armature rail gun.
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYtyOMbgiZ0
>
> The updating of Newtonian laws of motion... delete "external" from the first law and add "mechanical" to action in the third law
>
> The above link shows links to other videos, where there is plenty of data and maths to be found to support the new physics effect.

Sorry for the stupid questions, however, are you staging things?

START---------A0------A1---A2--A3

A0 attracts until the cylinder rolls over it, then A1 attracts and A0
repulses... When the cylinder rolls over A1, then A1 repulses and A2
attracts, when it rolls over A2, A2 repulses and A3 attracts. Then we
have a state where A0, A1 and A2 are all repelling and A3 is attracting...

Is the cylinder charged at all?

On Wednesday, 16 March 2022 at 13:49:37 UTC+11, bwr fml wrote:
> Remember the "EMDrive" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EmDrive
>
> They thought they had carefully measured the effect, not just watched it.
> Then the more carefully they measured this the more odd it became.
> Finally it seems that everyone thinks that they have figured it out,
> it just isn't what they originally thought that it was.

irrelevant to my work..anyone can see and judge that electricity moves the armature up the slope. I was persecuted as the authorities at my PHD thesis interview did not believe i had actually made such a device, back in 2015, but now they cannot disagree. Not that I care much about not getting a doctorate but that is another story.

>
> See if you can find a way to really carefully measure what you have done.

Very simple. School level work, although the maths and physics are new and revolutionary, bright kids should grasp same

> And avoid missing any little details that can detract from the result.

True. Here the gun hits an obstacle at the rear. But it does work as a gun or rather a cannon as it fires a heavy bullet and one can sense the reaction is much less than a chemical gun.
I have done more experiments with this gun and will present the results to the world. As this is a revolutionary experiment every schoolteacher of physics should perform for his class.

> That may be a little difficult with the large impulse forces you seem to have.

Yes the momentum is of the order of 7 kg m/s from memory. I have worked out details. That is momentum like a rifle bullet.
>
> Just mounting the whole setup on wheels and seeing that it rolls off
> in one direction is almost certainly not enough, because the friction
> may be different during different parts of the impulse experiment.

It is not mounted on wheels. It is mounted on light rollers to reduce friction to low levels in either direction. One can push it with equal ease in either direction. Would be nice to do it in the space station but as I cannot, all I can do is to reduce friction. You will see how that works in later shows.

> Need to find something much better than that to measure your effect.

Yes. Here all you can see is the working of a new invention, the low voltage heavy bullet rail gun and one can sense the absence of too much recoil.

There is no end to improvement. I am making a bigger gun, though this is good enough to show the rail gun action, and the violation of Newtonian laws for this special case. The big gun will be a good show for any sale of the original experimental apparatus. Will come with my personal lectures, to the highest bidder.

> Good luck

Thanks.
I had the good luck to be the one to do this experiment. Which was some experience! I am so blessed.
Now I need to sell my work to raise money to make motors to break all speed records.
Exciting times!

Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee

On Wednesday, 16 March 2022 at 14:24:05 UTC+11, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 3/15/2022 3:54 PM, banerjee...@gmail.com wrote:
> > The creation of momentum with my new invention, the low voltage heavy armature rail gun.
> >
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYtyOMbgiZ0
> >
> > The updating of Newtonian laws of motion... delete "external" from the first law and add "mechanical" to action in the third law
> >
> > The above link shows links to other videos, where there is plenty of data and maths to be found to support the new physics effect.
> Sorry for the stupid questions, however, are you staging things?

Unless one is blind in every sense, one can see exactly what i am doing.

>
>
> START---------A0------A1---A2--A3
>
> A0 attracts until the cylinder rolls over it, then A1 attracts and A0
> repulses... When the cylinder rolls over A1, then A1 repulses and A2
> attracts, when it rolls over A2, A2 repulses and A3 attracts. Then we
> have a state where A0, A1 and A2 are all repelling and A3 is attracting...
>
> Is the cylinder charged at all?

No.

It conducts electric current.
Read up on rail guns, and how they work.
I have invented a new kind, first time in 2015 and this is the latest upgrade.
This uses a very low voltage and a heavy bullet.
Military rail guns use very high voltage and light bullets.
But the basic principle is the same, though my new design theory is more evolved.

Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee

On 3/15/2022 8:41 PM, banerjee...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Wednesday, 16 March 2022 at 14:24:05 UTC+11, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>> On 3/15/2022 3:54 PM, banerjee...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> The creation of momentum with my new invention, the low voltage heavy armature rail gun.
>>>
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYtyOMbgiZ0
>>>
>>> The updating of Newtonian laws of motion... delete "external" from the first law and add "mechanical" to action in the third law
>>>
>>> The above link shows links to other videos, where there is plenty of data and maths to be found to support the new physics effect.
>> Sorry for the stupid questions, however, are you staging things?
>
> Unless one is blind in every sense, one can see exactly what i am doing.
>
>>
>>
>> START---------A0------A1---A2--A3
>>
>> A0 attracts until the cylinder rolls over it, then A1 attracts and A0
>> repulses... When the cylinder rolls over A1, then A1 repulses and A2
>> attracts, when it rolls over A2, A2 repulses and A3 attracts. Then we
>> have a state where A0, A1 and A2 are all repelling and A3 is attracting...
>>
>> Is the cylinder charged at all?
>
> No.
>
> It conducts electric current.
> Read up on rail guns, and how they work.
> I have invented a new kind, first time in 2015 and this is the latest upgrade.
> This uses a very low voltage and a heavy bullet.
> Military rail guns use very high voltage and light bullets.
> But the basic principle is the same, though my new design theory is more evolved.

Oh sorry, I was thinking of electromagnets wrt a roller coaster. Sorry
for polluting you post.

On 3/15/2022 11:03 PM, banerjee...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Wednesday, 16 March 2022 at 13:44:53 UTC+11, Michael Moroney wrote:
>

>>> This follows from my work posted online in 2017 - the links are there in the above link.
>> Did you actually get it to go uphill?
>
> The slope of the rails is slanted uphill, yes, following my new triggering system which uses slight gravite for the bullet to rest against the firing pin.
> Are you blind?

I'm not going to bother watching it if it is bad as your 2017 crashing
armature video.
>>
>> Did you carefully measure the speed/acceleration etc. when performing
>> the experiment?
>
> Anyone can do that from the video. If there is minimum competence.

So the answer is no, you did not follow science in making your video.
>>
>> Did you get a demonstration that is clear and obvious where anyone can
>> see your effect rather than that pathetic first video where nobody can
>> see anything?
>
> Are you blind as well as stupid?

So again, the answer is no, just like the last one, we only have your
word that it actually did anything.

My decision not to bother watching is obviously the correct one.

On Wednesday, 16 March 2022 at 17:27:23 UTC+11, Michael Moroney wrote:
> On 3/15/2022 11:03 PM, banerjee...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 16 March 2022 at 13:44:53 UTC+11, Michael Moroney wrote:
> >
>
> >>> This follows from my work posted online in 2017 - the links are there in the above link.
> >> Did you actually get it to go uphill?
> >
> > The slope of the rails is slanted uphill, yes, following my new triggering system which uses slight gravite for the bullet to rest against the firing pin.
> > Are you blind?
> I'm not going to bother watching it if it is bad as your 2017 crashing
> armature video.
It is lost upon those blind in every possible way and bigoted to boot, so your reaction is understandable.
> >>
> >> Did you carefully measure the speed/acceleration etc. when performing
> >> the experiment?
> >
> > Anyone can do that from the video. If there is minimum competence.
> So the answer is no, you did not follow science in making your video.

It is not no, moron. It is what it is. One can measure the speed and acceleration from the video as it is real time.
> >>
> >> Did you get a demonstration that is clear and obvious where anyone can
> >> see your effect rather than that pathetic first video where nobody can
> >> see anything?
> >
> > Are you blind as well as stupid?
> So again, the answer is no, just like the last one, we only have your
> word that it actually did anything.
>
> My decision not to bother watching is obviously the correct one.

Now who cares for the decision of morons of the Moroney class?
Alas, the whole world of fools does so.
Sad.

On Tuesday, March 15, 2022 at 10:13:30 PM UTC-4, banerjee...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Wednesday, 16 March 2022 at 11:04:58 UTC+11, timba...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Tuesday, March 15, 2022 at 6:55:04 PM UTC-4, banerjee...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > The creation of momentum with my new invention, the low voltage heavy armature rail gun.
> > >
> > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYtyOMbgiZ0
> > >
> > > The updating of Newtonian laws of motion... delete "external" from the first law and add "mechanical" to action in the third law
> > >
> > > The above link shows links to other videos, where there is plenty of data and maths to be found to support the new physics effect.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Arindam Banerjee
> > > Director
> > > HTN Research Pty Ltd
> > > Melbourne
> > Well, at least it didn't take very long.
> It was on the rails for 0.46 seconds. Will do more work on that, thanks for your response, most encouraging.
> Cheers,
> Arindam Banerjee

Are you claiming that this is something different than a rail gun?
I think it's cool. I've never made one.
At some level you'd like a lighter object travelling faster as much as a heavy object. At some point you are going to cause some damage. Be careful.

banerjee...@gmail.com explained on 3/15/2022 :
> On Wednesday, 16 March 2022 at 13:49:37 UTC+11, bwr fml wrote:
>> Remember the "EMDrive" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EmDrive
>>
>> They thought they had carefully measured the effect, not just watched it.
>> Then the more carefully they measured this the more odd it became.
>> Finally it seems that everyone thinks that they have figured it out,
>> it just isn't what they originally thought that it was.
>
> irrelevant to my work..anyone can see and judge that electricity moves the
> armature up the slope. I was persecuted as the authorities at my PHD thesis
> interview did not believe i had actually made such a device, back in 2015,
> but now they cannot disagree. Not that I care much about not getting a
> doctorate but that is another story.
>
>>
>> See if you can find a way to really carefully measure what you have done.
>
> Very simple. School level work, although the maths and physics are new and
> revolutionary, bright kids should grasp same
>
>> And avoid missing any little details that can detract from the result.
>
> True. Here the gun hits an obstacle at the rear. But it does work as a gun or
> rather a cannon as it fires a heavy bullet and one can sense the reaction is
> much less than a chemical gun. I have done more experiments with this gun and
> will present the results to the world. As this is a revolutionary experiment
> every schoolteacher of physics should perform for his class.
>
>> That may be a little difficult with the large impulse forces you seem to
>> have.
>
> Yes the momentum is of the order of 7 kg m/s from memory. I have worked out
> details. That is momentum like a rifle bullet.
>>
>> Just mounting the whole setup on wheels and seeing that it rolls off
>> in one direction is almost certainly not enough, because the friction
>> may be different during different parts of the impulse experiment.
>
> It is not mounted on wheels. It is mounted on light rollers to reduce
> friction to low levels in either direction. One can push it with equal ease
> in either direction. Would be nice to do it in the space station but as I
> cannot, all I can do is to reduce friction. You will see how that works in
> later shows.
>
>> Need to find something much better than that to measure your effect.
>
> Yes. Here all you can see is the working of a new invention, the low voltage
> heavy bullet rail gun and one can sense the absence of too much recoil.
>
> There is no end to improvement. I am making a bigger gun, though this is good
> enough to show the rail gun action, and the violation of Newtonian laws for
> this special case. The big gun will be a good show for any sale of the
> original experimental apparatus. Will come with my personal lectures, to the
> highest bidder.
>
>
>> Good luck
>
> Thanks.
> I had the good luck to be the one to do this experiment. Which was some
> experience! I am so blessed. Now I need to sell my work to raise money to
> make motors to break all speed records. Exciting times!
>
> Cheers,
> Arindam Banerjee

How did you measure the force pushing the rails apart?

On Thursday, 17 March 2022 at 06:17:36 UTC+11, FromTheRafters wrote:
> banerjee...@gmail.com explained on 3/15/2022 :
> > On Wednesday, 16 March 2022 at 13:49:37 UTC+11, bwr fml wrote:
> >> Remember the "EMDrive" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EmDrive
> >>
> >> They thought they had carefully measured the effect, not just watched it.
> >> Then the more carefully they measured this the more odd it became.
> >> Finally it seems that everyone thinks that they have figured it out,
> >> it just isn't what they originally thought that it was.
> >
> > irrelevant to my work..anyone can see and judge that electricity moves the
> > armature up the slope. I was persecuted as the authorities at my PHD thesis
> > interview did not believe i had actually made such a device, back in 2015,
> > but now they cannot disagree. Not that I care much about not getting a
> > doctorate but that is another story.
> >
> >>
> >> See if you can find a way to really carefully measure what you have done.
> >
> > Very simple. School level work, although the maths and physics are new and
> > revolutionary, bright kids should grasp same
> >
> >> And avoid missing any little details that can detract from the result.
> >
> > True. Here the gun hits an obstacle at the rear. But it does work as a gun or
> > rather a cannon as it fires a heavy bullet and one can sense the reaction is
> > much less than a chemical gun. I have done more experiments with this gun and
> > will present the results to the world. As this is a revolutionary experiment
> > every schoolteacher of physics should perform for his class.
> >
> >> That may be a little difficult with the large impulse forces you seem to
> >> have.
> >
> > Yes the momentum is of the order of 7 kg m/s from memory. I have worked out
> > details. That is momentum like a rifle bullet.
> >>
> >> Just mounting the whole setup on wheels and seeing that it rolls off
> >> in one direction is almost certainly not enough, because the friction
> >> may be different during different parts of the impulse experiment.
> >
> > It is not mounted on wheels. It is mounted on light rollers to reduce
> > friction to low levels in either direction. One can push it with equal ease
> > in either direction. Would be nice to do it in the space station but as I
> > cannot, all I can do is to reduce friction. You will see how that works in
> > later shows.
> >
> >> Need to find something much better than that to measure your effect.
> >
> > Yes. Here all you can see is the working of a new invention, the low voltage
> > heavy bullet rail gun and one can sense the absence of too much recoil.
> >
> > There is no end to improvement. I am making a bigger gun, though this is good
> > enough to show the rail gun action, and the violation of Newtonian laws for
> > this special case. The big gun will be a good show for any sale of the
> > original experimental apparatus. Will come with my personal lectures, to the
> > highest bidder.
> >
> >
> >> Good luck
> >
> > Thanks.
> > I had the good luck to be the one to do this experiment. Which was some
> > experience! I am so blessed. Now I need to sell my work to raise money to
> > make motors to break all speed records. Exciting times!
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Arindam Banerjee
> How did you measure the force pushing the rails apart?

I did not even try to do that. The rails are fixed. They have to be kept in liquid conductor for such experiments as you suggest. Work on those lines was done by US Navy engineers in 2007. Schroder, Putnam. They worked on static rail gun models, but looked for opposite reaction, not lateral forces on the rails.
Later on I will present a detailed movie about how the momentum is created with this equipment which is more powerful than the earlier one I made in 2015.

On Thursday, 17 March 2022 at 01:55:24 UTC+11, timba...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 15, 2022 at 10:13:30 PM UTC-4, banerjee...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 16 March 2022 at 11:04:58 UTC+11, timba...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, March 15, 2022 at 6:55:04 PM UTC-4, banerjee...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > The creation of momentum with my new invention, the low voltage heavy armature rail gun.
> > > >
> > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYtyOMbgiZ0
> > > >
> > > > The updating of Newtonian laws of motion... delete "external" from the first law and add "mechanical" to action in the third law
> > > >
> > > > The above link shows links to other videos, where there is plenty of data and maths to be found to support the new physics effect.
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Arindam Banerjee
> > > > Director
> > > > HTN Research Pty Ltd
> > > > Melbourne
> > > Well, at least it didn't take very long.
> > It was on the rails for 0.46 seconds. Will do more work on that, thanks for your response, most encouraging.
> > Cheers,
> > Arindam Banerjee
> Are you claiming that this is something different than a rail gun?

My claim is to have made a new design of a rail gun, which is light, fires a very heavy bullet, and operates on a relatively very low voltage. The geometry too is new with widely set apart rails, and that follows from my new theory about rail gun design, that had been explained in my 2017 set of videos freely available on youtube, to find them just go through the link above.

It is a very powerful gun. Even the working model shown above creates 7.8 kg-m/s of momentum. As it fires a 3000g bullet at 2.6m/s muzzle speed. This is equivalent to firing at 10g rifle bullet at Mach2.27.

Normal military rail guns work on creating a conductive plasma created around the relatively light plastic bullet with a very high electric voltage driving a very high current. The bore is like that of a conventional gun. It is very different from my invention, which can launch hypersonic missiles easily by firing them at Mach 2+ to begin with.

> I think it's cool. I've never made one.

No one has. It is a new invention. Thanks for your appreciation.
My interest from this video above and earlier ones in 2017 is to show:
1. that the laws of physics need to be updated, for the Newtonian laws of motion (first and third) are directly broken by this device
2. that we can make reactionless, very efficient, non-polluting electric motors for transport through space at unlimited speeds
3. any responsible school teacher can perform this experiment to his students, so please go ahead.

> At some level you'd like a lighter object travelling faster as much as a heavy object. At some point you are going to cause some damage. Be careful.

Well, my wife did the above experiment and got scared. I am under strict instructions to test the bigger gun outdoors. Not that it will cause much damage, as it is so slow. The above had a muzzle speed of 2.6m/s and I expect the later model to have a muzzle speed of 4.16m/s, creating thus a momentum of 12.5 Arindams. That will be the demonstration model for hopes of publicity and funding. I would be so glad if I got offers from worthy people or institutions, for this apparatus along with a set of lectures.

Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee

On Wednesday, March 16, 2022 at 6:09:41 PM UTC-4, banerjee...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thursday, 17 March 2022 at 01:55:24 UTC+11, timba...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Tuesday, March 15, 2022 at 10:13:30 PM UTC-4, banerjee...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, 16 March 2022 at 11:04:58 UTC+11, timba...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday, March 15, 2022 at 6:55:04 PM UTC-4, banerjee...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > The creation of momentum with my new invention, the low voltage heavy armature rail gun.
> > > > >
> > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYtyOMbgiZ0
> > > > >
> > > > > The updating of Newtonian laws of motion... delete "external" from the first law and add "mechanical" to action in the third law
> > > > >
> > > > > The above link shows links to other videos, where there is plenty of data and maths to be found to support the new physics effect.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > Arindam Banerjee
> > > > > Director
> > > > > HTN Research Pty Ltd
> > > > > Melbourne
> > > > Well, at least it didn't take very long.
> > > It was on the rails for 0.46 seconds. Will do more work on that, thanks for your response, most encouraging.
> > > Cheers,
> > > Arindam Banerjee
> > Are you claiming that this is something different than a rail gun?
> My claim is to have made a new design of a rail gun, which is light, fires a very heavy bullet, and operates on a relatively very low voltage. The geometry too is new with widely set apart rails, and that follows from my new theory about rail gun design, that had been explained in my 2017 set of videos freely available on youtube, to find them just go through the link above.
>
> It is a very powerful gun. Even the working model shown above creates 7.8 kg-m/s of momentum. As it fires a 3000g bullet at 2.6m/s muzzle speed. This is equivalent to firing at 10g rifle bullet at Mach2.27.
>
> Normal military rail guns work on creating a conductive plasma created around the relatively light plastic bullet with a very high electric voltage driving a very high current. The bore is like that of a conventional gun. It is very different from my invention, which can launch hypersonic missiles easily by firing them at Mach 2+ to begin with.
> > I think it's cool. I've never made one.
> No one has. It is a new invention. Thanks for your appreciation.
> My interest from this video above and earlier ones in 2017 is to show:
> 1. that the laws of physics need to be updated, for the Newtonian laws of motion (first and third) are directly broken by this device
> 2. that we can make reactionless, very efficient, non-polluting electric motors for transport through space at unlimited speeds
> 3. any responsible school teacher can perform this experiment to his students, so please go ahead.
> > At some level you'd like a lighter object travelling faster as much as a heavy object. At some point you are going to cause some damage. Be careful.
> Well, my wife did the above experiment and got scared. I am under strict instructions to test the bigger gun outdoors. Not that it will cause much damage, as it is so slow. The above had a muzzle speed of 2.6m/s and I expect the later model to have a muzzle speed of 4.16m/s, creating thus a momentum of 12.5 Arindams. That will be the demonstration model for hopes of publicity and funding. I would be so glad if I got offers from worthy people or institutions, for this apparatus along with a set of lectures.
>
> Cheers,
> Arindam Banerjee

If there is decent efficiency there the idea of a reciprocating drive without any gears could be meaningful. There are electric jack hammers already, but yours might yield some better impulse power. Whatever; you've obviously gotten beyond armchair physics, which in any form is meaningful. Congratulations on your basement experiment.

banerjee...@gmail.com used his keyboard to write :
> On Thursday, 17 March 2022 at 06:17:36 UTC+11, FromTheRafters wrote:
>> banerjee...@gmail.com explained on 3/15/2022 :
>>> On Wednesday, 16 March 2022 at 13:49:37 UTC+11, bwr fml wrote:
>>>> Remember the "EMDrive" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EmDrive
>>>>
>>>> They thought they had carefully measured the effect, not just watched it.
>>>> Then the more carefully they measured this the more odd it became.
>>>> Finally it seems that everyone thinks that they have figured it out,
>>>> it just isn't what they originally thought that it was.
>>>
>>> irrelevant to my work..anyone can see and judge that electricity moves the
>>> armature up the slope. I was persecuted as the authorities at my PHD thesis
>>> interview did not believe i had actually made such a device, back in 2015,
>>> but now they cannot disagree. Not that I care much about not getting a
>>> doctorate but that is another story.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> See if you can find a way to really carefully measure what you have done.
>>>
>>> Very simple. School level work, although the maths and physics are new and
>>> revolutionary, bright kids should grasp same
>>>
>>>> And avoid missing any little details that can detract from the result.
>>>
>>> True. Here the gun hits an obstacle at the rear. But it does work as a gun
>>> or rather a cannon as it fires a heavy bullet and one can sense the
>>> reaction is much less than a chemical gun. I have done more experiments
>>> with this gun and will present the results to the world. As this is a
>>> revolutionary experiment every schoolteacher of physics should perform for
>>> his class.
>>>
>>>> That may be a little difficult with the large impulse forces you seem to
>>>> have.
>>>
>>> Yes the momentum is of the order of 7 kg m/s from memory. I have worked out
>>> details. That is momentum like a rifle bullet.
>>>>
>>>> Just mounting the whole setup on wheels and seeing that it rolls off
>>>> in one direction is almost certainly not enough, because the friction
>>>> may be different during different parts of the impulse experiment.
>>>
>>> It is not mounted on wheels. It is mounted on light rollers to reduce
>>> friction to low levels in either direction. One can push it with equal ease
>>> in either direction. Would be nice to do it in the space station but as I
>>> cannot, all I can do is to reduce friction. You will see how that works in
>>> later shows.
>>>
>>>> Need to find something much better than that to measure your effect.
>>>
>>> Yes. Here all you can see is the working of a new invention, the low
>>> voltage heavy bullet rail gun and one can sense the absence of too much
>>> recoil.
>>>
>>> There is no end to improvement. I am making a bigger gun, though this is
>>> good enough to show the rail gun action, and the violation of Newtonian
>>> laws for this special case. The big gun will be a good show for any sale
>>> of the original experimental apparatus. Will come with my personal
>>> lectures, to the highest bidder.
>>>
>>>
>>>> Good luck
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>> I had the good luck to be the one to do this experiment. Which was some
>>> experience! I am so blessed. Now I need to sell my work to raise money to
>>> make motors to break all speed records. Exciting times!
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Arindam Banerjee
>> How did you measure the force pushing the rails apart?
>
> I did not even try to do that. The rails are fixed. They have to be kept in
> liquid conductor for such experiments as you suggest. Work on those lines was
> done by US Navy engineers in 2007. Schroder, Putnam. They worked on static
> rail gun models, but looked for opposite reaction, not lateral forces on the
> rails. Later on I will present a detailed movie about how the momentum is
> created with this equipment which is more powerful than the earlier one I
> made in 2015.

I suggest making the apparatus weigh the same as the projectile and
suspending both in separate cradles. The force moving them apart can be
compared, if not measured with accuracy, more easily by the angle of
deflection.

Of course, you probably want some sort of capture device so the
experiment doesn't crash when the pendulum(s) return with nearly the
same force as that which separared them.

On Friday, 18 March 2022 at 00:51:22 UTC+11, timba...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 16, 2022 at 6:09:41 PM UTC-4, banerjee...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Thursday, 17 March 2022 at 01:55:24 UTC+11, timba...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, March 15, 2022 at 10:13:30 PM UTC-4, banerjee...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday, 16 March 2022 at 11:04:58 UTC+11, timba...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > On Tuesday, March 15, 2022 at 6:55:04 PM UTC-4, banerjee...@gmail..com wrote:
> > > > > > The creation of momentum with my new invention, the low voltage heavy armature rail gun.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYtyOMbgiZ0
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The updating of Newtonian laws of motion... delete "external" from the first law and add "mechanical" to action in the third law
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The above link shows links to other videos, where there is plenty of data and maths to be found to support the new physics effect.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > Arindam Banerjee
> > > > > > Director
> > > > > > HTN Research Pty Ltd
> > > > > > Melbourne
> > > > > Well, at least it didn't take very long.
> > > > It was on the rails for 0.46 seconds. Will do more work on that, thanks for your response, most encouraging.
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Arindam Banerjee
> > > Are you claiming that this is something different than a rail gun?
> > My claim is to have made a new design of a rail gun, which is light, fires a very heavy bullet, and operates on a relatively very low voltage. The geometry too is new with widely set apart rails, and that follows from my new theory about rail gun design, that had been explained in my 2017 set of videos freely available on youtube, to find them just go through the link above.
> >
> > It is a very powerful gun. Even the working model shown above creates 7..8 kg-m/s of momentum. As it fires a 3000g bullet at 2.6m/s muzzle speed. This is equivalent to firing at 10g rifle bullet at Mach2.27.
> >
> > Normal military rail guns work on creating a conductive plasma created around the relatively light plastic bullet with a very high electric voltage driving a very high current. The bore is like that of a conventional gun. It is very different from my invention, which can launch hypersonic missiles easily by firing them at Mach 2+ to begin with.
> > > I think it's cool. I've never made one.
> > No one has. It is a new invention. Thanks for your appreciation.
> > My interest from this video above and earlier ones in 2017 is to show:
> > 1. that the laws of physics need to be updated, for the Newtonian laws of motion (first and third) are directly broken by this device
> > 2. that we can make reactionless, very efficient, non-polluting electric motors for transport through space at unlimited speeds
> > 3. any responsible school teacher can perform this experiment to his students, so please go ahead.
> > > At some level you'd like a lighter object travelling faster as much as a heavy object. At some point you are going to cause some damage. Be careful.
> > Well, my wife did the above experiment and got scared. I am under strict instructions to test the bigger gun outdoors. Not that it will cause much damage, as it is so slow. The above had a muzzle speed of 2.6m/s and I expect the later model to have a muzzle speed of 4.16m/s, creating thus a momentum of 12.5 Arindams. That will be the demonstration model for hopes of publicity and funding. I would be so glad if I got offers from worthy people or institutions, for this apparatus along with a set of lectures.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Arindam Banerjee
> If there is decent efficiency there the idea of a reciprocating drive without any gears could be meaningful.

The formulas are there in my videos, for this kind of new motor. One has to go through them, which may not be easy for most. So I need to give some lectures to the young people.
It is very efficient, much more than any known device, for it is based upon superior physics that throws out the conservation of momentum laws, upsets inertia, entropy, etc.

>There are electric jack hammers already, but yours might yield some better impulse power. Whatever; you've obviously gotten beyond armchair physics, which in any form is meaningful. Congratulations on your basement experiment.

Thank you. Your encouragement is most helpful. From those who consider themselves physicists, with only a few exceptions to prove the rule, I have got nothing but ridicule and scorn.
I will be making a film on the experiment, showing exactly how the Newtonian laws are broken by this device.
Then I am making as I said a bigger gun.
To make motors for space travel, replace jet engines, etc. I need to get funds and that may come from selling my original prototypes and giving lectures.

Let us see. I do hope for the best.

Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee
Director
HTN Research Pty Ltd.

On Friday, 18 March 2022 at 01:04:55 UTC+11, FromTheRafters wrote:
> banerjee...@gmail.com used his keyboard to write :
> > On Thursday, 17 March 2022 at 06:17:36 UTC+11, FromTheRafters wrote:
> >> banerjee...@gmail.com explained on 3/15/2022 :
> >>> On Wednesday, 16 March 2022 at 13:49:37 UTC+11, bwr fml wrote:
> >>>> Remember the "EMDrive" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EmDrive
> >>>>
> >>>> They thought they had carefully measured the effect, not just watched it.
> >>>> Then the more carefully they measured this the more odd it became.
> >>>> Finally it seems that everyone thinks that they have figured it out,
> >>>> it just isn't what they originally thought that it was.
> >>>
> >>> irrelevant to my work..anyone can see and judge that electricity moves the
> >>> armature up the slope. I was persecuted as the authorities at my PHD thesis
> >>> interview did not believe i had actually made such a device, back in 2015,
> >>> but now they cannot disagree. Not that I care much about not getting a
> >>> doctorate but that is another story.
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> See if you can find a way to really carefully measure what you have done.
> >>>
> >>> Very simple. School level work, although the maths and physics are new and
> >>> revolutionary, bright kids should grasp same
> >>>
> >>>> And avoid missing any little details that can detract from the result.
> >>>
> >>> True. Here the gun hits an obstacle at the rear. But it does work as a gun
> >>> or rather a cannon as it fires a heavy bullet and one can sense the
> >>> reaction is much less than a chemical gun. I have done more experiments
> >>> with this gun and will present the results to the world. As this is a
> >>> revolutionary experiment every schoolteacher of physics should perform for
> >>> his class.
> >>>
> >>>> That may be a little difficult with the large impulse forces you seem to
> >>>> have.
> >>>
> >>> Yes the momentum is of the order of 7 kg m/s from memory. I have worked out
> >>> details. That is momentum like a rifle bullet.
> >>>>
> >>>> Just mounting the whole setup on wheels and seeing that it rolls off
> >>>> in one direction is almost certainly not enough, because the friction
> >>>> may be different during different parts of the impulse experiment.
> >>>
> >>> It is not mounted on wheels. It is mounted on light rollers to reduce
> >>> friction to low levels in either direction. One can push it with equal ease
> >>> in either direction. Would be nice to do it in the space station but as I
> >>> cannot, all I can do is to reduce friction. You will see how that works in
> >>> later shows.
> >>>
> >>>> Need to find something much better than that to measure your effect.
> >>>
> >>> Yes. Here all you can see is the working of a new invention, the low
> >>> voltage heavy bullet rail gun and one can sense the absence of too much
> >>> recoil.
> >>>
> >>> There is no end to improvement. I am making a bigger gun, though this is
> >>> good enough to show the rail gun action, and the violation of Newtonian
> >>> laws for this special case. The big gun will be a good show for any sale
> >>> of the original experimental apparatus. Will come with my personal
> >>> lectures, to the highest bidder.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Good luck
> >>>
> >>> Thanks.
> >>> I had the good luck to be the one to do this experiment. Which was some
> >>> experience! I am so blessed. Now I need to sell my work to raise money to
> >>> make motors to break all speed records. Exciting times!
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>> Arindam Banerjee
> >> How did you measure the force pushing the rails apart?
> >
> > I did not even try to do that. The rails are fixed. They have to be kept in
> > liquid conductor for such experiments as you suggest. Work on those lines was
> > done by US Navy engineers in 2007. Schroder, Putnam. They worked on static
> > rail gun models, but looked for opposite reaction, not lateral forces on the
> > rails. Later on I will present a detailed movie about how the momentum is
> > created with this equipment which is more powerful than the earlier one I
> > made in 2015.
> I suggest making the apparatus weigh the same as the projectile and
> suspending both in separate cradles.

In the experiment in the video, the projectile weighs 3000g and the rest weighs 4200g.
Yes, what you suggest was done in experiments from 2015.
A number of videos were published in 2017, Links are at:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hqBfwAClVlg
IFE - 1 Ground Experiments

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w9eGq4Oiv9s
IFE - 2 Experimental setups

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3hC48BMrno
IFE - 3 Pendulum experiments

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3sSPxGsLkws
IFE - 4 Evolution of spaceship

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pJdM6UDPauU
IFE - 5 Hydrogen Transmission Network

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TUAcx7rAplc
IFE - 6 Spaceship Design

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H5Zbpvc3fdA
IFE - 7 Anti-Gravity

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VA9LUwqMhxY
IFE - 8 New Physics

One needs to go through them one by one to get a full picture.

Since then, I have made more rail guns and the one shown is the latest.
It shows the lack of recoil, and momentum created, very clearly.
Which I will illustrate in a special flim.

However, the main thing can be seen in just 0.5 sec! Electric current of the order of 3300A drives the projectile.
That is the key to the much more complex technology which will comprise the new class of reactionless electric motor.
Now there the currents will be of the order of 500000 amps.
I discuss that sort of design in the videos above.

The force moving them apart can be
> compared, if not measured with accuracy, more easily by the angle of
> deflection.

>
> Of course, you probably want some sort of capture device so the
> experiment doesn't crash when the pendulum(s) return with nearly the
> same force as that which separared them.

There are two modes - the gun mode as shown when the projectile/armature/bullet leaves the apparatus.
When the projectile is trapped, the whole thing moves forward with a certain velocity from the created momentum.
That is possible as there is no equal and opposite reaction.
Yes, in the video there is some recoil, but that is because of the rolling friction.
If I managed to make it slide (not difficult, just beyond my means at the moment) that recoil would be much less.

Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee
Director
HTN Research Pty Ltd
Melbourne