I first made contact with the flawed mainstream formulation of calculus in the encyclopedia Britannica at the age of 9 years. It was on page 600 of that edition. In this short article I give you a glimpse into my genius mind and share some of my thoughts with lesser mortals such as you.

https://www.academia.edu/61998111/My_First_Contact_with_the_flawed_mainstream_calculus

[f(x+h)-f(x)]/h = f'(x) + Q(x,h)

The apes of mainstream academia then did the following:

lim_{h->0} [f(x+h)-f(x)]/h = f'(x) + lim_{h->0} Q(x,h)

There are so many things wrong with what the orangutans did.

In effect, what the buffoons of mainstream math academia had done was to take the limit of a constant, ie, Q(x,h), which even in their theory cannot change, but in the limit definition, it goes to ZERO! If it is not zero, the RHS is no longer equal to the LHS.

Some irrefutable facts:

1. The limit of a constant is the constant itself.
2. They assume that only f'(x) remains constant.
3. The limit definition itself is circular for to verify the limit, one has to already know the limit.

On 3/23/2022 8:18 AM, Eram semper recta wrote:
> I first made contact with the flawed mainstream formulation of calculus in the encyclopedia Britannica at the age of 9 years.

Eram semper recta -> "I am always a rectum"

THE GREATEST EMPTINESS!

_____________________________
| | The perfect vacuum......
| ........................
| ...inside your skull!...
| _____________________________

*** Completely Uncontaminated ***

-> BY <-

Neurons and other brainish substances.