A reply to Alice Roberts and Mark Maslin:
Our ancestors may indeed have evolved at the shoreline – and here is why.
doi 10.13140/RG.2.2.23127.68007
Erika Schagatay, Peter Rhys-Evans, Kathlyn Stewart, Michael Crawford, Marc Verhaegen, Mario Vaneechoutte, Naama Goren-Inbar, Stephen Munro, Algis Kuliukas, Stephen Cunnane, Tom Brenna & Michael Crawford

BBC Radio 4 (Sept.2016) broadcast: How long have humans and our ancestors been habitual users of aquatic & marine resources? Have we adapted physiologically & cognitively to a littoral environment, in which we depended on those aquatic & marine resources? What evidence from the last 15 years of research has emerged to refute or to illuminate either of these questions?
On September 16th & since, Alice Roberts & Mark Maslin made claims which may have been justifiable 40 years ago, but which are no longer of any relevance in 2016.

On Friday, May 28, 2021 at 6:29:16 PM UTC-4, littor...@gmail.com wrote:
> A reply to Alice Roberts and Mark Maslin:
> Our ancestors may indeed have evolved at the shoreline – and here is why.
> doi 10.13140/RG.2.2.23127.68007
> Erika Schagatay, Peter Rhys-Evans, Kathlyn Stewart, Michael Crawford, Marc Verhaegen, Mario Vaneechoutte, Naama Goren-Inbar, Stephen Munro, Algis Kuliukas, Stephen Cunnane, Tom Brenna & Michael Crawford
>
> BBC Radio 4 (Sept.2016) broadcast: How long have humans and our ancestors been habitual users of aquatic & marine resources? Have we adapted physiologically & cognitively to a littoral environment, in which we depended on those aquatic & marine resources? What evidence from the last 15 years of research has emerged to refute or to illuminate either of these questions?
> On September 16th & since, Alice Roberts & Mark Maslin made claims which may have been justifiable 40 years ago, but which are no longer of any relevance in 2016.

Chasing kudus again, my little boy?

Op zaterdag 29 mei 2021 om 03:26:17 UTC+2 schreef DD'eDeN aka note/nickname/alas_my_loves:

> > A reply to Alice Roberts and Mark Maslin:
> > Our ancestors may indeed have evolved at the shoreline – and here is why.
> > doi 10.13140/RG.2.2.23127.68007
> > Erika Schagatay, Peter Rhys-Evans, Kathlyn Stewart, Michael Crawford, Marc Verhaegen, Mario Vaneechoutte, Naama Goren-Inbar, Stephen Munro, Algis Kuliukas, Stephen Cunnane, Tom Brenna & Michael Crawford
> > BBC Radio 4 (Sept.2016) broadcast: How long have humans and our ancestors been habitual users of aquatic & marine resources? Have we adapted physiologically & cognitively to a littoral environment, in which we depended on those aquatic & marine resources? What evidence from the last 15 years of research has emerged to refute or to illuminate either of these questions?
> > On September 16th & since, Alice Roberts & Mark Maslin made claims which may have been justifiable 40 years ago, but which are no longer of any relevance in 2016.

> Chasing kudus again, my little boy?

Ceterum censeo only obsolete PAs still chase kudus.
The comparative biology is obvious:
there's no doubt: H.erectus was a littoral mammal, google
"coastal dispersal Pleistocene Homo PPT".