Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

Neutrinos are into physicists.


tech / sci.electronics.design / Re: crosstalk

SubjectAuthor
* crosstalkJohn Larkin
+* Re: crosstalkPhil Hobbs
|`* Re: crosstalkJohn Larkin
| +- Re: crosstalkJohn Larkin
| `* Re: crosstalkwhit3rd
|  +- Re: crosstalkJohn Walliker
|  `* Re: crosstalkJohn Larkin
|   `* Re: crosstalkwhit3rd
|    `- Re: crosstalkDimiter_Popoff
+* Re: crosstalkDimiter_Popoff
|`* Re: crosstalkJohn Larkin
| `- Re: crosstalkDimiter_Popoff
+- Re: crosstalkRicky
`* Re: crosstalkJohn Doe
 `* Re: crosstalkEdward Hernandez
  `* Re: crosstalkJohn Doe
   `- Re: crosstalkEdward Hernandez

1
crosstalk

<a7vi7h5nupq2957c34b4u33r5mb9nra511@4ax.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=96626&group=sci.electronics.design#96626

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.supernews.com!news.supernews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 09 May 2022 15:51:53 -0500
From: jlar...@highland_atwork_technology.com (John Larkin)
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: crosstalk
Date: Mon, 09 May 2022 13:51:53 -0700
Organization: Highland Tech
Reply-To: xx@yy.com
Message-ID: <a7vi7h5nupq2957c34b4u33r5mb9nra511@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.1/32.783
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 19
X-Trace: sv3-ZDbp4uG6j8yrnUGs4jvN0XAX55nn1cKE5KobOHaRdrXBC3PKNdmG6l6MsLyxBR+fSkKwyQ+/zczhlRR!XzdGJ+GQSbCFAm2zqXZ+9E1zrftW1KAaprEJVw1YvEDGVN9gw6i5QMjw0fnD8w8c3Io1Arts6MRa!gZf4SQ==
X-Complaints-To: www.supernews.com/docs/abuse.html
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: www.supernews.com/docs/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 1565
 by: John Larkin - Mon, 9 May 2022 20:51 UTC

https://www.dropbox.com/s/zaf7w7t71jmc820/Xtalk.jpg?raw=1

PCB layout people like to pack traces in nice tight bundles, which
encourages crosstalk and impedance issues.

Some general advice might be to separate microstrip traces by 2x the
trace width or 2x the distance to the ground plane, whichever is
greater.

I just made that up. What are your rules?

--

If a man will begin with certainties, he shall end with doubts,
but if he will be content to begin with doubts he shall end in certainties.
Francis Bacon

Re: crosstalk

<869e9ecc-d8a6-c6c2-4b64-508d71adf620@electrooptical.net>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=96627&group=sci.electronics.design#96627

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!1.us.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.supernews.com!news.supernews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 09 May 2022 16:06:09 -0500
Subject: Re: crosstalk
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
References: <a7vi7h5nupq2957c34b4u33r5mb9nra511@4ax.com>
From: pcdhSpam...@electrooptical.net (Phil Hobbs)
Message-ID: <869e9ecc-d8a6-c6c2-4b64-508d71adf620@electrooptical.net>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2022 17:06:08 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/68.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <a7vi7h5nupq2957c34b4u33r5mb9nra511@4ax.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 34
X-Trace: sv3-DWs/sZJ1q47lorU4RzGAC8EN/rZXgTMys7bnA4tdn/CoNN+6XSIeEENowaABuX0Ei0PVXEzfFdrHvg8!V6x32JT9xZH//mXY+RQHUC195NicE9suHHL3oJyaiRxNpei15THhZgP6ZG4lQUgfFf5ujwonzUHm!I4V4xnBGI8IuiqzJUzqk5FM=
X-Complaints-To: www.supernews.com/docs/abuse.html
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: www.supernews.com/docs/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2095
 by: Phil Hobbs - Mon, 9 May 2022 21:06 UTC

John Larkin wrote:
>
> https://www.dropbox.com/s/zaf7w7t71jmc820/Xtalk.jpg?raw=1
>
> PCB layout people like to pack traces in nice tight bundles, which
> encourages crosstalk and impedance issues.
>
> Some general advice might be to separate microstrip traces by 2x the
> trace width or 2x the distance to the ground plane, whichever is
> greater.
>
> I just made that up. What are your rules?

Ish. Alternating traces going in opposite directions is a big help,
because the coupling doesn't build up that way.

It depends on how far they go together, how fast the signals are, and
how vulnerable the receiving trace is.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs
Principal Consultant
ElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOptics
Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510

http://electrooptical.net
http://hobbs-eo.com

Re: crosstalk

<kcbj7h593c2i65ue3t7vvrfjklrsujkbah@4ax.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=96631&group=sci.electronics.design#96631

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.supernews.com!news.supernews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 09 May 2022 19:18:02 -0500
From: jlar...@highland_atwork_technology.com (John Larkin)
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: crosstalk
Date: Mon, 09 May 2022 17:18:02 -0700
Organization: Highland Tech
Reply-To: xx@yy.com
Message-ID: <kcbj7h593c2i65ue3t7vvrfjklrsujkbah@4ax.com>
References: <a7vi7h5nupq2957c34b4u33r5mb9nra511@4ax.com> <869e9ecc-d8a6-c6c2-4b64-508d71adf620@electrooptical.net>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.1/32.783
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 40
X-Trace: sv3-se9M8BVDsCv14WXiOASCGSEBi6YG9x1LxdjElYDocc/8snYmT0IN3iBPiRxOA6jDybPQYoPiiJqwWyL!isjSwep3Sq2sCLSu3UPjxGM5gfKqmfbPx004TneM9Zebv6o0DGxnLMO2wifafnnztrIMaZcQnRWI!uX1UGQ==
X-Complaints-To: www.supernews.com/docs/abuse.html
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: www.supernews.com/docs/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2437
 by: John Larkin - Tue, 10 May 2022 00:18 UTC

On Mon, 9 May 2022 17:06:08 -0400, Phil Hobbs
<pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:

>John Larkin wrote:
>>
>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/zaf7w7t71jmc820/Xtalk.jpg?raw=1
>>
>> PCB layout people like to pack traces in nice tight bundles, which
>> encourages crosstalk and impedance issues.
>>
>> Some general advice might be to separate microstrip traces by 2x the
>> trace width or 2x the distance to the ground plane, whichever is
>> greater.
>>
>> I just made that up. What are your rules?
>
>
>Ish. Alternating traces going in opposite directions is a big help,
>because the coupling doesn't build up that way.
>
>It depends on how far they go together, how fast the signals are, and
>how vulnerable the receiving trace is.
>
>Cheers
>
>Phil Hobbs

This board has a MicroZed that runs a lot of fast signals to 8 plugin
boards. The pinouts were selected (not by me) to minimize crossovers
and vias without much thought to signal speeds or directions. The easy
fix is to just spread them out.

The traces are, quite by accident, the correct 75 ohms, 8 mil wide
microstrips.

--

If a man will begin with certainties, he shall end with doubts,
but if he will be content to begin with doubts he shall end in certainties.
Francis Bacon

Re: crosstalk

<9fcj7h53qaspefb9j07hb5rl4tq6ckmda6@4ax.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=96632&group=sci.electronics.design#96632

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.supernews.com!news.supernews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 09 May 2022 19:36:36 -0500
From: jlar...@highland_atwork_technology.com (John Larkin)
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: crosstalk
Date: Mon, 09 May 2022 17:36:36 -0700
Organization: Highland Tech
Reply-To: xx@yy.com
Message-ID: <9fcj7h53qaspefb9j07hb5rl4tq6ckmda6@4ax.com>
References: <a7vi7h5nupq2957c34b4u33r5mb9nra511@4ax.com> <869e9ecc-d8a6-c6c2-4b64-508d71adf620@electrooptical.net> <kcbj7h593c2i65ue3t7vvrfjklrsujkbah@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.1/32.783
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 54
X-Trace: sv3-cvbDjzJsVQQpUSda8aLtAik8j8EMplgibLO2cL2foKXJ4AUfDU0opKP2ehLUkZc4VX+mKWrijBFtSGj!CgFqrSkfpPU9oR3omP7GLVww19zTjhNYEnW+B4hVrM6bu1dIVa43/YhaNy4503x9KrXgzj1uf1y2!wGVKzA==
X-Complaints-To: www.supernews.com/docs/abuse.html
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: www.supernews.com/docs/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 3093
 by: John Larkin - Tue, 10 May 2022 00:36 UTC

On Mon, 09 May 2022 17:18:02 -0700, John Larkin
<jlarkin@highland_atwork_technology.com> wrote:

>On Mon, 9 May 2022 17:06:08 -0400, Phil Hobbs
><pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:
>
>>John Larkin wrote:
>>>
>>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/zaf7w7t71jmc820/Xtalk.jpg?raw=1
>>>
>>> PCB layout people like to pack traces in nice tight bundles, which
>>> encourages crosstalk and impedance issues.
>>>
>>> Some general advice might be to separate microstrip traces by 2x the
>>> trace width or 2x the distance to the ground plane, whichever is
>>> greater.
>>>
>>> I just made that up. What are your rules?
>>
>>
>>Ish. Alternating traces going in opposite directions is a big help,
>>because the coupling doesn't build up that way.
>>
>>It depends on how far they go together, how fast the signals are, and
>>how vulnerable the receiving trace is.
>>
>>Cheers
>>
>>Phil Hobbs
>
>This board has a MicroZed that runs a lot of fast signals to 8 plugin
>boards. The pinouts were selected (not by me) to minimize crossovers
>and vias without much thought to signal speeds or directions. The easy
>fix is to just spread them out.
>
>The traces are, quite by accident, the correct 75 ohms, 8 mil wide
>microstrips.

Playing with the diff pair calculator in Saturn, one would like a diff
pair to be 75 ohms per trace and 150 differential, which implies zero
coupling. I get that with about 50 mils between traces, 12 mils of FR4
to the ground plane.

With 8 mil traces and a 16 mil gap, 12 mils down to the plane, I see
75r per trace and 131 differential, which is mediocre isolation.

A 24 mil gap is better, 75 and 141 ohms. 24 is accidentally 2x the 12
mil dielectric thickness.

--

If a man will begin with certainties, he shall end with doubts,
but if he will be content to begin with doubts he shall end in certainties.
Francis Bacon

Re: crosstalk

<f6d8b9cd-3cf8-419c-a930-3e905401425cn@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=96645&group=sci.electronics.design#96645

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:4e8c:0:b0:2f3:d53a:add3 with SMTP id 12-20020ac84e8c000000b002f3d53aadd3mr10347571qtp.300.1652167337263;
Tue, 10 May 2022 00:22:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:7301:0:b0:64a:a46c:2e31 with SMTP id
o1-20020a257301000000b0064aa46c2e31mr11817093ybc.424.1652167337060; Tue, 10
May 2022 00:22:17 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Date: Tue, 10 May 2022 00:22:16 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <kcbj7h593c2i65ue3t7vvrfjklrsujkbah@4ax.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=209.221.140.126; posting-account=vKQm_QoAAADOaDCYsqOFDAW8NJ8sFHoE
NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.221.140.126
References: <a7vi7h5nupq2957c34b4u33r5mb9nra511@4ax.com> <869e9ecc-d8a6-c6c2-4b64-508d71adf620@electrooptical.net>
<kcbj7h593c2i65ue3t7vvrfjklrsujkbah@4ax.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <f6d8b9cd-3cf8-419c-a930-3e905401425cn@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: crosstalk
From: whit...@gmail.com (whit3rd)
Injection-Date: Tue, 10 May 2022 07:22:17 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
 by: whit3rd - Tue, 10 May 2022 07:22 UTC

On Monday, May 9, 2022 at 5:18:14 PM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
> On Mon, 9 May 2022 17:06:08 -0400, Phil Hobbs
> <pcdhSpamM...@electrooptical.net> wrote:

> >Ish. Alternating traces going in opposite directions is a big help,
> >because the coupling doesn't build up that way.

> This board has a MicroZed that runs a lot of fast signals to 8 plugin
> boards. The pinouts were selected (not by me) to minimize crossovers
> and vias without much thought to signal speeds or directions. The easy
> fix is to just spread them out.

That's not a great fix for ground-loop (inductive) problems. Area inside
the loop is an interfering-signal coupler, so 'spread' is a square-law
interference increaser.

Re: crosstalk

<2b11b299-7504-47dc-8877-0aa2f94ae97cn@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=96646&group=sci.electronics.design#96646

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
X-Received: by 2002:a37:2f04:0:b0:663:397d:7051 with SMTP id v4-20020a372f04000000b00663397d7051mr14502845qkh.333.1652172826559;
Tue, 10 May 2022 01:53:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a5b:8c5:0:b0:648:d88b:3dd5 with SMTP id
w5-20020a5b08c5000000b00648d88b3dd5mr16584991ybq.267.1652172826346; Tue, 10
May 2022 01:53:46 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Date: Tue, 10 May 2022 01:53:46 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <f6d8b9cd-3cf8-419c-a930-3e905401425cn@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2001:8b0:fb4e:0:8286:f2ff:fe6b:6c87;
posting-account=de11ZAoAAACBQRb2jWnaIkHYK2q9mRvs
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:8b0:fb4e:0:8286:f2ff:fe6b:6c87
References: <a7vi7h5nupq2957c34b4u33r5mb9nra511@4ax.com> <869e9ecc-d8a6-c6c2-4b64-508d71adf620@electrooptical.net>
<kcbj7h593c2i65ue3t7vvrfjklrsujkbah@4ax.com> <f6d8b9cd-3cf8-419c-a930-3e905401425cn@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <2b11b299-7504-47dc-8877-0aa2f94ae97cn@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: crosstalk
From: jrwalli...@gmail.com (John Walliker)
Injection-Date: Tue, 10 May 2022 08:53:46 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Received-Bytes: 2314
 by: John Walliker - Tue, 10 May 2022 08:53 UTC

On Tuesday, 10 May 2022 at 08:22:21 UTC+1, whit3rd wrote:
> On Monday, May 9, 2022 at 5:18:14 PM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
> > On Mon, 9 May 2022 17:06:08 -0400, Phil Hobbs
> > <pcdhSpamM...@electrooptical.net> wrote:
>
> > >Ish. Alternating traces going in opposite directions is a big help,
> > >because the coupling doesn't build up that way.
> > This board has a MicroZed that runs a lot of fast signals to 8 plugin
> > boards. The pinouts were selected (not by me) to minimize crossovers
> > and vias without much thought to signal speeds or directions. The easy
> > fix is to just spread them out.
> That's not a great fix for ground-loop (inductive) problems. Area inside
> the loop is an interfering-signal coupler, so 'spread' is a square-law
> interference increaser.
But not if there is a ground plane underneath as the loop is then the area
of the vertical cross section between the track and the ground plane
which does not depend on separation between tracks.
John

Re: crosstalk

<t5du1h$rpn$1@dont-email.me>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=96650&group=sci.electronics.design#96650

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: dp...@tgi-sci.com (Dimiter_Popoff)
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: crosstalk
Date: Tue, 10 May 2022 17:49:20 +0300
Organization: TGI
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <t5du1h$rpn$1@dont-email.me>
References: <a7vi7h5nupq2957c34b4u33r5mb9nra511@4ax.com>
Reply-To: dp@tgi-sci.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 10 May 2022 14:49:21 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="012b009db50842c70716cf8998e39309";
logging-data="28471"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/ZbhiQyRrQueY/VrYF+0sfJrwfoXwbbW8="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/91.8.1
Cancel-Lock: sha1:nq2XNHrRB55ZkKmIPyA/NoQM7so=
In-Reply-To: <a7vi7h5nupq2957c34b4u33r5mb9nra511@4ax.com>
Content-Language: en-US
 by: Dimiter_Popoff - Tue, 10 May 2022 14:49 UTC

On 5/9/2022 23:51, John Larkin wrote:
>
> https://www.dropbox.com/s/zaf7w7t71jmc820/Xtalk.jpg?raw=1
>
> PCB layout people like to pack traces in nice tight bundles, which
> encourages crosstalk and impedance issues.
>
> Some general advice might be to separate microstrip traces by 2x the
> trace width or 2x the distance to the ground plane, whichever is
> greater.
>
> I just made that up. What are your rules?
>
>
>

For digital (where density is really needed) within 100-200 MHz
we have been doing 4 mil trace 4 mil spacing for ages now.
That on the visible (top and bottom layers), referenced to GND
planes beneath each.
No issue whatsoever. Well, actually I had one, an I2C line was
passing too close (probably not 4 mil, may be a whole mm) to a
flyback switch (IRF540-ish) for the HV which was doing nice
100V excursions and at times managed to upset the i2c.
Pulling the latter up with 1k on each line fixed it (was 2k IIRC).

Re: crosstalk

<s06l7h556g25vpepoul79v3j9bcrnr6chj@4ax.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=96657&group=sci.electronics.design#96657

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.supernews.com!news.supernews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 May 2022 11:52:40 -0500
From: jlar...@highland_atwork_technology.com (John Larkin)
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: crosstalk
Date: Tue, 10 May 2022 09:52:40 -0700
Organization: Highland Tech
Reply-To: xx@yy.com
Message-ID: <s06l7h556g25vpepoul79v3j9bcrnr6chj@4ax.com>
References: <a7vi7h5nupq2957c34b4u33r5mb9nra511@4ax.com> <869e9ecc-d8a6-c6c2-4b64-508d71adf620@electrooptical.net> <kcbj7h593c2i65ue3t7vvrfjklrsujkbah@4ax.com> <f6d8b9cd-3cf8-419c-a930-3e905401425cn@googlegroups.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.1/32.783
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 28
X-Trace: sv3-LcQonWckCtUiVdjx0uwkHkfwTJ7adGataeNKaH6kalQbpkNUgP109C3vmYJy+ViWtg4abeSxmNsazQW!mNEHOYgK4WiJWypk9uG9ulwjQHMcqYCG8/ajmilbCMyAt2G7kEwa4JnxeEfJtkqjzAKwwJ2LF9TR!xtBPEQ==
X-Complaints-To: www.supernews.com/docs/abuse.html
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: www.supernews.com/docs/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2303
 by: John Larkin - Tue, 10 May 2022 16:52 UTC

On Tue, 10 May 2022 00:22:16 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com>
wrote:

>On Monday, May 9, 2022 at 5:18:14 PM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
>> On Mon, 9 May 2022 17:06:08 -0400, Phil Hobbs
>> <pcdhSpamM...@electrooptical.net> wrote:
>
>> >Ish. Alternating traces going in opposite directions is a big help,
>> >because the coupling doesn't build up that way.
>
>> This board has a MicroZed that runs a lot of fast signals to 8 plugin
>> boards. The pinouts were selected (not by me) to minimize crossovers
>> and vias without much thought to signal speeds or directions. The easy
>> fix is to just spread them out.
>
>That's not a great fix for ground-loop (inductive) problems. Area inside
>the loop is an interfering-signal coupler, so 'spread' is a square-law
>interference increaser.

But spreading the traces is a great fix for crosstalk. Try it.

--

If a man will begin with certainties, he shall end with doubts,
but if he will be content to begin with doubts he shall end in certainties.
Francis Bacon

Re: crosstalk

<146l7hdr9b7kutq7ccs28qblct79ihsql4@4ax.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=96658&group=sci.electronics.design#96658

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.supernews.com!news.supernews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 May 2022 11:56:36 -0500
From: jlar...@highland_atwork_technology.com (John Larkin)
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: crosstalk
Date: Tue, 10 May 2022 09:56:36 -0700
Organization: Highland Tech
Reply-To: xx@yy.com
Message-ID: <146l7hdr9b7kutq7ccs28qblct79ihsql4@4ax.com>
References: <a7vi7h5nupq2957c34b4u33r5mb9nra511@4ax.com> <t5du1h$rpn$1@dont-email.me>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.1/32.783
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 39
X-Trace: sv3-lYoqiUudvfhA8AiDTA0pa2csWj+3cAgx7ogrMorzY7XDMTQeu4Kx3Lt531YM+G51r9kzm2sYVQp3X99!BVQXPZTrL+i+WMsAUEeqdposZTAxDhQ5CzvMSOmtZC0wTJCEQrPgKlhvQcoWKU2vrKqBbw3GkRA2!urkb3A==
X-Complaints-To: www.supernews.com/docs/abuse.html
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: www.supernews.com/docs/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2577
 by: John Larkin - Tue, 10 May 2022 16:56 UTC

On Tue, 10 May 2022 17:49:20 +0300, Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com>
wrote:

>On 5/9/2022 23:51, John Larkin wrote:
>>
>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/zaf7w7t71jmc820/Xtalk.jpg?raw=1
>>
>> PCB layout people like to pack traces in nice tight bundles, which
>> encourages crosstalk and impedance issues.
>>
>> Some general advice might be to separate microstrip traces by 2x the
>> trace width or 2x the distance to the ground plane, whichever is
>> greater.
>>
>> I just made that up. What are your rules?
>>
>>
>>
>
>For digital (where density is really needed) within 100-200 MHz
>we have been doing 4 mil trace 4 mil spacing for ages now.
>That on the visible (top and bottom layers), referenced to GND
>planes beneath each.
>No issue whatsoever. Well, actually I had one, an I2C line was
>passing too close (probably not 4 mil, may be a whole mm) to a
>flyback switch (IRF540-ish) for the HV which was doing nice
>100V excursions and at times managed to upset the i2c.
>Pulling the latter up with 1k on each line fixed it (was 2k IIRC).

Some of our traces will be fast 8b10b data streams. At powerup time we
"train" the receivers to adapt to the actual data timing. Crosstalk
from other signals can wobble the bit edges and potentially make data
errors.

--

If a man will begin with certainties, he shall end with doubts,
but if he will be content to begin with doubts he shall end in certainties.
Francis Bacon

Re: crosstalk

<t5e744$tvb$1@dont-email.me>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=96660&group=sci.electronics.design#96660

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: dp...@tgi-sci.com (Dimiter_Popoff)
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: crosstalk
Date: Tue, 10 May 2022 20:24:20 +0300
Organization: TGI
Lines: 40
Message-ID: <t5e744$tvb$1@dont-email.me>
References: <a7vi7h5nupq2957c34b4u33r5mb9nra511@4ax.com>
<t5du1h$rpn$1@dont-email.me> <146l7hdr9b7kutq7ccs28qblct79ihsql4@4ax.com>
Reply-To: dp@tgi-sci.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 10 May 2022 17:24:20 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="012b009db50842c70716cf8998e39309";
logging-data="30699"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19rLNbDbA4vz99goe3ajPK9m6b6sN+hLEU="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/91.9.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:QkEZqLmaEn76P3lZtkCpw2+aVwQ=
In-Reply-To: <146l7hdr9b7kutq7ccs28qblct79ihsql4@4ax.com>
Content-Language: en-US
 by: Dimiter_Popoff - Tue, 10 May 2022 17:24 UTC

On 5/10/2022 19:56, John Larkin wrote:
> On Tue, 10 May 2022 17:49:20 +0300, Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On 5/9/2022 23:51, John Larkin wrote:
>>>
>>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/zaf7w7t71jmc820/Xtalk.jpg?raw=1
>>>
>>> PCB layout people like to pack traces in nice tight bundles, which
>>> encourages crosstalk and impedance issues.
>>>
>>> Some general advice might be to separate microstrip traces by 2x the
>>> trace width or 2x the distance to the ground plane, whichever is
>>> greater.
>>>
>>> I just made that up. What are your rules?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> For digital (where density is really needed) within 100-200 MHz
>> we have been doing 4 mil trace 4 mil spacing for ages now.
>> That on the visible (top and bottom layers), referenced to GND
>> planes beneath each.
>> No issue whatsoever. Well, actually I had one, an I2C line was
>> passing too close (probably not 4 mil, may be a whole mm) to a
>> flyback switch (IRF540-ish) for the HV which was doing nice
>> 100V excursions and at times managed to upset the i2c.
>> Pulling the latter up with 1k on each line fixed it (was 2k IIRC).
>
> Some of our traces will be fast 8b10b data streams. At powerup time we
> "train" the receivers to adapt to the actual data timing. Crosstalk
> from other signals can wobble the bit edges and potentially make data
> errors.
>

I have done something around 100-150 MHz clocked video squeezed into
lvds (don't know how much faster the lvds was clocked, some 8 times
I believe) using the same routing but not many times and over a
short distance, well within an inch. No problems there, either.

Re: crosstalk

<c41e8718-db44-4808-91ba-503d7996ca53n@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=96666&group=sci.electronics.design#96666

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:262c:b0:45a:97e8:68df with SMTP id gv12-20020a056214262c00b0045a97e868dfmr19848737qvb.52.1652211025291;
Tue, 10 May 2022 12:30:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a81:4b8a:0:b0:2fb:2b30:ea30 with SMTP id
y132-20020a814b8a000000b002fb2b30ea30mr20949959ywa.294.1652211025116; Tue, 10
May 2022 12:30:25 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Date: Tue, 10 May 2022 12:30:24 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <s06l7h556g25vpepoul79v3j9bcrnr6chj@4ax.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=209.221.140.126; posting-account=vKQm_QoAAADOaDCYsqOFDAW8NJ8sFHoE
NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.221.140.126
References: <a7vi7h5nupq2957c34b4u33r5mb9nra511@4ax.com> <869e9ecc-d8a6-c6c2-4b64-508d71adf620@electrooptical.net>
<kcbj7h593c2i65ue3t7vvrfjklrsujkbah@4ax.com> <f6d8b9cd-3cf8-419c-a930-3e905401425cn@googlegroups.com>
<s06l7h556g25vpepoul79v3j9bcrnr6chj@4ax.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <c41e8718-db44-4808-91ba-503d7996ca53n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: crosstalk
From: whit...@gmail.com (whit3rd)
Injection-Date: Tue, 10 May 2022 19:30:25 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Received-Bytes: 2287
 by: whit3rd - Tue, 10 May 2022 19:30 UTC

On Tuesday, May 10, 2022 at 9:52:52 AM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
> On Tue, 10 May 2022 00:22:16 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >On Monday, May 9, 2022 at 5:18:14 PM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
> >> ... to minimize crossovers
> >> and vias without much thought to signal speeds or directions. The easy
> >> fix is to just spread them out.

> >That's not a great fix for ground-loop (inductive) problems. Area inside
> >the loop is an interfering-signal coupler, so 'spread' is a square-law
> >interference increaser.

> But spreading the traces is a great fix for crosstalk. Try it.

How to apply that fix, though, to a cat5 cable's four pairs?
In one instance, I found a DC/DC converter that needed its input
power through a common-mode bead, because it crosstalked to components a
foot and three circuit boards away. Freeze mist on the converter
changed the frequency of the interference, after other inspections
didn't find the problem.

Re: crosstalk

<t5efph$37b$1@dont-email.me>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=96667&group=sci.electronics.design#96667

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: dp...@tgi-sci.com (Dimiter_Popoff)
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: crosstalk
Date: Tue, 10 May 2022 22:52:16 +0300
Organization: TGI
Lines: 32
Message-ID: <t5efph$37b$1@dont-email.me>
References: <a7vi7h5nupq2957c34b4u33r5mb9nra511@4ax.com>
<869e9ecc-d8a6-c6c2-4b64-508d71adf620@electrooptical.net>
<kcbj7h593c2i65ue3t7vvrfjklrsujkbah@4ax.com>
<f6d8b9cd-3cf8-419c-a930-3e905401425cn@googlegroups.com>
<s06l7h556g25vpepoul79v3j9bcrnr6chj@4ax.com>
<c41e8718-db44-4808-91ba-503d7996ca53n@googlegroups.com>
Reply-To: dp@tgi-sci.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 10 May 2022 19:52:17 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="012b009db50842c70716cf8998e39309";
logging-data="3307"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/NPHLPoGUjgSdlDB/T/f0qUewYlQ75x4g="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/91.9.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:pd1BAUqXw3iOKA4LC2u0Q3vxVFg=
In-Reply-To: <c41e8718-db44-4808-91ba-503d7996ca53n@googlegroups.com>
Content-Language: en-US
 by: Dimiter_Popoff - Tue, 10 May 2022 19:52 UTC

On 5/10/2022 22:30, whit3rd wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 10, 2022 at 9:52:52 AM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
>> On Tue, 10 May 2022 00:22:16 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> On Monday, May 9, 2022 at 5:18:14 PM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
>
>>>> ... to minimize crossovers
>>>> and vias without much thought to signal speeds or directions. The easy
>>>> fix is to just spread them out.
>
>>> That's not a great fix for ground-loop (inductive) problems. Area inside
>>> the loop is an interfering-signal coupler, so 'spread' is a square-law
>>> interference increaser.
>
>> But spreading the traces is a great fix for crosstalk. Try it.
>
> How to apply that fix, though, to a cat5 cable's four pairs?
> In one instance, I found a DC/DC converter that needed its input
> power through a common-mode bead, because it crosstalked to components a
> foot and three circuit boards away. Freeze mist on the converter
> changed the frequency of the interference, after other inspections
> didn't find the problem.

Ouch... Sounds nightmarish. Many years ago I had a share of nightmarish
inductive coupling, a tiny (20mm side IIRC) fan turned out to get into
the input signal of a moderately sensitive amp (tens of MHz bandwidth,
the interference was well visible at hundreds of mV fullscale at the
input).
There was nothing I could do other than just get rid of the fan as part
of the design. Which worked, luckily it turned out I had enough margin
for that.

Re: crosstalk

<783b04f8-76b7-4040-8e4a-cd4aa8733a04n@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=96674&group=sci.electronics.design#96674

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:208c:b0:69f:f0f4:75d with SMTP id e12-20020a05620a208c00b0069ff0f4075dmr17883391qka.690.1652235971524;
Tue, 10 May 2022 19:26:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:c0d7:0:b0:64a:250:996c with SMTP id
c206-20020a25c0d7000000b0064a0250996cmr21706730ybf.512.1652235971302; Tue, 10
May 2022 19:26:11 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Date: Tue, 10 May 2022 19:26:11 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <a7vi7h5nupq2957c34b4u33r5mb9nra511@4ax.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=65.207.89.54; posting-account=I-_H_woAAAA9zzro6crtEpUAyIvzd19b
NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.207.89.54
References: <a7vi7h5nupq2957c34b4u33r5mb9nra511@4ax.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <783b04f8-76b7-4040-8e4a-cd4aa8733a04n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: crosstalk
From: gnuarm.d...@gmail.com (Ricky)
Injection-Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 02:26:11 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Received-Bytes: 1908
 by: Ricky - Wed, 11 May 2022 02:26 UTC

On Monday, May 9, 2022 at 4:52:05 PM UTC-4, John Larkin wrote:
> https://www.dropbox.com/s/zaf7w7t71jmc820/Xtalk.jpg?raw=1
>
> PCB layout people like to pack traces in nice tight bundles, which
> encourages crosstalk and impedance issues.
>
> Some general advice might be to separate microstrip traces by 2x the
> trace width or 2x the distance to the ground plane, whichever is
> greater.
>
> I just made that up. What are your rules?

Crosstalk is negligible between traces on the same plane. It is between traces on different planes running along the same paths that create crosstalk. Very easy to avoid by paying attention when routing... if you don't use an auto-router.

--

Rick C.

- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209

Re: crosstalk

<t5opu8$aeb$2@dont-email.me>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=96829&group=sci.electronics.design#96829

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design free.spam
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: always.l...@message.header (John Doe)
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,free.spam
Subject: Re: crosstalk
Date: Sat, 14 May 2022 17:46:49 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 54
Message-ID: <t5opu8$aeb$2@dont-email.me>
References: <a7vi7h5nupq2957c34b4u33r5mb9nra511@4ax.com> <04748706-31ca-4f62-8cc2-c3aa63f35f1en@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Date: Sat, 14 May 2022 17:46:49 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="0532e40e3a44e9af7a79fcc69a32a913";
logging-data="10699"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX187wzB6Wi/d42Oa0jU1bM7L3uPe1m0uERs="
User-Agent: Xnews/2006.08.05
Cancel-Lock: sha1:v095dL0AOOCixL/PxwReRM1opi0=
 by: John Doe - Sat, 14 May 2022 17:46 UTC

An utterly loony Australian.

Bozo Bill Sloman, the most frequent troll in this group, is an attention-
craving chronic liar who cannot be reasoned with.

"the user has posted under the same name in other places, so not
nym-shifting" (Bozo sucks at logic)

"the Mueller investigation was about Trump only because Trump made it so"
(Bozo being Bozo)

"the concepts "male" and "female" are essentially social constructions"
(Bozo is a textbook cannibal leftist)

--
Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote:

> X-Received: by 2002:ae9:de43:0:b0:69f:7585:8276 with SMTP id s64-20020ae9de43000000b0069f75858276mr13923501qkf.706.1652152243589; Mon, 09 May 2022 20:10:43 -0700 (PDT)
> X-Received: by 2002:a81:134a:0:b0:2f8:6751:bd66 with SMTP id 71-20020a81134a000000b002f86751bd66mr17383455ywt.340.1652152243275; Mon, 09 May 2022 20:10:43 -0700 (PDT)
> Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
> Date: Mon, 9 May 2022 20:10:42 -0700 (PDT)
> In-Reply-To: <a7vi7h5nupq2957c34b4u33r5mb9nra511@4ax.com>
> Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=118.208.108.19; posting-account=SJ46pgoAAABuUDuHc5uDiXN30ATE-zi-
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 118.208.108.19
> References: <a7vi7h5nupq2957c34b4u33r5mb9nra511@4ax.com>
> User-Agent: G2/1.0
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Message-ID: <04748706-31ca-4f62-8cc2-c3aa63f35f1en@googlegroups.com>
> Subject: Re: crosstalk
> From: Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>
> Injection-Date: Tue, 10 May 2022 03:10:43 +0000
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
> X-Received-Bytes: 1793
> Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org sci.electronics.design:668762
>
> On Tuesday, May 10, 2022 at 6:52:05 AM UTC+10, John Larkin wrote:
>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/zaf7w7t71jmc820/Xtalk.jpg?raw=1
>>
>> PCB layout people like to pack traces in nice tight bundles, which
>> encourages crosstalk and impedance issues.
>>
>> Some general advice might be to separate microstrip traces by 2x the
>> trace width or 2x the distance to the ground plane, whichever is
>> greater.
>>
>> I just made that up. What are your rules?
>
> A ground strip between individual signal-carrying traces provides extra isolation between them. If John Larkin had read enough to become knowledgeable about PC traces. he would have seen that mentioned.
>
> --
> Bill Sloman, Sydney
>

Re: crosstalk

<UWRfK.3399724$u91.925699@usenetxs.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=96831&group=sci.electronics.design#96831

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design free.spam
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!news.uzoreto.com!news-out.netnews.com!news.alt.net!fdc2.netnews.com!peer02.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer03.ams4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx02.ams4.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: dtgame...@gmail.com (Edward Hernandez)
Subject: Re: crosstalk
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,free.spam
References: <a7vi7h5nupq2957c34b4u33r5mb9nra511@4ax.com> <04748706-31ca-4f62-8cc2-c3aa63f35f1en@googlegroups.com> <t5opu8$aeb$2@dont-email.me>
Lines: 40
Message-ID: <UWRfK.3399724$u91.925699@usenetxs.com>
X-Complaints-To: https://www.astraweb.com/aup
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 14 May 2022 17:47:32 UTC
Date: Sat, 14 May 2022 17:47:32 GMT
X-Received-Bytes: 2094
 by: Edward Hernandez - Sat, 14 May 2022 17:47 UTC

The John Doe troll stated the following in message-id
<sdhn7c$pkp$4@dont-email.me>:

> The troll doesn't even know how to format a USENET post...

And the John Doe troll stated the following in message-id
<sg3kr7$qt5$1@dont-email.me>:

> The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from
> breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is
> CLUELESS...

And yet, the clueless John Doe troll has continued to post incorrectly
formatted USENET articles that are devoid of content (latest example on
Sat, 14 May 2022 17:46:49 -0000 (UTC) in message-id
<t5opu8$aeb$2@dont-email.me>).

NOBODY likes the John Doe troll's contentless spam.

Further, Troll Doe stated the following in message-id
<svsh05$lbh$5@dont-email.me> posted Fri, 4 Mar 2022 08:01:09 -0000
(UTC):

> Compared to other regulars, Bozo contributes practically nothing
> except insults to this group.

Yet, since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) Troll Doe's post ratio
to USENET (**) has been 60.5% of its posts contributing "nothing except
insults" to USENET.

** Since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) Troll Doe has posted at
least 1364 articles to USENET. Of which 148 have been pure insults and
677 have been Troll Doe "troll format" postings.

This posting is a public service announcement for any google groups
readers who happen by to point out that the John Doe troll does not even
follow the rules it uses to troll other posters.

Fr7RG8qvqnxH

Re: crosstalk

<t5oqbb$aeb$5@dont-email.me>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=96834&group=sci.electronics.design#96834

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design free.spam
Followup: alt.test.group
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: always.l...@message.header (John Doe)
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,free.spam
Subject: Re: crosstalk
Followup-To: alt.test.group
Date: Sat, 14 May 2022 17:53:48 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 75
Message-ID: <t5oqbb$aeb$5@dont-email.me>
References: <a7vi7h5nupq2957c34b4u33r5mb9nra511@4ax.com> <04748706-31ca-4f62-8cc2-c3aa63f35f1en@googlegroups.com> <t5opu8$aeb$2@dont-email.me> <UWRfK.3399724$u91.925699@usenetxs.com>
Injection-Date: Sat, 14 May 2022 17:53:48 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="0532e40e3a44e9af7a79fcc69a32a913";
logging-data="10699"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18lSkmm0Nx7ATLx+0+LbnSwulerAWFfYQI="
User-Agent: Xnews/2006.08.05
Cancel-Lock: sha1:1SawS+NowkjUQ2+M5hElNvoH6YI=
 by: John Doe - Sat, 14 May 2022 17:53 UTC

Eddie wants so badly to nym-shift. That's a no-no here, Eddie!

Eddie has never posted anything NORMAL except when it got a spanking...

https://groups.google.com/g/sci.electronics.repair/c/MesPLcGU4BE

See also...
John Doe <always.look@message.header> (astraweb)
Peter Weiner <dtgamer99@gmail.com>
Edward H. <dtgamer99@gmail.com>
Edward Hernandez <dtgamer99@gmail.com>

Eddie is an example for all newbies. Don't get spanked!

Spanked Eddie...

--
Edward Hernandez <dtgamer99@gmail.com> wrote:

> Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder1.feed.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!news-out.netnews.com!news.alt.net!fdc2.netnews.com!peer02.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer03.ams4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx02.ams4.POSTED!not-for-mail
> From: Edward Hernandez <dtgamer99@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: crosstalk
> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,free.spam
> References: <a7vi7h5nupq2957c34b4u33r5mb9nra511@4ax.com> <04748706-31ca-4f62-8cc2-c3aa63f35f1en@googlegroups.com> <t5opu8$aeb$2@dont-email.me>
> Lines: 40
> Message-ID: <UWRfK.3399724$u91.925699@usenetxs.com>
> X-Complaints-To: https://www.astraweb.com/aup
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 14 May 2022 17:47:32 UTC
> Date: Sat, 14 May 2022 17:47:32 GMT
> X-Received-Bytes: 2094
> Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org sci.electronics.design:668987 free.spam:18249
>
> The John Doe troll stated the following in message-id
> <sdhn7c$pkp$4@dont-email.me>:
>
>> The troll doesn't even know how to format a USENET post...
>
> And the John Doe troll stated the following in message-id
> <sg3kr7$qt5$1@dont-email.me>:
>
>> The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from
>> breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is
>> CLUELESS...
>
> And yet, the clueless John Doe troll has continued to post incorrectly
> formatted USENET articles that are devoid of content (latest example on
> Sat, 14 May 2022 17:46:49 -0000 (UTC) in message-id
> <t5opu8$aeb$2@dont-email.me>).
>
> NOBODY likes the John Doe troll's contentless spam.
>
> Further, Troll Doe stated the following in message-id
> <svsh05$lbh$5@dont-email.me> posted Fri, 4 Mar 2022 08:01:09 -0000
> (UTC):
>
>> Compared to other regulars, Bozo contributes practically nothing
>> except insults to this group.
>
> Yet, since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) Troll Doe's post ratio
> to USENET (**) has been 60.5% of its posts contributing "nothing except
> insults" to USENET.
>
> ** Since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) Troll Doe has posted at
> least 1364 articles to USENET. Of which 148 have been pure insults and
> 677 have been Troll Doe "troll format" postings.
>
> This posting is a public service announcement for any google groups
> readers who happen by to point out that the John Doe troll does not even
> follow the rules it uses to troll other posters.
>
> Fr7RG8qvqnxH
>
>
>

Re: crosstalk

<P3SfK.858135$I_K3.245975@usenetxs.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=96836&group=sci.electronics.design#96836

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design free.spam
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!feeder1.feed.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!news-out.netnews.com!news.alt.net!fdc2.netnews.com!peer03.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer02.ams4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx14.ams4.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: dtgame...@gmail.com (Edward Hernandez)
Subject: Re: crosstalk
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,free.spam
References: <a7vi7h5nupq2957c34b4u33r5mb9nra511@4ax.com> <04748706-31ca-4f62-8cc2-c3aa63f35f1en@googlegroups.com> <t5opu8$aeb$2@dont-email.me> <UWRfK.3399724$u91.925699@usenetxs.com> <t5oqbb$aeb$5@dont-email.me>
Lines: 37
Message-ID: <P3SfK.858135$I_K3.245975@usenetxs.com>
X-Complaints-To: https://www.astraweb.com/aup
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 14 May 2022 17:57:03 UTC
Date: Sat, 14 May 2022 17:57:03 GMT
X-Received-Bytes: 2070
 by: Edward Hernandez - Sat, 14 May 2022 17:57 UTC

The John Doe troll stated the following in message-id
<sdhn7c$pkp$4@dont-email.me>:

> The troll doesn't even know how to format a USENET post...

And the John Doe troll stated the following in message-id
<sg3kr7$qt5$1@dont-email.me>:

> The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from
> breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is
> CLUELESS...

And yet, the clueless John Doe troll has itself posted yet another
incorrectly formatted USENET posting on Sat, 14 May 2022 17:53:48 -0000
(UTC) in message-id <t5oqbb$aeb$5@dont-email.me>.

Further, Troll Doe stated the following in message-id
<svsh05$lbh$5@dont-email.me> posted Fri, 4 Mar 2022 08:01:09 -0000
(UTC):

> Compared to other regulars, Bozo contributes practically nothing
> except insults to this group.

Yet, since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) Troll Doe's post ratio
to USENET (**) has been 60.5% of its posts contributing "nothing except
insults" to USENET.

** Since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) Troll Doe has posted at
least 1367 articles to USENET. Of which 148 have been pure insults and
679 have been Troll Doe "troll format" postings.

This posting is a public service announcement for any google groups
readers who happen by to point out that the John Doe troll does not even
follow the rules it uses to troll other posters.

LujEfVNcdpEE

1
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.7
clearnet tor