"Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> wrote in
news:op.1j6zy1bgmvhs6z@ryzen.lan:

> On Tue, 05 Apr 2022 14:21:58 +0100, Clive Arthur
> <clive@nowaytoday.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> On 29/03/2022 18:56, Commander Kinsey wrote:
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>>> If I was a Russian I'd stand by Putin. What's wrong with taking
>>> back a nation that once belonged to you, one full of such rich
>>> resources?
>>
>> My Sister might know, she lives in Anchorage. Alaska and see
>> what she thinks.
>
> It's not even properly joined to the USA. Give it to Canada or
> something.
>

Canada and Northern Ireland are not attached to the UK, maybe
Canada should be ours.

See how retarded your bent brained logic is, boy?

6 year old kids know more about the world than a putz like you
does.

John Doe <always.look@message.header> wrote in
news:t2l0r5$v2h$3@dont-email.me:

>
> The only truthful argument is "Russia is EVIL and needs to be
> exterminated".
>

More like "Rusian leaders are crazy still, and we must set up
defenses.

There is no goal to do harm to the nation. It would be great if
their embrace of democracy stuck, but the KGB and Putin saw to it that
was not the case.

John Dope <always.look@message.header> wrote in
news:t2l0r5$v2h$3@dont-email.me:

> Self-defense is a basic right. Ukraine is within 200 miles from
> Moscow. We would not allow any hostile military organization into
> Mexico or Canada.

Ukraine is not a hostile military organization, you pathetic cringing
milksop. Also, they are not setting up missiles aimed toward Moscow.
Not now, not ever.

It could happen now though.

It does not get more stupid than this lame John Dope troll character
in SED.

whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com> wrote in
news:1b462dbf-f52f-4b4d-ba1f-dd1d96a80f4bn@googlegroups.com:

> On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 2:31:24 PM UTC-7, John Doe wrote:
>> For anyone who has time to do the research...
>>
>> Since the Cold War ended, after Russia gave up Ukraine and many
>> other border countries, the MILITARY organization NATO has been
>> expanding eastward to those former Russian border countries.
>
> Nonsense, starting with 'Russia gave up'; Ukraine has its own
> government, was under USSR for a while, but not Russia. The
> various border countries ditto have their own governments.
> Only Russian government answers to Putin.
>
> NATO is not a nation, but its members are nations with borders.
> None of those borders moved when membership in NATO changed.
> Putin's Russia is killing people to move borders.
>
>> Only someone who is geographically and historically challenged,
>> or someone who is corrupt, would not see Russia's security
>> interests in the Russia-Ukraine issue. It's obvious to anyone
>> with their eyes open. Unfortunately, many people are wearing
>> imperialist warmonger blinders.
>
> It seems that only nobles like John Doe can see the emperor's new
> clothes.
>

Spot on every point.

Ed Lee <edward.ming.lee@gmail.com> wrote in
news:1d5d4c62-a32a-4910-b041-d7b9ed46a907n@googlegroups.com:

> On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 2:55:22 PM UTC-7, whit3rd wrote:
>> On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 2:31:24 PM UTC-7, John Doe wrote:
>> > For anyone who has time to do the research...
>> >
>> > Since the Cold War ended, after Russia gave up Ukraine and many
>> > other border countries, the MILITARY organization NATO has been
>> > expanding eastward to those former Russian border countries.
>> Nonsense, starting with 'Russia gave up'; Ukraine has its own
>> government, was under USSR for a while, but not Russia. The
>> various border countries ditto have their own governments.
>> Only Russian government answers to Putin.
>
> Well, in analogy, EU don't want UK to leave and should invade UK
> UK has no right to be independent.
>

Back to the dopey shit, I see.

"Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> wrote in
news:op.1j78h0m9mvhs6z@ryzen.lan:

> NATO is a pest, they're the ones making war everywhere.

You're an utter retard. You're the one wasting the planet's Oxygen.
Go find a tall building to jump off of and then do so.

"Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> wrote in
news:op.1j8cpklhmvhs6z@ryzen.lan:

> What do you call sanctions that make the Russian innocent
> civilians pay three times as much for food? What NATO is doing is
> criminal.

To others reading this thread:
This Kinsey idiot is about as stupid as it gets.

To you, Kinsey idiot:
NATO did not impose any sanctions, you idiot. The leaders of
individual nations did.

Do you even know what "The United Nations" is?

That explains the way Sloman responds to posts by the idiot John
Dope.

He does not address him directly, he addresses any would be readers
of the thread, and John Dopes stupid posts.

I know you have a hard time with understanding anything, but his
"English" is fine, as is his grammar and composition. You are the
idiot.

John Dope <always.look@message.header> wrote in news:t2leeq$grv$2@dont-
email.me:

> At some point NATO's expansion was not about DEFENSE anymore.

You're an abject idiot. At EVERY point.

"Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> wrote in
news:op.1j8e7bnwmvhs6z@ryzen.lan:

> On Thu, 07 Apr 2022 02:01:25 +0100, Ed Lee
> <edward.ming.lee@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 5:52:34 PM UTC-7, Commander Kinsey
>> wrote:
>>> On Thu, 07 Apr 2022 01:44:36 +0100, Ed Lee
>>> <edward....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> > On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 5:31:18 PM UTC-7, John Doe
>>> > wrote:
>>> >> Ed Lee <edward....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> > I am just applying John Doe's logic
>>> >> Your comrade cannot follow a conversation.
>>> >>
>>> >> That's not even close to my logic. The United Kingdom is not
>>> >> acting like a hostile neighbor to the European Union.
>>> >
>>> > Ukraine was not hostile to Russia before invasion of Crimea.
>>> > All they want is to get back their territory.
>>> >
>>> >> It is not inviting a powerful EU-hostile MILITARY
>>> >> organization onto its territory.
>>> >
>>> > Ukraine wants NATO for protection, not to invade Russia. NATO
>>> > would not invade Russia on behalf of Ukraine anyway.
>>> What do you call sanctions that make the Russian innocent
>>> civilians pay three times as much for food? What NATO is doing
>>> is criminal.
>>
>> Unfortunate victim of conflict. Even if they are paying three
>> times for food, it's still a lot better than Ukrainians in
>> Mariupol area who can't get food at all, or the dead Ukrainians
>> who has no use for food.
>
> Not a valid excuse. If we want to get involved in the war, we
> should shoot at Russian military, and do nothing else.

Then that would include the Kremlin, if we follow suit with their
behavior and your edict, because the Kremlin IS a Russian military
target.

"Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> wrote in
news:op.1j8e9tenmvhs6z@ryzen.lan:

> So it's just another warmonger - a bunch of countries that got
> together to form a gang.
>

Putin is just another warmonger, you fucking idiot.

And your 'gang' got together to form a DEFENSE SHIELD against that.
ZERO aggression, 100% defense. As in no missile batteries pointed at
Russia, while the entire world knows that Russia has misile batteries
pointed outward from themseleves and ICBM missile silos targetting
cities around the world. NO other nation does that stupid shit.

All of ours only point to one target. There is a reason for that.
One you are obviously and absoluetely oblivious to.

"Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> wrote in
news:op.1j8fcs17mvhs6z@ryzen.lan:

> That was so funny when America, the country that thought it was in
> charge of the world, lost it's big towers. I fell of my chair
> laughing in hysterics.
>

Somebody needs to come find you and feed you to a pen full of feral
pigs, so the world can laugh at the departure of yet another totally
retarded example of a failed human. You are truly pathetic.

"Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> wrote in
news:op.1j8fekizmvhs6z@ryzen.lan:

>
> Not just Russia, they have India and China on their side. Good
> luck to them, I'm considering defecting, I'm fed up of the pansy
> West.
>

You are wrong about both India and China. But then the world knows
just how utterly stupid you are.

"Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> wrote in
news:op.1j8i60jxmvhs6z@ryzen.lan:

> Sanctions which hurt Russian civilians and also hurt the countries
> imposing those sanctions. That's an act of war.

No idiot. Putin's invasion was an act of war, you stupid putz.
The imposition of sanctions is a retaliation designed to force the
idiot to stop. It will work, and Putin and his Russia will have lost a
big chunk of their military hardware and men because of his stupid
warmongering move.

Sanctions are not acts of war, they are acts of retaliation against
war driven idiots. You could not be more stupid if you tried.

"Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> wrote in
news:op.1j8i60jxmvhs6z@ryzen.lan:

> NATO needs to be tried for war crimes.

Kinsey needs to be fed to a pen of feral pigs.

Six pieces, sixteen pigs. About 8 minutes.

Except Kinsey is probably a huge lard ass, so maybe 12 minutes.

"Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> wrote in
news:op.1j8srsermvhs6z@ryzen.lan:

> Who was given warning?

Putin was you total fucking self imposed utter retard.

> The Russian civilians that aren't in
> control of what Putin is doing?

Before Putin closed off their ability to see what was taking place,
many of them saw it coming. They were not warned because they did
nothing. The warning was to Putin, idiot.

The result will force him to stop. He did not. The result will be
that his own people, all the way to the top will oust him, and not
likely by the ways of the normal world. Putin will very likely die at
the hands of his own.

If we were anything like him, he would already be dead. Because WE
CAN get bombs all the way to Moscow, even directly from US soil.
Putin, however cannot, and any attempts we will thwart.

Whereas OUR stuff will hit its mark, were we to ever send it.

"Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> wrote in
news:op.1j8srsermvhs6z@ryzen.lan:

>
> The conflict is nothing to do with me or my country. My
> government has no right to help some other country fight some
> other country.
>

Your 8 year old mental age is showing through again.

You prove that you really have no grasp of reality at all.

On 2022-04-07, Commander Kinsey <CK1@nospam.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 07 Apr 2022 02:01:25 +0100, Ed Lee <edward.ming.lee@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 5:52:34 PM UTC-7, Commander Kinsey wrote:
>>> On Thu, 07 Apr 2022 01:44:36 +0100, Ed Lee <edward....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> > On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 5:31:18 PM UTC-7, John Doe wrote:
>>> >> Ed Lee <edward....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> > I am just applying John Doe's logic
>>> >> Your comrade cannot follow a conversation.
>>> >>
>>> >> That's not even close to my logic. The United Kingdom is not acting like a
>>> >> hostile neighbor to the European Union.
>>> >
>>> > Ukraine was not hostile to Russia before invasion of Crimea. All they want is to get back their territory.
>>> >
>>> >> It is not inviting a powerful EU-hostile MILITARY organization onto its territory.
>>> >
>>> > Ukraine wants NATO for protection, not to invade Russia. NATO would not invade Russia on behalf of Ukraine anyway.
>>> What do you call sanctions that make the Russian innocent civilians pay three times as much for food? What NATO is doing is criminal.
>>
>> Unfortunate victim of conflict. Even if they are paying three times for food, it's still a lot better than Ukrainians in Mariupol area who can't get food at all, or the dead Ukrainians who has no use for food.
>
> Not a valid excuse. If we want to get involved in the war, we should shoot at Russian military, and do nothing else.

Not trading with Russia is "doing nothing".

--
Jasen.

On Fri, 08 Apr 2022 07:25:33 +0100, Jasen Betts <usenet@revmaps.no-ip.org> wrote:

> On 2022-04-07, Commander Kinsey <CK1@nospam.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, 07 Apr 2022 02:01:25 +0100, Ed Lee <edward.ming.lee@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 5:52:34 PM UTC-7, Commander Kinsey wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 07 Apr 2022 01:44:36 +0100, Ed Lee <edward....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 5:31:18 PM UTC-7, John Doe wrote:
>>>> >> Ed Lee <edward....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> > I am just applying John Doe's logic
>>>> >> Your comrade cannot follow a conversation.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> That's not even close to my logic. The United Kingdom is not acting like a
>>>> >> hostile neighbor to the European Union.
>>>> >
>>>> > Ukraine was not hostile to Russia before invasion of Crimea. All they want is to get back their territory.
>>>> >
>>>> >> It is not inviting a powerful EU-hostile MILITARY organization onto its territory.
>>>> >
>>>> > Ukraine wants NATO for protection, not to invade Russia. NATO would not invade Russia on behalf of Ukraine anyway.
>>>> What do you call sanctions that make the Russian innocent civilians pay three times as much for food? What NATO is doing is criminal.
>>>
>>> Unfortunate victim of conflict. Even if they are paying three times for food, it's still a lot better than Ukrainians in Mariupol area who can't get food at all, or the dead Ukrainians who has no use for food.
>>
>> Not a valid excuse. If we want to get involved in the war, we should shoot at Russian military, and do nothing else.
>
> Not trading with Russia is "doing nothing".

OCD alert.